cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rizanizarli
Contact Email
rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
anwar.hafidzi@uin-antasari.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Ahmad Yani KM. 4,5 Banjarmasin Kalimantan Selatan
Location
Kota banjarbaru,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
ISSN : 14126303     EISSN : 2549001X     DOI : 10.18592/sjhp.v22i1.4843
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Syariah specializes on Law and Islamic law, and is intended to communicate original research and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 362 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
Volume 17 No.2 Desember 2017 Syariah, Jurnal
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 17, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (237.852 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sy.v17i2.2127

Abstract

TELAAH KRITIS PANDANGAN ULAMA DAYAH ACEH UTARA DAN ATURAN KHITENTANG ATURAN PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI Noval, Yusri
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 16, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2736.416 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sy.v16i1.987

Abstract

The issue of polygamy is a hot issue that to be debated continuesly. One side polygamy is claimed as exploitation and hegemony of male to female. On the other hand, polygamy is seen have normative reference and it considered as one of the solutions to solve the problems of in infidelity and prostitution. The Indonesian government has been reform the rules of polygamy. In KHI, although it adheres to the principle of monogamy, but the government is still open opportunity for polygamy. However, this rule of KHI is critized bythe dayah scholars of North Aceh. The overview of Ulama dayah is that polygamy rules made by the government out of the Shari’a corridors. Also that issueto be politicied and adopt the rules of the west to complicate polygamy practise and legalized prostitution. Therefor, this study aim to examine and analyze the rules of KHI regarding polygamy from sharia aspect, social, cultural, welfare and others. Also, analyze and critize the views and thoughts of dayah scholar about the rules of polygamy in KHI.
HAK ATAS DERAJAT PELAYANAN KESEHATAN YANG OPTIMAL Hidayat, Rifatul
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 16, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2704.4 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sy.v16i2.1035

Abstract

Adanya pengakuan baik menurut Hukum Nasional maupun Hukum Internasional terhadap hak atas kesehatan tidak  berarti masyarakat mempunyai hak untuk sehat. Siapapun pada dasarnya tidak mampu menjamin suatu kondisi kesehatan tertentu, baik Pemerintah maupun masyarakat.  Kondisi kesehatan individu lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh faktor lingkungan tempat tinggal dan  keturunan. Definisi-definisi hak atas kesehatan yang digunakan dalam instumen-instrumen  hak asasi manusia seperti yang telah dikemukakan,  umumnya mengacu pada “derajat kesehatan tertinggi yang dapat dicapai” (the highest attainable standard of health) sebagai sasaran hak atas kesehatan. Oleh karena itu substansi hak atas kesehatan sangat relatif, karena derajat tertinggi yang dapat dicapai tersebut dapat bervariasi sesuai waktu dan tempat. 
Konsekuensi yang Timbul Dari Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana Materiil Pristiwati, Endang
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 13, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (146.029 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/syariah.v13i2.171

Abstract

The principle of legitimacy as a state aims to protect the society, which is expressed in the principle of legality. While the purpose of the law is more fundamental justice. This principle is officially defined as what is just stated by the constitution. This definition however has been left by some developed countries which is according to them could not be extended in its application. Therefore the definition of the principle of legitimacy should be expanded comprehensively in order reach wider consequence in the law and constitution. Substantive legality principle holds that the main purpose of the law is that justice can be realized based on the laws that have a broader scope than just the law, so it should have been in Indonesia also have to switch the view of the use of formal legality principle to the principle of legality material.
IMPLIKASI HUKUM ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 25/PUU-XIV/2016 TERHADAP PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Saputra, Dadin E.; Khalid, Afif
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 18, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (218.622 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sy.v18i1.2063

Abstract

Abstract: There is an increase in corruption level in Indonesia, both in the total number of cases and in the total amount of financial losses suffered by the state. There are even more systematic corruption which present in all aspect of social life.The main problem formulation would be focusing on the consideration upon the decision of the panel of judges of the Constitutional Court in its decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 and its legal implication towards law enforcement process and corruption eradication. The objective of this research is, first, to understand the legal consideration of the panel of judges of constitutional court in the decision Number 25/PUUXIV/2016. As for the second objective, the researcher would like to be cognizant of the legalimplication related with the law enforcement and corruption eradication process. In conducting the research, the researcher is using normative judicial research, with juridical approach as the method. This research is using qualitative method and in analytical-descriptive analysis. This research resulted in number of conclusions, per se, Constitutional Court decision Number 25/PUUXIV/2016 has created legal uncertainty related to the formulation of corruption; as corruption was material offense, whereof in the beginning was formal offense. Such circumstance obliges law enforcer to establish the ground on how much actual financial loss the state has suffered, not on potential financial loss. There is different, legally unrelated perspective in defining “could” as in “could inflict state financial loss or harm state economy” under criminal approach of Law on Corruption Eradication and under administrative approach of Law Number 30 Year 2004.Abstrak: pertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016.Dan untuk mengetahui Implikasi hukum apa terkait dengan proses penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif.Dalam penelitian ini peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif dan diuraikan secara deskriptif analitis. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016 melahirkan ketidakpastian hukum yaitu berkaitan dengan rumusan delik tindak pidana korupsi, dimana awalnya rumusan tindak pidana korupsi adalah delik formil menjadi delik materiil, sehingga penegak hukum harus dapat membuktikan berapa nilai kerugian keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara secara riil atau nyata (actual loss) bukan pada sudut pandang potensi nilai kerugian yang akan dialami (potential loss). Frasa kata “dapat” merugikan keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara antara pendekatan pidana sebagaimana dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi dengan pendekatan administratif sebagaimana dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 adalah 2 hal yang berbeda dan tidak mempunyai hubungan hukum.
DISHARMONISASI PROBLEM PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA ALAM DI KABUPATEN KOTABARU MUZAINAH, GUSTI
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 15, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (195.252 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/syariah.v15i2.549

Abstract

This paper discusses the rules that con?ict with the higher, so the local regulations must be canceled. If the local law has been withdrawn, the local laws cannot be enforced and cannot be guided due to invalid. On the contrary, if the local legislation has not been canceled, then the local regulations have binding force or valid until cancellation. The urgency of norms con?ict resolution of that theory, based on the deepest layer of law that is the legal philosophy in mining activities in forest areas is precisely the Forestry Act rests the preservation of forests while the regency government was grounded in economic interests.
ISTIHSAN: DALIL SYARA` YANG DIPERSELISIHKAN Noorwahidah, Noorwahidah
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 16, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2864.942 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sy.v16i1.1001

Abstract

Autenticity of  istihsan as syara` argument disputed by scholars. Group of Hanafiyah, Malikiyah, and most Hanabilah scholars use istihsan as an argument, but Syafi`iyah, Zhahiriyah, Mutazili, and Shia scholars reject istihsan. The dispute happened because the difference of interpreting of istihsan. The scholars who use as argument interpret istihsan as turned away from will of qiyas to more powerful qiyas or specialized qiyas because there is stronger evidence thereof, meanwhile, scholars who refuse define istihsan as all things considered good by the mujtahid by his wits. Substantively all scholars, both who use and who reject istihsan using it in some law conclusion, although scholars who reject not call it as an istihsan. They categorize it as a qiyas.
Model Hukum Islam: Suatu Konsep Metode Penemuan Hukum melalui Pendekatan Ushuliyyah Zaidah, Yusna
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 17, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (545.835 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sy.v17i2.1969

Abstract

Penelitian ini akan membahas mengenai metode penemuan hukum islam melalui pendekatan ushul. Dalam upaya menemukan hukum yang digali dari sumbernya, para pengali hukum Islam seyogianya bertitik tolak dari prinsip kemaslahatan dengan metode yang telah ditawarkan oleh para pendahulu yang ahli dibidangnya. Maka ditemukan metode maslahah, istihsan, pendekatan linguistik, dan metode kausasi.
PERSEPSI KETUA PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN KETUA PENGADILAN AGAMA TENTANG PENINJAUAN KEMBALI (PK) PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO. 34/PUU-XI/2013 DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA Basri, Bahran
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 15, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.405 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/syariah.v15i1.543

Abstract

Since test material to the provisions of Pasal 268 ayat (3) Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981on Criminal Proceedings in Mahkamah Konstitusi, Mahkahmah decided in its decision number 34 /PUU-XI / 2013, which states that the provisions was inconsistent with the Undang-Undang Dasar1945, so it does not have binding legal force. Therefore, Peninjauan Kembali (PK) in criminal cases maybe done more than once with the new circumstances or conditions found substantial novum new foundduring previous PK undiscovered. If problems associated PK novum criminal case is considered sub-stantial, and neither should Novum issues related PK in civil cases, as may be after the filing of the PKand disconnected, no new circumstances or substantial novum recently discovered that during theprevious PK undiscovered or if there is a decision of a judges mistake or a real mistake was discoveredafter PK decided. PK is an extraordinary remedy that aims to find justice and truth material. Justice cannot be limited by time or formal provision that limits that PK is only one time. Justice is a very basichuman needs, the more basic human needs of the rule of law. But in civil cases, the results of this studyindicate that the filing PK limited only once.
Kriteria Poligami serta Dampaknya melalui Pendekatan Alla Tuqsitu Fi al-Yatama dalam Kitab Fikih Islam Wa Adillatuhu Hafidzi, Anwar; Hayatunnisa, Eka
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 17, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (798.962 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/sy.v17i1.1967

Abstract

Poligami merupakan ketentuan hukum Islam yang membolehkan beristeri lebih dari satu. Permasalahan ini disinggung dalam al quran dan ada ayat-ayat yang memberikan dasar hukum pada poligami. Pada dasarnya Islam membolehkan poligami yang dalam al quran disebutkan bahwa poligami maksimal di berikan batasan sampai 4 org isteri.  Mengenai hal ini terdapat berbagai persoalan dan problematika yang dipahami secara beragam oleh beberapa ulama, terutama mengenai dampak poligami di era modern sekarang ini. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini akan berfokus pada kajian terhadap 2 kitab fikih yakni Fikih Islaam wa Adillatuhu dan Fikiih Sunnah, yang keduanya membahas tentang dampak poligami. Penulis mencoba mengkontestualisasikan cara pandang kedua kitab ini dalam memahami poligami yang terjadi di masa kini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode desktiptif analitik terhadap dua kitab yang telah disebutkan di atas. Melalui tulisan ini, tampak bahwa dampak poligami sangat merugikan pihak perempuan, lebih dari itu ia juga justru menimbulkan masalah baru di lingkungan masyarakat. 

Page 4 of 37 | Total Record : 362

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 25 No 2 (2025) Vol 25 No 1 (2025) Vol 24 No 2 (2024) Vol 24 No 1 (2024) Vol 23 No 2 (2023) Vol 23, No 1 (2023) Vol 23 No 1 (2023) Vol 22, No 2 (2022) Vol 22, No 1 (2022) Vol 21, No 2 (2021) Vol 21 No 1 (2021) Vol 21, No 1 (2021) Vol 20, No 2 (2020) Vol 20, No 1 (2020) Vol 19, No 2 (2019) Vol 19, No 1 (2019) Vol 19, No 1 (2019): (in Press) Vol 18, No 2 (2018) Vol 18, No 2 (2018) Vol 18, No 1 (2018) Vol 18, No 1 (2018) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 2 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 17, No 1 (2017) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 2 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 16, No 1 (2016) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 2 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 15, No 1 (2015) Vol 14, No 2 (2014) Vol 14, No 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 2 (2013) Vol 13, No 1 (2013) More Issue