Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Jurnal Konstitusi

jk
Website

Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

ISSN : 18297706 EISSN : 25481657 DOI : 10.31078

Core Subject : Education, Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 896 Documents

80 81 82 83 84

Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Ekonomi Warga Negara Melalui Hak Paten di Indonesia Alia Harumdani Widjaja; Winda Wijayanti; Rizkisyabana Yulistyaputri
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Cases of piracy against patents or trademarks are cases that often occur in Indonesia. Responding to these challenges, this study aims to find out how the legal protection of citizens economic constitutional laws through patents in Indonesia. This research is prescriptive legal research and was carried out using systematic literature review methods. The research data is sourced from rules and regulations in force in Indonesia, books, and articles from national and international journals that discuss patent rights. The researcher then analyzed the data collected in a descriptive qualitative manner. The results of this study indicate that the Indonesian government protects the constitutional rights of its citizens through patents by registering their work or products by the provisions in force in Indonesia. However, when the work or product is not registered, the product is not protected by law. For this reason, citizens who have works and products that are economically valuable that allow them to be reproduced are advised to register their products or works through patents.

Analisis Konstitusionalitas Batasan Kewenangan Presiden dalam Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Sakirman Sakirman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

This paper is directed to notice about the limits of authority formation Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) as outlined in Article 22 of the Indonesia Constitution 1945 as the excesses of the state that are considered critical and pushy or in legal terminology often referred to as matters of urgency to force. Nevertheless, the existence of Article 22 Indonesia Constitution 1945 as the legal basis of the authority of the President in the form Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) not provide any legal certainty regarding presidential authority limits in the PERPU formation. The nature of subjectivity strengthened in the President becomes a problem and the pros and cons in any talks regarding the formation of this Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) by using the methodology of normative legal research and the study of literature and used conseptional approach. On conclusion that there are three (3) main principal requirement Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) their formation performed by the President based on the provisions of Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution and the law analisan results in this paper. These three things first is the limitation of time (when) a Government Regulation in Lieu of Act (PERPU) which by Maria Farida is limited (temporary) and limits the material (substance) were interpreted in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138 / PUU-VII / 2009 as well as limits to the protection of the constitutional rights of the people.

Konsep Bentuk Perusahaan Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Hayat Hayat
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The concept of mineral and coal mining management provided by business entities, cooperatives and individuals as regulated in Law No.3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to Law No.4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining which is managed under the concept of a Mineral and Coal mining company. constitution based on the 1945 Constitution. The research method used is juridical normative, resulting in that the form of mineral and coal mining companies by the 1945 Constitution is a business entity, cooperative or individual listed in the Mineral and Coal Mining Law. which has a cooperative nature by the 1945 Constitution.

Dampak Jaminan Fidusia Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor yang Tidak Didaftarkan terhadap Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak Akhmad Yasin
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Motor vehicles ownership through finance companies can be realized after going through a series of procedures before a notary and fiduciary registration office. However, this series of procedures are not done by finance companies in providing motor vehicle financing to consumers. Increasing consumer financing to the public for motor vehicles ownership should also increase the number of non-tax state revenues from fiduciary guarantees. The study purpose is to know the legal consequences for fiduciary recipients who did not register their fiduciary guarantees and to know the impact of unregistered fiduciary guarantees on non-tax state revenue (PNBP). The formulation of the problem in the research question is how the legal consequences for fiduciary recipients who do not register their fiduciary guarantees and how the impact of unregistered fiduciary guarantees on non-tax state revenue (PNBP). The research method used is descriptive qualitative normative legal research using secondary data. The study results found that fiduciary finance companies/ recipients did not register their fiduciary guarantee, so they committed illegal acts by utilizing third parties to execute motorized vehicles that were not actually burdened with fiduciary guarantees. The executor’s right to fiduciary recipient is legally flawed because he does not hold a fiduciary guarantee certificate as a result of not registering a motorized vehicle as a fiduciary guarantee. The impact on state finances because they were not registering motor vehicles as fiduciary guarantees at the fiduciary registration office resulting in non-tax revenue (PNBP) being not optimal for the state.

Hak Pilih Kelompok Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019 Di Sumatera Barat Henny Andriani; Feri Amsari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

In the voting process at elections, the people who vote in the elections believe they can influence the actions of those who are authorized to make binding decisions. In other words, they believe that what they are doing has a political effect (political efficiency). So it is an important thing to protect the political rights of all citizens, including the voting rights owned by groups of people with disabilities. Based on the above background, there are at least two problem formulations that can be used as a fence in this research, namely What are the problems and violations of the rights of groups of persons with disabilities in the 2019 General Election ?; and How are the rights of groups of persons with disabilities protected in the 2019 General Election in West Sumatra?

Ratio Legis Penetapan Pembayar Pajak (Taxpayer) sebagai Kedudukan Hukum dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi M. Yasin Al Arif; Hasanuddin Muhammad
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The discourse regarding the determination of the taxpayer standing in judicial review is not a completely new issue to be analyzed. However, it still needs to be examined in the framework of exploring the legal ratio for determining taxpayer standing in judicial review by the Constitutional Court. The findings of this research are an inseparable part of legal research in doctoral degree regarding the dynamics of the Petitioner’s legal standing in judicial review by the Constitutional Court. This research specifically answers the following questions: (a) how is the taxpayer doctrine as a legal standing in judicial review? (b) What is the legal ratio for determining taxpayer standing in judicial review by the Constitutional Court? This is normative legal research, by analyzing secondary data in the form of statutory regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and literature related to the doctrine of the taxpayer standing in judicial review. The results indicate that the legal ratio for determining taxpayer standing in a judicial review can be traced through the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court decisions in judicial review since 2003-2019.

Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Korea Selatan) Yunita Nurwulantari; Anna Erliyana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Testing public officials decision in Indonesia, which has been the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) should be done through a constitutional complaint mechanism, written under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI). This is due to all public officials have the potential to perform acts that violate or harm the constitutional rights of citizens as guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945). This additional authority to examine and decide cases of constitutional complaints should be possible in the framework of carrying out the functions of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution as implemented in countries that apply the principle of constitutional supremacy, one of which is as applied in the Constitutional Court of The South Korea. Even though South Korea has an administrative court which also has the authority to examine the decision of public officials, South Korea still open space for its citizens to file constitutional complaint in Constitutional Court of South Korea when there is a public official decision that harm and violating the constitutional rights of the citizens that have been guaranteed in constitution. Thus, when all legal remedy for violations of constitutional rights as a result of the issuance of public official decision has been exhausted, but violations still occur, then this constitutional complaint mechanism into the need to provides maximum protection and respect the constitutional rights of citizens. Therefore, the additional authority to examine and decide constitutional complaint can not be separated from the authority of the Constitutional Court.

Menakar Independensi Hakim Pengadilan Pajak Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 10/PUU-XVIII/2020 Ananthia Ayu Devitasari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Judicial independence is the main foundation for the of justice and legal certainty. Regarding the discourse on the independence of judicial power, the Constitutional Court decided on Case Number 10/PUU-XVIII/2020 which examined Article 5 paragraph (2) and Article 8 paragraph (2) of Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court. The Petitioners challenged the authority of Ministry of Finance to develop the organization, administration and finance for the Tax Court, the authority of the Minister of Finance to propose the chairperson and deputy chairman of the Tax Court. Furthermore, the Court in its ruling states that “the Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson are appointed by the President who is elected from and by the Judges who are subsequently proposed through the Minister with the approval of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court for 1 (one) term of office for 5 (five) years”. This study examined the independence of the tax court judges after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 10 / PUU-XVIII / 2020 with independent judicial theory approach. This study showed that the Court’s decision not only supports the independence of the tax court judges but also draws a demarcation line between judicial power and executive power.

Konstitusionalitas Perkawinan Antar-Pegawai Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Hwian Christianto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Kebijakan perusahaan atau instansi yang melarang seorang pegawai menikah dengan rekan kerja sering dianggap wajar untuk mencegah konflik kepentingan dan penurunan kinerja pegawai. Akibatnya pasangan pegawai itu berada pada pilihan yang sulit yakni terpaksa berhenti bekerja ataukah merahasiakan status perkawinan mereka. Mahkamah Konstitusi menilai bahwa ketentuan di dalam UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan yang membuka ruang bagi perusahaan/instansi untuk menerbitkan larangan demikian adalah inkonstitusional. Hal ini bertentangan dengan hak untuk bekerja yang diatur dalam UUD 1945. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal, menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 13/PUU-XV/2017 mengenai konstitusionalitas perkawinan antar-pegawai dalam perusahaan yang sama belum sepenuhnya dipatuhi. Beberapa kantor yang masih menerapkan larangan ikatan perkawinan antar-pegawai hendaknya segera mencarikan solusi yang dapat diterima oleh semua pihak dalam rangka melindungi hak konstitusional pegawai sekaligus kepentingan perusahaan.

Refleksi Kedaulatan Negara dalam Penegakan Hukum Sumber Daya Alam Hayati di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Andriani Wahyuningtyas Novitasari
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The international law regime on EEZ has been developed by the international community through the United Nations Conference on and state practices. This regime is intended to protect the interests of coastal states from the danger of being depleted of biological natural resources by fishing activities based on the free sea regime. In addition, the EEZ is also intended to protect the interests of the coastal state in the field of marine environment conservation as well as marine scientific research in order to support the use of natural resources in the zone. UNCLOS gives sovereign rights to Indonesia as a coastal state to explore and exploit natural resources in the EEZ as well as jurisdictions relating to the exercise of these sovereign rights. For that reason needs integrated law enforcement an effort to conserve living natural resources in ZEE Indonesia. By using the normative legal writing method, this study describes how the concept of law enforcement of living natural resources in Indonesia's EEZ based on various laws and regulations.

Page 82 of 90 | Total Record : 896

80 81 82 83 84

Filter by Year

2010 2022

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 19, No 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA