Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Lingua Idea Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Cakrawala Linguista Talimi
Az-Zahra, Namira
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Keintransitifan Terbelah dalam Bahasa Arab Az-Zahra, Namira; Mulyadi, Mulyadi
JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36722/sh.v10i1.3956

Abstract

The phenomenon of split-intransitivity divides intransitive verbs into two types, namely unergative and unaccusative which differ in syntactic structure and semantic role. As a complex language and rich in morphological systems, Arabic does not explicitly distinguish between the two verbs. So this research is conducted to find out the split ditransitive especially unergative verbs and unaccusative verbs found in Arabic. This research is a qualitative research. Data in the form of sentences that use unergative and unaccusative verbs in Arabic, collected through documentation studies from the third edition of the book Arabic Verbs and Essential Grammar and related scientific journals, then analyzed using the agih method with direct element division and form change techniques. The result of the research is that unergative verbs (al-af‘āl al-lāzimah) in Arabic include various categories, namely character verbs, instinct verbs, behavior verbs, color verbs, physical and emotional state verbs, and verbs with fa’ula patterns. While unaccusative verbs (al-af‘āl al-muṭāwa‘ah) include various patterns such as the transition of object to subject without any change in verb form, passive construction and morphosyntactic affixation process.Keywords – Arabic, Split Intransitivity, Unaccusative, Unergative 
Teori Anxiety dalam Preferensi Pemilihan Sekolah dalam Pandangan Psikologi Islam Qoirunnisa, Fentika Zahra; Qodriyah, Laelatul; Az-Zahra, Namira; Kunaepi, Aang
Nizham Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 12 No 01 (2024): Nizham: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Pascasarjana IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/nizham.v12i01.6870

Abstract

Education is an important thing for humans. The human need for education is primary. However, in pursuing education, schools are needed which are the category of formal education. School is a way to get an education. However, over time, school selection has become a scourge for children. The underlying factors are the zoning registration system, and the dominance of parents in determining schools. Parents tend to refer to madrasas or Islamic-based schools in the hope of getting more integrated Islamic lessons. This gives rise to a feeling of anxiety in children and are not free in determining their choices. This article will discuss the causes of the appearance of symptoms anxiety in children in school selection preference. This case study took place on Jl. Margosari rt.04 rw.07, Sawah Besar, Gayamsari, Semarang. This research uses the case study method and literature study at the same time. The results revealed that 25% of children objected if their parents forced them to attend further education at madrasah.
Ironi pada Debat Calon Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2024 Parasian, Nehemia Anugrah; Saragih, Erikson; Mulyadi, Mulyadi; Az-Zahra, Namira
CAKRAWALA LINGUISTA Vol 8, No 2 (2025): Volume 8, Number 2 December 2025
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26737/cling.v8i2.7921

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bentuk, tujuan, dan fungsi ironi yang muncul dalam debat calon presiden Indonesia tahun 2024. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan model analisis isi dan tematik.Data berupa tuturan para kandidat diambil dari rekaman video keseluruhan debat yang ditayangkan melalui kanal YouTube resmi Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya 152 temuan ironi yang terbagi menjadi tiga bentuk: 63 ironi verbal, 38 ironi dramatis, dan 51 ironi situasional. Tujuan penggunaan ironi meliputi mengkritik lawan, membangun citra diri, menciptakan kedekatan dengan publik, menggiring opini sosial, serta menunjukkan inklusivitas. Adapun fungsi tindak tutur yang ditemukan meliputi representatif, direktif, ekspresif, komisif, dan deklaratif, dengan dominasi pada fungsi representatif. Temuan ini memperlihatkan bahwa ironi dalam debat capres berperan sebagai strategi retoris sekaligus instrumen politik yang efektif untuk memengaruhi opini publik dan memperkuat citra kandidat.
Diatesis Pasif dalam Bahasa Arab: Kajian Tipologi Linguistik az-Zahra, Namira; Nasution, Khairina; Basaria, Ida
Ta'limi | Journal of Arabic Education and Arabic Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Ta'limi
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tlmi.v5i1.347

Abstract

This study aims to describe the system of passive diathesis in Arabic by highlighting the morphological forms that mark passive constructions and analyzing the relationship between morphological forms and syntactic structures. The research is grounded in Linguistic Typology theory Comrie and Morphosyntactic Diathesis theory Haspelmath. It employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive method through a library research design. The data sources consist of classical and modern Arabic texts, including the Qur’an, literary works, traditional Arabic grammar books (nahwu), and scholarly articles and books on Arabic linguistics. The data comprise sentences or clauses containing passive constructions (al-mabnī lil-majhūl), collected using the note-taking technique. The data were analyzed using the distributional method and the immediate constituent analysis (ICA) technique. The findings reveal that the passive diathesis in Arabic is formed through two main strategies: the synthetic and the analytic. The synthetic strategy is realized through internal vowel alternation within the verb, while the analytic strategy is expressed through constructions involving auxiliary verbs such as qāma and tamma, which have undergone grammaticalization. Syntactically, the formation of the passive diathesis is characterized by the omission of the active subject (fāʿil) and the promotion of the object to the subject position (nāʾib al-fāʿil). This phenomenon demonstrates the close interrelation between morphology and syntax in the Arabic diathesis system and indicates a typological shift from a synthetic to an analytic system as a form of grammatical innovation.
The Attitude of CNN Indonesia Online Media in Reporting Corruption Cases in Indonesia Az-Zahra, Namira; Saragih, Erikson; Harahap, Fathul Jannah
Jurnal Lingua Idea Vol 16 No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jli.2025.16.2.18065

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the types of language attitude employed by the online media outlet CNN Indonesia in reporting corruption cases in Indonesia and to analyze how ideological messages are represented through the use of such attitudes. The research adopts a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. The analysis is conducted using the Appraisal theory, particularly the subsystem of attitude, which encompasses affect, judgement, and appreciation. The data consist of clauses containing evaluative attitudes drawn from 15 CNN Indonesia news texts on corruption cases published between January 1 and December 31, 2024. The data were collected through documentation, observation, and note-taking techniques, and analyzed using an interactive model. The findings indicate that the use of attitude is dominated by the judgment category (65%), particularly within the subcategory of propriety, which evaluates perpetrators of corruption as unethical, immoral, and irresponsible. Additionally, positive judgment is used to legitimize law enforcement agencies as professional and credible actors. The appreciation category (29%) is used to assess the social, economic, and ecological impacts of corruption. In comparison, affect (6.27%) is rarely applied and more frequently appears implicitly to reinforce the negative image of the perpetrators. These findings suggest that language attitude functions not only as a linguistic evaluative tool but also as an ideological strategy through which the media frames perpetrators as "public enemies" and strengthens the hegemony of anti-corruption discourse.
Co-Authors Aang Kunaepi Erikson Saragih Harahap, Fathul Jannah Ida Basaria Mulyadi Mulyadi Nasution, Khairina Parasian, Nehemia Anugrah Qodriyah, Laelatul Qoirunnisa, Fentika Zahra