Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.126
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Roida Nababan
Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Analysis of the Application of the Principle of Balance in Marriage Agreements (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1362 K/Pdt/2024) Patrick Fransseda Naibaho; Janpatar Simamora; Roida Nababan
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.51841

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation and implementation of marital agreements under the Indonesian Marriage Law and to examine the legal considerations of the Supreme Court in Decision Number 1362 K/Pdt/2024. This research employs a normative juridical method. The findings indicate that in Decision Number 1362 K/Pdt/2024, the Supreme Court affirmed that a prenuptial agreement containing an imbalanced clause where all marital assets become the wife’s property while all obligations are imposed upon the husband contradicts the principle of balance (the principle of equality). This decision emphasizes that freedom of contract in marital agreements is not absolute, but must be limited by the principles of substantive justice and the protection of the weaker party.
Pembelaan Hukum Untuk Korban Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dari Prespektif Hukum Pidana Ruth Evelina Mariana Lumbantoruan; Roida Nababan
Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Jurnal Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53697/iso.v6i2.3785

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perlindungan hukum yang tersedia bagi mereka yang mengalami kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT), dilihat melalui lensa hukum pidana Indonesia, dengan fokus pada periode setelah implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 yang membahas pemberantasan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (UU PKDRT). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai bagaimana hukum pidana menawarkan perlindungan kepada individu yang terdampak kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas penegakan hukum di dunia nyata, dan untuk mengeksplorasi tantangan yang dihadapi dalam memastikan perlindungan hukum. Metodologi penelitian yuridis normatif, yang mencakup kerangka legislatif yang relevan, wawasan dari para ahli, dan putusan pengadilan, digunakan. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun UU PKDRT telah menetapkan struktur hukum yang lebih baik dan lebih menyeluruh, berbagai elemen seringkali menghambat perlindungan korban, termasuk keberadaan norma sosial patriarki yang signifikan, tantangan dalam penegakan hukum selama fase investigasi dan persidangan, dan kurangnya pemahaman publik tentang hukum. Kesimpulan Meskipun Undang-Undang Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga telah menciptakan kerangka hukum yang komprehensif, perlindungan korban seringkali terhambat oleh beberapa faktor. Temuan menunjukkan peningkatan tindakan katarsis (pemenjaraan pelaku) dibandingkan dengan perlindungan preventif seperti "rumah aman". Tantangan utama meliputi norma sosial patriarki yang kuat yang menyamakan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, hambatan khusus terhadap investigasi dan persidangan, dan rendahnya pemahaman publik tentang hukum. Penegakan hukum yang efektif tetap terhambat oleh lambatnya kolaborasi kelembagaan dan stigma sosial.
ICA-CEPA Within the Framework of GATT 1994: Negative Impact on Indonesia as a Developing Country Lasma Ria Siregar; Roida Nababan; Sovia Simamora
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3360

Abstract

The Indonesia-Canada Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (ICA-CEPA) is a comprehensive trade agreement that stands under the framework of the GATT 1994, specifically Article XXIV, which regulates the establishment of free trade areas and customs unions. The purpose of this article is to examine Indonesia's position in the ICA-CEPA negotiations from the perspective of international trade law and assess whether the provisions of the GATT provide sufficient space for Indonesia to protect its national interests. This study uses a normative-critical approach with an analysis of international laws and agreements, as well as a policy review related to the mechanism of revocation and postponement of agreements. The results of the analysis show that the GATT 1994, in particular Article XXIV, only provides a legal basis for the establishment of the ICA-CEPA, but does not clearly regulate the clause for the revocation or postponement of the implementation of the agreement. These provisions are entirely dependent on the text of the ICA-CEPA itself, so Indonesia has limited power to terminate or suspend the agreement if it is proven to have a severe negative impact on the economy and the sovereignty of domestic regulations. This article argues that the absence of a strong legal basis in the 1994 GATT makes the ICA-CEPA potentially serve more as a trade political tool that benefits Canada, while Indonesia is in a less protected position within the structure of the agreement.
Tanggung Jawab Direksi Terhadap Keputusan Investasi dan Pengelolaan Keuangan Berbasis Artificial Intelligence dalam Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia Fransisko Pasaribu; Roida Nababan; Samuel Situmorang
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/ep66yg90

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence in investment decision-making and corporate financial management constitutes part of the digital transformation in corporate governance, which requires legal certainty regarding the liability of the Board of Directors. While the use of AI has the potential to enhance efficiency and accuracy in business analysis, it simultaneously gives rise to legal risks where decisions generated by AI result in losses to the company.This study aims to analyze directors’ legal liability for corporate financial losses arising from the use of Artificial Intelligence in investment decisions and to examine the application of the Business Judgment Rule and fiduciary duty as forms of legal protection. This research employs normative legal methods using statutory and conceptual approaches, relying on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that AI does not constitute a legal subject; therefore, liability remains with directors as final decision-makers. The use of AI expands the directors’ duty of care by requiring technological risk awareness and system oversight. Legal protection under the Business Judgment Rule applies when decisions are made rationally, based on adequate information, and free from conflicts of interest. Excessive reliance on AI without critical evaluation may be considered negligence. Accordingly, AI utilization in corporations necessitates stronger fiduciary duty standards and good corporate governance.
Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Atas Agunan yang Diambil Alih BPR Berdasarkan Asas Kepastian Hukum dan Itikad Baik Eliakim Tinambunan; Roida Nababan; Sovia Simamora
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/srr3cv72

Abstract

Asset Takeover (AYDA) constitutes a non-performing loan resolution mechanism recognized in banking practice, including in Rural Credit Banks (BPR). Although normatively permitted, its implementation may raise legal concerns, particularly when collateral is taken over without the debtor’s consent and without proper execution of security rights as regulated by law. This study aims to analyze debtor legal protection against unilateral collateral takeover by a BPR, based on Jember District Court Decision Number 128/Pdt.Bth/2023/PN Jmr, and to examine the application of the principles of legal certainty and good faith in the AYDA mechanism. This research employs normative legal methods using statutory and case approaches. The results of the study show that the legal protection for debtors for collateral taken over by BPR without the debtor's consent is based on the Jember District Court Decision Number 128/Pdt.Bth/2023/PN Jmr and analyzes the application of the principle of legal certainty and the principle of good faith in the AYDA mechanism, especially in the obligation of creditors who act honestly and fairly towards the debtor during the collateral takeover process. In addition,, Such practice also fails to reflect the principle of good faith as mandated under Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code. The court decision affirms that creditors’ preferential rights are not absolute and must be exercised in accordance with statutory provisions and justice principles. Therefore, AYDA implementation must ensure transparency, proportionality, and adherence to legal certainty and good faith.
Penggabungan Perkara Tindak Pidana Perusakan Lingkungan Hidup dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Pemeriksaan di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi July Esther; Martono Anggusti; Roida Nababan; Alex Denischael Berutu
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 11 (2025): Tema Hukum Lingkungan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i11.3008

Abstract

This study examines the possibility of joining environmental destruction crimes and corruption offenses before the Corruption Crimes Court. It employs normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the limited jurisdiction of the Corruption Court under Article 6 of Law No. 46 of 2009 obstructs the implementation of fast, simple, and low-cost justice, as environmental cases must be tried separately. In fact, the concurrence doctrine under the Criminal Code allows case consolidation. Therefore, this study recommends expanding the Court’s jurisdiction and establishing integrated prosecution guidelines to enhance legal effectiveness.
The Application of the Rebus Sic Stantibus Principle in Oil Sales and Purchase Agreements by PT Pertamina (Persero) Amidst Geopolitical Instability in the Middle East Budi Constantin Sihombing; Roida Nababan; Samuel Situmorang
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v5i3.17095

Abstract

Geopolitical instability in the Middle East—triggered by armed conflict, economic sanctions, disruptions to energy distribution routes, and global oil price fluctuations—has brought about significant changes in the execution of international crude oil sales contracts. These conditions potentially affect the ability of the parties involved, including PT Pertamina (Persero), to fulfill their agreed-upon contractual obligations. This study aims to analyze whether geopolitical instability in the Middle East can be classified as a "fundamental change of circumstances" that meets the criteria for invoking the rebus sic stantibus principle, and to examine the legal implications and dispute resolution mechanisms should this principle be applied to oil sales agreements involving PT Pertamina (Persero). The study employs a normative legal research method utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. Legal materials—comprising primary, secondary, and tertiary sources—were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that, under certain conditions, geopolitical instability in the Middle East can be categorized as a fundamental change of circumstances if it meets the elements recognized under the rebus sic stantibus doctrine: namely, a change that was unforeseeable at the time the contract was concluded, occurred beyond the parties' control, significantly altered the contract's economic balance, and rendered performance excessively burdensome without making it impossible to execute.
Co-Authors Alex Denischael Berutu Budi Constantin Sihombing Eliakim Tinambunan Fransisko Pasaribu Janpatar Simamora July Esther Lasma Ria Siregar Martono Anggusti Patrick Fransseda Naibaho Ruth Evelina Mariana Lumbantoruan Samuel Situmorang Sovia Simamora