Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.036
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Eastasouth Journal of Effective Community Services Ngaliman ILJS
Ubaidillah, Nizam
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : ILJS

 1 
Perbandingan Hukum Siyasah dan Hukum Positif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Myaskur, Myaskur; Ubaidillah, Nizam
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, Maret 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v9i1.932

Abstract

Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) often encounter disputes that impact political stability and public trust. This study compares siyasah law and positive law in resolving Pilkada disputes. Positive law, based on formal regulations, emphasizes legality and transparency through institutions like the Constitutional Court. Conversely, siyasah law, rooted in sharia principles, offers a deliberation-based approach focusing on communal welfare. The analysis reveals that positive law excels in legal certainty but lacks adaptability to local contexts, while siyasah law is more flexible but faces challenges in implementation within a plural society. This study recommends integrating both approaches to establish a more equitable, effective, and community-responsive dispute resolution mechanism for Pilkada.
Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah Ubaidillah, Nizam; Syalafiyah, Nurul
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, Maret 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v10i1.1451

Abstract

The dissolution of the mass organization Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) by the Indonesian government in 2017 has generated significant discourse concerning its legal foundations and implications from the perspective of Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah (Islamic Constitutional Jurisprudence). This decision was enacted through Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) Number 2 of 2017, which amended Law Number 17 of 2013 on Community Organizations. The government justified this action by asserting that HTI's activities were incompatible with the principles of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, and posed a potential threat to the unity and integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). From the lens of Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah, this measure can be interpreted as an initiative to safeguard public welfare (maslahah) and prevent harm (dar’u al-mafasid), aligning with Islamic political principles that emphasize the importance of national stability and security. Nevertheless, the dissolution has also ignited debates surrounding the protection of fundamental rights, particularly freedom of association and expression, within the framework of a democratic state governed by the rule of law. This tension highlights the complex interplay between state authority, constitutional principles, and the protection of civil liberties in a pluralistic society.
Perbandingan Hukum Siyasah dan Hukum Positif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pilkada Myaskur, Myaskur; Ubaidillah, Nizam
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, Maret 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v9i1.932

Abstract

Regional Head Elections (Pilkada) often encounter disputes that impact political stability and public trust. This study compares siyasah law and positive law in resolving Pilkada disputes. Positive law, based on formal regulations, emphasizes legality and transparency through institutions like the Constitutional Court. Conversely, siyasah law, rooted in sharia principles, offers a deliberation-based approach focusing on communal welfare. The analysis reveals that positive law excels in legal certainty but lacks adaptability to local contexts, while siyasah law is more flexible but faces challenges in implementation within a plural society. This study recommends integrating both approaches to establish a more equitable, effective, and community-responsive dispute resolution mechanism for Pilkada.
Profesionalisme Aparat Desa Dalam Menjalankan Fungsi Pemerintahan Desa Ubaidillah, Nizam; Yuliana Puji Astuti
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 8 No 02 (2023): Islamic Law September 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v8i02.735

Abstract

Pelaksanaan pemerintahan desa masih terdapat kekurangan dalam pelaksanaan pelayanan publiknya terutama dalam memberikan layanan prima kepada masyarakat. Isu riset terkait bagaimana profesionalisme dan fungsi administrasi desa dalam upaya untuk meningkatkan pelayanan warga. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan sosio legal riset dengan memanfaatkan data kualitatif lapangan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Analisa data dilakukan mulai dari reduksi data, penyajian data, dan menarik kesimpulan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Profesionalisme aparat desa dapat dipahami dari kepatuhannya dan kompetensi dibidangnya. Dalam tugas administrasinya dapat dilihat dari semangat kinerja yamg dibuktikan dengan pelayanan yang tepat serta responsif terhadap warganya. Sedangkan upaya meningkatkan profesionalisme dilakukan dengan pembinaan, evaluasi, pengawasan dan pendisilinan.
Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah Ubaidillah, Nizam; Syalafiyah, Nurul
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah, Maret 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v10i1.1451

Abstract

The dissolution of the mass organization Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) by the Indonesian government in 2017 has generated significant discourse concerning its legal foundations and implications from the perspective of Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah (Islamic Constitutional Jurisprudence). This decision was enacted through Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) Number 2 of 2017, which amended Law Number 17 of 2013 on Community Organizations. The government justified this action by asserting that HTI's activities were incompatible with the principles of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, and posed a potential threat to the unity and integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). From the lens of Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah, this measure can be interpreted as an initiative to safeguard public welfare (maslahah) and prevent harm (dar’u al-mafasid), aligning with Islamic political principles that emphasize the importance of national stability and security. Nevertheless, the dissolution has also ignited debates surrounding the protection of fundamental rights, particularly freedom of association and expression, within the framework of a democratic state governed by the rule of law. This tension highlights the complex interplay between state authority, constitutional principles, and the protection of civil liberties in a pluralistic society.
Co-Authors Ambodo, Triyo Asmaul Husna Fathur Rochim Myaskur Myaskur, Myaskur Syalafiyah, Nurul Tohawi, Agus Yuliana Puji Astuti