Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Urgency of Amicus Curiae in The Indonesian Law (A Case Study of the 2024 Presidential Election Dispute) Sulistyowati; Mery, Lisa; Maharani, Dewi Nadya; Andika, Andi
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 6 No 3 (2024): The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement and Prevention in Modern Society
Publisher : Department of Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v6i3.51252

Abstract

One of the authorities of the Constitutional Court (MK) is to resolve disputes over general election results. In the 2024 presidential election, the presidential candidate pair Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin and the Ganjar-Mahfud pair filed a lawsuit with the Constitutional Court. This study uses normative research. The results show that many figures have emerged as Amicus Curae, such as Megawati Soekarnoputri, Dien Syamsudin and others. In addition, this Amicus Curae is very important in order to achieve openness and justice in general election disputes in the Indonesian legal system.
Neutrality of Public Officials in Elections based on The Perspective of General Principles of Good Governance Sulistyowati, Sulistyowati; Prasetyo, Mas Subagyo Eko; Maharaja, Gusti Bintang; Andika, Andi
Law Development Journal Vol 6, No 3 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.6.3.344-357

Abstract

A clean and competent government applies the general principles of good government. Neutrality is one of the general principles of good government that every state official must uphold. Neutrality of public officials means not taking sides or engaging in practical political interests, especially in elections. This study aims to analyze the problems related to public officials' neutrality in Indonesia and provide solutions to ensure that neutrality. This study uses qualitative methods with a normative approach. The data used are secondary in the form of legislation, official documents, literature, and relevant previous research results. The results showed that the main problems related to public officials' neutrality in Indonesia are public officials' low awareness and understanding about the importance of neutrality, weak supervision, sanctions against neutrality violations, and the pressure and intervention of certain interested parties. Solutions that can be provided to ensure the neutrality of public officials in Indonesia are to increase socialization and education about neutrality, strengthen monitoring and enforcement mechanisms against neutrality violations, and build a culture of integrity and professionalism among public officials. Vigorous law enforcement is the solution.