cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ ARMIA
Contact Email
msiddiq@ar-raniry.ac.id
Phone
+6281317172202
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.petita@ar-raniry.ac.id
Editorial Address
http://petita.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/petita/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota banda aceh,
Aceh
INDONESIA
PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS)
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
ISSN : 25028006     EISSN : 25498274     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v6i1
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
PETITA journal has aimed to deliver a multi-disciplinary forum for the discussion of thoughts and information among professionals concerned with the boundary of law and sharia, and will not accept articles that are outside of PETITA’s aims and scope. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the law and sharia systems and the social consequences of their contact. The journal has tried to find understanding and collaboration in the field through the wide-ranging methods represented, not only by law and sharia, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines. The Editors and Publisher wish to inspire a discourse among the specialists from different countries whose various legal cultures afford fascinating and challenging alternatives to existing theories and practices. Priority will therefore be given to articles which are oriented to a comparative or international perspective. The journal will publish significant conceptual contributions on contemporary issues as well as serve in the rapid dissemination of important and relevant research findings. The opinions expressed in this journal do not automatically reflect those of the editors. PETITA journal have received papers from academicians on law and sharia, law theory, constitutional law, research finding in law, law and philosophy, law and religion, human rights law, international law, and constitutionality of parliamentary products. In specific, papers which consider the following scopes are cordially invited, namely; • Sharia Law • Constitutional Law • International Law • Human Rights Law • Land Property Law • Halal Law • Islamic Law • Sharia Court • Constitutional Court • Refugee Law • Transitional Justice • Trade Law • Regional Law • Institutional Dispute Law • Legal Thought • Law and Education • Humanitarian Law • Criminal Law • Islamic Law and Economics • Capital Punishment • Child Rights Law • Family Law • Anti-Corruption Law • International Trade Law • Medical Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 174 Documents
 13   14   15   16   17 
REGIONAL LEVIES IN SPECIAL AUTONOMY PROVINCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXECUTIVE REVIEWS ON REGIONAL REGULATIONS Badri Hasan Sulaiman; Muslem Abdullah
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 6 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v6i2.121

Abstract

In implementing Special Autonomy, various provinces in Indonesia compete to increase their Regional Levies. These efforts have encouraged the governments to create regulations that can add value to their provinces. However, these regulations sometimes experience disharmony and asynchronous with the higher regulations, both in terms of contents and technically. This issue has resulted in an increasing number of Regional Regulations being annulled or revised after being evaluated by the Ministry of Home Affairs. At least 7500 Regional Regulations since 2002, originating from all regencies/cities and provinces in Indonesia, have been evaluated by the Ministry of Home Affairs. Nearly half of these Regional Regulations were annulled because they contradicted the principles of the formation. It is assumed that this number will continue to rise with the increasing legislative process in the regions. Abstrak: Dalam upaya pelaksanaan otonomi khusus, berbagai provinsi di Indonesia bersaing dalam upaya peningkatan retribusi daerahnya masing-masing. Hal ini telah mendorong provinsi-provinsi untuk membuat peraturan (regulasi) yang dapat mendatangkan nilai tambah bagi provinsinya. Peraturan tersebut kadangkala mengalami ketidakharmonisan dan ketidaksinkronan dengan regulasi yang lebih lebih tinggi baik dari segi materi muatan maupun dari segi teknis pembuatannya. Hal ini mengakibatkan meningkatnya jumlah peraturan daerah yang dibatalkan atau yang perlu di revisi kembali setelah diuji oleh Departemen Dalam Negeri. Hingga saat ini, Depdagri telah mengevaluasi sedikitnya 7500 perda sejak 2002, yang berasal dari seluruh kabupaten/kota dan provinsi di Indonesia. Dari jumlah tersebut, hampir setengah dari jumlah perda tersebut dibatalkan karena bertentangan dengan prinsip pembentukan perda. Jumlah tersebut diasumsikan akan terus bertambah seiring dengan semakin meningkatnya proses legislasi di daerah. Kata Kunci: Retribusi Daerah, Peraturan Daerah, Eksekutif Review.
INTRODUCTION Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 5 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v5i2.126

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 5 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v5i1.127

Abstract

CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES (CLS): AN ALTERNATIVE FOR CRITICAL LEGAL THINKING IN INDONESIA Muchamad Ali Safa’at; Milda Istiqomah
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 7 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v7i1.122

Abstract

This article discusses Critical Legal Studies (CLS) as the critical study of the law that opposes the doctrine of legal formalism. As a form of critical study, CLS accommodates not only Marxist legal ideas but also liberalist-radical and postmodernist ones. This article aims to describe the ideas contained within CLS from the perspectives of various legal experts and identify its advantages and disadvantages, as well as its context with the legal development in Indonesia. The normative research method was utilized for the investigation and analysis of the existing legal doctrines. This article concludes with a critique of the law in Indonesia at present and an explanation as to how the ideas of CLS may be utilized as another radical alternative for solving legal problems in Indonesia. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas mengenai Critical Legal Studies (CLS) sebagai studi kritis hukum yang menentang doktrin formalisme hukum. Sebagai bentuk kajian kritis, CLS tidak hanya menampung ide-ide hukum Marxis, tetapi juga liberalis-radikal dan postmodernis. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi secara singkat gagasan-gagasan yang terkandung dalam CLS dari berbagai pakar hukum, kelebihan dan kekurangannya, serta konteksnya dengan perkembangan hukum di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode normatif untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis keberadaan doktrin-doktrin hukum. Artikel ini diakhiri dengan kritik terhadap hukum di Indonesia saat ini dan bagaimana gagasan CLS dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai alternatif radikal lain dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan hukum di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Studi Kritis Hukum, Doktrin Formalisme Hukum, Alternatif Radikal.
THE ROLE OF THE SHIA SECT IN ISLAMIC LAW: DOES IT MAKE SENSE? Badri Hasan Sulaiman
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 7 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v7i1.125

Abstract

Shia sect was born due to political factors that later developed into Fiqh (Islamic Jurisprudence). The different perspectives on the Caliph of Ali ibn Abi Talib's position have led to several sectarianisms in Shia, from ordinary to extreme views, claiming that angel Gabriel sent wrong revelations to Muhammad instead of Ali ibn Abi Talib. Thus, not all of the Sects of Shia are misleading. The Shia’s teachings are contrary to the Aqeedah (creed) and thus should be watched to avoid the negative consequences. This article explores the Islamic law thought from the perception of Shia sects to get a clear point of view and prevent the misunderstanding of Shia sects in the Islamic society. Abstrak: Pada mulanya mazhab Syi'ah lahir karena faktor-faktor politis yang kemudian berkembang menjadi mazhab fiqh. Timbulnya berbagai macam aliran dalam mazhab Syiah dikarenakan perbedaan cara pandang terhadap kedudukan 'Ali. Dari pandangan biasa sampai pandangan yang sangat ekstrim hingga berpendapat bahwa Jibril salah menurunkan wahyu. Tidak semua mazhab Syi'ah menyimpang dari aqidah tetapi ada juga yang sesuai. Multitafsir ini harus dihargai sebagai suatu rahmah karena perbedaan yang membuat Islam menjadi besar. Untuk Syiah yang bertentangan dengan aqidah Islam selayaknya harus diwaspadai aqidahnya, untuk menghidari akibat negatif yang ditimbulkannya, karena hal ini akan berakibat negatif bagi masyarakat awam yang belum memahami Islam sepenuhnya. Kata Kunci: Mazhab, Syiah, Aliran Sesat
INTRODUCTION Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 6 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v6i1.131

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 6 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v6i2.132

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 7 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v7i1.143

Abstract

DELINEATING THE RHETORIC? THE INTERSECTION OF RETRIBUTIVE AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN INTERNATIONAL SENTENCING Oriola O. Oyewole
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 7 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v7i2.145

Abstract

A large and growing body of literature has investigated victim participation at the International Criminal Court. Hence, an increasing number of published studies describe victims' participatory roles and their evolution. However, literature is scarce on managing victims' rights and interests during sentencing and on the impact of victims' involvement in sentencing decisions. For example, victims have interests in reparations, justice, truth and sentencing. Knowledge of restorative justice in criminal sentencing is important for an understanding of how victims navigate criminal trials, especially regarding their perceptions of the sentencing. Using a case analysis, this article critically examines the interaction of retributive and restorative justice vis-à-vis victims’ positions during sentence hearings and reviews. Abstrak: Sejumlah besar literatur telah menyelidiki partisipasi korban di Pengadilan Kriminal Internasional. Oleh karena itu, semakin banyak penelitian yang diterbitkan menggambarkan peran korban selama partisipasi korban dan evolusinya. Namun, literatur tentang pengelolaan hak dan kepentingan korban selama hukuman dan dampak keterlibatan korban pada keputusan hukuman masih terbatas. Misalnya, korban memiliki kepentingan dalam reparasi, keadilan, kebenaran dan hukuman. Pengetahuan tentang keadilan restoratif dalam pemidanaan penting untuk memahami bagaimana korban menjalani persidangan pidana, terutama mengenai persepsi mereka tentang hukuman. Dengan menggunakan analisis kasus, artikel ini secara kritis mengkaji interaksi keadilan retributif dan restoratif vis-à-vis posisi korban selama pemeriksaan dan peninjauan hukuman. Kata Kunci: Hukuman Internasional, Pemidanaan, Reintegrasi, Korban, Pengurangan Hukuman, Keadilan Restoratif.
THE CONTRIBUTION OF ISLAMIC KINGDOMS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ISLAMIC JUDICIARY IN INDONESIA: HISTORICAL LEGAL APPROACH ANALYSIS Muhammad Fazlurrahman Syarif; Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 7 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v7i2.146

Abstract

Islamic kingdoms in Indonesia have played significant roles in spreading and enforcing Islamic law. Each kingdom has a judge from an Islamic school in the Islamic judiciary process. If the cases are difficult to adjudicate, the court invites other Islamic scholars from other kingdoms to give their opinion on the cases. Islamic scholars have habitually written books to be used by further Islamic scholars. Although Islamic kingdoms have shared their experiences and knowledge, the implementation of Islamic law has still been different even though decisions tended to find their way to justice. For instance, in family law cases, the verdicts could be different, considering the customary law established in each kingdom. This article utilizes a historical legal approach to analyze the data from historical documents in Indonesia. The Islamic court in Indonesia has grown from the court in the time of Islamic kingdom, including Islamic family law. However, the present-day Islamic court has developed further than it was in the time of Islamic kingdom in Indonesia. Thus, the 4.0 era has also affected the judiciary process. Abstrak: Kerajaan-kerajaan Islam di Indonesia telah memainkan peran penting dalam menyebarkan dan menegakkan hukum Islam. Setiap kerajaan memiliki hakim dari sekolah Islam dalam proses peradilan Islam. Jika kasusnya sulit untuk diadili, pengadilan mengundang ulama Islam lainnya dari kerajaan lain untuk memberikan pendapat mereka tentang penyelesaian kasus tersebut. Cendekiawan Islam memiliki kebiasaan menulis buku yang digunakan untuk sarjana Islam selanjutnya. Meskipun di antara kerajaan-kerajaan Islam telah berbagi pengalaman dan pengetahuan, penerapan hukum Islam masih berbeda, meskipun cenderung mencari jalan menuju keadilan. Misalnya, dalam kasus hukum keluarga putusannya bisa berbeda, mengingat hukum adat yang dipraktekkan dalam suatu kerajaan. Artikel ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum historis untuk menganalisis data dari dokumen sejarah di Indonesia. Peradilan Islam di Indonesia memiliki keterkaitan dengan peradilan pada masa kerajaan Islam, termasuk hukum keluarga Islam. Akan tetapi Peradilan Islam saat ini lebih berkembang dibandingkan pada masa kerajaan Islam di Indonesia; salah satu penyebabnya adalah era 4.0 juga mempengaruhi proses peradilan. Kata Kunci: Kontribusi Kerajaan Islam, Peradilan Islam Di Indonesia, Pendekatan Hukum Historis

Page 15 of 18 | Total Record : 174

 13   14   15   16   17 

Filter by Year

2016 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8 No 2 (2023) Vol 8 No 1 (2023): MAINTAINING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO CREATE A BETTER SOCIETY Vol 7 No 2 (2022) Vol 7 No 1 (2022) Vol 6 No 2 (2021) Vol 6 No 1 (2021) Vol 5 No 2 (2020) Vol 5 No 1 (2020) Vol 4 No 2 (2019) Vol 4 No 1 (2019) Vol 3 No 2 (2018) Vol 3, No 2 (2018) Vol 3, No 1 (2018) Vol 3 No 1 (2018) Vol 2 No 2 (2017) Vol 2, No 2 (2017) Vol 2, No 1 (2017) Vol 2 No 1 (2017) Vol 1 No 2 (2016) Vol 1, No 2 (2016) Vol 1 No 1 (2016) Vol 1, No 1 (2016) More Issue