cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dewanta Arya Nugraha
Contact Email
dewanta.an@gmail.com
Phone
+6289673449687
Journal Mail Official
jmme@fkip.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36A Kentingan Surakarta 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 20898878     EISSN : 27158276     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jmme
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Journal Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) is a peer-refereed open-access journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of mathematics and mathematics education. This journal was founded by the Magister of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret. It is published twice in a year (June and December). The JMME welcomes high-quality manuscripts resulted by researchers, scholars, teachers, and professionals from a research project in the scope of Pure Mathematics, Computing Mathematics, Statistics, Mathematics Learning, Evaluation and Assessment in Mathematics Learning, STEAM, Ethnomathematics, ICT in Mathematics Education, Design / Development Research in Mathematics Education
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 157 Documents
 9   10   11   12   13 
Description Of Differences In Creative Thinking Profile For Male And Female Students In Open Ended Problem Solving Hana Shohwatul Islam; Budiyono Budiyono; Siswanto Siswanto
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52747

Abstract

One of the manifestations of high-level thinking is creative thinking, characterized by creating something new from ideas, concepts, experiences, and knowledge that is in one's mind. This study aims to describe the creative thinking profile of male and female students in solving open-ended problems. The research method used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The subject of the study used was 2 grade VII students of SMP Negeri 3 Surakarta. This research instrument uses open-ended problem tests with indicators of creative thinking and interviews. In describing the student's creative thinking profile, the researcher will pay attention to 4 stages: preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification stages. The results of this study show that male students can explain problems and solutions orally or in writing. While female students can explain the problem and the solution is both verbally but less able to explain with writing
Algatika: Mathematics Private Lending Applications As An Effort To Increase Students Learning Interest In Mathematics Learning Septi Rahmita Sari; Amelia T. R. Sidik; Nisky Imansyah Yahya
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52740

Abstract

In the era of sustainable development, education is a fundamental right for everyone. Education is a process of helping humans develop themselves so that they can face all problems with an open attitude. One way to help students clarify the concepts and understanding of mathematics that is being studied during the learning process is by using teaching aids. Teaching aids serve to facilitate the purpose of implementing learning in schools. However, the fact is that the use of mathematics teaching aids during learning at school is not yet entrenched, especially in areas far from urban areas, many of which do not have teaching aids. This directly impacts students' lack of understanding and learning experience, resulting in low student learning outcomes. This paper will introduce ALGATIKA, an application of lending mathematics teaching aids for elementary and junior high schools which can later solve these problems. The research methodology used is a qualitative descriptive method by deepening the material through literature studies. The result is that the lack of teaching aids in some schools can be overcome by the ALGATIKA application of lending mathematics teaching aids in elementary and junior high schools. Thus this application can help provide the teaching aids needed to build and improve educational facilities and provide an effective learning environment for all. It can develop students' teaching and learning processes and create higher quality education which leads to relevant and effective learning outcomes in accordance with the targets of the SDG's in education.
Minimum Competency Assessment (Akm): An Effort To Photograph Numeracy Irma Rachmah Hidayah; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Laila Fitriana
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i1.52742

Abstract

The National Literacy Movement (GLN) refers to the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) states that literacy numeracy is one of the basic literacy that must be mastered in the 21st century. However, PISA results show that Indonesian students have low literacy numeracy skills. The Ministry of Education followed up to replace the National Examination (UN) with a Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM). AKM is an essential competency assessment that is tested on students used to measure learners' reasoning ability when faced with problems that require literacy and numeracy skills, namely problems that require basic mathematical knowledge. This study uses the method of literature study. This study aims to examine efforts to improve numeracy capabilities. Efforts that can be made to improve numeracy skills are by providing materials and integrating learning with ethnomathematics approaches, giving higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) that are associated with real life, and utilization of interactive learning games
Analysis of Difficulty Level on The Topic Line and Angle Maria Agustina Kleden; Maria Lobo; Ganesha Lapenangga; Yosep Sugi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v10i1.42431

Abstract

A study on the level of difficulty of the mathematics subject has been carried out inthe Junior High Schools Aroun the City of Kupang. The samples were taken purposively among year 8 students and their mathematics teachers in the second semester from 8 public schools and 5 private schools. The number of samples was 659 students and 33 teachers. The analysis was conducted on the topics of Comparison, Aritmatic, Lines and Angles and Triangles and Quadrilateral Shapes. The study shows that the most challenging mathematic topics for the year 8 students in the City of Kupang is Lines and Angles followed by the calculation of area of irregular plane shapes particularly on pentagon forms
Mathematic Literation Abilities Based on PISA-Like Ummu Baroroh; Yuliana Tririnika; Ida Yuliani
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v9i2.48393

Abstract

Literacy is one of the abilities should be owned by students in prepare competitiveness due to the development of the knowledge and technology in the 21st century. Literacy is a student ability to formulate, application, and interpreted mathematics in various contexts. Mathematics literacy is the one of abilities assessed in the PISA study. The purpose of this research is to determine how the literacy skills of student at SMP 24 Surakarta. The research conducted by descriptive quantitative to seeing the literacy abilities of student. The research was conducted by subtract sample 3 student of IX class and from the result of the test it was found that the literacy skills of student were low. Low literacy skills are due to the inaccuracy of student and a lack of understanding of concept in working on these problems.
TINGKAT BERPIKIR MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF Annisa Prima Exacta; Krisdianto Hadiprasetyo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v8i2.25846

Abstract

Abstract: Differences in cognitive styles influence students’ mindset and behavior. Students with Field Independent (FI) cognitive style have different mindset with Field Dependent (FD) students. By identifying cognitive style, lecturer needs to understand the concept of material due to the way in explaining it to students. The objectives of this study are to find out: (1) students’ thinking level in Geometry who have Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style, (2) students’ thinking level in Geometry who have Field Independent (FI) cognitive style. This research is conducted at Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo in Mathematics Education Department in the academic year of 2017/2018. It is a qualitative descriptive research. Data about thinking levels are obtained from diagnostic tests and interview results, while data on cognitive style are obtained from the results of Group Embedded Figure test (GEFT). Subjects are taken by purposive sampling technique and triangulation method is used as data validation. In analyzing data, the researchers employ some stages consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results reveal that students’ thinking level who have Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style in Geometry course is visualization and pre-analysis, while students’ thinking level who have of Field Independent (FI) cognitive style in Geometry course is visualization, analysis, and informal pre-deduction.Keywords:Thinking Level, Cognitive Style, Field Independent (FI), Field Dependent (FD), Geometry. 
Implications of the Constructivism Philosophy Perspective in Mathematics Learning Dhani Nur Hendrayanto
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v9i1.48285

Abstract

Implication has the aim of comparing the results of research between the past and those that have just been carried out. Basically, the implication of a theory can be defined as a direct result or a consequence of the findings of a research process. Thus various theories of research results emerged. This Constructivism learning theory has a strong influence in the world of education. As a result, the learning orientation in the classroom has shifted. Learning orientation shifted from teacher-centered teaching to student-centered learning. Students are no longer positioned as empty vessels ready to be filled. With a resigned attitude students are prepared to be filled with information by their teachers. Or students are conditioned in such a way to receive knowledge from their teachers. Now the teacher learning partners are students. Teachers are not the only information center or learning center. Meanwhile other learning sources can be peers, nature, the internet and others.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Venty Meilasari; Budiyono Budiyono; Isnandar Slamet
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10042

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium or low independence of learning students, (3) in each learning models, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium, or low independence of learning students, (4) in each categories of independence of learning, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction learning model. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The research design was a 3×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the eight class of junior high school in Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling and consisted of 281 students. The instruments used were independence of learning questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) TAI model provided the mathematics achievement as good as GI model, TAI model and GI model provided better mathematics achievement than direct instruction model. (2) The high independence of learning student had better mathematics achievement than medium and low independence of learning students, and the medium had better than low independence of learning students. (3) In TAI model and direct instruction model, the high, medium, and low independence of learning had the same mathematics achievement, in GI learning model, the high independence of learning students had mathematics achievement as good as the medium independence of learning students, the high independence of learning had better than the low independence of learning, and the medium independence of learning students had the same as the low independence of learning students. (4) In high and low independence of learning, TAI model, GI model, and direct instruction model provided the same achievement, in medium independence of learning, TAI model and GI model provided the same achievement, TAI model provided better achievement than direct instruction model, GI model was the same as direct instruction model.Keyword: TAI, GI, Direct Instruction, Independence of Learning, and Mathematics Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN JIGSAW BERBANTU MEDIA FLASH PADAMATERI DIMENSI TIGA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Rina Kurniawati; Riyadi Riyadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v7i1.20244

Abstract

Abstract: This research was purposed to determine: (1) which one produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash, or direct instruction; (2) which one had better mathematics learning achievement between students with visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style; (3) on each learning style, which one learning model that produced better mathematics learning achievement, cooperative learning model type Jigsawand Jigsaw Flash or direct instruction (4) on each learning model, which one student had better mathematics learning achievement , student who had visual learning style, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style. This study was a quasi-experimental study with factorial 3x3 design. Population in this research were eleventh grade students of Vocational High School in Sragen. Sample collection were done by stratified cluster random sampling. Data collection were done by the method of documentation in order to test the balance of the population, the questionnaire were used to determine the students learning style and test were used to know the students achievement on material dimension three. Data analysis techniques used ANAVA two ways with unbalanced cells. The results of this study concluded as follows (1) cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (2) Students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style; students with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style; (3) on each learning style, cooperative learning model type Jigsaw Flash gave better mathematics learning achievement than cooperative learning type Jigsaw and direct instruction, cooperative learning type Jigsaw gave better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction; (4) on each learning model (Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, and direct instruction), students with kinesthetic learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with visual learning style and auditory learning style with visual learning style had better mathematics learning achievement than students with auditory learning style.Keywords: Learning Model, Jigsaw, Jigsaw Flash, Learning Style, learning achievement
PENGARUH FRAILTY DALAM PEMODELAN MORTALITA Siti Alfiatur Rohmaniah; Novita Eka Chandra
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v8i1.25832

Abstract

Abstract:Factors that affect a person's risk of death are divided into two, namely underwriting factor and frailty factor. Underwriting factor is an observed factor, including age, occupation, history of heart disease, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and etc. In contrast, frailty is a factor that cannot be observed, including a person's vulnerability of death. This study aims to determine the effect of frailty on mortality modeling. The modeling used is in the form of mortality model with underwriting factor using Generalized Linear Models method, and mortality model with underwriting factor using generalized linear models, and frailty factor using Generalized Linear Mixed Models method. The data in this research are longitudinal data related to underwriting factor that have binomial distribution which is taken from Health and retirement study and processed using R software. After comparing the two models, it can be concluded that frailty has an effect on mortality modeling.Keywords: underwriting, frailty, Generalized Linear Mixed Models. 

Page 11 of 16 | Total Record : 157

 9   10   11   12   13 

Filter by Year

2011 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2023): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 2 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 2 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education More Issue