Yusuf DM, Mohd.
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI

ANALISIS FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF TEORI LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Setiawan, Feri; Sitompul, Hasran Irawadi; Berson, Hendri
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i2.6369

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors hindering law enforcement in Indonesia through the perspective of Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory, which consists of legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were analyzed from primary and secondary legal materials and correlated with relevant empirical practices. The findings reveal that the main obstacles to law enforcement lie in the lack of integrity and professionalism among law enforcement officials, inconsistencies in legal substance, and the generally low level of legal culture in society. Low legal awareness and a preference for informal dispute resolution further weaken the formal legal system. This study recommends structural reforms of law enforcement institutions and the enhancement of legal culture through legal education and consistent, fair law enforcement. Keywords: Legal Structure; Legal Substance; Legal Reform; Public Legal Awareness.
PERSINGGUNGAN KEWENANGAN POLRI DAN KPK DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI: ANALISIS YURIDIS Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Nopen, Nasib; Hidayah Fatriah, Syarifah; Sitohang, Ramlan; Hamide, Hamide; Pratama, Dio Yulio; Sahfana, Natasya Sri; Nahda, Sayyidah; Habeahan, Irwanto; Wahyudi, Eka; Andrika, Muhammad Reyhan; Danu, Robby Raman
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i2.6374

Abstract

This article examines the overlap of authority between police investigators and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in handling corruption cases. Using a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes the relevant legal frameworks governing both institutions, including Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Criminal Procedure Code, Law No. 2 of 2002 on the Indonesian National Police, and Law No. 19 of 2019 on the Corruption Eradication Commission. The findings reveal overlapping jurisdictions that may create conflicts in investigative practice, particularly in relation to coordination, supervision, and the execution of institutional mandates. To address these challenges, the article proposes several measures, such as strengthening mechanisms of coordination and supervision, as well as drafting clearer and more binding implementing regulations. These efforts are expected to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of anti-corruption law enforcement, while also enhancing public trust in the integrity of Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Keywords: Investigator, Police, Corruption Eradication Commission
DINAMIKA KONFLIK AGRARIA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LAHAN: ANALISIS SOSIOLOGI HUKUM TERHADAP RELASI NEGARA, KORPORASI, DAN MASYARAKAT Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Fadhli, M.; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Santoso, Budi; Mulyono, Joko Dwi; Putra, Ari Armanda; Warianti, Khairunisak; Arifa, Atika Putri
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6719

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of agrarian conflicts in Indonesia using a sociological perspective on law, particularly in the context of land dispute resolution. This study uses a socio-legal approach by combining normative analysis of agrarian legislation and conceptual studies of legal sociology to understand the interaction between law, social structures, and power relations in the practice of land dispute resolution. The results show that the existence of agrarian regulations has not been fully able to realize substantive justice because their implementation is often influenced by social inequality, the dominance of economic interests, and the weak bargaining position of the community, especially farmers and marginalized groups. In practice, the law not only functions as a normative instrument but also reflects the configuration of power at work in society. Therefore, the resolution of agrarian conflicts requires an approach that is not merely legal-formal, but also sensitive to the social context, distributive justice, and the protection of land rights in a sustainable manner. Keywords: Agrarian Conflict; Sociology of Law; Land Disputes; Social Justice