Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandawa : Pusat Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law
Usman Rasyid
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Mengenai Perlindungan Anak Bagi Siswa dan Guru di SMP Negeri 2 Luwuk Dian Ekawaty Ismail; Avelia Rahmah Y. Mantali; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha; Dolot Alhasni Bakung; Usman Rasyid
Pandawa : Pusat Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Juli : Pandawa : Pusat Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/pandawa.v1i3.72

Abstract

Children as the next generation of the nation, must be protected from childhood to adulthood. If a child has been in an environment of crime since childhood, that child can become a criminal in the future, and will disturb people's lives. It is wise for child protection to start in junior high school. Junior high school (SMP) as a place for children to gain knowledge, begins to learn to get along with peers, smaller friends or teachers and begins to understand ways to commit violence against others. Therefore, the protection of children and teachers is currently an important matter and must be a common concern. Lack of understanding and knowledge of legal protection for children in the school environment has resulted in many violations and even criminal acts of violence against children in the school environment. As a result, children do not feel comfortable at school, skip school, or even drop out. Taking into account the legal issues above, the law faculty community service team carried out this service activity as an effort to increase public awareness and teachers that the importance of child protection starts from a child-friendly school environment and teachers. Regarding these problems, we all must pay attention to the protection of children and teachers, including at SMP Negeri 2 Luwuk. In this community service, we provide counseling and outreach to the concept of child protection, namely the urgency of legal protection for children and teachers in schools. The outputs that will be produced through this service are legal counseling activities for the community, scientific articles in the Community Service Journal, Publication in the Media Period (Print/Online), then Mandatory Reports in the form of Service Implementation Results Reports, Activity Diary Books and Financial Record Books.
Dilema Kemanusiaan dan Kedaulatan Negara: Telaah Kebijakan Penolakan Bantuan Asing Dalam Penanggulangan Bencana Alam di Indonesia Usman Rasyid; Novendri M. Nggilu; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.3919

Abstract

Indonesia sebagai negara hukum memiliki kewajiban konstitusional untuk melindungi segenap bangsa dan seluruh tumpah darah Indonesia, termasuk dalam situasi bencana alam. Namun, dalam praktik penanggulangan bencana, muncul dilema antara nilai kemanusiaan yang bersifat universal dan prinsip kedaulatan negara, khususnya terkait kebijakan penolakan atau pembatasan bantuan asing. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis relasi antara kemanusiaan dan kedaulatan dalam negara hukum Indonesia melalui kajian kebijakan penolakan bantuan asing pada penanggulangan bencana banjir bandang di wilayah Sumatera yang melibatkan tiga provinsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan penolakan bantuan asing didasarkan pada prinsip kedaulatan negara dan pengendalian terhadap potensi intervensi eksternal, namun kebijakan tersebut harus tetap mempertimbangkan nilai kemanusiaan sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan keseimbangan antara kedaulatan negara dan kepentingan kemanusiaan agar penanggulangan bencana dapat berjalan efektif tanpa mengabaikan prinsip negara hukum.
Penguatan Pembentukan Hukum Demokratis: Analisis Kelayakan Penerapan Mekanisme Public Inquiry di Indonesia Mohamad Rivaldi Moha; Ramadhan Usman; Usman Rasyid; Dicky Andika Rauf; Muhammad Iqbal Mustapa
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2503

Abstract

This study examines the structural weaknesses of public participation in Indonesia’s legislative process and evaluates the feasibility of adopting a public inquiry mechanism to strengthen Evidence-Based lawmaking. Although the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 13 of 2022 formally guarantee public involvement, existing parliamentary hearings and public consultations remain largely procedural and fail to meet deliberative democratic standards. This condition raises urgent concerns regarding legislative legitimacy, transparency, and the substantive use of public input. The research employs a normative-comparative approach combined with juridical-empirical analysis. It analyzes Indonesia’s participatory legal framework and compares it with public inquiry models in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, focusing on institutional independence, transparency, and investigative authority. Empirical assessment of legislative practices reveals a persistent gap between normative guarantees and practical implementation, resulting in symbolic participation with limited policy impact. Comparative findings demonstrate that public inquiry mechanisms can enhance deliberative quality and accountability through systematic evaluation of evidence. The study concludes that a hybrid public inquiry model integrating parliamentary procedures with independent expert panels is legally and institutionally feasible, provided that regulatory reform, institutional capacity building, and political safeguards are effectively implemented.
From Bandung to the Constitution: Post-Colonial Constitutional Values in Indonesia, India, and South Africa Usman Rasyid; Rismanto Kaku
International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Gorontalo Legal Research and Consulting

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66502/95fk5c91

Abstract

Post-colonial constitutionalism in Asia and Africa has often been analyzed through domestic constitutional transitions or global human rights frameworks, while the normative legacy of the 1955 Bandung Conference remains largely confined to diplomatic history and international relations. This separation has obscured the extent to which Bandung Principles—such as anti-colonialism, sovereign equality, non-intervention, and self-determination—have informed the internal normative architecture and constitutional identity of post-colonial states. This article aims to examine how these Bandung-inspired norms have been internalized as constitutional values within selected Asian and African constitutional systems. Employing a normative legal research design with statutory, comparative, and philosophical approaches, the study conducts a selective comparative analysis of Indonesia, India, and South Africa. The article offers a novel conceptual reframing of the Bandung Principles as post-colonial constitutional values rather than merely diplomatic or political commitments. It demonstrates that Bandung constitutes a shared normative reference that continues to shape constitutional ethos, identity, and interpretive orientation across divergent constitutional trajectories. The analysis reveals that while Indonesia reflects an ethos-based constitutionalization closely aligned with foundational constitutional narratives, India and South Africa exhibit distinct pathways mediated by judicial culture and institutional design. By bridging diplomatic history and constitutional theory, this study contributes to comparative constitutional law by advancing a Global South perspective that recognizes historical experience and normative plurality as sources of constitutional normativity. In doing so, the article responds to its research objective by establishing Bandung as an enduring constitutional framework that informs contemporary post-colonial constitutional development beyond historical commemoration.
Co-Authors Avelia Rahmah Y Mantali Dian Ekawaty Ismail Dicky Andika Rauf Dolot Alhasni Bakung Mohamad Rivaldi Moha Muhammad Iqbal Mustapa Novendri M Nggilu Ramadhan Usman Rismanto Kaku