Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.945
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PATTIMURA Legal Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities JISIP UNJA (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik Universitas Jambi) Jurnal Pendidikan Siber Nusantara Jurnal Humaniora, Ekonomi Syariah dan Muamalah Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Dinasti Information and Technology Dinasti Accounting Review Jurnal Kewirausahan dan Multi Talenta (JKMT) Dinasti Health and Pharmacy Science Siber International Journal of Advanced Law
Wala, Gevan Naufal
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Regulatory Challenges in International Aviation: Indonesia and Russia Compared Wala, Gevan Naufal; Antonovich, Lazarev Viktor
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2025): April 2025 PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v4i1.18372

Abstract

Introduction: The global aviation industry operates within a complex web of international regulatory frameworks that vary significantly from one country to another. This study focuses on the interplay between these frameworks, particularly examining the legal perspectives of Indonesia and the operational experiences of Russian pilots. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for identifying regulatory challenges that affect cross-border aviation operations. Purposes of the Research: The primary purpose of this research is to analyze the differences in aviation regulatory frameworks between Indonesia and Russia, with a focus on documentation requirements, certification recognition, and environmental regulations. By bridging theoretical legal examination with practical insights from aviation practitioners. Methods of the Research: This study employs a comparative legal analysis methodology, integrating theoretical frameworks with empirical data gathered from interviews and surveys of aviation professionals, including pilots and regulatory officials. The research examines documentation processes, certification practices, and environmental regulations in both jurisdictions, highlighting the operational implications for pilots navigating these regulatory landscapes. Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal significant divergences in documentation requirements, with Indonesian authorities placing a strong emphasis on procedural compliance, while Russian frameworks prioritize technical standards. Certification recognition issues were found to increase operational costs by 4-7%, leading pilots to develop unofficial workarounds to address contradictory requirements. Additionally, environmental regulations exhibited stark differences; Indonesia's focus on noise abatement in densely populated areas contrasts sharply with Russia's emissions-oriented approach for Arctic operations. The research culminates in practical recommendations for regulatory harmonization that aim to reduce compliance burdens while maintaining safety standards across both jurisdictions.
The Impact of Judicial Digitalization on Access to Justice and Human Rights in Indonesia Post-Pandemic Wala, Gevan Naufal
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2022)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v2i4.2387

Abstract

This research examines the impact of judicial digitalization on access to justice and human rights protection in Indonesia following the COVID-19 pandemic. The study analyzes the implementation of digital court systems (e-court), virtual trials, and electronic case management systems that were accelerated during the pandemic period. Using normative-empirical legal research methodology, this study combines regulatory analysis, case studies of e-court implementation, and statistical data analysis from various court levels. The findings reveal that while digitalization has improved judicial efficiency, accessibility, and transparency, it has also created new challenges including digital divide, exclusion of vulnerable groups, and potential violations of fair trial principles. The research concludes that a balanced approach combining digital and physical court proceedings, supported by comprehensive regulatory frameworks and digital literacy programs, is essential to ensure digitalization enhances rather than undermines access to justice and human rights protection.
Co-Authors Antonovich, Lazarev Viktor M. Ridho Mahaputra Muliawan, Adi Nugraha, Afdhillah Wahyu Putra Rujitoningtyas, Karimatussholikah Saputra, Raihan Tesalonika, Retha Wala, Anindya Nikeisha