Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Psikologi Integratif GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling
Bahtiar, Fadhilatussyifa Auliyarahmani
Unknown Affiliation
Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konstruksi Urban Marital Satisfaction Scale (UMSS): Alat Ukur Kepuasan Pernikahan dengan Konteks Perkotaan Indonesia Bahtiar, Fadhilatussyifa Auliyarahmani; Oktarina, Nina; Khoir, Ahmad Kholiqul; Nugroho, Bambang; Jarar, Syeda Parsa; Seniati, Ali Nina Liche
GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling Vol 15, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24127/gdn.v15i3.13326

Abstract

The Urban Marital Satisfaction Scale (UMSS) was developed to measure marital satisfaction among couples living in urban areas by emphasizing financial and communication aspects that are often overlooked in previous instruments. This scale was constructed based on the theoretical framework of Spanier and Busby, which includes three key dimensions: dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion, and dyadic satisfaction. A total of 52 initial items were developed and tested through readability trials, expert judgment, and item analysis. Based on empirical testing with married individuals aged 20 to 40 years, who had been married for at least two years, a total of 21 items were retained in the final version of the scale. The item selection process involved eliminating poorly performing items and revising ambiguous or culturally unfamiliar statements. Psychometric evaluations showed that the UMSS demonstrates strong internal consistency and good construct validity. The scale is also able to distinguish between individuals with high and low levels of marital satisfaction. These findings indicate that the UMSS is a reliable and valid measurement tool that can be used in psychological assessments and interventions targeting urban couples.
“Saya Tidak Mau Ikut Demonstrasi”: Collective Action terhadap Procedural Injustice Ditinjau dari Empat Tipologi Budaya Syarif, Akhmad Saputra; Fathiyah, Amya Bunga; Bahtiar, Fadhilatussyifa Auliyarahmani; Arafah, Fajriah Rahmah B; Rosalinda, Nadhifa Annisa
Jurnal Psikologi Integratif Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Psikologi Integratif
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jpsi.v13i2.3342

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether cultural typologies: vertical collectivism (VC), horizontal collectivism (HC), vertical individualism (VI), and horizontal individualism (HI), predict individuals’ intentions to engage in collective action in response to procedural injustice. The study employed a quantitative survey design involving 300 participants (67.67% female; 89% aged 18–30 years). Participants were presented with a procedural injustice vignette and subsequently completed the Individualism–Collectivism Scale (Triandis & Gelfand, 1998) and the Belief-Aligned Collective Action Scale (Cervone et al., 2023). Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression while controlling for age and gender. The findings indicate that vertical individualism significantly predicts higher intentions to engage in collective action (p < .001), whereas other cultural typologies do not show significant effects. These results suggest that individualistic orientations emphasizing competition and status differentiation may play a stronger role in motivating collective action under conditions of procedural injustice.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji peran tipologi budaya; vertical collectivism (VC), horizontal collectivism (HC), vertical individualism (VI), dan horizontal individualism (HI), dalam memprediksi intensi individu untuk terlibat dalam aksi kolektif ketika menghadapi ketidakadilan prosedural. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei yang melibatkan 300 partisipan (67,67% perempuan; 89% berusia 18–30 tahun). Partisipan terlebih dahulu diberikan skenario ketidakadilan prosedural (vignette), kemudian diminta mengisi Individualism–Collectivism Scale (Triandis & Gelfand, 1998) dan Belief-Aligned Collective Action Scale (Cervone et al., 2023). Data dianalisis menggunakan regresi linier berganda dengan mengontrol variabel usia dan jenis kelamin. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa hanya tipologi budaya vertical individualism yang secara signifikan memprediksi peningkatan intensi aksi kolektif (p < .001), sementara tipologi budaya lainnya tidak menunjukkan pengaruh yang signifikan. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa orientasi individualistik yang menekankan kompetisi dan diferensiasi status memiliki peran yang lebih kuat dalam mendorong aksi kolektif dalam konteks ketidakadilan prosedural.
Co-Authors Ali Nina Liche Seniati Arafah, Fajriah Rahmah B Bambang Nugroho Fathiyah, Amya Bunga Jarar, Syeda Parsa Khoir, Ahmad Kholiqul Nina Oktarina Rosalinda, Nadhifa Annisa Syarif, Akhmad Saputra