Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal HAM Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Firmansyah, Muhamad Atji
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Bawaslu dalam Mewujudkan Keterbukaan Informasi di Era Digital Firmansyah, Muhamad Atji; Alallah, A. Azkia Mutawakil
Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Vol 3 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara (HTN), Fakultas Syariah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/vjhtn.v3i2.616

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas peran Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) dalam memberikan informasi kepada masyarakat umum sesuai dengan tujuan dari Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik (UU No. 14 Tahun 2008). Di samping itu, mengulas pula peran Bawaslu dalam memberikan informasi kepada masyarakat dengan berbasis pada apa yang sedang diminati masyarakat saat ini. Artikel ini termasuk sebagai socio-legal studies dengan berbasis pada data sekunder yang dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasilnya, peran Bawaslu untuk memberikan informasi dimulai dari pengawasan hingga pemilihan sesuai dengan tujuan UU No. 14 Tahun 2008. Selain itu, Bawaslu juga menggunakan berbagai cara untuk menarik perhatian masyarakat agar melihat postingan di media sosialnya, seperti menggunakan gaya mutakhir video yang sedang viral, postingan bergambar, dan berupa teks.
Pemidanaan terhadap Perbedaan Pemahaman: Analisis Hak Asasi Manusia atas Perkara Penodaan Agama di Indonesia Rizal, Moch. Choirul; Aji, Michelle Salma Khotom; Firmansyah, Muhamad Atji; Purwanti, Unsa Elen
Jurnal HAM Vol 16, No 2 (2025): August Edition
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2025.16.135-150

Abstract

The right to have different interpretations of mainstream religious teachings in Indonesia can lead to criminal penalties. In practice, judges often rely on expert testimony to gain confidence that “those who are different” have committed the crime of blasphemy. The research method employed in this article is the Human Rights (HAM) research method, which emphasizes the study of court decisions related to criminal acts of blasphemy in Indonesia, particularly regarding the spread of beliefs that differ from the mainstream as blasphemy. The court decisions are analyzed using a human rights approach, especially the right to freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). As a result, 3 (three) of the 11 (eleven) court decisions reviewed still ignore the principle of impartiality in testing differences in interpretations of mainstream religious teachings. Judges do not open up space for dialogue to explore expert testimony from the defendant's perspective. This criminal justice practice, in turn, will undermine FoRB as a meaningful concept. In the future, differences in interpretation of mainstream religious teachings will not be a matter of criminalization, but rather of dialogue. Even if criminalization is necessary, what is prohibited is the crime of broadcasting religious hatred, the judicial process for which is carried out independently and impartially.
Co-Authors Aji, Michelle Salma Khotom Alallah, A. Azkia Mutawakil Purwanti, Unsa Elen Rizal, Moch. Choirul