cover
Contact Name
Muhammad Virsyah Jayadilaga
Contact Email
pusbangdatin@gmail.com
Phone
+628122115449
Journal Mail Official
pusbangdatin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan H.R. Rasuna Said Kavling 4-5, Jakarta Selatan 12940
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
ISSN : 25798561     EISSN : 14105632     DOI : 10.30641
Core Subject : Education, Social,
The De Jure Legal Research Journal, known as Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, is a legal publication issued three times a year in March, July, and November. It is published by the Law Policy Strategy Agency of the Ministry of Law of the Republic of Indonesia, in collaboration with the Indonesian Legal Researcher Association (IPHI). This association was legalized under the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number AHU-13.AHA.01.07 in 2013, dated January 28, 2013. The journal serves as a platform for communication and a means to publish diverse and relevant legal issues primarily for Indonesian legal researchers and the broader legal community. In 2024, the management of the De Jure Legal Research Journal will include various stakeholders, as outlined in the Decree of the Head of the Law and Human Rights Policy Agency Number PPH-18.LT.04.03 for 2024, dated February 20, 2024, which establishes a publishing team for the journal. According to the Decree of the Director-General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, Number PPH-18.LT.04.03 for 2024, which is based on the Accreditation Results of Scientific Journals for Period 2 of 2024, the De Jure Legal Research Journal has achieved a Scientific Journal Accreditation Rank of 2 (Sinta-2). This reaccreditation is valid for Volume 23, Number 1, of the year 2023, through Volume 27, Number 4, of the year 2027.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition" : 8 Documents clear
Kewenangan Kepala Otorita dalam Penyusunan Perencanaan Pembangunan Ibu Kota Negara Nusantara Diani Sadiawati; Rianda Dirkareshza; Wicipto Setiadi; Elizabet Devi Permatasari
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.325-340

Abstract

Preparing development plans for the National Capital City (IKN) of Nusantara is one of the authorities that must be carried out by the Government to ensure the continuity and progress of the State’s development in accordance with the mandate of Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the National Capital City. However, in reality, the formulation of development plans for the new National Capital City still experiences problems related to the Nusantara Capital City Authority (OIKN). Problems with OIKN in preparing development plans for the new National Capital City can come from various factors, such as disharmony of laws and regulations. This study aimed to find out the power of the chairman of authority related to the planning and development of the Nusantara Capital City and the concept of the chairman of authority in preparing the Nusantara Capital City development plans in harmony with the Long-Term National Development Plan. The method used in this study was the Normative Method with interviews and Legislative, Conceptual, Philosophical, and Futuristic approaches which were analyzed in a descriptive-analytic manner and processed qualitatively. The results of the study show that in planning for the development of the national capital city, the chairman of authority has the power to determine the location of the new national capital city according to geographical, social, and economic conditions and to prepare a master plan. However, IKN development plans that are not guided by the Long-Term National Development Plan (RPJPN) as national development guidelines, but are instead guided by the Government’s Master Plan (RIP) will create their own problems. The recommendation from this research is to launch a Hybrid Government system followed by the process of integrating the RIP into the 2025-2045 RPJPN so that it becomes the country’s grand master plan for the next 20 years.
Perluasan Tafsir Frasa Tahap Penyelidikan melalui Interprestasi Sistematis sebagai Solusi Perselisihan Prayudisial Suwitno Yutye Imran; Abdul Madjid; Apripari Apripari
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.341-356

Abstract

This study examined two things; the first is related to the relationship between judicial disputes, legal protection, and the role of the preliminary investigator; the second is related to the expansion of the phrase of preliminary investigation stages in the Criminal Procedure Code through systematic interpretation. This study applied normative legal research methods specified on the type of legal research for in-concreto cases. To strengthen the study, a statutory approach, a case approach, and a theoretical approach were used. The results of the study found that the actions of preliminary investigator who were limited to carrying out preliminary investigation without paying attention to cases that had a direct relationship with the cases being investigated could not yet provide legal protection, because they opened up opportunities for judicial disputes to occur. Speaking of which, judicial disputes need to be avoided through the use of systematic interpretation carried out by preliminary investigator in the preliminary investigation stages to expand the interpretation of the phrase of preliminary investigation stages in the Criminal Procedure Code and its derivative regulations. The systematic interpretation referred to is carried out in a limited manner, by simply reading opportunities for civil lawsuits and state administrative requests from parties involved in the case being investigated. In addition, it ensured the similarity of the parties involved in criminal cases as well as civil cases or state administrative cases in question.
Mekanisme Ideal Penyelesaian Clerical Error dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia (Perbandingan terhadap Inggris, Amerika Serikat, dan Singapura) Eka N.A.M. Sihombing; Cynthia Hadita
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.273-282

Abstract

The problem of article clerical error creates multi-interpretation, ambiguity, and obscure in understanding the meaning of the substance of the Article so a mechanism is needed to optimize the authority of the Constitutional Court. This study aims to optimize the Constitutional Court's role in providing a legal interpretation of clerical error. The research method used is normative juridical with a doctrinal approach. The results showed that clerical error resulted in multiple interpretations of the substance of an Article. Thus, a legal interpretation by the Constitutional Court for the clerical error is needed which needs to be optimized for its role as a preventive multi-interpretation of the substance of articles in laws and regulations in Indonesia. For example, there is a newly passed law, so to change an article that is not by the system of changing/revising the law for a long time, so to shorten the mechanism for change/revision it requires legal interpretation in the Constitutional Court.
Prinsip Periodik dalam Pemilihan Umum: Orientasi dan Implikasinya di Indonesia Muhammad Mutawalli; Zulhilmi Paidi
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.357-374

Abstract

The general election is one part of the practice of democracy in Indonesia. In this case, the general election is a manifestation of people’s sovereignty. In general, the principles of elections include the principles of direct, general, free, confidential, honest, and fair. This study seeks to explore the legal construction related to the periodic principle of general elections which must be held periodically every five years to become a separate principle in elections. The issue of periodization in general elections really needs to be emphasized as one of the principles in general elections as the main basis for creating a cycle of replacement and filling of public positions in the state administration system. This research is a normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study confirm that the orientation of legal construction on the periodic principle has actually been expressly stated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and is based on a systematic interpretation. In this case, the orientation of the periodic aspect is part of the general election principle which is obligatory and must be implemented. This implies that the principles of general elections include the principles of direct, general, free, confidential, honest, and fair, and must be held periodically for five years. In this case, the periodic principle becomes very important to be recognized and explicitly stated in the general election law as a new principle in the technical implementation of general elections. this has implications for the implementation of elections that are inconsistent and tend to change in each implementation. Whereas in holding general elections, the periodic principle will uniformize the holding of elections simultaneously, both national elections and elections at the regional level by setting forth and affirming in the general election law that periodization is a technical principle in holding general elections in Indonesia.
Dinamika Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Memberikan Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Maluku Nasaruddin Umar; Rustam Magun Pikahulan; Syafa'at Anugrah Pradana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.283-298

Abstract

The problem of protecting and recognizing the rights of Customary Law Communities in Indonesia, including in Maluku, from the perspective of local government policies, is still being underestimated, even though Article 18 B paragraph (2) of the constitution has given recognition and respect to the unity of Customary Law Communities and their traditional rights, However is it that to get recognition of the status of customary villages in several negeri in the districts of Maluku and disputes over the mata rumah parentah still occur frequently. This study raises issues regarding legal protection and problems regarding the recognition of the rights of Customary Law Communities in districts/cities in Maluku by using statutory, conceptual approaches and case studies of court decisions relating to the rights of Customary Law Communities. Based on the results of the study it was found that the Provincial Government had issued a policy to provide customary law protection in Maluku which became the basis for establishing customary villages in Ambon City and Tual City, however, there are still regencies that have not provided recognition in the form of regional regulations for establishing customary villages, such as in West Seram Regency and Central Maluku Regency due to weak local government commitment and juridical problems.
Perbandingan Ketentuan Pidana Legislasi Nasional Negara Sponsor Deep-Seabed Mining Ratna Galuh Manika Trisista; Farhana Farhana; Hamdan Azhar Siregar
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.375-388

Abstract

National legislation is the requirement established by the International Seabed Authority (ISA) for each country sponsoring Deep-seabed Mining (DSM) and criminal provisions and sanctions are an inseparable part of it. A total of 38 states are listed as sponsoring states, while Indonesia, with its potential as a maritime country and member of UNCLOS 1982, has not participated in DSM activities. This article aims to explore and compare the criminal provisions in the national legislation of sponsoring states that have been approved by the ISA so that the formulation of sanctions in Indonesian national legislation can be illustrated in order to prepare Indonesia’s contribution as a sponsoring state for DSM activities in the International Seabed Area. The research method used is normative juridical with a statute and comparative approach. The research results show that the majority of sponsoring states in their criminal provisions stipulate criminal sanctions in the form of fines as well as the possibility of imprisonment and several administrative sanctions. Based on the results of this comparative study, it can be concluded that the formulation of sanctions that can be regulated in Indonesian national legislation is a maximum fine of more than 100 billion Rupiah and a maximum prison sentence of not less than 5 years, as well as additional criminal penalties and administrative sanctions in the form of termination or revocation of DSM activity permits, confiscation of profits resulting from illegal DSM acquisition, and compensation for environmental damage caused by DSM activities.
Kedudukan Negara sebagai Pemegang Saham Dwiwarna dalam Privatisasi Perusahaan Anggota Holding BUMN Huta Disyon; Elisatris Gultom; Ema Rahmawati
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.299-312

Abstract

According to Government Regulation 72/2016, the formation of state-owned-holding-companies (“SOHC”) is accomplished using the transfer mechanism, which transforms State shares in SOEs into equity in other SOEs, resulting in a change in the status of share ownership of holding-member-companies from being owned directly by the State to being owned by the holding company. GR 72/2016 also requires the state to own shares with special rights in holding-members-companies originating from ex-SOE, which can only be owned by the state, known as Dwiwarna shares. Potential issues arise because of the ambiguity of the controlling authority role in managing a SOHC, whether the state still holds it or has been transferred to the parent company, including in terms of selling shares of holding-member-companies. Hopefully, this study will provide the State with legal certainty, benefits, and justice in privatizing holding-member companies. The research methodology used is a normative juridical approach with qualitative normative legal research that relies on secondary data from the library. This study indicates that the State’s Controlling Rights are based on state ownership of Dwiwarna shares in holding-member companies originating from ex-SOE, implying that the sale of company shares only sometimes results in reduced state control and ownership. As a result, the sale of series B shares may be accomplished using corporate regulations in line with their respective authorities. Meanwhile, the State must carry out the sale of Dwiwarna shares, per GR 33/2005. The author recommends that the State create a new mechanism for exercising Dwiwarna shareholder privileges so that the implementation of the absolute authority and rights for Dwiwarna shareholders can proceed in an orderly and legal manner.
Penundukan Diri Non-Muslim dalam Qanun Jinayat Aceh: Penyimpangan atau Pengembangan Asas Hukum Pidana? Mohd. Din; Ali Abubakar; Marah Halim
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.313-324

Abstract

This article aims to provide legal logic for the permissibility of choosing criminal law for non-Muslims who commit criminal acts regulated in the Aceh Qanun Jinayat based on one of the legal principles raised (endorsement) as the basis for establishing norms in the qanun in question, namely the principle of submission which is actually not recognized in criminal law. The research data are several decisions of the Syar’iyah Court in Aceh against violations of the Qanun Jinayat committed by non-Muslims. It is assumed that the decisionis a shift in the principles of criminal law. This problem will be analyzed by observing the basic principles of criminal law, including the principles of the application of criminal law and the politics of criminal law. The results of the study showed that from the point of view of the principles of criminal law which is a compelling law, this submission is a deviation, but from a legal-political perspective, because the birth of permissible provisions in qanuns is a political process, where the demand to apply Islamic Sharia which basically only applies to Muslims, then as a softening of the territorial principle non-Muslims are allowed to vote.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8