Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Philosophy of The Objectives of Islamic Law with a Systems Approach: Study of Jasser's Thought in The Book of Maqashid Ash-Shari'ah Kafalsafah Li At-Tasyri' Al-Islami Ru'yah Mandhumiyah Ahmad Musadad; Achmad Badarus Syamsi; Umi Indasyah Zahro; A. Mufti Khazin; Baihaqi Baihaqi; Tri Pujiati; Imamuddin Imamuddin
Nuris Journal of Education and Islamic Studies Vol. 6 No. 1: January - June 2026
Publisher : Institut Nurul Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52620/jeis.v6i1.245

Abstract

This study explores the philosophical foundations of the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah) through a systems approach as articulated by Jasser Auda in his work Maqāṣid Asy-Syarī‘ah Kafalsafah li At-Tasyri‘ Al-Islāmī: Ru’yah Mandhumiyah. The urgency of this research lies in the increasing demand to reinterpret Islamic law in order to address the complexities of contemporary society while maintaining its foundational principles. This study employs a qualitative method with a library research approach, focusing on Auda’s conceptual framework and its implications for the philosophy of Islamic law. The findings reveal that Auda’s systems approach redefines maqāṣid as a dynamic and holistic framework emphasizing justice, public interest, and human dignity. This perspective challenges rigid textual interpretations and proposes a flexible methodology that aligns Islamic law with the realities of modern life. Auda’s approach significantly contributes to contemporary discourse on Islamic jurisprudence by presenting maqāṣid as a living philosophy capable of adapting to evolving societal contexts
Optimalisasi Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Bumdes) dalam Mewujudkan Desa Kreatif di Desa Pademawu Timur Pamekasan Indien Winarwati; Achmad Syarifudi; Moh Karim; Tri Pujiati; Achmad Badarus Syamsi
Santri : Journal of Student Engagement Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Santri : Journal of Student Engagement
Publisher : Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/santri.v5i1.2511

Abstract

This Community Service Program (Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat/PKM) focuses on strengthening the regulatory framework and management capacity of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) as a strategic instrument for local economic development. The program aims to optimize BUMDes management in fostering a creative, tourism-based village in Pademawu Timur Village, Pamekasan Regency. The main challenges faced by the community partner include limited understanding among BUMDes managers and village stakeholders regarding the roles, governance mechanisms, and regulatory foundations of BUMDes in supporting social services and sustainable village economic development. The program employed a participatory and sustainable community development approach involving 28 participants, consisting of BUMDes managers, village officials, local MSME actors, and community representatives. The activities were implemented through three sequential stages: (1) socialization of BUMDes roles and regulatory frameworks; (2) educational sessions on BUMDes governance, collaborative governance, and the entrepreneurial ecosystem; and (3) training and mentoring on optimizing BUMDes management through the integration of village tourism potential and local MSMEs. The results indicate a significant improvement in participants’ awareness and understanding of BUMDes as a village economic institution oriented not only toward profit generation but also toward community empowerment, professional governance, and business sustainability. This program is expected to strengthen BUMDes institutional capacity, promote the development of competitive village-based tourism, and contribute to inclusive and sustainable improvements in community welfare and the local village economy.
Algorithmic Injustice in E-Contract Termination: Islamic and Indonesian Legal Analysis of Shopee’s Return Policy Ahmad Musadad; Achmad Badarus Syamsi; Fajar Fajar; Muttaqin Choiri; Imamuddin Imamuddin
Tadayun: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/tadayun.v7i1.595

Abstract

Algorithmic automation in digital transactions often overlooks substantive justice, as evidenced by the automatic approval feature within Shopee’s return and refund policy, which triggers systemic injustice for sellers. This research aims to analyze the unilateral termination of contracts by algorithmic systems through the perspectives of Islamic Law and Indonesian Positive Law. Employed a socio legal research method with case, statutory, and comparative approaches, this study discussed the anomaly of termination as a system act. The results indicated the auto-acc feature created technical coercion that paralyzes the seller’s verification rights and violates the principle of An Tarāḍin, thereby triggering buyer moral hazard risks. Theoretically, this research contributes through the integration of Contractual Balance Theory and Maqāṣid al-Mu‘āmalah to identify bargaining position distortions in algorithmic termination. The research conclusion affirmed that the platform’s absolute discretion violates the doctrine of good faith and property protection (ḥifẓ al-māl). It is recommended to establish a digital economic law harmonization model that mandates human oversight, and compensation mechanisms (ta‘wīḍ) to ensure the integrity of a substantively fair e-commerce ecosystem. Abstrak Otomatisasi algoritma dalam transaksi digital sering kali mengabaikan keadilan substantif, sebagaimana terlihat pada fitur persetujuan otomatis pada fitur pengembalian barang/dana Shopee yang memicu ketidakadilan sistemik bagi penjual. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis terminasi akad sepihak oleh sistem algoritma melalui perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum sosiologis dengan pendekatan kasus, perundang-undangan, dan perbandingan, penelitian ini membedah anomali terminasi sebagai tindakan sistem (system-act). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa fitur auto-acc menciptakan paksaan teknis (technical coercion) yang melumpuhkan hak verifikasi penjual dan mencederai asas ‘An Tarāḍin, sehingga memicu risiko moral hazard pembeli. Secara teoretis, penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi melalui integrasi Teori Keseimbangan Kontraktual dan Maqāṣid al-Mu‘āmalah untuk mengidentifikasi distorsi posisi tawar dalam terminasi algoritmik. Simpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa diskresi absolut platform melanggar doktrin itikad baik dan perlindungan harta (ḥifẓ al-māl). Direkomendasikan adanya model harmonisasi hukum ekonomi digital yang mewajibkan pengawasan manusia (human oversight) dan mekanisme kompensasi (ta‘wīḍ) guna menjamin integritas ekosistem e-commerce yang berkeadilan substantif.