Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Maulida Fitriani
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penghapusan Merek WIN Terdaftar yang Tidak Digunakan dalam Kegiatan Perdagangan Berdasarkan Kepentingan Pihak Ketiga : Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 45/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst Azizah Arfah; Angel Evelin; Hendra Parulian; Maulida Fitriani; Rildo Anuar Sihite; Handoyo Prasetyo; Atik Winanti
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i1.2034

Abstract

The right holder of a trademark has full validity to use his own trademark or license it to other parties, including delisting of its own trademark. Delisting of a mark could be done by the owner of the relevant mark, based on initiative of the minister or third party’s interest. Hongyunhonghe Tobacco (Group) Co. Ltd. (Plaintiff) has filed a lawsuit for the delisting of registered WIN trademark owned by PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company (Defendant). The issues raised are how the legal arrangements for the delisting of trademarks by third party’s interested and the suitability of the application of the law in Decision Number 45/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pstreviewed based on the applicable trademark rules. Normative juridical research type through a statutory study approach and literature study-based data collection. Qualitative data analysis with prescriptive nature. The provisions of Article 74 paragraph (1) jo. Article 85 of the Trademark Law regulates the delisting of registered trademarks filed third party’s interested in the form of a lawsuit to the Chairman of the Central Jakarta Commercial Court. The application of the law applied in the decision is erroneous and states the Plaintiff is not interested. Law enforcement is one of the factors that affect the effectiveness and utilities of the law for the community. Trademarks that have been obtained should be used as well as possible in accordance with the term of protection, so as not to cause a gap for other parties to conduct the delisting of registered trademarks.
Perbandingan Royalty Hak Cipta Menjadi Harta Bersama Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Maulida Fitriani; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i3.2792

Abstract

Copyright royalties as an economic object in intellectual property are of particular concern in family law, especially when associated with their status as joint property in marriage. This study aims to examine and compare how the Indonesian and Malaysian legal systems regulate the distribution of copyright royalties in the context of divorce. In Indonesia, the concept of joint property is regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974, which was updated by Law Number 16 of 2019, as well as in the Compilation of Islamic Law. Meanwhile, in Malaysia, different Islamic family laws between states provide a basis for the division of joint property, including royalties, by considering the contribution of the spouse. This study uses a normative-comparative approach through literature study and analysis of legal documents. It was found that despite the differences in legal systems, both countries in principle recognize copyright royalties as part of joint property if they meet certain requirements, especially regarding the time of acquisition and the contribution of the spouse. This study emphasizes the importance of the principle of justice in the division of intangible assets in the context of a household.
Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Rahasia Dagang Produksi Kopi Bubuk Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 332k/Pid.Sus/2013 Azizah Arfah; Raka Haikal; Hendra Parulian; Albert S. Limbong; Maulida Fitriani; Irwan Triadi
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.1087

Abstract

Appreciation of IPR in Indonesia is still relatively low and many people consider IPR to be unimportant and even many lay people do not understand IPR. One of them is the protection of trade secrets which plays an important role for both personal and public interests. The research method is normative legal with prescriptive data analysis. Trade secrets cover aspects of pre-production to post-production, including marketing and sales. The use of trade secrets without permission and approval from other parties is a violation of Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets. The use of information includes production methods, frying, grinding, to marketing and sales of CV ground coffee. Tiga Putra Berlian resembles CV. Bintang Harapan by recruiting employees, offering coffee products that have been produced to CV customers. Bintang Harapan, causing losses and violating Article 17 of Law Number 30 of 2000.
Co-Authors Albert S. Limbong Angel Evelin Atik Winanti Azizah Arfah Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Handoyo Prasetyo Hendra Parulian Irwan Triadi Raka Haikal Rildo Anuar Sihite