Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implikasi Pengaturan Tata Hukum di Indonesia terhadap Supremasi Hukum Siregar, Barly Harly; Azis, Muhammad; Hidayah, Hafidz Muhammad; Kholis, Muhammad; Fadillah, Rifai; Hidayah, Khairul; Pamungkas, Putra; Putri, Deby Octafiani; Ritonga, Almiftahul Jannah; Syahputri, Ardita; Qomariah, Bunga Nur; Lubis, Fahrul Ramadhan
As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial JournalĀ 
Publisher : Ikatan Da'i Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56672/y96s7f38

Abstract

The rule of law in the current era of democratization is one of the demands that must be implemented in the context of transparency in the handling of legal cases in social, national and state life. Impeachment is the process of dismissing the President and/or Vice President during their term of office which involves three state institutions, namely the DPR, the Court. The Constitution, and the MPR where the results of impeachment carried out by one of these three institutions have a legal relationship and influence each other. The Constitutional Court's decision provides a juridical interpretation of the DPR's accusations regarding violations of the law and disgraceful acts committed by the president and/or vice president and/or it is proven that the president and/or vice president no longer fulfills the requirements to be president and/or vice president.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Tata Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat Siregar, Barly Harly; Fadhil, Rahmad; Kutub, Sayyid; Sarah, Aulia; Hasibuan, Mutiah Aminarti; Syahputri, Tri; Dewi, Delima Puspita; Harahap, Muthia Sartika; Rahma, Hidayatul; Siregar, Risnawati; Andini, Tatya Zahra; Siregar, Haiqal Rahman
As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial JournalĀ 
Publisher : Ikatan Da'i Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56672/36n0xk47

Abstract

Perhaps the most important development in patients' rights has been that in Indonesia and the United States regarding the doctrine of informed consent. Embracing the Continental European legal system, the doctrine of informed consent in Indonesia is articulated in Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health, Government Regulation No.32 of 1996 on Health Worker, Law No.29 of 2004 on Medical Practice, and Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. It is also specifically regulated by Health Ministerial Decree No. 29 of 2008 regarding Medical Action Approval. This doctrine requires physicians to share certain information with patients before asking for their consent to treatment. The Court in the United States of America used the term of informed consent to describe the physicians obligations to provide information. The legal consequences if informed consent is not given, it is considered as an act of abuse (intentionally) to the patient. According to Rule of law in the United States that physicians have to open all the information about all the necessary facts, so that patients can determine appropriate treatment options. Tort Law in Anglo-Saxon legal system, similar to "act against the law" in the Continental European legal system. This article examines a comparative study of informed consent in the Indonesian Health Laws and regulations and those of the United States.