Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal An Nuqud: Journal of Islamic Economics Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal
Jailuddin, Syuaib
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Hukum Kausalitas Dalam Perspektif Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern Zikri, Abdalul; Jailuddin, Syuaib; M, Marilang; Siola, M. Nasir
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 2, No 6 (2025): January
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Causality is one of the most important topics in the history of philosophy, this is because the principle of causality is one of the main issues in the tradition of Islamic philosophy where the principle of causality is a fundamental issue in philosophy. In the Middle Ages, Muslim philosophers were busy with productive debates about causality that were seen solely from Islamic philosophy and Islamic theology, thus giving rise to debates among philosophers where each philosopher had his own opinion. In fact, it can be said that awareness of the world and representation in the world always depend on causal relationships. Finding all the relationships between cause and effect also provides insight into the causal structure of nature and forms the ability to learn to act intelligently in the world. Finding what actually causes the possibility of building causal patterns, and this allows for rational or logical predictions, decisions, and actions in the world. Causality forms a chain that begins in the past, exists in the present, and disappears in the future. The views of philosophers on the principle of causality have evolved from Plato, who emphasized the importance of causes in change, to Aristotle who distinguished four types of causes. The Stoics asserted that every event has a cause, while medieval philosophers distinguished between primary and secondary causes. In modern times, Hume emphasized the need for experience to understand causal relationships, while Kant argued that causality is based on the structure of reason. Mill added that causes are combinations of conditions. Overall, these developments reflect the complexity of views on causality in philosophy.
Kedudukan Filsafat Keilmuan Dalam Penerapan Hukum Islam Jailuddin, Syuaib; M, Marilang; Siola, Nasir
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper discusses the meaning, concept, position, and role of philosophy in Islam which is divided into two main views: the group that rejects philosophy and the group that accepts it. The group that rejects philosophy views it as a threat to the purity of Islamic teachings, while the group that accepts philosophy sees it as a tool to deepen the understanding of Islamic teachings through the use of reason and rationality. Philosophy has an important position in Islam, as evidenced by the history of Muslim philosophers such as Al-Farabi, Ibn Sina, and Ibn Rushd, who not only developed Islamic thought but also bridged the traditions of Greek and Western philosophy. In the context of Islam, philosophy helps answer contemporary challenges, understand the wisdom of religious teachings, and encourage a critical and rational approach to sacred texts. The philosophical approach in Islam also has a significant impact on the formation of science, such as ushul fiqh and tasawuf, and provides a framework for thinking to face modern challenges. Thus, philosophy and Islam complement each other in forming a deep and relevant understanding of religious teachings in everyday life.
Konsep Kritik Matan: Sejarah, Tujuan, Manfaat, dan Langkah – Langkah Penelitian Matan Hadis Jailuddin, Syuaib
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The criticism of hadith texts is a discipline in the study of hadith that aims to test the validity and authenticity of hadith texts, both in terms of sanad and matan. The concept of this criticism is rooted in the term "naqd," which means to examine, distinguish, and separate between the authentic and the flawed. The tradition of hadith criticism has existed since the time of the Prophet Muhammad, with various motives such as clarification and confirmation, and developed further during the time of the Companions and the Muhaddisin period. The criticism of matan serves to maintain the purity of Islamic teachings, prevent errors in understanding hadith, and face the challenges of forgery of hadith that have emerged throughout history. The method of criticism of matan hadith involves steps such as collecting hadiths with similar themes, testing the conformity of matan with the Qur'an and other hadiths, analyzing the language and structure of the text, and considering the historical context (asbab al-wurud). In addition, this approach also includes efforts to harmonize the content of hadiths that appear contradictory through the principles of mukhtalif al-hadith. This study emphasizes the importance of matan criticism in protecting the integrity of Islamic teachings from distortion and ensuring the correct understanding of the words of the Prophet Muhammad SAW. Thus, matan criticism of hadith is not only a scientific endeavor, but also a responsibility to maintain the continuity and authenticity of religious teachings.
Keluar Dari Perbedaan Pendapat Ulama (Khilaf) Adalah Sesuatu Yang Dianjurkan (Sunnah/Mustahab) Jailuddin, Syuaib; Musyahid, Achmad; Akmal, Andi Muhammad
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 1 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15836661

Abstract

Makalah ini membahas kaidah fikih al-khurūj min al-khilāf mustaḥabb yang berarti "keluar dari perselisihan adalah sesuatu yang disukai". Kaidah ini merupakan prinsip penting dalam fiqih Islam yang bertujuan untuk menjaga kehati-hatian dan menghindari perbuatan yang berpotensi salah menurut sebagian pendapat ulama. Dalam konteks khilafiyah, kaidah ini menganjurkan umat Islam untuk memilih pendapat yang dapat mencakup semua pandangan agar ibadah dan amalnya terhindar dari kekurangan atau ketidaksahan. Pembahasan dalam makalah ini mencakup pengertian bahasa dan istilah kaidah, sumber-sumber syar’i dari Al-Qur’an, hadis Nabi SAW, serta contoh-contoh aplikatif dalam berbagai bidang fiqih seperti wudhu, shalat berjamaah, dan shalat Jumat yang bertepatan dengan hari raya. Melalui pendekatan normatif dan deskriptif, makalah ini menekankan pentingnya sikap bijak dan toleran dalam menghadapi perbedaan pendapat serta pentingnya mengedepankan prinsip kehati-hatian sebagai bentuk perlindungan terhadap keabsahan ibadah. Dengan demikian, kaidah ini tidak hanya bersifat teoritis, tetapi juga memiliki nilai praktis tinggi dalam kehidupan sehari-hari umat Islam
ZAKAT, INFAK, DAN SADAQAH SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PEMBANGUNAN SOSIAL DALAM EKONOMI SYARIAH KONTENPORER Jailuddin, Syuaib; Sapa, Nasrullah Bin; Misbahuddin
An Nuqud Journal of Islamic Economics Vol 4 No 1 (2025): AN NUQUD
Publisher : LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN PADA MASYARAKAT

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51192/annuqud.v4i1.2042

Abstract

The Islamic economic system offers a unique approach to addressing social inequality through a fair wealth distribution mechanism. One of the primary instruments in this system is zakat, infaq, and sadaqah (ZIS), which serve both spiritual and socio-economic functions. This article aims to explain the definitions and distinctions of these three instruments from a sharia economic perspective, while highlighting their role in promoting social justice and strengthening the Muslim community's economy. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach, using secondary data obtained from books, academic journals, legal regulations, and relevant institutional documents. The analysis shows that zakat, as a religious obligation, has stricter management mechanisms compared to infaq and sadaqah, which are voluntary. However, all three complement each other in creating a more equitable economic distribution. Together, these instruments serve as vital pillars for developing a sustainable Islamic economic system, especially in the face of current socio-economic challenges
Co-Authors Achmad Musyahid, Achmad Akmal, Andi Muhammad M, Marilang Misbahuddin Sapa, Nasrullah Bin Siola, M. Nasir Siola, Nasir Zikri, Abdalul