Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.922
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM JAPHTN-HAN PACIVIC: Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK International Journal of Law and Society AT-TAKLIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisiplin Jurnal Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administrasi Negara
Vieta Imelda Cornelis
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research

 1 
Legal Review of Local Government Institutions in Papua under Government Regulation No. 106/2021 Billy Muskitta Bastian Erlando; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Noenik Soekorini; Sri Astutik; Hartoyo Hartoyo
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1368

Abstract

The Province of Papua holds a special constitutional status under Law No. 2 of 2021, implemented through Government Regulation (PP) No. 106 of 2021, which assigns 23 governmental functions to regional authorities. The regulation embodies asymmetric decentralization intended to protect the rights of Indigenous Papuans (OAP) and address local needs. However, it raises legal concerns regarding ambiguous authority distribution between central, provincial, and municipal levels, as well as the unclear operational role of the Papuan People’s Assembly (MRP). The main research problem is whether PP No. 106/2021 provides a coherent and constitutionally consistent governance framework. This study applies doctrinal legal research using normative-analytical methods, including statutory interpretation, constitutional tests, and comparative perspectives. The findings indicate weak accountability mechanisms in managing Special Autonomy Funds, limited integration of customary law, and institutional fragility in newly established bodies such as BP-DOP and UPAP. The study concludes that PP No. 106/2021 does not fully align with the constitutional principles of legal certainty and decentralization. It recommends substantial revisions, strengthening MRP’s legal status, formal recognition of customary law through Perdasus, and an institutional blueprint with clear performance indicators to ensure effective, inclusive, and adaptive governance in Papua
Legal Safeguards for Justice Collaborators in Murder Cases: The Richard Eliezer Verdict Analysis Charles Ardani; Sri Astutik; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Siti Marwiyah; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 12 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1405

Abstract

Justice collaborators, or "crown witnesses," have become essential in modern criminal justice systems, particularly in dismantling organized crime and uncovering complex murder cases. This study explores the legal protections afforded to justice collaborators in Indonesia through a doctrinal analysis of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1704 K/PID.SUS/2022, commonly known as the Richard Eliezer verdict. The objective is to critically examine the adequacy and application of legal safeguards provided to individuals who cooperate with law enforcement while implicated in serious crimes. Employing normative legal research methods and a statutory and case approach, the paper reveals discrepancies in the implementation of protections for justice collaborators. While the Indonesian Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) offers procedural protections, this analysis identifies significant gaps in enforcement, judicial interpretation, and institutional coordination. The findings underscore a need for stronger legislative frameworks and consistent judicial standards to uphold the rights and safety of justice collaborators. The implications extend to criminal law reform and the balancing of retributive justice with restorative mechanisms. This study contributes to the legal discourse on human rights protections in criminal procedure, particularly concerning vulnerable individuals assisting the justice system under duress or threat.
Constitutionality Testing of Presidential Candidacy Thresholds in Elections Based on the Principle of Popular Sovereignty Munir; Noenik Soekorini; Sri Astutik; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1421

Abstract

This study critically examines the constitutionality of Indonesia’s presidential candidacy threshold under Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017 in relation to the principle of popular sovereignty in Article 1(2) of the 1945 Constitution. The threshold requiring a party or coalition to hold 20% of DPR seats or 25% of the popular vote has been controversial for limiting voter choice and reinforcing oligarchic dominance. Using a normative legal research method, the study applies doctrinal interpretation through grammatical, systematic, historical, and teleological approaches to evaluate whether the threshold is consistent with constitutional democracy. The analysis identifies a disconnect between the legislative rule and the constitutional concept of sovereignty residing with the people, informed by theories of democracy, sovereignty, and progressive legal thought. While procedurally legitimate, the threshold lacks substantive constitutional validity because of its exclusionary impact on political participation. The study proposes four reform options: repeal, proportional adjustment, judicial reinterpretation, and constitutional amendment. These reforms would realign electoral rules with democratic principles and restore voters’ political agency. A doctrinal reinterpretation model is offered, framing the threshold as a regulatory instrument rather than a rigid barrier, advocating a legal structure that promotes inclusivity and reflects the people’s general will.
Co-Authors Bachrul Amiq Baharuddin Riqiey Billy Muskitta Bastian Erlando Charles Ardani Chintia Permatasari Duke Arie Widagdo Hartoyo Hartoyo Idayana Putri, Siti M Syahrul Borman Mardiman Mohammad Fikri Alfada Wijaya Munir Noenik Soekorini Nur Handayati Rengga Fatma Jaya Rizky Bangun Wibisono Siti Marwiyah Sri Astutik Syahrul Borman Tribuana Tunggal Dewi Rachman Yuanita Mayangsari