Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal EIGEN MATHEMATICS JOURNAL Jurnal Diferensial AL - KAFF: JURNAL SOSIAL HUMANIORA Jurnal Wicara Desa
Fadhilah, Rifdah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : EIGEN MATHEMATICS JOURNAL

 1 
The Decision on Selecting the Best Laptop Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Simple Additive Weighting Method at the Faculty of MIPA University of Mataram Fadhilah, Rifdah; Harsyiah, Lisa; Robbaniyyah, Nuzla Af’idatur
Eigen Mathematics Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2024): December
Publisher : University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/emj.v7i2.231

Abstract

Laptops have the potential to increase educational productivity in Indonesia. For example, students at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (MIPA) at the University of Mataram now feel involved. However, the decision to choose the right laptop according to the needs of students is difficult. The research population used was active students from the class of 2020-2023, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (MIPA), University of Mataram. This research aims to determine the best laptop selection based on alternative laptop brands, namely Asus Vivobook, Acer 3, HP 14S, Dell Vostro 14, and Lenovo IP1. Further criteria include price, processor, Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), and screen size. The methods used are the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods. The research results show that the first priority position is filled by the Asus Vivobook with a weight of 0,26 for the AHP method and the Lenovo IP1 with a weight of 0,898 for the SAW method. The results of priority comparisons using euclidean distance, it was found that the most optimal method for deciding on the best laptop was the AHP method. The AHP method has a value closest to 0 (zero), namely with an average value of 0,127, while the SAW method has an average value of 0,798.
Analysis of Factors that Influence Poverty in West Nusa Tenggara Using Principal Component Regression Zulhan Widya Baskara; Harsyiah, Lisa; Baskara, Zulhan Widya; Putri, Dina Eka; Fadhilah, Rifdah
Eigen Mathematics Journal Vol 8 No 1 (2025): June
Publisher : University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/emj.v8i1.229

Abstract

West Nusa Tenggara (NTB) is one of the provinces in Indonesia with a percentage of poor people according to the March-September period in 2019, namely 14.56% -13.88%, while in 2020 it was 13.97% -14.23% and in 2021 the percentage was 14.14% -13.83%. The factors suspected of influencing poverty in each province have different conditions each year, so repeated observations are needed on poverty data and the factors that influence it. If the data contains multicollinearity, then one of the classic assumptions of multiple linear regression is not met so that the problem of multicollinearity needs to be addressed. The Principal Component Regression (PCR) method is the most consistent compared to the ridge and least square regression methods in solving multicollinearity problems. This study aims to analyze poverty in NTB using the PCR method. The data used in this study are the number of poor people and factors influencing poverty based on districts in NTB in 2020-2022. Based on the calculation results, it was obtained that Component 1 with an eigenvalue of 4.008 explained 57.2% of the variance, while Component 2 with an eigenvalue of 1.740 explained 82.1% of the variance. Both components significantly affect poverty according to the results of simultaneous and partial tests. This model has an R^2 value of 0.302 or 30.2% and the remaining 69.8% is influenced by external factors (error). The R^2 value is classified as a weak category and it is recommended to add other factors that affect poverty including access to electricity, access to sanitation, access to clean drinking water, and government spending.
Co-Authors Abdurahim, Abdurahim Akbar, Rizal Andini, Lani Dina Eka Putri Faradina, Cinta Sasmi Garini, Fitri Ardia Gayatri, Marena Rahayu Harsyiah, Lisa I Gede Adhitya Wisnu Wardhana Iyon Muhdiyati Izza, Nida’ul Kamilatul Kuswanto, Reklivson Andre Lestari, Sahin Two Pratiwi, Lia Fitta Putra, Nicko Rosyawan Robbaniyyah, Nuzla Af’idatur Satria, Muhammad Tito Satrijo Saloko Sya, Mega Febriani Zazkiya, Nely Zulhan Widya Baskara