Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Cakrawala Linguista
Az-Zahra, Namira
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Keintransitifan Terbelah dalam Bahasa Arab Az-Zahra, Namira; Mulyadi, Mulyadi
JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36722/sh.v10i1.3956

Abstract

The phenomenon of split-intransitivity divides intransitive verbs into two types, namely unergative and unaccusative which differ in syntactic structure and semantic role. As a complex language and rich in morphological systems, Arabic does not explicitly distinguish between the two verbs. So this research is conducted to find out the split ditransitive especially unergative verbs and unaccusative verbs found in Arabic. This research is a qualitative research. Data in the form of sentences that use unergative and unaccusative verbs in Arabic, collected through documentation studies from the third edition of the book Arabic Verbs and Essential Grammar and related scientific journals, then analyzed using the agih method with direct element division and form change techniques. The result of the research is that unergative verbs (al-af‘āl al-lāzimah) in Arabic include various categories, namely character verbs, instinct verbs, behavior verbs, color verbs, physical and emotional state verbs, and verbs with fa’ula patterns. While unaccusative verbs (al-af‘āl al-muṭāwa‘ah) include various patterns such as the transition of object to subject without any change in verb form, passive construction and morphosyntactic affixation process.Keywords – Arabic, Split Intransitivity, Unaccusative, Unergative 
Teori Anxiety dalam Preferensi Pemilihan Sekolah dalam Pandangan Psikologi Islam Qoirunnisa, Fentika Zahra; Qodriyah, Laelatul; Az-Zahra, Namira; Kunaepi, Aang
Nizham Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 12 No 01 (2024): Nizham: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Pascasarjana IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/nizham.v12i01.6870

Abstract

Education is an important thing for humans. The human need for education is primary. However, in pursuing education, schools are needed which are the category of formal education. School is a way to get an education. However, over time, school selection has become a scourge for children. The underlying factors are the zoning registration system, and the dominance of parents in determining schools. Parents tend to refer to madrasas or Islamic-based schools in the hope of getting more integrated Islamic lessons. This gives rise to a feeling of anxiety in children and are not free in determining their choices. This article will discuss the causes of the appearance of symptoms anxiety in children in school selection preference. This case study took place on Jl. Margosari rt.04 rw.07, Sawah Besar, Gayamsari, Semarang. This research uses the case study method and literature study at the same time. The results revealed that 25% of children objected if their parents forced them to attend further education at madrasah.
Ironi pada Debat Calon Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2024 Parasian, Nehemia Anugrah; Saragih, Erikson; Mulyadi, Mulyadi; Az-Zahra, Namira
CAKRAWALA LINGUISTA Vol 8, No 2 (2025): Volume 8, Number 2 December 2025
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26737/cling.v8i2.7921

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bentuk, tujuan, dan fungsi ironi yang muncul dalam debat calon presiden Indonesia tahun 2024. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan model analisis isi dan tematik.Data berupa tuturan para kandidat diambil dari rekaman video keseluruhan debat yang ditayangkan melalui kanal YouTube resmi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya 152 temuan ironi yang terbagi menjadi tiga bentuk: 63 ironi verbal, 38 ironi dramatis, dan 51 ironi situasional. Tujuan penggunaan ironi meliputi mengkritik lawan, membangun citra diri, menciptakan kedekatan dengan publik, menggiring opini sosial, serta menunjukkan inklusivitas. Adapun fungsi tindak tutur yang ditemukan meliputi representatif, direktif, ekspresif, komisif, dan deklaratif, dengan dominasi pada fungsi representatif. Temuan ini memperlihatkan bahwa ironi dalam debat capres berperan sebagai strategi retoris sekaligus instrumen politik yang efektif untuk memengaruhi opini publik dan memperkuat citra kandidat.
Co-Authors Aang Kunaepi Erikson Saragih Mulyadi Mulyadi Parasian, Nehemia Anugrah Qodriyah, Laelatul Qoirunnisa, Fentika Zahra