cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rizanizarli
Contact Email
rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
anwar.hafidzi@uin-antasari.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Ahmad Yani KM. 4,5 Banjarmasin Kalimantan Selatan
Location
Kota banjarbaru,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
ISSN : 14126303     EISSN : 2549001X     DOI : 10.18592/sjhp.v22i1.4843
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Syariah specializes on Law and Islamic law, and is intended to communicate original research and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 391 Documents
 36   37   38   39   40 
Rekonstruksi Teori Hukum Informasi dalam Menghadapi Berita Palsu: Analisis Etika Media Digital Berbasis Regulasi dan Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Mochamad Riyanto; Ahmad Roihan Firdiansyah
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.18181

Abstract

The spread of fake news in the digital era has posed complex challenges to journalism ethics, legal regulation, and social stability. Existing information laws tend to be reactive and have not integrated ethical dimensions or religious values. This study presents a new theoretical model based on maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, integrating professional ethics, positive law, and Islamic legal principles as a framework for reconstructing Media and Press Law. Using a normative-qualitative approach, this study analyzes press regulations in Indonesia, selected scientific literature, and Islamic legal doctrine—particularly the concepts of taʿzīr and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah—through thematic analysis with source selection criteria and a conceptual coding process to identify gaps between media ethics, regulations, and fiqh. This approach examines how misinformation and disinformation threaten the protection of reason (ḥifẓ al-ʿaql) and religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), which are the core objectives of Sharia. The study's results indicate that integrating the principles of information verification (tabayyun), accountability, and public responsibility into the legal system and journalistic practices can increase resilience to disinformation. The information governance model based on maqāṣid, formulated in this study, is a conceptual contribution that aligns law enforcement with journalistic ethics, ensuring that freedom of expression remains guaranteed while upholding the collective obligation to maintain truth and justice in the digital public space. In addition, this study proposes policy indicators that translate the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah into regulatory measures that can be implemented by media institutions and state authorities, thereby building an adaptive and ethically based regulatory framework to address the threat of disinformation within the scope of Media and Press Law.
Hambatan Sertifikasi Halal pada UMKM di Makassar: Perspektif Finansial, Digital, dan Tata Kelola Reslawati Reslawati; R. Adang Nofandi; Ahsanul Khalikin
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.18226

Abstract

This study examines how the dynamics of halal certification shape the experiences of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Makassar, South Sulawesi, in the aftermath of the Halal Product Assurance Law (UU JPH). While previous scholarship has repeatedly highlighted financial burdens, regulatory complexity, and technological gaps, few studies explore how these challenges unfold in specific local contexts. Drawing on a qualitative design that combined field observation, document analysis, and semi-structured interviews, this research identifies the barriers encountered by MSMEs and evaluates the real outcomes of government-led support initiatives in Makassar. The findings reveal that persistent financial constraints, uneven levels of digital literacy, and weak institutional coordination remain the most significant obstacles to effective certification. These issues are analyzed through the lenses of policy implementation, governance, and service quality, showing that systemic institutional weaknesses, rather than mere technical inefficiencies, lie at the heart of these challenges. By situating Makassar’s case within broader debates on Indonesia’s halal governance, the study demonstrates how localized insights can illuminate gaps in national implementation frameworks. The results underscore the urgent need for targeted financial assistance, integrated governance reforms, and sustained capacity-building programs to ensure that MSMEs are not only able to comply with certification requirements but also benefit from their participation in the growing halal economy, while providing context sensitive field perspectives that are rarely addressed in existing literature.
Reconstructing The Legal Protection Of Indonesian Migrant Workers Facing The Death Penalty (Jinayat) In Saudi Arabia: National And International Legal Perspectives Ahmad Muchlis; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Nabitatus Sa'adah
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.18269

Abstract

  This study examines the reconstruction of the legal protection model for Indonesian migrant workers (PMI) facing the death penalty in Saudi Arabia from both national and international legal perspectives. The research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of existing legal instruments, identify implementation gaps, and propose a comprehensive, human rights–based model of protection. Employing a normative juridical (doctrinal) method, the study analyzes Indonesia’s constitutional and statutory framework, international conventions such as the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963), and the structure of Saudi Arabia’s jināyāt legal system. The findings reveal that although Indonesia possesses a robust national legal framework, weak implementation, inadequate inter-agency coordination, and limited bilateral enforcement mechanisms continue to expose migrant workers to severe human rights risks, particularly due to Saudi Arabia’s non-compliance with Mandatory Consular Notification (MCN). The study recommends the establishment of binding bilateral agreements, the strengthening of legal diplomacy and attaché functions, and the harmonization of national law with international human rights standards. The implications highlight that migrant worker protection must operate as an integrated system—covering prevention, legal assistance, and post-trial support—to effectively realize the state’s constitutional duty to protect its citizens abroad.  
Arsitektur Akad Fintech Syariah: Pengembangan Kerangka Standarisasi Berbasis Konvergensi Fiqh, Fatwa, dan Putusan Pengadilan Yasardin Yasardin; Amelia Rahmaniah; Avisena Ilma Rachmasari
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.18275

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) schemes represents a major shift in consumer finance and has entered Islamic financial markets with significant controversy. While promoted as an inclusive financing solution, Islamic BNPL raises urgent concerns regarding hybrid contracts, Shariah compliance, and consumer protection. This trend reflects both technological change and a regulatory gap that demands systematic assessment and normative solutions.Existing studies on Islamic fintech largely focus on compliance checklists or technical contracts, leaving unresolved tensions between innovation, governance, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This research addresses the problem of whether Islamic BNPL can be structured as a Shariah-compliant instrument that also supports economic democratization. Using doctrinal and normative legal analysis, this study examines Islamic BNPL practices through the lenses of Shariah governance, contract theory, and Islamic economic principles. The analysis reveals that loosely structured hybrid contracts often generate legal ambiguity, misallocate risk, and weaken ethical safeguards. Conversely, BNPL models grounded in clear contractual separation and effective Shariah oversight show stronger alignment with justice and inclusivity. This study concludes that Islamic BNPL requires governance reform rather than mere contractual labeling. It recommends regulatory harmonization, strengthened Shariah supervision, and contract standardization to ensure that BNPL contributes to responsible financial access and equitable economic development.
Reconstructing Paylater Schemes in Islamic Fintech: A Normative Analysis of Deferred Payment Contracts Under Sharia Economic Law Anisah Norlaila Hayati; Wahyu Fitrianoor; Sri Sudono Saliro; Nor Fadillah; Siti Rif’atussa’adah Sitorus Pane
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.18517

Abstract

The proliferation of financial technology (fintech) innovations has reshaped consumer behavior through digital payment models such as paylater, enabling deferred payments in online transactions. Despite its practical benefits, the paylater mechanism raises legal and ethical concerns in Islamic economic law due to possible elements of riba (usury), gharar (uncertainty), and contractual ambiguity. This study investigates the normative validity of paylater schemes within the framework of Sharia economic law by reconstructing them through Sharia-compliant contractual models. Using a normative-juridical method supported by doctrinal analysis, this research examines primary sources such as the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES), relevant fatwas of the National Sharia Council–Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI), and international Sharia standards (AAOIFI and IFSB), supplemented by secondary literature on Islamic finance and e-commerce. The findings indicate that paylater is permissible under Sharia when structured as bai‘ bi tsaman ajil (deferred payment sale) or murabahah (cost-plus sale), provided that price, ownership, and risk are clearly defined and that penalties do not involve interest. Conversely, a paylater model based on qardh (loan) with fixed returns constitutes riba and violates Islamic principles. The study further offers practical recommendations for regulators and fintech operators to design transparent, fair, and Sharia-compliant digital financing systems aligned with maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah to protecting religion, life, intellect, wealth, and lineage. This reconstruction contributes to the global discourse on Islamic fintech by proposing a viable Islamic “Buy Now Pay Later” (BNPL) model that balances consumer protection, market competitiveness, and ethical finance.
Green Sukuk dan Kepatuhan Syariah: Penguatan Kerangka Hukum Verifikasi Proyek Berkelanjutan di Indonesia Nisa Afifah; Gicella Sonbay; Defrianus Nong Deris; Bimaryudho Dhimas Kurnia Armadha; Mujiburrohman Mujiburrohman; Muhamad Abdul Kholik
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 26 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v26i1.18857

Abstract

Indonesia’s green sukuk has been widely promoted as an innovation in sustainable Islamic finance. However, behind this development remain structural problems related to regulatory fragmentation, verification gaps, and the risk of greenwashing that threaten legal certainty, accountability, and investor confidence. Amid growing international debates on sustainable finance regulation, Islamic financial governance, and sharia-based environmental accountability, there is still no legal framework that operationally integrates maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah principles with measurable sustainability verification mechanisms. This study examines three main issues, namely the conceptualization of green sukuk within sharia business law, the weaknesses of environmental sharia verification mechanisms in Indonesia, and the formulation of an ideal legal framework capable of ensuring measurable dual compliance between environmental sustainability and sharia principles. The research employs a normative juridical method using conceptual and comparative approaches through the analysis of the Sovereign Sukuk Law, Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 18 of 2015, DSN-MUI Fatwa Number 122 of 2018, the Indonesian Green Sukuk Framework, and comparative practices in Malaysia and the United Kingdom. The findings demonstrate that the current legal framework only establishes formal conformity between green sukuk and sharia principles without operationalizing maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as technical evaluative indicators. The system also maintains a separation between sharia audits and environmental audits and lacks a national institution responsible for coordinating environmental sharia verification, thereby creating opportunities for greenwashing practices. In response, this study proposes the establishment of the National Green Sharia Audit Board and the National Standard for Green Sukuk Sharia Verification as mechanisms for translating maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah into substantive dual compliance indicators. The study contributes to the development of Islamic financial law by shifting the paradigm from formal normative compliance toward substantive and functional compliance within sustainable Islamic finance governance.
Rethinking Family Legitimacy in European Law: Legal Recognition and Protection of Unmarried Cohabitants Oleh Prostybozhenko; Yunina Maryna; Olena Pushkina; Olha Bondarenko; Myroslava Skrynyk
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 26 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v26i1.19552

Abstract

The recognition of unmarried cohabitants in European law demonstrates an ongoing transformation of the concept of family within modern legal systems. The comparative analysis shows that France, Sweden, Italy, and England and Wales adopt different regulatory approaches, resulting in varying levels of protection concerning property rights, inheritance, social welfare, and relationship dissolution. These differences indicate that legal protection for cohabitants in Europe remains fragmented and inconsistent. The study also confirms the important role of the European Court of Human Rights in expanding the interpretation of “family life” under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Nevertheless, significant gaps remain between symbolic recognition and effective legal protection, particularly regarding financial rights and cross-border legal certainty. The absence of harmonized rules governing transnational cohabitation further increases legal uncertainty within the European legal framework. This article argues that the current fragmented legal structure creates vulnerability for unmarried cohabitants, especially economically dependent partners. Therefore, European legal systems should develop minimum protective standards, strengthen the recognition of cohabitation agreements, and improve supranational coordination to ensure equitable and predictable legal protection for contemporary family relationships.
Otoritas Keagamaan dan Tata Kelola Budaya dalam Hukum Publik Islam: Studi Fiqh Siyasah tentang Regulasi Konser Musik di Aceh Sutrisno Sutrisno; Shofiatun Nikmah; Risma Hikmawati; Aty Munshihah; Wahid Syafruddin
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.19925

Abstract

The prohibition of music concerts in Aceh over the past two decades of the post-conflict period has shown an increasingly consolidated trend alongside the deepening institutionalization of Islamic law in the public sphere. This phenomenon reflects a process of negotiation that is not always harmonious between religious authority and contemporary cultural expression often culminating in the cancellation and prohibition of music concerts through administrative mechanisms. This study examines the fiqh siyasah foundations underlying the construction of the Aceh Ulama Consultative Council (MPU) Fatwa No. 12 of 2013 and evaluates the implications of its implementation for governance practices in Aceh. Employing a juridical-normative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, the study analyzes key legal sources underpinning the prohibition of music concerts, including MPU fatwas, regional government circular letters, and classical as well as contemporary fiqh siyasah literature. The findings indicate that MPU Fatwa No. 12/2013 is formulated within the framework of fiqh siyasah through the approaches of siyāsah shar‘iyyah and maṣlaḥah mursalah, functioning primarily as a moral-religious guideline for regulating arts and entertainment in Aceh.However, when such a fatwa is translated into regional policy in the absence of a formal qanun and balanced public deliberation mechanisms, its function shifts from an ethical norm to an instrument of symbolic control over cultural space, thereby constraining the plurality of contemporary cultural expressions. This study recommends the formulation of a specific qanun regulating Islamic arts and culture through a participatory, inclusive, and transparent legislative process, ensuring that shariabased policies remain responsive to the evolving cultural expressions of society
Reconstructing Professional Legal Ethics within the Framework of Fiqh Qadha and Qur'an: A Normative Study of Islamic Judicial Integrity Rahmat Sholihin; Adwin Tista; Saila Salsabila
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 26 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v26i1.20166

Abstract

The modern judiciary faces an unprecedented crisis of legitimacy, marked by widespread ethical violations, corruption allegations, and declining public trust in judicial institutions across Muslim-majority nations. This phenomenon represents a critical juncture requiring the reconstruction of professional legal ethics grounded in Islamic normative sources, particularly Fiqh Qadha and Qur'anic principles that articulate transcendent standards of judicial integrity. The theoretical landscape reveals a significant disjuncture between contemporary positive law frameworks and the rich Islamic jurisprudential heritage addressing judicial ethics. Existing scholarship has predominantly examined either the procedural dimensions of Islamic courts or institutional reforms in secular-positivist contexts, leaving unexamined the substantive ethical reconstruction of the judicial profession itself through integrated Qur'anic and Fiqh Qadha principles. This study aims to systematically reconstruct professional legal ethics within the framework of Fiqh Qadha and Qur'anic principles to establish normative standards for Islamic judicial integrity, examining how classical jurisprudential categories and Qur'anic ethical directives can inform contemporary judicial reform in Muslim societies. Through this reconstruction, the research seeks to create a comprehensive ethical paradigm that simultaneously honors Islamic legal tradition and addresses modern governance challenges. Employing a normative juridical method grounded in library research, the study engages primary sources including the Qur'an, classical fiqh works, contemporary fatwas, and statutory instruments to conduct a qualitative analysis of judicial ethics principles. The research synthesizes textual hermeneutics with jurisprudential comparison to identify core ethical standards applicable to contemporary judicial practice. The findings establish that Islamic normative sources articulate a comprehensive ethical framework centered on justice (al-adl), trustworthiness (amanah), intellectual integrity (fathanah), and moral steadfastness (istiqamah), principles that fundamentally exceed the procedural minimalism of many positive law codes. These principles function not merely as behavioral guidelines but as transcendent standards grounding judicial authority in divine accountability, thereby creating a distinctive ethical architecture superior to purely secular frameworks. The study concludes that reconstructing professional legal ethics through Fiqh Qadha and Qur'anic integration offers a transformative pathway for restoring judicial credibility, strengthening institutional legitimacy, and fostering ethical accountability in Muslim-majority legal systems. The research recommends systematic institutional reform integrating Islamic ethical training, establishing shari'ah-based ethics commissions, and implementing maqasid-aligned oversight mechanisms to operationalize these normative principles in contemporary judicial governance.
Rezim Harta Perkawinan dalam Hukum Islam: Analisis Perbandingan Mazhab dan Integrasinya ke dalam Tata Kelola Ekonomi Islam Modern Ahmad Mubarak; Nahdia Nazmi; Muhamad Rahmani Abduh; Nurul Azkia; Novy Listiana; Iqnaul Umam Ashidiqi
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 26 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v26i1.20553

Abstract

The economic transformation of contemporary Muslim families has significantly reshaped the ownership, management, and distribution of property within marriage. This development has generated legal tension where classical fiqh, which generally upholds separate ownership between spouses, confronts the realities of dual-income households, women’s economic contribution, and increasing state intervention in the pursuit of family justice. Marital property must therefore be understood not merely as a matter of private law, but as an issue located at the intersection of Islamic family law, Islamic economic law, comparative madhhab analysis, and state legal governance. This article aims to analyse the normative construction of marital property regimes across the Sunni madhhabs, examine their integration into modern state law, and formulate a more just and context-sensitive conceptual model. The study employs a qualitative legal research design based on a doctrinal-comparative approach, complemented by a limited socio-legal perspective. Data were collected through systematic library research and documentary legal research, and analysed through qualitative content analysis, comparative legal analysis, and normative-constructive analysis. The findings show that classical Islamic law does not recognise the automatic fusion of property by virtue of marriage, yet it provides normative resources through milkiyyah, shirkah, ‘urf, nafaqah, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah to acknowledge entitlements arising from both direct and indirect contribution. The central problem lies not in the absence of Islamic norms, but in the weak translation of those norms into fair adjudicative methods and state policy. This article proposes a maqāṣid-based relational marital property regime that balances individual ownership, economic and domestic contribution, the social function of family assets, and equitable adjustment. It concludes that reform of marital property law should move towards interpretations that are more responsive to contribution, child protection, and the economic governance of modern Muslim families.

Page 39 of 40 | Total Record : 391

 36   37   38   39   40 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26 No 1 (2026) Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore Vol 25 No 1 (2025) Vol 24 No 2 (2024) Vol 24 No 1 (2024) Vol 23 No 2 (2023) Vol 23 No 1 (2023) Vol 23, No 1 (2023) Vol 22, No 2 (2022) Vol 22, No 1 (2022) Vol 21, No 2 (2021) Vol 21 No 1 (2021) Vol 21, No 1 (2021) Vol 20, No 2 (2020) Vol 20, No 1 (2020) Vol 19, No 2 (2019) Vol 19, No 1 (2019) Vol 19, No 1 (2019): (in Press) Vol 18, No 2 (2018) Vol 18, No 2 (2018) Vol 18, No 1 (2018) Vol 18, No 1 (2018) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 14, No 2 (2014) Vol 14, No 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 1 (2013) More Issue