cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dodi Faedlulloh
Contact Email
dodi.faedlulloh@fisip.unila.ac.id
Phone
+625723504025
Journal Mail Official
journal.administratio@fisip.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung B Lantai 1 FISIP Universitas Lampung, Jl. Prof. Dr. Ir. Sumantri Brojonegoro No.1, Gedong Meneng, Rajabasa, Kota Bandar Lampung, Lampung 35141
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 20870825     EISSN : 25486977     DOI : https://doi.org/10.23960/administratio
Core Subject : Education,
Other
Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan adalah terbitan berkala nasional yang memuat artikel penelitian (research article) di bidang administrasi publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan diharapkan dapat menjadi media untuk menyampaikan temuan dan inovasi ilmiah di bidang administrasi publik kepada para ilmuan dan praktisi di bidang administrasi publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan diterbitkan 2 kali dalam setahun (bulan Januari-Juni, dan Juli-Desember) oleh Jurusan Administrasi Negara FISIP Universitas Lampung, bekerjasama dengan Persatuan Sarjana Adminstrasi Negara (PERSADI) Provinsi Lampung.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Administrasi Publik
Articles 196 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
Systemic Decoupling in Digital Foreigner Reporting: Uneven APOA Adoption in Surakarta ⁠Fitriana Riscadewi Warisno; Sudarmo; Sri Yuliani
Administratio Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/administratio.v17i1.597

Abstract

Indonesia has a legally supported digital mandate for reporting foreigners, but data intake in Surakarta’s accommodation sector remains minimal. This article aims to explain this gap by analyzing Aplikasi Pelaporan Orang Asing (APOA) as a digital governance arrangement rather than a fully realized surveillance system. The study uses a qualitative case study based on documentary analysis and secondary institutional data, covering immigration regulations, official APOA procedures, a Surakarta accommodation dataset, and relevant literature on digital governance, technology adoption, and migration control. The empirical snapshot shows a marked decoupling between digital policy and reporting reality: registration rose from 26 of 976 accommodation units on 2 September 2025 to 31 of 976 on 27 November 2025, or 3.18% overall coverage. Hotel coverage reached 8.89%, while non-hotel accommodation coverage remained 0.45%. These figures do not demonstrate causal explanations or comparative patterns across jurisdictions, but they show that APOA’s monitoring capacity is largely unrealized in this case. The article concludes that the central issue is a governance gap between formal control and actual compliance infrastructure: legal authority and platform availability are present, but coordination, reciprocal incentives, organizational follow-up, and trust-building remain insufficiently institutionalized.
Bridging the Gap Between Design and Practice: The Implementation of SILOG in Election Logistics Matheus Gratiano Mali; Faisal Yudi Anugerah; Eko Ari Wibowo
Administratio Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/administratio.v17i1.603

Abstract

The rapid development of information and communication technology has encouraged governments to adopt digital systems to improve the efficiency, transparency, and accountability of public services. One form of this transformation is the implementation of E-Government in election administration, including the use of the Logistics Information System (SILOG) by the General Election Commission (KPU). Logistic Information System is a technology-based system designed to integrate the planning, management, distribution, and monitoring of election logistics in a digital and integrated manner. The implementation of this system is important to support more effective, accurate, and well-documented election logistics management. This study aims to analyze the implementation of SILOG in election logistics management at the KPU of Magelang City. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies. Informants were selected using purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques involving several parties directly involved in managing the system. The analysis applies an E-Government framework that includes aspects of support, capacity, value, willingness, and local culture, as well as the identification of supporting and constraining factors in its implementation. The findings indicate that the implementation of SILOG contributes to supporting a more integrated and digital-based election logistics management process. Its implementation is influenced by various factors related to institutional support, resource capacity, and technical and organizational conditions in practice
The Illusion of Local Autonomy: Central Power and Subnational Governance in Indonesia Maria Lusiana Florentin Werang; Nicolaus Petrus Likuwatan Werang; Mia Rizki; Rizky Amalia Putri
Administratio Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/administratio.v17i1.613

Abstract

Decentralization has been a key reform agenda in Indonesia since the post-1998 transition, aiming to scale up democratic governance and reduce regional disparities. While assumptions about (central) authority lead to a linear transfer of authority, this article argues that decentralization has produced a counterintuitive configuration, best understood as a recentralization of bureaucracy within a formally decentralized system. This connectivity emphasizes that local governments retain administrative responsibilities, while the central government reasserts control through regulatory, fiscal, and sectoral instruments. Further, qualitative content analysis and data collection, guided by iterative coding and triangulation, are applied to laws, implementing regulations, policy documents, and peer-reviewed literature to explore how authority is distributed and reconfigured across levels of government. Findings suggest that variations in governance are insignificant and reflect local capacity, which is inherently part of decentralization, rather than a strategic reconfiguration of authority in which high-risk functions are administrative burdens and then delegated. It has resulted in overlapping mandates, fragmented accountability, and consistently uneven concretization since the reform era. This article also reframes Indonesian decentralization as an evolving institutional solution formulated by selective recentralization. It suggests that reforms should prioritize clarifying authority and strengthening accountability rather than relying solely on capacity building.
The Accountability Paradox in Hybrid Zakat Governance: Evidence from BAZNAS Kota Yogyakarta Savira Nur Aini; Sudarmo; Faizatul Ansoriyah
Administratio Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/administratio.v17i1.615

Abstract

Contemporary public accountability reforms often assume that stronger transparency, auditability, and regulatory compliance will enhance organizational legitimacy and strengthen public trust. This assumption remains contested, particularly in hybrid faith-based public organizations that operate under overlapping bureaucratic and moral-religious accountability demands. This study examines public accountability practices in BAZNAS Kota Yogyakarta as a local zakat governance institution with strong formal compliance structures. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and non-participant observation. The analysis applies a multidimensional public accountability framework encompassing legal, financial, managerial, and social accountability, interpreted through the lenses of symbolic transparency and institutional decoupling. Findings show that BAZNAS Kota Yogyakarta demonstrates strong formal accountability through regulatory compliance, layered audit systems, standardized reporting, and active digital disclosure. Substantive accountability, however, remains comparatively limited. Managerial accountability is primarily oriented toward program delivery rather than systematic outcome evaluation, while social accountability is characterized more by informational openness than meaningful participatory engagement. These patterns suggest an accountability paradox in which visible compliance strengthens formal legitimacy without fully translating into substantive accountability. The study argues that accountability in hybrid faith-based public organizations should not be understood solely as a technocratic compliance mechanism, but as a contested governance process shaped by competing institutional logics, public expectations, and organizational legitimacy pressures. The findings contribute to public administration scholarship by extending accountability debates into the context of hybrid zakat governance.
Defense Spending as Strategic Investment in Indonesia: A Systematic Review of Governance and Capability Sustainability Haridinuto; Surachman Surjaatmadja
Administratio Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/administratio.v17i1.620

Abstract

Indonesia’s defense-spending problem cannot be understood only as a shortage of fiscal resources. It also reflects a governance-mediated capability risk: annual budget allocations, procurement decisions, sustainment obligations, manpower policy, industrial participation, and accountability mechanisms are not yet fully integrated into a long-cycle capability system.  This article examines the conditions under which defense spending in Indonesia may function as strategic investment rather than as a recurring fiscal burden. Strategic investment is understood here as expenditure that generates durable readiness, life-cycle affordability, industrial learning, strategic resilience, and public legitimacy.  The study employs a concept-driven systematic literature review using a PRISMA-informed protocol. Literature was identified through Scopus, Web of Science, and targeted Google Scholar searches, then screened and synthesized thematically. A final core corpus of 33 studies was analyzed across four themes: fiscal capacity and governance gap; life-cycle costing, procurement, and sustainment; defense manpower, reserve components, and budget efficiency; and industrial participation, accountability, and strategic value. The review finds that Indonesia’s central challenge is not merely underfunding, but capability leakage caused by weak alignment between fiscal planning, procurement continuity, sustainment costs, manpower design, industrial policy, and oversight.  Through the Defense Resource Governance and Management System framework, the article argues that defense spending becomes strategic investment only when it is governed as an integrated long-term capability system. The article concludes that failure to govern defense spending in this way is not simply an administrative inefficiency, but a national security risk because repeated expenditure may fail to accumulate durable strategic value.
Community-Based Conservation and Tourism Integration: A Bibliometric and Risk-Based Assessment for Sustainable Management of Ranu Darungan Asti Amelia Novita; Gita Zulfie Ramadhani
Administratio Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/administratio.v17i1.627

Abstract

This study aims to map research trends and strategic risks in sustainable tourism management within conservation areas using bibliometric analysis via VOSviewer and a risk assessment matrix. Based on 137 Scopus-indexed articles, findings reveal that themes such as sustainable tourism, collaborative governance, and conservation have evolved dynamically since 2013, shifting toward integrating governance, ecosystem services, and sustainable development. The six major thematic clusters identified were then translated into locally relevant risk categories through stakeholder-based assessment. The highest-priority risks were visitor overcapacity and habitat disturbance. This research provides an integrated analytical approach that links worldwide governance trends identified by bibliometric mapping with locally specific risk priorities, laying a pragmatic ground for adaptive governance and sustainable tourism management in conservation zones.

Page 20 of 20 | Total Record : 196

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 17 No 1 (2026): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 16 No 2 (2025): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 16 No 1 (2025): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 15 No 2 (2024): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 14 No 2 (2023): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 14 No 1 (2023): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 13 No 2 (2022): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 13 No 1 (2022): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 12 No 2 (2021): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 12 No 1 (2021): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 11 No 2 (2020): Administratio: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 11 No 1 (2020): Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 10 No 2 (2019): Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 10 No 1 (2019): Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 9 No 2 (2018): Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 9 No 1 (2018): Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 8 No 2 (2017): Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan Vol 8 No 1 (2017): Administratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik dan Pembangunan More Issue