Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika (JIE) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Herni Ramayanti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
UTILIZATION OF THE INTERNET OF THINGS IN CREATING SMART LIBRARIES AND INCREASING STUDENTS' INTEREST IN READING Herni Ramayanti; Yetnimar; Peni Astuti; Septian Simatupang; Aloysius Eka Wenats
JURNAL ILMIAH EDUNOMIKA Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): EDUNOMIKA
Publisher : ITB AAS Indonesia Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29040/jie.v9i2.17033

Abstract

Abstract This study is a qualitative study with a descriptive approach, namely approaching the description of the main parts used in this article. In this case, the main parts in question are the Internet of Things and Smart Library. The data used in this article is secondary data that researchers obtain from sources indirectly obtained or it can be said that researchers obtain from credible quotations such as Books, Journals, and Websites. After the data is collected, the existing data is reduced, selected, and conclusions are drawn. The result in this article show that Internet of Things in creating a smart library that has four concepts and has been proposed by researchers above can be achieved easily. With a good Internet of Things, the internet network will be stronger and wider. The references owned are also increasing and in accordance with the needs and desires of students. This can make students happy and increase their interest in reading. Keywords: Internet of Things, Smart Library, Students
A Comprehensive Study of The Criminalization of Parental Violence Against Children (Legal, Human Rights, and Sharia Perspectives) Herni Ramayanti; Rabith Madah Khulaili Harsya; Asyri Febriana; Nabain Idrus; Syamsul Efendi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v7i2.9493

Abstract

This study is a qualitative study with a descriptive approach, namely an approach that aims to describe each main topic in this study, including the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of Indonesian law, the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of human rights, and the criminalization of children by parents from the perspective of sharia law. The data used in this study are secondary data that researchers obtained from books, scientific articles, laws and regulations, websites, and so on. The data obtained was analyzed using the stages of data collection, data selection, data reduction, and drawing conclusions. The conclusion in this article show that from an Indonesian legal perspective, criminalization or violence against children is subject to varying penalties depending on the type of criminalization or violence committed. In physical violence in the form of abuse, the maximum penalty is three years and six months and/or a fine of Rp. 72,000,000.00 for minor abuse. The maximum penalty is five years if the child experiences serious injuries with a fine and/or Rp. 100,000,000.00 for abuse that causes serious injuries. And is subject to a maximum of fifteen years imprisonment and/or a fine of Rp. 300,000.00 if the child dies. If the violence is committed by a parent, a third of the sentence is added. In contrast to physical criminalization, parents can be sentenced to a minimum of five years imprisonment and a maximum of fifteen years if they commit sexual violence against their child, an additional one-third. From a human rights and Islamic law perspective, this is a heinous and prohibited act and the perpetrator must be punished according to the level of criminalization and violence.
Socialization of the Impact of Thuggery in Hindering Investment and the Progress of Rural MSMEs: Penelitian Herni Ramayanti; Heri Fitriadi; Darwin Kesuma; M. Pahlan; Samuel Indrayana
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Volume 4 Nomor 1 (Juli 2025 -
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.2232

Abstract

This article is a compilation of the author's outreach to fellow lecturers regarding tips on how to avoid predatory journals. The lecturers involved in this outreach came from several universities especially Muhammadiyah University of Makassar Indonesia, Doktor Nugroho University of Magetan Indonesia, Doktor Nugroho University of Magetan Indonesia and Antasari State Islamic University of Banjarmasin Indonesia. The author sincerely hopes that after this outreach, all lecturers targeted in this article will be able to choose higher-quality journals and avoid predatory journals, which have the various characteristics explicitly and comprehensively outlined above. By avoiding predatory journals, the author believes the quality of lecturers' research will continue to improve in the coming periods.
Presidential Campaign Authority in The General Election Law Muhammad Salman Alfansuri Jacob; Frizhal Arzhi Jiwantara; Herni Ramayanti; Sri Chatun; Esa Arung Syuhada
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i1.2106

Abstract

The President's Authority to Campaign during the General Election has recently become an interesting topic of discourse among the public. Some people think that the President should not campaign to maintain the neutrality of elections, the President's dignity, and so on. However, on the other hand, the public thinks that it is okay for the President to campaign because basically it is not the norm in the laws and regulations that has been violated. Therefore, this research aims to examine the President's authority to campaign in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. This research is a qualitative research with a normative approach that uses legislative regulations as the main focus to elaborate and explain comprehensively the authority of the President's campaign in the General Election Law. The data used in this research is secondary data that researchers obtained from statutory regulations, scientific journals, books, credible websites, and a number of other sources that are commonly used in every research. These data were analyzed using grammatical and teleological legal interpretation methods. The result in this articel show 1. There are two different opinions, namely those who agree with the president's campaign with the argument of maintaining ELECTION neutrality, potentially causing abuse of power, and maintaining presidential ethics. But on the other hand, they think it's okay because no rules have been violated. 2. Article 281 paragraph 1 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections regulates the President's ability to campaign as long as he does not use state facilities and takes leave. However, this article was interpreted differently by Bivitri Susanti because it relates to the President who will nominate again and the President must be registered in the campaign team. Apart from that, Zainal Arifin Mukhtar also has the same opinion that the President's campaign could cause legal complications and could potentially lead to the practice of nepotism. 3. The researcher does not agree with the two constitutional experts because there is an inconsistency in Bivitri Susanti's argument that initially the president was not allowed to campaign by interpreting market 281 paragraph 1 as relating to the incumbent President, but in the next sentence it seems to allow it by requiring the President to be included in the campaign team. Regarding Zainal Arifin Mukhtar's opinion, researchers consider that campaigning and nepotism are two very different things. Can campaigning is something that has not happened and is stated in the laws and regulations, whereas nepotism is something that has already happened and needs to be proven first and it does not necessarily mean that the President campaigning is nepotism. The researcher adheres firmly to the principles of Nullum Delictum, Nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali" and the fiqh rule "Al-Ashlu Fil Muamalah Ibahah Hatta Yadulla Daliil 'Ala Tahrimiha". The researcher believes that article 281 paragraph 1 has provided a comprehensive explanation regarding these abilities and the limits of the President. if you want to campaign.
Co-Authors Aloysius Eka Wenats Asyri Febriana Darwin Kesuma Esa Arung Syuhada Frizhal Arzhi Jiwantara Harsya, Rabith Madah Khulaili Heri Fitriadi M. Pahlan Muhammad Salman Alfansuri Jacob Nabain Idrus Peni Astuti Samuel Indrayana Septian Simatupang Sri Chatun Syamsul Efendi Yetnimar