Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Analisis Lemahnya Penegakkan Hukum dari Kausalitas Maraknya Agen Judi Online di Indonesia Syahir, Fabhian Halky; Raharjo, Angga Sandhika; Nadjima, Aulia Rachmatullah; Irvan, Rafi Muhammad; Viano, Nurloise; Rahman, Hafizh Aulia; Putra Pammuji, Daffa Adam; Hasnakusumah, Raisha Tiara; Marsanthy, Talitha Aqiella; Mulyadi, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11666290

Abstract

Abstract: Gambling is a game that uses money or goods as bets, such as playing dice and cards. Meanwhile, online gambling is gambling conducted online via the internet. According to Article 303 paragraph (3), it is explained that “a game called gambling is any game, where in general the possibility of obtaining profit depends solely on luck, as well as because the player is better trained or more skilled. The method used in this research is qualitative research where this method involves collecting relevant information and data from various reliable sources. To obtain credible sources, the author uses online library tools such as journals, scientific articles, e-books, and websites that have been tested for reliability by testing institutions. In Indonesia, the eradication of online gambling agents is needed to overcome the problem of online gambling addiction and reduce the unemployment rate. Data-box noted that in 2023, around 7.9 million or 5.45% of Indonesian people are still unemployed. The phenomenon of online gambling is triggered by several factors, including the development of information technology that facilitates access to online gambling sites. In addition, ef ective law enforcement and public awareness of the importance of understanding the negative impact
Mata Najwa Sebagai Cermin Demokrasi dan Representasi Kebenaran Dalam Media Alternatif Pasah, Marip; Raharjo, Angga Sandhika; Almagfira, Anisa; Syahir, Fabhian Halky; Asmara, Daffi Allegra; Carina T., Joy Catherine; Carolina, Lavia Luky; Adfari, Tsabitah Rahmah; Abdullah, Nayla Putri; Yadila, Natasya; Amelia, Sabina Putri
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the president’s narrative through Habermas’ deliberative democracy framework and assesses the communication relations between the elite and the public within the IKN policy as a reflection of the quality of participatory democracy in Indonesia. The article aims to examine whether elite political communication can serve as an indicator of the overall quality of democracy itself. The research method employed is qualitative content analysis, examining Mata Najwa as a representation of democracy and an alternative media platform. Data were gathered from various media sources and academic references, and analyzed comprehensively to produce findings that are relevant, applicable, and contributive to the development of media and democracy discourse in Indonesia. Mata Najwa, hosted by Najwa Shihab, has become one of the most notable highlights within Indonesia’s media landscape. With a track record as an independent journalist, the program consistently discusses political, social, cultural, and societal issues through a critical, reflective, and credible approach. Each broadcast presents competent speakers and multiple perspectives, creating a comprehensive dialogic space. This approach not only provides information but also education, while enhancing public satisfaction and awareness. The Mata Najwa podcast plays a strategic role in fostering an open political discussion space in Indonesia. Through the episode “[Exclusive] Jokowi on IKN, Gibran, and ‘Put Jokowi on Trial’,” the program invited President Jokowi to respond to political issues, public criticisms, and national policies. This broadcast reflects values of national defense, ethical leadership, and political courage in facing contemporary challenges.
Runtuhnya Pilar Demokrasi Akibatkan Politik Dinasti: Menelisik Jejak Hitam Nepotisme Anwar Usman Devi, Murtanti Fajarrani; Putri, Salsabila Restia; Syahir, Fabhian Halky; Raharjo, Angga Sandhika; Asmara, Daffi Allegra; Latri, Akhdan Adityo; Delyananda, Zahrah Rani’ah; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15483861

Abstract

The phenomenon of dynastic politics in Indonesia has become a major highlight in contemporary democratic discourse, especially when the involvement of families of public officials extends into the realm of judicial power. One case that has generated great controversy is the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which paved the way for Gibran Rakabuming Raka the son of President Joko Widodo to run in a national political contest. The decision was colored by a conflict of interest following the involvement of the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court, Anwar Usman, who has a direct kinship with the party benefiting from the decision. This situation raises serious questions about the integrity of the judiciary, the neutrality of judges, and the effectiveness of the legal profession's code of ethics in safeguarding democratic principles and the rule of law. Using a normative juridical approach and a case approach, this analysis focuses on relevant legislation and court decisions, to unravel the extent to which Indonesia's legal mechanisms are able to prevent and crack down on the practice of nepotism in constitutional institutions. Violation of the principle of nemo judex in causa sua (not to hear cases involving personal interests) is the main highlight in seeing the fragility of the pillars of democracy due to the dominance of family interests and patronage politics. In this context, strengthening the code of ethics, the role of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court, and revitalizing the basic principles of justice such as independence, impartiality and accountability are absolute prerequisites in maintaining public confidence in the constitutional justice system in Indonesia.
Board of Directors’ Responsibility in The Implementation of Know Your Customer (Kyc) in The Case of Default by Debtors (CASE STUDY NO. 266/PDT.G/2012/PN. SBY) Syahir, Fabhian Halky; Satino , Satino
Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 4 No. 11 (2025): JURNAL LOCUS: Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/locus.v4i11.5140

Abstract

The suboptimal implementation of Know Your Customer (KYC) by bank directors contributes to the increase in non-performing loans (NPLs). This normative legal research analyzes the legal responsibility of directors for the failure to implement KYC in the context of debtor default, as well as the integration of KYC in creditworthiness analysis (5C). The results show that KYC has evolved into a fundamental instrument of the board of directors' duty of care, which is functionally integrated to validate the Condition and Collateral criteria. Analysis of Decision No. 266/Pdt.G/2012/PN. SBY indicates that KYC failure constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty that has a causal relationship with the bank's losses. This negligence opens up multidimensional liability for directors, including administrative sanctions, civil lawsuits (Article 1365 of the Civil Code), and potential criminal liability (TPPU). The board of directors holds full responsibility to ensure the effectiveness of KYC as a key pillar of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) to mitigate credit and legal risks.