Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.453
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Proceedings of Annual International Conference Syiah Kuala University - Social Sciences Chapter Lentera Hukum Al-'Adalah Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Journal of SouthEast Asian Human Rights Jurnal Konstitusi PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Konstitusi JAPHTN-HAN Jurnal Review Politik Al-Mudharabah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam Jurnal Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Hukum Administrasi Negara
Muhammad Siddiq Armia
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court In Protecting Energy Security Armia, Muhammad Siddiq
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (458.789 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1321

Abstract

After more a decade, Indonesian Constitutional Court (ICC) has importantly played a significant role in the law reform, such  as  protecting  energy  security  through  their judgements. ICC comes out of the box, creating unpredictable judgements, and ensuring the justice values. In protecting energy security ICC makes important breakthrough with reviewing Act Number 22 of 2001 on the Oil and Earth Gas, Act Number 4 of 2009     on the Mineral Mining and Coal, and invaliding Act Number 20 of 2002 on the Electrical Power. Those acts contradict the basic norm in the 1945 Constitution. Although creating public debate, ICC judgment should be   appreciated.
PENGHAPUSAN PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMULIHAN HAK-HAK KONSTITUTIONAL Armia, Muhammad Siddiq
Petita : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah Vol 1, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (676.29 KB) | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v1i2.1303

Abstract

The removal of the presidential threshold system, on the one hand, has made a positive impact on the development of democracy in Indonesia. It can restore the basic rights of the citizens in the constitution (remedy of constitutional rights) that had been hurt by the threshold. The advantages include the minor parties’ opportunity to propose their respective presidential candidates and also the prospect of having more diversed presidential candidates. The new system will allow the president to be at ease in carrying out the governmental duties due to the absence of the dominant parties’ intervention in the parliament. However, the weaknesses of the abolition of the presidential threshold should also be of concern because of the vulnerability of individual interests that may be obtained through the presidential nomination. In terms of the national security, there will be an expansion of conflict and criminal acts escalation attributed to the candidates' election. Further, for the efficiency itself, the electoral budget allocation will greatly increase (high cost election). This will nevertheless an issue because such excessive budget allocation may be better supplied to areas that can increase the people’s welfare. Therefore, this assumption needs to be investigated further with in-depth research on the efficiency of campaign funds.
Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi Akbar, Khairil; Pasha Karim, Zahlul; Fadlullah, Nyak; Siddiq Armia, Muhammad
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719

Abstract

DOKA is the biggest source of corruption that has driven distric heads in Aceh to prison. This fact raises the question, how has the DOKA monitoring system been carried out and what is the impact on corruption eradication? This study aims to explain the DOKA monitoring system and its impact on corruption eradication. The theory used is the theory of Check and Balances and the theory of Willingness & Oppurtunity. This research is classified into qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques. The main findings of the study indicate that DOKA is not being taken seriously. This can be seen in the absence of a special supervision system and the normal supervision system for DOKA is not optimal. In addition, there is no special institution that oversees the implementation of DOKA. Such a supervisory system has no impact on corruption eradication. It needs serious improvement and a comprehensive evaluation of the use and distribution of DOKA for the realization of social welfare in Aceh.
The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court In Protecting Energy Security Muhammad Siddiq Armia
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (458.789 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1321

Abstract

After more a decade, Indonesian Constitutional Court (ICC) has importantly played a significant role in the law reform, such  as  protecting  energy  security  through  their judgements. ICC comes out of the box, creating unpredictable judgements, and ensuring the justice values. In protecting energy security ICC makes important breakthrough with reviewing Act Number 22 of 2001 on the Oil and Earth Gas, Act Number 4 of 2009     on the Mineral Mining and Coal, and invaliding Act Number 20 of 2002 on the Electrical Power. Those acts contradict the basic norm in the 1945 Constitution. Although creating public debate, ICC judgment should be   appreciated.
Autonomy in Aceh-Indonesia, from Armed Conflict to Regulation Conflict Muhammad Siddiq Armia
Proceedings of AICS - Social Sciences Vol 7 (2017): 7th AIC in conjuction ICMR 2017 Universitas Syiah Kuala October 2017
Publisher : Proceedings of AICS - Social Sciences

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (123.475 KB)

Abstract

The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in Helsinki in 2005, the Government of Aceh agrees to unconditionally accept the Act of Government of Aceh, delivering the principles of special autonomy and ending the 30-years conflict. The Act orders explicitly and implicitly to legislate some bylaws for implementing the norms of autonomy. Despite passing bylaws, both Government of Aceh and Central Government have involved in endless regulation conflict, including land and flag bylaw. This article uses black-letter law approach as research method, focusing on several government official texts, and case law happening during this conflict.
SERPIHAN PEMIKIRAN HUKUM ISLAM DALAM MAZHAB SYIAH Muhammad Siddiq Armia
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 7, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v7i2.3262

Abstract

In the begining, Sect of Shiah was born from political background, then became part of Islamic Jurisprudence. The sect of Shiah has emerged from the differen perspective of seeing Chalif of Ali Bin Abi Thalib. From the extrem perspective of Shia, they claim that Jibril as the angel revealition has made a serious mistake, because of delivering revealition to Muhammad instead of Chaliph Ali bin Abi Thalib. Thus, not all of Sect of Shiahs’ are misleading, some of them still have a right path. This article will explore the Islamic legal thought in the perpective of Shia sects, to get a clear point of view on them and to prevent misunderstanding of Shia sects in the Islamic society. Keywords: Sects, Shia, Misleading Thought
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF KHIYAR SYARAT ON TRANSACTION OF SHOES BY DROPSHIP SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF BANDA ACEH (A Study Case of Dropshipper in Syiah Kuala Sub-District) Ade Nidya Fernanda; Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Rispalman Risfalman
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 11, No 2 (2021): JURNAL DUSTURIAH
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v11i2.8617

Abstract

Dropshipping is a form of online buying and selling in which business actors act as intermediaries between genuine sellers (suppliers) and consumers. Shoe dropshippers in Syiah Kuala District do not stock goods and do not take care of shipments so they do not know the actual condition of the goods. Sometimes in online buying and selling like this there is a risk in the form of defects/damage to goods, shipping errors, etc. so a warranty system is needed to protect both parties from loss or disputes at a later date. The problem in this research is what is the form of return guarantee in the sale and purchase agreement of shoes in Syiah Kuala District by dropship and how is the khiyār review of the terms of the return guarantee form of dropship shoe purchase. In this study the authors used a sociolegal approach with descriptive analysis research methods based on data obtained from interviews. The result of this research is the guarantee provided by the dropshipper in the Syiah Kuala District in the form of exchanging goods (returns) and a refund (refund) for 3x24 hours with certain terms and conditions. In the concept of fiqh muamalah, the return guarantee has relevance to the khiyār requirement, because the dropshipper provides an option for returns within a certain time in order to guarantee the willingness of the parties. The provision of 3 days is in accordance with the terms of the khiyār time according to the terms of the fuqaha. The difference lies in the form of guarantee provided, in khiyār the terms of sale and purchase can be canceled if there is consumer defect or dissatisfaction, while the return guarantee by most dropshippers only provides exchange of goods, which shows that the sale and purchase cannot be canceled.
Kegentingan Memaksa Atau Kepentingan Penguasa (Analisis Terhadap Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (PERPPU)) Muhammad Siddiq
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 48, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.2014.48.1.%p

Abstract

The arguable on explanation of circumstances of compelling crisis in making PERPPU (emergency law), has a possibility to create abuse of power. President, as an executive possessors in Indonesian constitutional law, has fully given absolute subjective rights in creating PERPPU. President is the only one person who has authority to interpret circumstances of compelling crisis regarding on government condition, whether it is in a good condition or not. Due to PERPPU characteristics is very subjective, it has possibility to mislead from its main meaning and purpose. It could be possible that president personal interest might be accommodated in a PERPPU, because of his authority in making PERPPU. For the time being, there is no regulation which interpret clearly circumstances of compelling crisis and its requirement, to explain whether the situation is in emergency or not. Because of that, if it does not have special regulation, PERPPU might have possibility to abuse by irresponsible person as a tool to achieve his personal purposes.
Democracy through Election Muhammad Siddiq Armia
Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights Vol 2 No 1 (2018): June 2018
Publisher : Jember University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jseahr.v2i1.5333

Abstract

After amendment the 1945 Constitution, Indonesia has adopted election mechanism to implement a value of democracy. Unfortunately, the regulations as a main tool have not completely covered all of election issues. It follows that the election legal systems have only been prepared for the post-election dispute instead of the pre-election dispute. This case happened in the province of Aceh. On one hand Aceh has its own law regarding the autonomy province, on the other hands, Aceh must coexist the national law as well. However, both Aceh’s law and national’s law does not clearly provide the mechanism of handling the pre-election dispute among the regulations. This implies that the provincial election cannot be implemented as long as does not have legal certainty. In the provincial level have suggested making a new bylaw focusing on the local election only, nevertheless, central government have strongly rejected this idea.
CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW: LESSON LEARNED FOR INDONESIA (MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DAN PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG: PEMBELAJARAN BAGI INDONESIA) Muhammad Siddiq Armia
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 8, No 1 (2017): JNH VOL 8 NO. 1 Tahun 2017
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v8i1.940

Abstract

In the context of reviewing law through judiciary organ, the court plays significant role to review several regulation. This article specifically will discuss regarding the role of court on judicial review. This idea spreads out worldwide including in Indonesia. The Constitutional court and judicial review are two words which having inextricably meaning that attached to each other. On worldwide, the system of reviewing law by involving judges commonly has been practiced by several countries. There are two most significant state organs that plays role in the system, they are constitutional court and supreme court. Most countries do not have constitutional court and will deliver the authority of judicial review through supreme court. It has added more tasks, not only to adjudicate the common case, but also regarding constitutionality matter of an act against constitution. This model is commonly known as a centralized model, as practiced in the United State of America. In the Countries that owned a constitutional court, will certainly deliver the authority of judicial review through constitutional court. 108 NEGARA HUKUM: Vol. 8, No. 1, Juni 2017 This model is commonly known as Kelsenian’s model. In this model, the constitutional court will merely focus on the constitutionality of regulations, and ensuring those regulations not in contradicting with the constitution. The Supreme Court in this model merely focus on handling common cases instead of regulations. Those two model of judicial review (through the constitutional court and the supreme court) has widely been implemented in the world legal systems, including in Indonesia. In the authoritarian regime, Indonesia implemented the centralized model, which positioned the Supreme Court as the single state organ to handle the common case and also judicial review. Having difficulties with the centralized model, after the constitution amendment in 2003, Indonesia has officially formed the constitutional court as the guardian of constitution. However, the Indonesian Constitutional Court (ICC) merely examine and/or review the statute that against the Indonesian’s Constitution year 1945, and related to the legislations products lower than the statute will remains the portion of the Supreme Court jurisdiction. Such modification is vulnerable resulting a judgement conflict between the ICC and the Supreme Court.ABSTRAKPosisi peradilan memainkan peranan penting dalam proses uji materi undang-undang. Mahkamah konstitusi dan pengujian undang-undang merupakan dua kata yang saling berkaitan memiliki keterikatan. Ide dasar pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan melalui lembaga peradilan berkembang luas di dunia hingga sampai ke Indonesia. Sistem pengujian undang-undang dengan melibatkan hakim sudah sering digunakan dan dipraktekkan di berbagai negara. Terdapat dua organ kenegaraan yang mempunyai peran vital dalam memaikan peran ini yaitu mahkamah konstitusi dan mahkamah agung. Model seperti ini lebih dikenal dengan model terpusat di suatu lembaga negara sebagaimana yang di Amerika Serikat. Sedangkan negara yang mempunyai mahkamah konstitusi akan melimpahkan kewenangan pengujian undang-undang kepada mahkamah konstitusi, model ini dikenal dengan model Kelsen. Pada model ini mahkamah konstitusi hanya berfokus pada konstitutionalitas peraturan peraturan perundang-undangan serta memastikannya agar tidak bertentangan dengan norma dalam konstitusi. Mahkamah agung pada model ini hanya berfokus untuk menangani kasus sehari-hari saja, bukan untuk menguji peraturan perundang-undangan. Dua model ini pengujian undang-undang ini (melalui mahkamah konstitusi dan mahkamah agung) sering diterapkan dalam sistem ketatanegaraan dunia, termasuk juga di Indonesia. Pada zaman rezim otoriter, Indonesia menerapkan sistem pengujian undang-undang terpusat, dengan memposisikan Mahkamah Agung sebagai organ tunggal negara yang menangani perkara sehari-hari dan pengujian undang-undang. Menemukan hambatan dengan model terpusat ini, akhirnya Indonesia membentuk Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia hanya menguji undang-undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Sedangkan peraturan perundangundangan di bawah undang-undang tetap menjadi kewenangan Mahkamah Agung. Modifikasi seperti ini berakibat rentannya terjadi pertentangan putusan antara Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung.
Co-Authors A. Hamid Sarong Abdul Jalil Salam Ade Nidya Fernanda Ali Hamzah Anisa Putri Chairul Fahmi Fadlullah, Nyak Hasan Basri M. Nur Husaini Husda Iqbal Maulana Khairil Akbar M. Deni Fitriadi Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia Muhammad Zulhilmi Mukhtar, Marduati Mulia Sari Munawiah Abdullah Nafrizal Rispalman Rispalman Zahlul Pasha Zahlul Pasha Karim