cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
ISSN : 08546509     EISSN : 25494600     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Legality (JIHL) is a peer-reviewed open access Journal to publish the manuscripts of high quality research as well as conceptual analysis that studies in any fields of Law, such as criminal law, private law, bussiness law, constitutional law, administrative law, international law, islamic law, criminal justice system, and the others field of law as a forum to develop the science of Law. JIHL published by University of Muhammadiyah Malang twice in a year every March and September.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 34 No. 1 (2026): March" : 4 Documents clear
The Silent Sea: The Legal Lacuna of Sedentary Activities in the Archipelagic Sea Lanes under UNCLOS Nur Gemilang Mahardhika; Ahmad Kushay; Arief Hasanul Husnan Nasution
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 34 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v34i1.41899

Abstract

This article maps the legal gap on provisions regarding sedentary activities on Archipelagic Sea Lanes (ASLs) under UNCLOS and subsequently charts the fairway of their governance. ASLs, already an almost uncharted regime of UNCLOS on its own, offers two freedoms for states users and archipelagic alike to enjoy: navigational rights and the consequent right to conduct sedentary activities those that are not in motion but maintain a static presence within the lanes. While the law of ASLs passage under UNCLOS is rather sufficiently defined, the Convention provides little guidance on how sedentary activities should be treated. This paper turns its attention to that silence. What will become of silent underwater activities, including cable-laying, surveillance, marine scientific research, or the unmoving presence of a submarine, which take place within these sea lanes, not as passage but as position? Article 53 of UNCLOS lies at the base of this inquiry, with its notable omission of non-navigational uses of ASLs. Through a close contextual reading of the Convention, reflected by state practice, the paper surfaces the following question: do sedentary activities fall within the scope of passage granted in ASLs, or are they subject to the sovereignty of the archipelagic state? Focusing on Indonesia, the world's largest archipelagic nation, the paper examines how sovereignty is asserted over both movement and stillness. It explores the legal lacuna in situations where the sea is not merely passed through but also silently dwelled within. The paper contributes to discussions surrounding ASLs by shedding light on them as stretches of maritime corridors where neither freedom of navigation nor sovereign control is properly articulated. This paper then concludes that this silent sea is where Indonesia is expected to take the helm in recasting the advancement of maritime law in three stanzas: devising its own domestic legal reform, regional cooperation, and international legal stratagem.
Restitution Mechanism for Rape Victims in Aceh: An Analysis of The Normative Shortcomings of Qanun Jinayat Widodo Widodo; Tongat Tongat
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 34 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v34i1.42091

Abstract

This research examines the restitution mechanism for rape victims in Aceh. The rules on restitution for rape victims set out under Article 51 of Qanun Jinayat in Aceh are intended to protect the victims; however, they are deemed ineffective, given that the restitution implemented by the judges of Mahkamah Syar’iyah only covered 6% of the total victims, 9% of the prosecutions by prosecutors. The victims have no chance of recovering from the physical injuries, psychological trauma, and social trauma. This article was written based on the use of normative legal research methods. Legal materials comprise legislation, Qanun, Mahkamah Syar’iyah rulings, and district court rulings. The research results were analysed in light of the concepts of justice in Islamic criminal law and feminist legal theory. The research results reveal several points to ponder: (a) regulating the minimum uqubat for restitution at 250 grams of pure gold calculated according to the cost spent on recovering the victim, as well as the principles of justice and the maslahat (public benefit) in the context of Islamic criminal law; (b) regulating the obligations of Mahkamah Syar’iyah judges in determining the losses that the aggrieved parties have to take, particularly in terms of setting the amount of uqubat restitution according to the studies on victimology and the theory of feminist law that prioritises gender equality. If the defendant lives in poverty (gharim), the restitution status shifts to a compensation obligation to be paid by the state through baitul mal. However, the defendant must serve a jail sentence instead of probation. Rule amendments are consistent with the concept of justice and legal certainty in Islamic criminal law. The findings of this research should expand access to justice for victims, without restricting judges' freedom to decide cases or violating the human rights of defendants facing financial difficulties, thereby narrowing criminal disparities.
The Structure and Culture of Negotiating Child Victims’ Rights in Cases of Sexual Violence Layyin Mahfiana; Masrukin Masrukin; Diana Zahro; Lukman Santoso
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 34 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v34i1.42348

Abstract

This article discusses the structure and culture of negotiating children's rights in sexual violence in Surakarta. This study employed a qualitative research method, collecting data through interviews and document analysis. The research writing was structured by data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. Empirical and legal-philosophical approaches were applied to analyse the data, revealing significant weaknesses that require further attention. The lack of protection, justice, and recovery for child victims remains an issue, which hampers the functions of law enforcers, including the police, the prosecutor's office, and the judicial system. Justice in the system is procedural and formalistic in the context of the burden of proof, overlooking the best interests of the child and leaving child victims without justice and fair access to justice and restitution, while being burdened by procedural formalities. As studied, the majority of people in Surakarta are not fully aware of this matter. Stigmatisation lays the blame on the victims, while inadequate psychosocial support for child victims silences them. Without properly addressing these issues, many children experience discrimination and pressure that only hinders their recovery. This study concludes that to provide the necessary protection for child victims of violence and neglect, different sectoral responses need to be coordinated more effectively. Key recommendations include developing child-sensitive skills among law enforcement officials and other agencies, increasing public understanding of children's rights, simplifying regulations to eliminate duplication, and improving integrated, community-based victim services.
Ensuring the Safety of Hydraulic Structures in Central Asia: A Comparative Perspective Narzullaev Olim Kholmamatovich; Kholmuminov Jumanazar Toshtemirovich; Baratov Azim Shamsievich; Mamatqulov Rashid Pazilbekovich; Khamidov Bakhtiyorjon Khamidovich
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 34 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v34i1.42508

Abstract

This study applies comparative legal and descriptive-analytical methods to analyse 30 interstate treaties (1992-2017), national legislation, and regulatory practice in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. The results demonstrate that although some neighbouring nations (Afghanistan and Tajikistan) have not ratified the conventions, they have been incorporated into their national laws. This hampers the effectiveness of emergency preparedness and risk prevention measures. Through the “Regional Hydrosecurity Concept,” which harmonises state competencies with international water law norms, this study offers a novel theoretical framework for hydrosecurity in Central Asia. Furthermore, the report proposes a “Model Law on the Safety of Hydraulic Structures” to standardise emergency response protocols, hazard classifications, and legal nomenclature at the regional level. These two approaches work together to produce a logical legal framework that addresses current sectoral issues. In particular, Uzbekistan's experience is of significant importance in this regard, as outdated hydraulic infrastructure further undermines the effectiveness of hydrosecurity governance. The study’s original scientific contribution lies in formulating a “Regional Hydrosecurity Concept” that harmonises state competences, international water law standards, and basin-level governance. The practical significance of the study lies in strengthening legal coherence and regional cooperation, while contributing to the implementation of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation).

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 34 No. 1 (2026): March Vol. 33 No. 2 (2025): September Vol. 33 No. 1 (2025): March Vol. 32 No. 2 (2024): September Vol. 32 No. 1 (2024): March Vol. 31 No. 2 (2023): September Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023): March Vol. 30 No. 2 (2022): September Vol. 30 No. 1 (2022): March Vol. 29 No. 2 (2021): September Vol. 29 No. 1 (2021): March Vol. 28 No. 2 (2020): September Vol 28, No 2 (2020): September Vol 28, No 1 (2020): Restorative Justice in Indonesia Legal System Vol. 28 No. 1 (2020): March Vol 28, No 1 (2020): March Vol. 27 No. 2 (2019): September Vol 27, No 2 (2019): September Vol 27, No 1 (2019): Maret Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019): Maret Vol. 26 No. 2 (2018): September Vol 26, No 2 (2018): September Vol 26, No 1 (2018): Maret Vol. 26 No. 1 (2018): Maret Vol. 25 No. 2 (2017): September Vol 25, No 2 (2017): September Vol. 25 No. 1 (2017): Maret Vol 25, No 1 (2017): Maret Vol 24, No 2 (2016): September Vol. 24 No. 2 (2016): September Vol 24, No 1 (2016) Vol. 24 No. 1 (2016): Maret Vol 24, No 1 (2016): Maret More Issue