Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.036
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Dialektika Hukum
Lananda, Ardelia
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
DAMPAK FENOMENA “NO VIRAL, NO JUSTICE” TERHADAP PENEGAKAN HUKUM KASUS KDRT DI INDONESIA Nur, Hilman; Lananda, Ardelia; Simbolon, Cindy Claudia; Rahmah, Mila Arastasya; Baidhowi, Nayla Ratu; Januwati, Pusfa; Dika, Muhammad Gilar; Tri Cahya, Muhammad Agung
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v6i1.325

Abstract

The phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” has become a highlight in handling cases of Domestic Violence (DV) in Indonesia. This phenomenon reflects the public perception that justice is often only achieved if cases of Domestic Violence (DV) receive widespread attention on social media. The purpose of this study is to analyze in more depth the law enforcement system for domestic violence crimes in Indonesia based on applicable laws and regulations, identify the factors causing the emergence of the phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” in law enforcement of domestic violence in Indonesia and examine the impact of the phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” on the effectiveness of law enforcement officers in handling domestic violence crimes in Indonesia. The method used in this study is the normative legal research method. This research method is carried out by examining problems and processing data obtained from legal regulations in accordance with existing regulations and rules or norms as the basis for research. The results of the study indicate that the phenomenon of “No Viral, No Justice” on social media can accelerate the law enforcement process and increase public pressure on law enforcement officers to act. However, this phenomenon can also pose risks, such as trials by the media, violations of victim privacy, and potential disinformation. In addition, dependence on virality can divert attention from systematic and sustainable efforts to address Domestic Violence (DV), so efforts are needed to strengthen effective and reliable mechanisms for protecting victims of Domestic Violence (DV).
KETIMPANGAN PENGUASAAN LAHAN SEBAGAI TANTANGAN PERLINDUNGAN PETANI DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM PERTANIAN INDONESIA Paminto, Saptaning Ruju; Lananda, Ardelia
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v7i1.719

Abstract

Inequality in agricultural land ownership in Indonesia is a structural issue that directly weakens the bargaining position and economic access of smallholder farmers. Although Indonesia's agrarian legal framework normatively affirms the principles of social justice, the social function of land, and restrictions on land ownership, land ownership and control remain concentrated in certain groups. This situation raises questions about the extent to which agricultural law is able to provide equitable protection for farmers. This study aims to analyze the regulation of agricultural land ownership within Indonesia's agricultural legal framework related to farmer protection, examine the factors causing inequality in land ownership that remain challenges in efforts to protect farmers under Indonesian agricultural law, and examine the role of Indonesian agricultural law in addressing inequality in land ownership to achieve equitable protection for farmers. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively to assess the consistency of norms and the political direction of agrarian law. The results show that although Indonesian agrarian law normatively contains instruments for limiting and equalizing land ownership, inequality persists due to weak implementation, regulatory disharmony, and ambiguous policies between redistribution and investment. Protection of farmers in agricultural law depends on the state's consistency in internalizing the principles of social justice in the substance, institutions, and agrarian policies so that the law functions not only to regulate, but also to transform conditions of inequality in land ownership.
KONSEKUENSI SIFAT FINAL DAN MENGIKAT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN YANG BERPOTENSI KELIRU Mulyadi, Dedi; Lananda, Ardelia; Putri Hidayat, Feyza Ashila; Muldiyanti, Suci; Apriliani, Syifa
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v7i1.720

Abstract

Constitutional Court decisions have the unique characteristic of being final and binding. This characteristic means that decisions made by the Constitutional Court immediately acquire permanent legal force upon pronouncement and are binding on all citizens, state institutions, and related parties. The absence of further legal remedies such as appeals, cassation, or judicial review makes Constitutional Court decisions absolute in the Indonesian constitutional system. On the one hand, this characteristic aims to guarantee legal certainty, maintain the stability of the legal system, and prevent conflicts of interpretation of the constitution. However, on the other hand, this final and binding nature can raise problems if the resulting decision has the potential to contain errors in the interpretation of norms, legal considerations, or resulting policy implications. This condition creates a dilemma between the principles of legal certainty and substantive justice in constitutional practice. This study aims to analyze the consequences of the final and binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions on the possibility of potentially erroneous decisions. The method used is a normative approach by examining relevant laws and regulations, legal theory, and doctrine. The results of the study show that although a final and binding nature is necessary to maintain the supremacy of the constitution, an academic oversight mechanism and constitutional evaluation are still needed to minimize the potential for errors in Constitutional Court decisions.
Co-Authors Aji Mulyana Alvian M,S, Ce Kedzma Alvian M.S, Ce Kedzma Apriliani, Syifa Baidhowi, Nayla Ratu Dedi Mulyadi Dedi Mulyadi Dika, Muhammad Gilar Farraz, Mohammad Irvanul Hilman Nur Januwati, Pusfa Kamilah, Anita Kirana Utami, Tanti Leny Megawati Mia Amalia Muhamad Budi Mulyadi Muldiyanti, Suci Nurwijayanti Perdana, Zaki Akhtar Putri Hidayat, Feyza Ashila Rahmah, Mila Arastasya Saptaning Ruju Paminto Simbolon, Cindy Claudia Tri Cahya, Muhammad Agung