Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

MATERIALISME DALAM TAFSIR SAYYID QUTB: Studi Atas Q.S Ali Imran Ayat 14 Utami, Devi Aulia; Rusli, Ris’an; Farsyad, Ahmad Farid
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Kajian Ilmu Ushuluddin dan Studi Agama
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v23i2.519

Abstract

This article discusses Sayyid Qutb's views on materialism, especially in the context of his interpretation of Surah Ali Imran, verse 14. This verse mentions human love for the world, including wealth, women, children, and other worldly pleasures. The method used in this article is a qualitative approach with a literature review. For the analytical approach, the article employs a tahlili (analytical) method, which allows the author to explore a verse in-depth. Through this study, the article aims to reveal how Qutb's *Tafsir Fi Zhilalil Qur'an* provides relevant insights into the dangers of materialism in modern life and how Muslims should balance their worldly life with the hereafter. The research findings show that in his tafsir, Sayyid Qutb criticizes excessive love for the world as a form of materialism that can divert Muslims from their higher purpose in life, which is to seek Allah’s pleasure and the happiness of the hereafter. Qutb emphasizes the importance of awareness that love for the world must remain within reasonable limits so that it does not hinder one's focus on spiritual values and righteous deeds.
Rechtsstaat from the Perspective of Al-Ghazali and Ibn Khaldun Rusli, Ris'an; Wijaya; Azwar, Alfi Julizun; Utami, Devi Aulia
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 4 No 1 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v4i1.106

Abstract

The concept of a state is a closely related discourse to the lives of all humanity. However, the Holy Quran and Hadits, as guidance for Muslims, did not mention the specific form and concept of a state. Therefore, this paper will discuss the idea of a state from some Islamic intellectual perspectives, such as al-Ghazali and Ibn Khaldun. Both of them were trying to formulate the form and concept of the state. This article uses a qualitative research method with a type of library research. This type of research allows primary data sources to come from books authored by Al-Ghazali and Ibn Khaldun. At the same time, secondary data sources come from various articles and other scientific books that can support the author's arguments. To analyze their thought, this article uses comparative analysis; comparative analysis allows researchers to understand how the two thinkers view the concept of the state of law and how their thinking can be compared in different contexts.  The results of the study show that Al-Ghazali and Ibn Khaldun have similarities in emphasizing the relationship between region and politics, as well as the importance of religious principles in government. They agreed that the government must maintain order and justice. However, the difference lies in the approach and form of government; Al-Ghazali supported the monarchy, while Ibn Khaldun did not specify a specific form as long as it met the criteria for justice. Their thinking can be the basis for understanding the interaction of religion and politics in creating a just system of government. Nevertheless, this paper is limited to the views of Ghazali and ibn Khaldun to understand the thoughts of both without involving experimental empirical methods.
ANALISIS TEMATIK TERM RA’FAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN: Upaya Rekonsiliasi Konseptual Rahmat Tuhan dan Teori Sanksi Zina Rahman, Pathur; Utami, Devi Aulia
TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Kajian Ilmu Ushuluddin dan Studi Agama
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Studies UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/tjd.v23i2.603

Abstract

This study thematically examines the term ra’fah in the Qur’an, particularly in the context of implementing zina (adultery) sanctions, aiming to formulate a conceptual reconciliation between the divine mercy and the principle of justice in Islamic law. The background of this research is based on the common practice in society of resolving zina cases through mediation or customary law, which contradicts the provisions of Islamic criminal law as stipulated in Q.S. An-Nur verse 2 and Aceh Qanun No. 9 of 2008, as well as the phenomenon of victims marrying their abusers to preserve family honor, which obscures the protection of victims' rights and justice. This study employs a qualitative method with a thematic interpretation approach to Qur’anic verses containing the term ra’fah. The findings reveal that ra’fah is explicitly mentioned only in two verses, Q.S. An-Nur verse 2 and Q.S. Al-Hadid verse 27, both revealed in Medina; in Q.S. An-Nur verse 2, ra’fah means the prohibition of allowing compassion to prevent the enforcement of zina sanctions in order to uphold justice and legal certainty, while in Q.S. Al-Hadid verse 27, ra’fah is associated with gentleness and compassion instilled in the hearts of the followers of Prophet Isa (Jesus). These findings affirm that ra’fah is not an obstacle to law enforcement but an ethical foundation that balances divine mercy and legal firmness in the implementation of Islamic sharia. The study recommends a comprehensive understanding of ra’fah as an ethical basis for enforcing Islamic criminal law to create harmony between compassion and justice. The novelty of this research lies in its focused thematic analysis of ra’fah in the context of zina sanctions, which has been rarely explored, and the affirmation that ra’fah is an ethical principle guiding law enforcement to remain humane without compromising firmness, thus contributing new theoretical insights to the development of Islamic law, especially in the enforcement of hudud sanctions through a more comprehensive and contextual interpretation of ra’fah.
Mysticism and Resistance: The Nature and Relevance of Ki Ageng Mangir’s Struggle Against the Mataram Sultanate Wijaya, Wijaya; Rusli, Ris'an; Utami, Devi Aulia; Azwar, Alfi Julizun
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2025.15.1.259-287

Abstract

This article critically examines the role of the legendary king Ki Ageng Mangir, who challenged the supremacy of the Sultanate of Mataram in sixteenth-century Java. Through a historical and semiotic approach, this study highlights how Ki Ageng Mangir combined Sufistic values, local traditions, as well as Islamic, Hindu, and Buddhist elements in his resistance against the expansionist Mataram sultanate. The Sufi path functioned as an instrument of legitimacy and effective symbolic resistance to the homogenization of ideology and political control. Values such as patience, sincerity, and God-reliance were the moral values that formed the character of Ki Ageng Mangir’s model of resistance, in contrast to the centralistic model of Panembahan Senopati and the integrative model of Sunan Kalijaga. This study found that local spirituality can serve as a means of individual enlightenment as well as the foundation for collective identity and communal resistance. Resistance to power hegemony can be manifested through meaningful religious and cultural expressions, affirming the relevance of traditional spirituality as the basis for legitimacy, identity, and resistance.