Natalis, Aga
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

KEBIJAKAN PENANGGULANGAN HIV/AIDS YANG BERKEADILAN: SEBUAH TELAAH FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY Natalis, Aga; Wibawa, Kadek Cahya Susila
CREPIDO Vol 3, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Crepido July 2021
Publisher : Bagian Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum & Hukum dan Masyarakat Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/alj.v%vi%i.49-57

Abstract

Pengakuan bahwa ketidaksetaraan mungkin menjadi pendorong kerentanan seseorang atau sekelompok orang atas HIV/AIDS, misalnya ketidaksetaraan gender dalam bidang pendidikan dan pembatasan otonomi sosial di kalangan perempuan secara langsung terkait dengan akses yang lebih rendah ke layanan kesehatan seksual, termasuk tes dan pengobatan HIV. Ketidaksetaraan tersebut menimbulkan serangkaian tanggapan Feminist Legal Theory di sebuah upaya untuk mengatasi HIV. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk untuk menganalisis mengenai kebijakan penanggulangan HIV/AIDS yang berkeadilan dalam telaah Feminist Legal theory. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian doktrinal/normatif serta pendekatan filosofi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa etika feminis mungkin sangat relevan dengan etika kesehatan masyarakat. Berangkat dari cara pandang feminist legal theory, maka pembuatan kebijakan penenanggulangan HIV/AIDS harus dilakukan berbasis pada people with HIV-centered social policies, yang menekankan bahwa dalam proses pembuatan suatu kebijakan haruslah berorientasi pada kesejahteraan ODHA.
REFORMASI HUKUM DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN BAGI PEREMPUAN: TELAAH FEMINIST JURISPRUDENCE Natalis, Aga
CREPIDO Vol 2, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Crepido July 2020
Publisher : Bagian Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum & Hukum dan Masyarakat Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/crepido.2.1.11-23

Abstract

Negara harus bertindak untuk mewujudkan instrumen hukum dalam rangka memajukan keadilan gender dan pemberdayaan perempuan, namun pada kenyataannya masih terjadi penyimpangan terhadap prinsip tersebut, karena instrumen hukum cenderung melanggengkan dominasi laki-laki terhadap perempuan. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai konsep hukum yang berkeadilan bagi perempuan dan upaya mewujudkan reformasi hukum melalui pendekatan feminist jurisprudence. Konsep hukum yang berkeadilan bagi perempuan, bahwa hukum harus menjamin perempuan untuk berhak hidup bermartabat dan bebas tanpa rasa takut, yang dapat terwujud dengan menerapkan tipe hukum responsif. Tipe hukum responsif mengakui adanya pluralisme hukum yang berdampak pada luasnya kesempatan bagi perempuan untuk berpartisipasi dalam proses pembuatan hukum. Upaya mewujudkan reformasi hukum melalui pendekatan feminist jurisprudence dimulai dengan persepsi bahwa hukum yang dibentuk berdasarkan nilai maskulin, menunjukkan sejumlah keterbatasan atau keterkaitan pada realitas nilai-nilai sosial. Hukum yang demikian harus dilakukan reformasi guna mewujudkan hukum yang berkeadilan bagi perempuan.
Community Engagement in Eradicating Corruption: Evaluating the Effectiveness and Reward Models for Whistleblowers As a Regional Strategy Suteki, Suteki; Jalil, Abdul; Natalis, Aga; Rembulan, Dewi
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): (January-June 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i1.20440

Abstract

Corruption represents a distinct social phenomenon within Indonesia's legal framework, which is rooted in the principles of a welfare state. Combating corruption requires more than enforcing formal regulations; it involves integrating cultural values, promoting good governance, and fostering active community participation. This study addresses these dimensions by examining the effectiveness of offering rewards to whistleblowers in regional corruption cases, investigating the factors that influence the success of these systems, and developing an optimal model for compensating whistleblowers to strengthen corruption eradication initiatives. The research combines normative legal analysis with sociological insights by employing a socio-legal framework—an approach that examines how law operates within its social context, considering both legal rules and their practical implementation in society. The findings reveal five key factors affecting the efficacy of reward systems: law enforcement, infrastructure, community involvement, cultural attitudes, and regulatory frameworks. The study highlights the importance of developing specific technical guidelines, providing robust protections for whistleblowers, ensuring transparent budget allocation processes, and fostering better coordination among law enforcement agencies. A well-structured reward system has the potential to enhance public trust, increase community participation, and cultivate a sustainable anti-corruption culture. This represents a strategic investment in achieving transparent, clean, and accountable governance in Indonesia.
Strategies for Achieving Gender Justice in Overcoming Multiple Layers of Marginalization Faced by Women Working in the Shallot Industry from an Existentialist Feminist Perspective Hardiyanti, Marzellina; Natalis, Aga; Claude Geofrey Mahoro, Jean
Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Vol 8, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : fakultas hukum universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/m-y.v8i2.25044

Abstract

Women who work as shallot sellers are vulnerable to the non-fulfillment of their fundamental labor rights, ranging from the right to receive fair wages to the right to protection from discrimination at work. This study focuses on understanding and analyzing the reasons for the need to protect and fulfill the rights of female shallot harvesters. It examines the reality of female shallot harvesters through an intersectional feminist approach, as outlined by Simone De Beauvoir, and proposes strategies for fulfilling the rights of female shallot harvesters based on gender justice and sustainability. This research employs a non-doctrinal research approach, utilizing a socio-legal perspective that combines primary and secondary data through descriptive-analytical and socio-cultural methods. The results of this research and discussion show that female shallot harvesters need protection and fulfillment of their rights because their welfare and wages are still below the regional minimum wage standard, and their working hours are unlimited as stipulated in Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, as well as gender bias issues for female shallot harvesters. The relevance of gender bias and the fulfillment of the rights of female onion peeling workers can be linked to the multiple vulnerabilities faced by women. The position of women, who are often placed after men, is highlighted in Simone de Beauvoir's work The Second Sex with an intersectional approach. This intersectional approach sees the multiple vulnerabilities faced by female shallot peeling workers, not only in terms of unmet decent wage standards but also in terms of gender bias issues. The strategy to fulfill the rights of female shallot sellers needs to be pursued through gender-responsive policies that guarantee the sustainability of their economy in terms of fair wages, appropriate working hours, and employment agreements in accordance with applicable regulations, as well as the right to protection from discrimination at work. 
GENDER INEQUALITY AGAINST WOMEN FISHERS IN INDONESIA Purwanti, Ani; Wijaningsih, Dyah; Mahfud, Muh. Afif; Natalis, Aga
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 12, No. 3
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study explores whether or not Law No. 7 of 2016 for the Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers discriminates against women. This law supports small fishermen since it requires the government to provide them with financial stability through harvest season output guarantees. On the other hand, we discovered that Law No. 7 of 2016, about the Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers, has discriminatory consequences damaging the welfare of female fishermen. Because of sociological and cultural bias, female fishermen are the most neglected segment in the fishing sector. This is in comparison to other individuals employed in the fishing industry. The Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers Act of 2016 do not recognise or compel affirmative action for women fishermen to have equal access to protection and empowerment programmes. Because the law seeks to protect and empower fishermen, fish farmers, and salt producers, this is the case. This makes it exceedingly challenging for female fishermen, who are already socially expected to remain at home and away from the fishing industry. This type of research is qualitative and collects data using a socio-legal methodology. This approach blends legal research with other types of research, including language and contextual research. People feel that patriarchal societies significantly impact the research topic, despite the fact that this is not a legal issue. The results of this study indicate that Law No. 7 of 2016, Concerning the Protection and Empowerment of Fishermen, Fish Cultivators, and Salt Farmers, Does Not Adequately Regulate the Fulfillment of the Rights of Women Fishermen. This is because the law only addresses the topic of empowerment and does not address the aspect of protection. Because Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Service employees consider fishermen to be ship owners and crews, women in Kendal Regency, who are equivalent to men in the fishermen's insurance plan, are not eligible for fishermen's insurance and hence cannot obtain it.