Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Mental Health and Spirituality: Qur’anic Teaching and Approaches to Mental Health in the Modern Era Mawaddah Rofiqoh, Laila; Zulfa, Indana; Nahid Ayad
Jurnal test Vol 4 No 1 (2025): AL-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58363/alfahmu.v4i1.246

Abstract

Mental health has become an increasingly critical issue in modern society, where stress, anxiety, and depression are prevalent concerns. In this context, exploring how Qur’anic teachings contribute to the understanding and treatment of mental health is essential. This study aims to examine the relationship between Qur’anic teachings and mental health approaches while identifying spiritual principles that support psychological well-being. The research employs a qualitative analysis of relevant Qur’anic verses alongside a literature review on the integration of spirituality into mental health practices. The findings indicate that Qur’anic principles, such as dzikr (remembrance of God), salat (prayer), and tawakkal (reliance on God), offer effective strategies for addressing mental health issues by fostering inner peace and enhancing psychological resilience. The study concludes that integrating spiritual values into mental health approaches not only provides emotional support but also helps individuals cultivate meaning and purpose in life. This knowledge has the potential to contribute to improved mental well-being and overall quality of life in today’s complex society.
From Riba to Zakat: An Analytical Study of Islamic Economic Principles and Their Distinction from Conventional Economics Nahid Ayad; Mowafg Abrahem Masuwd; Safa Alrumayh
Bulletin of Islamic Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Educational Foundation for Qur'anic Exegesis and Hadith Studies (Yayasan Pendidikan Tafsir Hadis)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69526/bir.v3i4.358

Abstract

This research explores the foundational principles and ethical framework of Islamic economics as a distinct paradigm from conventional economic systems. Anchored in Islamic legal and moral philosophy, the study examines core concepts such as the prohibition of Riba (interest), the obligation of zakat (almsgiving), the avoidance of Gharar (excessive uncertainty), and the requirement for halal (permissible) transactions. Using a qualitative content analysis approach, the research draws on instructional material to identify how these principles are articulated and positioned within Islamic economic thought. The analysis reveals that Islamic economics is not merely a financial model but a value-based system emphasizing justice, social welfare, and divine accountability. Unlike conventional economics, which prioritizes utility maximization and market efficiency, Islamic economics centers on moral responsibility, risk-sharing, and ethical profit. The findings highlight the potential of Islamic economics to address contemporary issues such as inequality and unsustainable growth. This study contributes to the literature by offering a structured interpretation of Islamic economics grounded in scriptural sources and pedagogical content. Its originality lies in clarifying the ethical-spiritual foundation of Islamic economics and its relevance in modern discourse on sustainable and equitable economic systems.
The Developing a Valid and Reliable Assessment Instrument for Academic Essay Writing in Higher Education M. Hilmy Hidayatullah; Nadrotin Mawaddah; Nur Mukminatien; Suhono, Suhono; Mukminatus Zuhriyah; Nahid Ayad; Yeasy Agustina Sari
Bulletin of Science Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Bulletin of Science Education
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/bse.v5i1.1896

Abstract

Many university instructors assess academic essay writing using general rubrics or borrowed instruments that do not align with specific course outcomes and learner profiles. This study was initiated to address this gap by developing a valid and reliable assessment instrument for academic essay writing among EFL university students, focusing on argumentative essays. The instrument was constructed systematically, involving needs analysis, expert validation, pilot testing, and statistical evaluation for reliability and validity. The trial was conducted with 6 students from the English Language Education Study Program, and their essays were rated by two trained raters. The results showed that the rubric successfully captured performance variation across six key writing components and allowed for consistent scoring with minimal discrepancies between raters. Expert validators confirmed that the rubric is clear, relevant, and aligned with academic essay writing expectations. Rater reliability analysis showed consistent inter-rater scores (score differences ≤1 point), indicating strong rubric usability. Based on these findings, this instrument offers a practical and theoretically grounded tool for assessing academic essay writing in EFL higher education settings.