Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora IPSSJ
Hendra Parulian
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Penghapusan Merek WIN Terdaftar yang Tidak Digunakan dalam Kegiatan Perdagangan Berdasarkan Kepentingan Pihak Ketiga : Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 45/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst Azizah Arfah; Angel Evelin; Hendra Parulian; Maulida Fitriani; Rildo Anuar Sihite; Handoyo Prasetyo; Atik Winanti
Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Intellektika : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/intellektika.v3i1.2034

Abstract

The right holder of a trademark has full validity to use his own trademark or license it to other parties, including delisting of its own trademark. Delisting of a mark could be done by the owner of the relevant mark, based on initiative of the minister or third party’s interest. Hongyunhonghe Tobacco (Group) Co. Ltd. (Plaintiff) has filed a lawsuit for the delisting of registered WIN trademark owned by PT Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company (Defendant). The issues raised are how the legal arrangements for the delisting of trademarks by third party’s interested and the suitability of the application of the law in Decision Number 45/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pstreviewed based on the applicable trademark rules. Normative juridical research type through a statutory study approach and literature study-based data collection. Qualitative data analysis with prescriptive nature. The provisions of Article 74 paragraph (1) jo. Article 85 of the Trademark Law regulates the delisting of registered trademarks filed third party’s interested in the form of a lawsuit to the Chairman of the Central Jakarta Commercial Court. The application of the law applied in the decision is erroneous and states the Plaintiff is not interested. Law enforcement is one of the factors that affect the effectiveness and utilities of the law for the community. Trademarks that have been obtained should be used as well as possible in accordance with the term of protection, so as not to cause a gap for other parties to conduct the delisting of registered trademarks.
Analisis Perbandingan Syarat Jumlah Utang dalam Permohonan Kepailitan di Indonesia dengan Malaysia sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Debitor Hendra Parulian; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Atik Winanti
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i3.998

Abstract

Bankruptcy petitions in Indonesia are regulated under Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), which stipulates that a debtor may be declared bankrupt if they have at least two debts, one of which is due and collectible. However, this provision does not specify a minimum debt threshold as a requirement for bankruptcy, thereby creating a legal loophole that creditors may exploit by using bankruptcy as a mere debt collection tool. This raises concerns regarding the legal protection of debtors. This study aims to compare the bankruptcy laws of Indonesia and Malaysia, particularly with regard to the minimum debt amount requirement, and to evaluate whether the conditions for bankruptcy under the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law and PKPU provide legal certainty and adequate protection for debtors. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that the current provisions in Indonesia are no longer aligned with present-day needs and are prone to abuse. Unlike Malaysia, which stipulates a minimum debt amount, Indonesia has yet to regulate this matter explicitly. Therefore, a reformulation of Indonesia's bankruptcy law is necessary to ensure fairness, prevent misuse, and provide balanced legal protection for all parties, especially debtors.
Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Rahasia Dagang Produksi Kopi Bubuk Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 332k/Pid.Sus/2013 Azizah Arfah; Raka Haikal; Hendra Parulian; Albert S. Limbong; Maulida Fitriani; Irwan Triadi
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.1087

Abstract

Appreciation of IPR in Indonesia is still relatively low and many people consider IPR to be unimportant and even many lay people do not understand IPR. One of them is the protection of trade secrets which plays an important role for both personal and public interests. The research method is normative legal with prescriptive data analysis. Trade secrets cover aspects of pre-production to post-production, including marketing and sales. The use of trade secrets without permission and approval from other parties is a violation of Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets. The use of information includes production methods, frying, grinding, to marketing and sales of CV ground coffee. Tiga Putra Berlian resembles CV. Bintang Harapan by recruiting employees, offering coffee products that have been produced to CV customers. Bintang Harapan, causing losses and violating Article 17 of Law Number 30 of 2000.
ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN PINJAMAN ONLINE ILEGAL ATAS PENAGIHAN YANG TIDAK SAH DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN DATA PRIBADI SECARA MELAWAN HUKUM Mustafid Milanto Achmad; Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin; Fandy Gultom; Rofi Ayyasy; Hendra Parulian; Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 06 November (2025): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Maraknya kasus penyalahgunaan data pribadi dalam praktik penagihan pinjaman online ilegal menimbulkan persoalan hukum serius, terutama karena tindakan tersebut dilakukan melalui intimidasi, ancaman, dan penyebaran informasi pribadi tanpa hak. Kondisi ini menempatkan korban dalam posisi yang rentan dan memerlukan analisis mendalam mengenai bagaimana perlindungan hukum bekerja dalam konteks kejahatan digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk penagihan tidak sah yang dilakukan pelaku pinjaman online ilegal, menelaah perlindungan hukum yang tersedia bagi korban berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, serta mengkaji pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam Putusan No. 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jakarta Utara terkait unsur penyalahgunaan data pribadi. Metode penelitian menggunakan studi literatur dengan menelaah putusan pengadilan, jurnal ilmiah, regulasi, serta penelitian terdahulu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyalahgunaan data pribadi oleh pelaku pinjol ilegal dilakukan melalui penyebaran informasi kontak, ancaman verbal, dan tekanan psikologis yang melanggar prinsip privasi dan perlindungan konsumen. Analisis putusan menunjukkan bahwa hakim menilai tindakan tersebut memenuhi unsur pemerasan elektronik sebagaimana diatur dalam UU ITE, dan menjatuhkan pidana penjara serta denda untuk memberikan efek jera. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi korban pinjol ilegal telah diakomodasi dalam berbagai regulasi, namun implementasinya masih memerlukan penguatan pengawasan dan edukasi masyarakat.
Co-Authors Albert S. Limbong Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho Angel Evelin Atik Winanti Azizah Arfah FANDY GULTOM Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Handoyo Prasetyo Irwan Triadi Maulida Fitriani Mustafid Milanto Achmad Raka Haikal Rildo Anuar Sihite Rofi Ayyasy Sulthoni Ajie Sahidin