cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rizanizarli
Contact Email
rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
anwar.hafidzi@uin-antasari.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Ahmad Yani KM. 4,5 Banjarmasin Kalimantan Selatan
Location
Kota banjarbaru,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
ISSN : 14126303     EISSN : 2549001X     DOI : 10.18592/sjhp.v22i1.4843
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Syariah specializes on Law and Islamic law, and is intended to communicate original research and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 391 Documents
 36   37   38   39   40 
Formulasi Islamic Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) untuk Mencapai Demokratisasi Ekonomi Syariah Prawitra Thalib; Fahrian Saleh Siregar; Wimboko Wimboko; Ibtisam @ Ilyana Ilias; Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.16325

Abstract

The rapid growth of financial technology has reshaped global economic structures and accelerated the diffusion of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) schemes, which commonly rely on interest‑based deferred payments. In Muslim‑majority jurisdictions such as Indonesia, this raises controversy over the permissibility of BNPL, given its riba‑like charges and opaque fee structures, alongside a regulatory gap that has not yet been addressed through a dedicated Islamic BNPL framework. This article examines that gap by asking, first, how a Sharia‑compliant BNPL model can be normatively formulated? and second, how such a model can contribute to achieving Sharia economic democracy? Using normative legal research based on historical and systematic interpretation, and employing conceptual, statute, and comparative approaches, the study analyses BNPL regulation and practice in Qatar, Malaysia, and Indonesia. The findings show that current Indonesian BNPL products embed riba, gharar, and unjust enrichment, whereas Qatar and Malaysia have begun to redesign BNPL through Murabaha, Ijarah, and Qard contracts under explicit Sharia governance and consumer‑protection rules. The study then proposes a legal‑contractual model for Islamic BNPL that combines fixed‑price or cost‑based fees, transparent contractual disclosure, capped non‑profit penalties, and formal Sharia supervision, operationalised through indicators of access, affordability, transparency, anti‑exploitation, and ethical governance. The article concludes by recommending that Indonesian regulators adopt a specific Islamic BNPL act, integrate Islamic supervisory mechanisms, and standardise consumer‑protection safeguards so that Islamic BNPL can function as an instrument of inclusive finance and Sharia‑based economic democracy.
Ethical Contestation in Law Enforcement: Reactualizing Islamic Values within Indonesia’s Rule of Law Framework. Muhammad Taufik; Muhammad Zainal Abidin; Elsayed Amin; Rusfian Effendi
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.16592

Abstract

Violations of ethical values have become a common phenomenon that occurs in law enforcement in Indonesia nowadays. Violations of ethical values have become a topic of discussion and debate in the public space, with society discussing the weak law enforcement and the difficulty of getting justice. The purpose of this research is to analyze the contestation of ethical values in law enforcement by reactivating Islamic values to achieve the supremacy of law. Academically, this research is important because it reinforces the ethical theory that states that the right action aligns with moral norms. In this case, law enforcement must be carried out, as it is a shared duty and responsibility. Meanwhile, in practice, violations of ethical values in law enforcement become a serious moral issue. This research uses a qualitative approach with in-depth exploration, digging into data scattered across the internet and online news. The research findings indicate that the public debate about ethics and the weak enforcement of the law has become commonplace. Moreover, ethical values must be applied in law enforcement, so as not to trigger debates and discussions about how justice and ethics should be realized. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the contestation of ethical values in law enforcement can be achieved by reactivating Islamic values to realize the supremacy of the law. Based on these findings, this study suggests the need for continuous training in law enforcement to create a just society. Additionally, the public should be given space to have their opinions heard to improve law enforcement in the future.
Ulasan Berbasis Maslahah terhadap Fatwa MUI tentang Cryptocurrency: Perspektif Manusia yang Sadar Sanuri Sanuri; Masdar Hilmy; Nafi’ Mubarok; Imroatul Azizah; Yoga Irama; Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.16641

Abstract

Cryptocurrency is increasingly gaining global popularity, particularly among investors and digital entrepreneurs. In parallel, debates surrounding its permissibility under Islamic law have intensified. The lack of legal clarity among Islamic scholars presents a significant challenge in providing normative guidance. The fatwa issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) declaring cryptocurrency haram (unlawful) has drawn criticism for being misaligned with contemporary concepts of maslahah and the evolving digital economy. This study critically examines the MUI's prohibition through the lens of Al-Tufi's human cognition-based theory of maslahah alongside contemporary Muslim scholars who assess legal rulings through contextual considerations of harm (mafsadah) and benefit (maslahah). This research is a literature-based study employing a normative-juridical approach and qualitative analysis, exploring the fatwa through the principles of Islamic jurisprudence, maslahah, and maqasid al-shari'ah while drawing on both classical and contemporary Islamic thought. The findings reveal that the MUI fatwa, based on four legal grounds—gharar (speculation), darar (harm), qimar (gambling), and sil'ah (tradable commodity)—and a rigid textual approach, fails to incorporate a human cognition-based maslahah as a viable alternative to support regulatory clarity and an adaptive formulation of Islamic law responsive to digital innovation. The study recommends prioritizing regulatory and constitutional certainty to enable a more adaptive and progressive Islamic legal response to technological advancement.
Meninjau Kembali Nasab dan Kewarisan dalam Hukum Islam: Pengakuan Hukum dan Status Anak yang Lahir di Luar Perkawinan di Indonesia Ahmad Sukris Sarmadi; Anwar Hafidzi; Latifah Abd Majid
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.16666

Abstract

This study examines the legal status and protection of children born out of wedlock within the Indonesian legal system, highlighting the tension between religious norms and human rights principles. The primary objective is to analyze the legal dimensions of lineage (nasab), inheritance rights, and civil recognition of such children based on Islamic law, national legislation, and Constitutional Court jurisprudence. Employing a normative legal method and qualitative analysis of statutory regulations, religious doctrines, and court decisions, the study finds that Islamic law recognizes only maternal lineage for out-of-wedlock children, excluding them from paternal inheritance. However, Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 affirms civil recognition through biological evidence, though its implementation faces administrative and societal resistance. The findings imply the urgent need for inclusive legal reform, harmonization between Islamic and national law, and strengthened child protection mechanisms in practice.
Penilaian Legalitas Perdagangan Kripto di Pasar Komoditas Indonesia: Studi Analitis Berbasis Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah. Bakhrul Huda; Rianto Anugerah Wicaksono; Mochammad Andre Agustianto; Fadllan Fadllan
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.16759

Abstract

Cryptocurrency trading has emerged as a global phenomenon, raising complex legal and ethical questions, particularly within the framework of Islamic law. In Indonesia, the government’s dual-track policy—legalizing crypto assets as commodities while prohibiting them as payment instruments—calls for critical normative analysis. This study aims to assess the legality of cryptocurrency trading in Indonesia’s futures market from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. Employing a normative legal research method integrated with a maqāṣid-based approach, the research analyzes statutory regulations and incorporates primary data from interviews with regulatory authorities (BAPPEBTI). The findings reveal that the legalization policy aligns with aspects of public interest (maṣlaḥah) and falls within the categories of maqāṣid ḥājiyyah and maʿānin ʿurfiyyah ʿāmmah, although continuous monitoring is essential to prevent elements of maysir, gharar, and ḍarar. The uniqueness of this research lies in its synthesis of legal formalism with maqāṣidic reasoning, supported by empirical insights, offering a novel contribution to the field of Islamic economic law. Future research should include comparative studies across Muslim jurisdictions to develop a sharīʿah-compliant regulatory framework responsive to fintech innovation.
Merekonstruksi Kesetaraan Gender dalam Hukum Keluarga: Analisis Normatif dan Komparatif Sistem Hukum Keluarga Eropa dalam Konteks Keagamaan Viktoriia Kobko -Odarii; Yuliia Leheza; Konstantin Sokolovskiy; Halyna Tatarenko; Oleksandra Nestertsova -Sobakar
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.17694

Abstract

This study examines the normative and doctrinal foundations of gender equality in European family law and investigates how Christian and Islamic religious heritage continues to shape contemporary legal interpretations and outcomes. Using a multi-method designcombining normative legal analysis, cross-jurisdictional comparison, and qualitative assessment of statutory frameworks, case law, and scholarly literature, the study evaluates legal mechanisms regulating gender relations through the lenses of critical gender theory, intersectional analysis, and religious ethics. The findings reveal marked divergences in matrimonial property regimes, valuation of care work, and principles governing divorce. Despite widespread recognition of formal equality, substantive inequalities remain embedded due to the undervaluation of domestic labor, tensions between autonomy and compensation principles, and the persistence of cultural “cryptotypes” rooted in religious and historical traditions. The analysis demonstrates that Christian and Islamic heritages exert dual influences: they reinforce patriarchal norms while simultaneously offering internal interpretive pathways for gender-progressive reform. The results underscore that, although European family law systems show increasing convergence toward human rights standards, doctrinal inconsistencies and implicit judicial biases continue to limit equitable outcomes. The study proposes a reconstructed model of family law incorporating gender-sensitive jurisprudence, equitable valuation of non-financial contributions, stronger regulation of religious adjudicatory bodies, and gender-responsive judicial training. This research contributes conceptual clarity and policy-relevant insights into how family law can be restructured to advance substantive gender equality within Europe’s diverse socio-legal contexts.
War in Islamic Law: Muslim Jurists’ Theological Arguments for Its Obligation in Classical Literature Wardani Wardani; Mujiburrahman Mujiburrahman; Muhammad Araby; Norhidayat Norhidayat
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i1.17880

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the Ḥanafīyah, Shāfiʿīyah, Mālikīyah, and Ḥanbalīyah jurists’ theological arguments supporting the obligation of jihād as a permanent war against non-Muslim communities from comparative, epistemological, and historical-context perspectives. The sources of this study are classical literature on Islamic law, analyzed through Karl Mannheim’s theory of the sociology of knowledge to identify the social contexts underlying the relationship between ideas and interests, ideas and social structures, as well as social location and historical experience. This article concludes that these theological arguments share similarities in their ultimate goal of establishing an ideal society capable of implementing Islamic law properly, as well as in their exclusive conceptions of disbelief (kufr) and polytheism (shirk). However, they differ regarding whether jihād constitutes a pillar of Islam and whether it may function as a means of seeking material gain. Epistemologically, these arguments are rooted in the Qur’an but were interpreted through an exclusive theological perspective aimed at constructing an ideal Muslim society, advancing the idea of Islamic universalism, and shaped by historical consciousness of the Prophet’s wars. This exclusive perspective within classical Islamic law on war should therefore be systematically reconstructed by removing its ideological and historical burdens and reinterpreting it in accordance with the spirit of humanity.
Kerapatan Qadi: Exploration of the Implementation of Islamic Law in Kalimantan Sabarudin Ahmad; Lisnawati Lisnawati; Muhammad Riyas Rasyid; Muhammad Gesit Widayatno
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 26 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v26i1.17886

Abstract

The Kerapatan Qadi is a judicial institution during the Banjar Kingdom era. This institution not only served as a place for those seeking justice but also symbolized the implementation of Islamic law in Kalimantan. The purpose of this study is to analyze and explore the Kerapatan Qadi as a manifestation of the enforcement of Islamic law in Kalimantan. This research falls under the category of empirical legal research using a historical approach. The data sources for this research can be classified into three categories: primary, secondary, and tertiary data, which are then analyzed using the theories of living law and the applicability of law. The results of this study indicate that, first, the Kerapatan Qadi as a judicial institution has existed since the establishment of the Banjar Kingdom in Kalimantan, and during the Dutch colonial era, it received legitimacy through Stbl. 1937 No. 116 and 610 regarding Religious Courts in Java and Madura, which confirmed Stbl. 1882 No. 152, as well as Stbl. 1937 Nos. 638 and 639 regarding the establishment of judicial institutions for South and East Kalimantan. The Kerapatan Qadi in Kalimantan is divided into two levels. The First-Level Kerapatan Qadi was spread across several important regions, including Negara, Kandangan, Barabai, Amuntai, Tanjung, Rantau, Pelaihari, Martapura, Banjarmasin, and Marabahan. Meanwhile, the Appellate level was held at the Kerapatan Qadi Besar in Banjarmasin. Second, the enforcement of Islamic law in Kalimantan, particularly during the Banjar Sultanate era, can be observed from the existence of the Kerapatan Qadi as an official judicial institution that upheld Islamic law. This study examines the rulings issued by the Kerapatan Qadi and demonstrates that the institution had broad jurisdiction, covering family law (ahwal syakhshiyah), criminal law (jinayah), and issuing fatwas.
Harmonisasi Hukum Konstitusi dan Hukum Islam dalam Perlindungan Warisan Budaya Papua di Tengah Pembangunan Infrastruktur: Studi Kasus Situs Batu Peradaban Aitumeiri Enny Martha Sasea; Marwati Riza; Syamsul Bachri; Ahmad Masum; Maskun Maskun
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.18090

Abstract

Rapid infrastructure development in Papua has intensified tension between economic growth and the protection of indigenous cultural heritage. This condition represents a critical phenomenon marked by regulatory change and the urgent need for sustainable legal solutions in culturally sensitive regions. Existing legal frameworks often operate in a fragmented manner, weakening effective heritage protection. The theoretical framework of this study lies at the intersection of constitutional law, Islamic law, and legal pluralism. Although the Indonesian Constitution guarantees cultural advancement and the recognition of indigenous rights, and Islamic law provides ethical guidance through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, their integration in heritage governance remains limited. This study aims to examine the harmonization of constitutional law and Islamic law in protecting Papua’s cultural heritage, using the Aitumeiri Civilization Stone Site as a case study. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by qualitative analysis and a maqāṣid al-sharīʿah framework focusing on the protection of religion, intellect, and lineage. The findings reveal overlapping regulations, weak intergovernmental coordination, and limited indigenous participation as major obstacles to effective heritage governance. Integrating maqāṣid al-sharīʿah into constitutional interpretation strengthens normative coherence and moral legitimacy. In conclusion, harmonized and inclusive legal frameworks are essential to safeguard Papua’s cultural heritage within sustainable development. The study recommends strengthening maqāṣid-based regional regulations, institutionalizing consultative mechanisms inspired by shūrā, and mandating heritage impact assessments involving indigenous communities.
Negotiating Sacred Law: Qur’anic Hermeneutics, Legal Pluralism, and Interfaith Marriage in Muslim-Majority Countries Syarif Syarif; Saifuddin Herlambang; Budiyono Budiyono; Gama Pratama; Fharkhan Luthfi; Nur Paikah
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v25i2.18166

Abstract

Interfaith marriage remains a persistently contested legal issue in Muslim-majority societies, situated at the intersection of Islamic legal authority, state constitutional frameworks, and global human rights discourses. The complexity of this debate has intensified within the context of the modern nation-state, which manages religious pluralism through state law and bureaucratic governance. This article examines how marital norms within Islamic law are not only formulated at the normative level but also negotiated, reinterpreted, and enacted within contemporary regimes of legal pluralism. Employing a qualitative approach grounded in an interdisciplinary framework, the study integrates doctrinal legal analysis, Qur’anic hermeneutics, and cross-national comparative law. Primary data are drawn from regulations and legal practices governing interfaith marriage in Indonesia, Egypt, Malaysia, and Turkey, while secondary data consist of classical fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) literature, Qur’anic exegetical works, and relevant contemporary scholarship. The findings reveal a spectrum of regulatory models ranging from absolute prohibition and ambiguous tolerance to hybrid regulation and secular permission, shaped by the complex interaction of fiqh doctrines, state bureaucratic governance, and social dynamics. The study further highlights the strategic role of bureaucratic actors in producing what is termed pragmatic fiqh, as well as the transnational strategies employed by interfaith couples to navigate restrictive domestic legal frameworks. Theoretically, the article introduces the concepts of negotiated orthodoxy and fiqh pragmatism as analytical tools for understanding the adaptation and transformation of Islamic law in modern contexts. In doing so, the study contributes to contemporary debates on Islamic legal pluralism by advancing fiqh pragmatism as an adaptive paradigm that bridges sacred norms and modern social realities.

Page 38 of 40 | Total Record : 391

 36   37   38   39   40 

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26 No 1 (2026) Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Rekonstruksi dan Integrasi Hukum Islam dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Kontempore Vol 25 No 1 (2025) Vol 24 No 2 (2024) Vol 24 No 1 (2024) Vol 23 No 2 (2023) Vol 23, No 1 (2023) Vol 23 No 1 (2023) Vol 22, No 2 (2022) Vol 22, No 1 (2022) Vol 21, No 2 (2021) Vol 21, No 1 (2021) Vol 21 No 1 (2021) Vol 20, No 2 (2020) Vol 20, No 1 (2020) Vol 19, No 2 (2019) Vol 19, No 1 (2019): (in Press) Vol 19, No 1 (2019) Vol 18, No 2 (2018) Vol 18, No 2 (2018) Vol 18, No 1 (2018) Vol 18, No 1 (2018) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 14, No 2 (2014) Vol 14, No 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 1 (2013) More Issue