Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.177
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Hukum Progresif Pandecta Lentera Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Journal of SouthEast Asian Human Rights International Journal of Law Reconstruction Jurnal Meta-Yuridis JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal CREPIDO: Jurnal Mengenai Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Hukum Filsafat dan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia
Natalis, Aga
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
REFORMASI HUKUM DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN BAGI PEREMPUAN: TELAAH FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE Natalis, Aga
CREPIDO Vol 2, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Crepido July 2020
Publisher : Bagian Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum & Hukum dan Masyarakat Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/crepido.2.1.11-23

Abstract

Negara harus bertindak untuk mewujudkan instrumen hukum dalam rangka memajukan keadilan gender dan pemberdayaan perempuan, namun pada kenyataannya masih terjadi penyimpangan terhadap prinsip tersebut, karena instrumen hukum cenderung melanggengkan dominasi laki-laki terhadap perempuan. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai konsep hukum yang berkeadilan bagi perempuan dan upaya mewujudkan reformasi hukum melalui pendekatan feminist jurisprudence. Konsep hukum yang berkeadilan bagi perempuan, bahwa hukum harus menjamin perempuan untuk berhak hidup bermartabat dan bebas tanpa rasa takut, yang dapat terwujud dengan menerapkan tipe hukum responsif. Tipe hukum responsif mengakui adanya pluralisme hukum yang berdampak pada luasnya kesempatan bagi perempuan untuk berpartisipasi dalam proses pembuatan hukum. Upaya mewujudkan reformasi hukum melalui pendekatan feminist jurisprudence dimulai dengan persepsi bahwa hukum yang dibentuk berdasarkan nilai maskulin, menunjukkan sejumlah keterbatasan atau keterkaitan pada realitas nilai-nilai sosial. Hukum yang demikian harus dilakukan reformasi guna mewujudkan hukum yang berkeadilan bagi perempuan.
Community Engagement in Eradicating Corruption: Evaluating the Effectiveness and Reward Models for Whistleblowers As a Regional Strategy Suteki, Suteki; Jalil, Abdul; Natalis, Aga; Rembulan, Dewi
Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): (January-June 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i1.20440

Abstract

Corruption represents a distinct social phenomenon within Indonesia's legal framework, which is rooted in the principles of a welfare state. Combating corruption requires more than enforcing formal regulations; it involves integrating cultural values, promoting good governance, and fostering active community participation. This study addresses these dimensions by examining the effectiveness of offering rewards to whistleblowers in regional corruption cases, investigating the factors that influence the success of these systems, and developing an optimal model for compensating whistleblowers to strengthen corruption eradication initiatives. The research combines normative legal analysis with sociological insights by employing a socio-legal framework—an approach that examines how law operates within its social context, considering both legal rules and their practical implementation in society. The findings reveal five key factors affecting the efficacy of reward systems: law enforcement, infrastructure, community involvement, cultural attitudes, and regulatory frameworks. The study highlights the importance of developing specific technical guidelines, providing robust protections for whistleblowers, ensuring transparent budget allocation processes, and fostering better coordination among law enforcement agencies. A well-structured reward system has the potential to enhance public trust, increase community participation, and cultivate a sustainable anti-corruption culture. This represents a strategic investment in achieving transparent, clean, and accountable governance in Indonesia.
Strategies for Achieving Gender Justice in Overcoming Multiple Layers of Marginalization Faced by Women Working in the Shallot Industry from an Existentialist Feminist Perspective Hardiyanti, Marzellina; Natalis, Aga; Claude Geofrey Mahoro, Jean
Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Vol 8, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : fakultas hukum universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/m-y.v8i2.25044

Abstract

Women who work as shallot sellers are vulnerable to the non-fulfillment of their fundamental labor rights, ranging from the right to receive fair wages to the right to protection from discrimination at work. This study focuses on understanding and analyzing the reasons for the need to protect and fulfill the rights of female shallot harvesters. It examines the reality of female shallot harvesters through an intersectional feminist approach, as outlined by Simone De Beauvoir, and proposes strategies for fulfilling the rights of female shallot harvesters based on gender justice and sustainability. This research employs a non-doctrinal research approach, utilizing a socio-legal perspective that combines primary and secondary data through descriptive-analytical and socio-cultural methods. The results of this research and discussion show that female shallot harvesters need protection and fulfillment of their rights because their welfare and wages are still below the regional minimum wage standard, and their working hours are unlimited as stipulated in Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, as well as gender bias issues for female shallot harvesters. The relevance of gender bias and the fulfillment of the rights of female onion peeling workers can be linked to the multiple vulnerabilities faced by women. The position of women, who are often placed after men, is highlighted in Simone de Beauvoir's work The Second Sex with an intersectional approach. This intersectional approach sees the multiple vulnerabilities faced by female shallot peeling workers, not only in terms of unmet decent wage standards but also in terms of gender bias issues. The strategy to fulfill the rights of female shallot sellers needs to be pursued through gender-responsive policies that guarantee the sustainability of their economy in terms of fair wages, appropriate working hours, and employment agreements in accordance with applicable regulations, as well as the right to protection from discrimination at work. 
GENDER INEQUALITY AGAINST WOMEN FISHERS IN INDONESIA Purwanti, Ani; Wijaningsih, Dyah; Mahfud, Muh. Afif; Natalis, Aga
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 12, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study explores whether or not Law No. 7 of 2016 for the Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers discriminates against women. This law supports small fishermen since it requires the government to provide them with financial stability through harvest season output guarantees. On the other hand, we discovered that Law No. 7 of 2016, about the Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers, has discriminatory consequences damaging the welfare of female fishermen. Because of sociological and cultural bias, female fishermen are the most neglected segment in the fishing sector. This is in comparison to other individuals employed in the fishing industry. The Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers Act of 2016 do not recognise or compel affirmative action for women fishermen to have equal access to protection and empowerment programmes. Because the law seeks to protect and empower fishermen, fish farmers, and salt producers, this is the case. This makes it exceedingly challenging for female fishermen, who are already socially expected to remain at home and away from the fishing industry. This type of research is qualitative and collects data using a socio-legal methodology. This approach blends legal research with other types of research, including language and contextual research. People feel that patriarchal societies significantly impact the research topic, despite the fact that this is not a legal issue. The results of this study indicate that Law No. 7 of 2016, Concerning the Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers, Does Not Adequately Regulate the Fulfillment of the Rights of Women Fishermen. This is because the law only addresses the topic of empowerment and does not address the aspect of protection. Because Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Service employees consider fishermen to be ship owners and crews, women in Kendal Regency, who are equivalent to men in the fishermen's insurance plan, are not eligible for fishermen's insurance and hence cannot obtain it.
EXPLORING INTERSECTIONALITY: THE LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED BY INDIGENOUS WOMEN IN PALM OIL LAND CONFLICTS Natalis, Aga; Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei; Aspin N, Ester Elisabeth; Hardiyanti, Marzellina; Putrijanti, Aju
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Diponegoro Law Review October 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.173-198

Abstract

This study explores the dual challenges faced by indigenous women in palm oil land conflicts through an intersectionality framework to understand their unique oppression. In Indonesia, the palm oil industry’s expansion has exacerbated gender-based, ethnic, economic, and ecological injustices faced by these women. Indigenous women are often excluded from decision-making processes regarding land disputes and development projects, leading to the loss of vital resources that sustain their livelihoods. This research demonstrates that these women bear an additional burden of domestic responsibilities, which are largely unrecognised, while also being marginalised in the socio-political and legal spheres. Through an intersectional lens, this study unveils the complex interactions of gender, ethnicity, and class, which create distinct forms of oppression, complicating the struggle of indigenous women to protect their land and culture. These conflicts are not simply issuing of agriculture; they represent a broader fight for recognition, autonomy, and the protection of ecosystems. In conclusion, the legal and policy frameworks often fail to adequately address the rights of indigenous women, highlighting the need for inclusive policies that ensure their participation in decision-making processes. It argues for the recognition of their ecological knowledge and cultural heritage in addressing and resolving land conflicts.
JUSTICE IS NOT BLIND: MODERNISME VERSUS POSTMODERNISME Natalis, Aga
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 10, No 1 (2022): April 2022
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jhp.10.1.37-51

Abstract

Ilmu (termasuk ilmu hukum) pada akhir abad ke-20 menghadapi perubahan yang sangat radikal, yaitu dari Modernisme menuju Postmodernisme. Tujuan dari penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk untuk mengkritisi konsep Blind Justice (Modernisme) dalam rangka membangun Justice is not Blind (Postmodernisme). Pengaruh Modernisme melahirkan konsep hukum yang buta, ini merupakan sebuah pengakuan bahwa hukum itu cacat sejak awal, karena hukum kemudian dipahami sebagai sebuah institusi yang objektif dan jauh dari persoalan dan kepentingan manusia. Melalui semangat Postmodernisme, hukum tidak lagi dipahami sebagai lembaga yang buta (blind), objektif, dan netral, melainkan hukum dipahami sebagai sebuah institusi yang yang tidak buta (not blind), subjektif, dan berpihak. Hukum yang tidak buta (Justice is Not Blind) bekerja dalam dimensi intelektual, moral, dan spiritual manusia, untuk mencari makna tentang dirinya.
Co-Authors Abdul jalil Aju Putrijanti Amri Panahatan Sihotang Ani Purwanti Arief Rachman Hakim Aspin N, Ester Elisabeth Budi Ispriyarso Claude Geofrey Mahoro, Jean Dewi Rembulan Dewi Tuti Muryati, Dewi Tuti Hapsari, Adinda Mustika Hardiyanti, Marzellina Joko Setiyono Juanito, Juanito Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa mUH. Afif Mahfud Nasution, Angelica Vanessa Audrey Prasetyo, Dimas Aji Sukimin Suteki, Suteki Teddy Asmara Tri Mulyan Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei Wijaningsih, Dyah