Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Al-battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum An-nisa: Journal of Islamic Family Law Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi dan Tata Negara
Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Wal Aqidah Ash-Shofa Manonjaya
Religion Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Penetrasi Konsep Hibah Sebagai Solusi Dalam Proses Pembagian Waris Diana Farid; Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/9td8h174

Abstract

An owner of property has the right to make grants to anyone, including his children, provided that the grant does not reduce the inheritance rights of other heirs. Grants that are given with the right conditions and fulfilled pillars are valid in law. However, there are restrictions in Islamic law regarding the granting of grants to heirs. This research aims to analyze the rights of heirs to grants and the limits of granting grants in Islamic law, Customary Law, and the Civil Code (BW), especially related to the protection of the rights of heirs. This research uses the literature study method by analyzing relevant legal sources, such as Islamic Law, Customary Law, and BW, to understand the provisions on grants and the division of inheritance. Grants given to heirs do not reduce their inheritance rights, as long as the grant does not exceed the stipulated limit, which is a maximum of 1/3 of the grantor's assets. This aims to protect the rights of heirs who could potentially be harmed by excessive grants. In addition, the principle of justice must be applied when grants are given to children or other heirs, to avoid imbalances in the distribution of inheritance. The maximum grant restrictions in Islamic Law, Customary Law, and BW aim to maintain the balance of heirs' rights and prevent harm to them. Although grants can strengthen relationships, it is important to comply with the legal limits to ensure that the rights of the heirs are not compromised. The existence of such restrictions also demonstrates the need for caution in making grants, especially when the grantor passes away and the distribution of the inheritance must be done.
Analisis Komparatif Hukum Perdata Islam dan Hukum Perdata Indonesia dalam Sistem Hukum Pluralistik di Indonesia Endang Pujiastuti; Tuti Herawati; Diana Farid; Daud Nurdin; Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti
Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi dan Tata Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Wal Aqidah Ash-Shofa Manonjaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64367/dialoglegal.v2i2.235

Abstract

Indonesia adopts a pluralistic legal system that accommodates various legal traditions, including customary law, civil law inherited from the Dutch Burgerlijk Wetboek, and Islamic civil law. Consequently, the application of civil law is not uniform but depends on judicial competence, the legal status of the parties, and the nature of the dispute. This article aims to examine the similarities, differences, and implementation of Islamic Civil Law and Indonesian Civil Law through a comparative legal approach. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches. Data were collected from legislation, court decisions, legal literature, and recent scholarly publications. The findings reveal that Islamic Civil Law emphasizes Sharia principles, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, and substantive justice, whereas Indonesian Civil Law, derived from the Burgerlijk Wetboek, primarily focuses on legal certainty through contractual freedom and individual rights. Despite their philosophical differences, both legal systems converge in protecting civil rights, ensuring justice, and maintaining legal certainty. Therefore, harmonization between these legal systems is essential to strengthen Indonesia's pluralistic national legal framework.
Co-Authors Aden Rosadi Ah. Fathonih Ahmad Syarifudin Juang Ais Surasa Amar Yusuf Abdurrohman Andini Zelikho Beni Ahmad Saebeni Daud Nurdin Diana Farid Diana Farid Endang Pujiastuti Ending Solehudin Ending Solehudin Fateema Muslihatun Najihah Fauzan Ali Rasyid Husain Husain Husain Husain Imran Ahmad Sajid Iqbal Saujan Ivan Tanoto Maruf Maruf Misbahuzzulam Misbahuzzulam Mohamad Riyad Mintarja Mohd Radhuan Arif Zakaria Mubarok Mubarok Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Nuryamin Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Saeideh Shakibiciu Sofia Gussevi Tuti Herawati Usep Saepullah Wahyudi Wahyudi Yudi Daryadi