Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pelestarian Warisan Sejarah: Identifikasi Koin Kuno Tiongkok di Kepulauan Selayar Nahnu, Asmuliyati; Waru, Dian Sari Unga; Saraka, Erwin Mansyur Ugu; Rahman, Fakhriawan Fathu; Muslimat, Andi Filsah; Halidun, Wa Ode Siti Hardianti; Bumbungan, Apriadi
IPTEK: Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol 4, No 3 (2025): IPTEK: Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : IPTEK: Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/iptek.v4i3.72350

Abstract

Abstrak. Mitra program ini adalah UPTD Museum Nekara dan Dinas Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Kepulauan Selayar. Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mencatat uang koin berinskripsi Mandarin yang tersimpan di Mesum Nekara Kepulauan Selayar. Dalam pelaksanaan kegiatan, sebanyak 83 koin berhasil teridentifikasi, yang terdiri dari 4 koin Dinasti Tang, 78 Koin Dinasti Song Utara dan 1 koin Dinasti Song Selatan. Proses Identifikasi dilakukan melalui tahapan pembersihan koin, pembacaan inskripsi, dokumentasi, pemberian nomor koleksi, pencatatan dan presentasi. Program ini mendukung pelestarian budaya lokal serta memperkaya wawasan tentang hubungan historis antara Nusantara dan Tiongkok. Koin-koin ini menunjukkan adanya interaksi budaya dan ekonomi di masa lampau. Kata Kunci: Koin Kuno, Sejarah, Tiongkok, Kepulauan Selayar, Museum Nekara
Subordinate Justice to Forensic Scientists: Indonesia's Authority and Regulation Gap Prasetya, Muhammad Djaelani; Ilyas, Amir; Saraka, Erwin Mansyur Ugu; Ratnawati
Media Iuris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v9i1.77587

Abstract

Abstract This study confirms the existence of fundamental contradictions in the application of Forensic Science in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System (CJS). Although globally recognized as a vital instrument for uncovering material truth and ensuring accountability, its status within Indonesia's legal framework, including the newly promulgated KUHAP 2025, remains implicit, partial, and subordinate to the judiciary. An analysis of regulations and verdict studies (murder, narcotics, and poisoning cases) shows that the Criminal Code reduces the value of forensic scientific evidence to indicative evidence, not explicit or primary evidence. Institutionally, regulation is still centered on Forensic Medicine, ignoring other Forensic Scientist disciplines (such as DNA and Toxicology). This gap is exacerbated by inconsistencies in expert qualifications in field practice, indicating a human resource crisis and the absence of comprehensive standards. The attachment of forensic institutions exclusively to the police creates a serious challenge to their independence and impartiality. Doctrinally, these findings demand the transformation of Forensic Science's position from a mere tool to an essential component that is mandatory and independent. This demand requires the explicit integration of Forensic Science as a strong type of evidence in the Criminal Code and the establishment of procedural standards and codes of ethics to ensure a scientific, objective, and effective evidentiary process to prevent the risk of human rights violations.