cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dewanta Arya Nugraha
Contact Email
dewanta.an@gmail.com
Phone
+6289673449687
Journal Mail Official
jmme@fkip.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta Jl. Ir. Sutami No. 36A Kentingan Surakarta 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 20898878     EISSN : 27158276     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jmme
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Journal Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) is a peer-refereed open-access journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of mathematics and mathematics education. This journal was founded by the Magister of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret. It is published twice in a year (June and December). The JMME welcomes high-quality manuscripts resulted by researchers, scholars, teachers, and professionals from a research project in the scope of Pure Mathematics, Computing Mathematics, Statistics, Mathematics Learning, Evaluation and Assessment in Mathematics Learning, STEAM, Ethnomathematics, ICT in Mathematics Education, Design / Development Research in Mathematics Education
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 157 Documents
 11   12   13   14   15 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS), THINK-TALK-WRITE (TTW) DAN TWO STAY-STRAY (TSTS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SELF-EFFICACY Khafittulloh Viqriah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10020

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievements and learning interest viewed from students self-efficacy. The learning model compared were TPS, TTW, and TSTS. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all of the students in grade 8th of Junior High School in Sleman regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 1 Kalasan, SMPN 4 Kalasan, and SMPN 2 Ngemplak. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self-efficacy questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TPS gives better mathematics achievement than TTW, and both gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS. (2) Students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. (3) For TPS and TTW, students who have high, medium, and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. For TSTS, students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. (4) For students who have high and medium self-efficacy, TPS,TTW, and  TSTS gives the same mathematics achievement. For students who have low self-efficacy, TPS and  TTW gives the same mathematics achievement, TPS gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS, and TTW gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS .Keywords: Think-Pair-Share (TPS), Think-Talk-Write (TTW), Two Stay-Two Stray (TSTS), self-efficacy
Linear Program Problem-Solving Skills Based on Sequential and Gender Thinking Styles During Online Learning Adila Rahmah; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i2.58129

Abstract

The study aims to describe linear program problem-solving skills reviewed from sequential thinking styles and genders as schools implement online learning due to the covid-19 pandemic. This research is a qualitative study that produces descriptive data. The subject of this study consisted of two male students and two female students of class XI MIPA High School MTA Surakarta. The study began by determining the study subjects using a thinking style questionnaire, followed by linear program problem-solving tests and interviews. Check the validity of the data using triangulation methods. The results show linear program problem-solving skills; 1) Sequential students of male and female concrete perform systematically and less carefully; 2) Abstract sequential male and female students collect complete data and analyze the information obtained regularly as well as female abstract sequential students strong in written decoding and symbols; 3) students' problem solving skills with sequential abstracts are higher than concrete sequential students ;4) male students with sequential thinking styles perform better at solving math problems than female students with sequential thinking styles.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW YANG DIMODIFIKASI DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN GROBOGAN TAHUN 2010/2011 Moertiningsih E.P.U; Riyadi Riyadi; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v2i1.9946

Abstract

ABSTRAK             Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) Apakah pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, dan keduanya lebih baik daripada pembelajaran konvensional. (2) Apakah siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent mempunyai prestasi belajar matematika yang lebih baik daripada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent. (3) Apakah penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi memberikan prestasi yang lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan pembelajaran konvensional pada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent maupun field independent.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan desain eksperimen 32. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII (delapan) SMP Negeri di Grobogan semester dua tahun pelajaran 2010/2011. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan stratified cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berasal dari SMP Negeri 1 Purwodadi, SMP Negeri 2 Grobogan, dan SMP Negeri 6 Purwodadi yang berjumlah 307 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar matematika dan tes gaya kognitif siswa. Uji instrumen meliputi validitas isi instrumen tes dilakukan oleh validator dan uji reliabilitas instrumen tes menggunakan rumus KR-20. Uji keseimbangan menggunakan uji anava satu jalan dengan sel tak sama. Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitas dengan menggunakan metode uji Lilliefors dan uji homogenitas menggunakan metode Bartlett dengan statistik uji Chi Kuadrat. Uji hipotesis menggunakan uji anava 2 jalan dengan sel tak sama.Hasil analisis data dengan anava dua jalan sel tak sama menunjukkan (1) Terdapat perbedaan rataan antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw  yang dimodifikasi, tipe Jigsaw dan konvensional  terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fa = 26,749  > F0,05;2;301 = 3,026). (2) Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan gaya kognitif siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fb = 22,652 > F0,05;1;301 = 3,026). (3) Tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan gaya kognitif terhadap prestasi belajar matematika (Fab = 1,618 < F0,05;2;301 = 3,026).Berdasarkan uji hipotesis dan uji pasca anava diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa: (1) Pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi menghasilkan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, dan keduanya menghasilkan prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. (2) Siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent mempunyai prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field dependent. (3) Pada siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent maupun field dependent yang diberikan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi mempunyai prestasi belajar lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan keduanya lebih baik daripada pembelajaran konvensional. Kata kunci:  Jigsaw yang dimodifikasi, Jigsaw, Gaya Kognitif, Field Independent, Field Dependent.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN ASPEK AFEKTIF SISWA PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN SPASIAL Habib Ratu Perwira Negara; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Imam Sujadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i2.9978

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, and the direct learning model towards students mathematics learning achievement and affective aspect on the subject of plane geometry viewed from the students spatial ability, and category of spatial ability consisted of high, medium and low. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. The sample of this research consisted of 261 students. The instrument used to collect data was mathematics achievement test, questionnaire of students affective aspect and spatial ability test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (2) The cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model. (3) Students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (4) Students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspect than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had the same affective aspect as students with the the low spatial ability. (5) On the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better achievement than students with the medium and low spatial ability, and students with the medium spatial ability had better achievement than students with the low spatial ability. (6) On the cooperative learning models of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw type, students with the high, medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. On the direct learning model, students with the high spatial ability had better affective aspects than students with the medium spatial ability, while students with the high and low spatial ability and students with the medium and low spatial ability had the same affective aspects. (7) On students spatial ability high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gaves a better achievement than direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves the same achievement as the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type. (8) On students with the high and medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type with CTL approach, Jigsaw type and direct learning model gives the same affective aspect. On students with the medium spatial ability, the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach gaves a better affective aspect than the direct learning model, while the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type with CTL approach and Jigsaw and also the cooperative learning of Jigsaw type and direct learning model gaves the same affective aspect.Keywords: Jigsaw, CTL approach, spatial ability, learning achievement, and affective aspect. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING SERTA MODEL THINK PAIR SHARE MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR MATEMATIS TINGKAT TINGGI PESERTA DIDIK SMP Yudi Pramono Pawiro; Budiyono Budiyono; Isnandar Slamet
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i1.10010

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the high order mathematical thinking skill viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were model of the PBL, model of the DL and model of the TPS. This research used the quasi experimental research. It’s population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 253 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 87 in Experimental Class 1, 84 in Experimental Class 2, and 83 in Experimental Class 3. The instruments to gather the data were test of high order mathematical thinking skill on the learning topic of cube and beam, and emotional quotient questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) Model of the PBL results in a better high order mathematical thinking skill than model of the DL, and  model of the TPS. Model of the DL results same high order mathematical thinking skill  with TPS. 2) Emotional quotient gives students a different effect on high order mathematical thinking skill on the learning topic of cube and beam. The students with the high emotional quotient have a better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the moderate emotional quotient and those with the low emotional quotient, the students with the moderate emotional quotient have a better  high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the low emotional quotient. 3) There was no interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the emotional quotient on the high order mathematical thinking skill of the students.Keywords: PBL, DL, TPS, High Order Mathematical Thinking Skill and Emotional Quotient.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DITINJAU DARI KEINGINTAHUAN DAN GAYA KOGNITIF PESERTA DIDIK SMP DI KABUPATEN BLORA Agung Putra Wijaya; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Suyono Suyono
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v1i2.9936

Abstract

 ABSTRACTThe purposes of this study are to know the different effect of each category of learning model, curiosity, and cognitive style, also their interaction towards mathematics achievement. This study is a quasi experimental research with 2x3x2 factorial design. The population is all students of junior high school in Blora. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random technique. The instruments used to collect data are test of prior knowledge in mathematics, curiosity questionnaire, cognitive style test (GEFT), and mathematics achievement test. The testing of hypothesis uses three-way analysis of variance with unequal cell. The testing of hypothesis concludes that (1) There is a different effect between each category of learning model. (2) There is a different effect among each category of curiosity. (3) There is a different effect among each category of cognitive style. (4) There is an interaction between learning model and curiosity towards mathematics achievement. (5) There is an interaction between learning model and cognitive style towards mathematics achievement. (6) There is an interaction between curiosity and cognitive style towards mathematics achievement. (7) There is an interaction among learning model, curiosity, and cognitive style towards mathematics achievement.Keywords: NHT, STAD, Curiosity, Cognitive Style, Mathematics Achievement
EFEKTIFITAS PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI SISWA PADA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012 Abdul Aziz KH; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Triyanto Triyanto
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v2i2.9968

Abstract

 Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1). Manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang lebih baik, pendekatan pembelajaran Kontekstual, Pemecahan Masalah atau Pembelajaran Langsung. (2). Manakah yang memberikan prestasi belajar matematika siswa yang lebih baik, siswa dengan konsep diri tinggi, sedang atau rendah. (3). Apakah  pada masing-masing konsep diri siswa (tinggi, sedang dan rendah) pendekatan pembelajaran Kontekstual lebih baik dibanding Pemecahan Masalah dan Pembelajaran Langsung, dan Pemecahan Masalah lebih baik dibanding Pembelajaran Langsung. (4). Apakah pada masing-masing pendekatan pembelajaran (Kontekstual, Pemecahan Masalah dan Pembelajaran Langsung) pada siswa dengan konsep diri tinggi lebih baik dibanding dengan konsep diri sedang dan rendah serta apakah siswa dengan konsep diri sedang lebih baik dibanding dengan konsep diri rendah.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain faktorial 3x3. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Sragen semester genap tahun pelajaran 2011/2012. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara stratified cluster random sampling dengan sampel penelitian adalah siswa-siswi SMP Negeri 2 Sragen, SMP Negeri 1 Karangmalang, dan SMP Negeri 2 Karangmalang masing-masing terdiri dari tiga kelas, satu kelas sebagai kelas Pembelajaran Kontekstual, satu kelas sebagai kelas Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah dan satu kelas sebagai kelas Pembelajaran Langsung. Banyak anggota sampel seluruhnya adalah 265 siswa. Uji instrumen yang digunakan adalah uji validitas, reliabelitas, daya beda dan tingkat kesukaran. Uji normalitas menggunakan Lilliefors, uji homogenitas dengan uji Bartlett dan uji keseimbangan menggunakan uji-F. Uji hipotesis menggunakan uji anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama.Berdasarkan hasil pengujian hipotesis dalam penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan. (1). Pendekatan pembelajaran kontekstual memberikan prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada pembelajaran pemecahan masalah dan pembelajaran langsung, dan pembelajaran pemecahan masalah memberikan prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada pembelajaran langsung. (2). Siswa yang memiliki konsep diri tinggi mempunyai prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki konsep diri sedang dan rendah, dan siswa dengan konsep diri sedang memberikan prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada siswa dengan konsep diri rendah. (3a). Pada siswa dengan konsep diri tinggi, pembelajaran pemecahan masalah memberikan prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada pembelajaran langsung. Sedangkan pendekatan pembelajaran kontekstual sama baiknya dengan pembelajaran pemecahan masalah dan pembelajaran langsung. (3b). Pada siswa dengan konsep diri sedang, pembelajaran kontekstual memberikan prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada pembelajaran langsung. Sedangkan pendekatan pembelajaran pemecahan masalah sama baiknya dengan pembelajaran kontekstual dan pembelajaran langsung. (3c). Pada siswa dengan konsep diri rendah, pendekatan pembelajaran kontekstual memberikan prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada pembelajaran pemecahan masalah. Sedangkan pendekatan pembelajaran pemecahan masalah dan kontekstual sama baiknya dengan pembelajaran langsung. (4a). Pada pendekatan pembelajaran kontekstual, semua siswa dengan beragam konsep diri memiliki prestasi belajar yang sama. (4b). Pada pendekatan pembelajaran pemecahan masalah, siswa dengan konsep diri tinggi memiliki prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada siswa dengan konsep diri sedang dan siswa dengan konsep diri tinggi memiliki prestasi belajar lebih baik daripada konsep diri rendah, dan siswa dengan konsep diri sedang akan lebih baik daripada siswa dengan konsep diri rendah. (4c). Pada pendekatan pembelajaran langsung, semua siswa dengan beragam konsep diri memiliki prestasi yang sama. Kata kunci :     Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika, Kontekstual, Pemecahan Masalah, Pembelajaran Langsung, Prestasi Belajar, Konsep Diri.
PROSES MEMBANGUN PENGETAHUAN KONSEPTUAL PADA SISWA KELAS VIII DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI SMP NEGERI 1 KUDUS Nova Ayu Arisjanti; Imam Sujadi; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i1.10000

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research is to describe the process of conceptual knowledge building of the students in Grade VIII in Mathematics learning at State Junior High School 1 of Kudus. This research used a qualitative case study method. The subjects of the research were three students in Grade VIII of the school with the high, medium, and low academic abilities respectively. The subjects of the research were chosen by using the purposive sampling technique. The data of the research were gathered through passive participatory observations. All of the learning activities were documented by taping them with handy camera. Based on data analysis of the three students in Grade VIII with the high, medium, and low academic abilities respectively in mathematics learning at the cube and cuboid elements at State Junior High School 1 of Kudus are as follows. (1) The process of conceptual knowledge building of the subject of the research with the low academic ability. Initially the knowledge associated with submitted materials teachers are still global. The information and knowledge obtained from doing the exercises, through: (a) visualizing the shape of cube and cuboid into the other shape to identify the elements; (b) making the relation and category classification between cube and cuboid. Doing the other activity, like: (a) learning the note book, handbook, and student’s work sheet; (b) using the complete note book as reference in the learning; (c) attending courses. (2) The process of conceptual knowledge building of the subject of the research with the medium academic ability. Initially knowledge obtained from teacher in the mathematics learning still global. The information and knowledge obtained from doing the exercises, through: (a) making the relation and category classification between cube and cuboid; (b) identifying the side of shape from cuboid through example. Doing the other activity, like: (a) relearning the material; (b) using material from explanation the teacher as reference in the learning; (c) giving certain signs if there are differences in the contents of the learning materials of the books learned; (d) doing the different exercises with example from the teacher; (e) attending courses. (3) The process of conceptual knowledge building of the subject of the research with the high academic ability. Initially acquired knowledge not as detailed as what the teachers explained. The information and knowledge obtained from doing the exercises, through: (a) discussion; (b) visualizing the shape of cube and cuboid into the other shape to indentify the elements; (c) determining criteria of classification the cube and cuboid. Doing the other activity, like: (a) reading the material; (b) doing the exercises from the formula and solution in the handbook; (c) attending courses.Keywords: the process of knowledge building, conceptual knowledge, and mathematics learning.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS DAN TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI SISWA KELAS VIII SMP Mishbahul Huda; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10032

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research are to investigate: (1) which learning model of the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the direc learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (2) which students of the the students with the high achievement motivation, the students with the moderate achievement motivation, and the students with the low achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in each category of the achievement motivations, which learning model of the cooperative learning model of the TGT type, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, and the direc learning model results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students of the the students with the high achievement motivation, the students with the moderate achievement motivation, and the students with the low achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Wonogiri regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the research were the students as many as 299 of State Junior Secondary School 1 of Purwantoro, State Junior Secondary School 1 of Jatisrono, and State Junior Secondary School 2 Puhpelem. The data of the research were analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with unbalanced cells at the significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows: 1) the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TGT type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and direct learning model, the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate achievement motivation and low achievement motivation, the students with the high achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low achievement motivation. 3) In each category of the achievement motivations, the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TGT type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type and direct learning model, the students instructed with the cooperative learning model of the TAI type have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the direct learning model. 4) In each learning model, the students with the high achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate achievement motivation and low achievement motivation, the students with the moderate achievement motivation have a better learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the low achievement motivation.Keywords: The cooperative learning model of the TGT type, the cooperative learning model of the TAI type, direct learning, and achievement motivation.
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Tourism Sector in Indonesia Using a Structural Path Analysis Based on Inter-Regional Input-Output Matrix Habi Cahya Kumara; Dedy Prastyo; Santi Puteri Rahayu
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v11i2.58130

Abstract

At the end of 2019 the world was shocked by the new emerging infectious disease in China; the Coronavirus disease (Covid-19). This outbreak is spreading fast and has infected almost all countries including Indonesia, the WHO has designated Covid-19 as a pandemic. The Indonesian government issued a policy of limiting community activities in an effort to break the spread of the virus. This restriction resulted in a significant reduction in economic demand. Based on the release of economic growth data by BPS, Indonesia experienced a recession in the third quarter of 2020 with the transportation and tourism sectors being the sectors most affected by this pandemic. This study will analyze the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia on the tourism sector and its relationship with other sectors using Backward Linkage, Forward Linkage, Multiplier Effects, and Structural Path Analysis (SPA) methods on Indonesia's Inter-Regional Input Output (IRIO) data. According to the results of the analysis up to October 2020, Indonesia lost potential income in the tourism sector by 165.97 trillion rupiah. The hotel and restaurant sector has the largest impact on the formation of output by -99.09 trillion rupiah. The decline in output of hotel and restaurant sector gave a high multiplier impact on the food and beverage sector by -17.9 trillion rupiah and trade sector by -10.7 trillion rupiah. Regionally, the province of Bali and DI Yogyakarta became the provinces with the biggest impact from the decline in tourism due to the composition of the tourism sector in it’s regional economy is equal to 34,8% and 26,5%.

Page 13 of 16 | Total Record : 157

 11   12   13   14   15 

Filter by Year

2011 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 1 (2023): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 2 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 2 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 2 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 10, No 1 (2020): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 2 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 2, No 1 (2012): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 2 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 1, No 1 (2011): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education More Issue