cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)" : 10 Documents clear
EKSISTENSI KLAUSULA PELARUNGAN BAGI SEAFARER DI INDONESIA Hutapea, Sintong Arion; Kusuma, Winanda; Kurnia, A. Cery
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.217

Abstract

In the world of shipping, seafarers are bound by a Seawork Agreement (PKL) which contains requirements that must be obeyed by the parties. This includes a clause that is included in the seafarer's employment contract. Implications arising from the burial of the seafarer's corpse. The existence of a banning clause in the seafarer's employment contract. The role of the state in providing legal protection for seafarers from confinement. The ban must meet 4 formal requirements. The unbalanced bargaining position makes entrepreneurs and seafarers as parties ban clauses can appear in street vendors. Finally, the seafarer inevitably has to obey the PKL that has been agreed with the entrepreneur. States intervenes in ensuring the protection of human rights for seafarers from the prohibition clause, it needs to be done by making changes to the legal system which includes the legal structure, legal substance and legal culture
KONSEP CYBERBULLYING DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA Hariyanto, Hariyanto
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.219

Abstract

This research is a normative legal research that aims to analyze the modus operandi of cyberbullying and analyze cyberbullying in the perspective of criminal law in Indonesia and other countries. The method in this study is a normative research method. The results of the study analyzed that the modus operandi of cyberbullying is various forms of bullying or bullying that is carried out through the internet. The modus operandi can be categorized into exclusion; flaming; impersonation/fake profiles; trickery; fraping; dissing; and cyberstalking. In Indonesia, cyberbullying is still not specifically regulated or limited. So the handling still depends on Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Likewise in the Criminal Code the crime of cyberbullying is only limited to insults and defamation. An adequate discussion regarding cyberbullying is contained in Arkanas Regulation (AR Code) AR Code 5-71-217 (2015) in points (b), (c) and (d) as well as in the EU's Criminal Law in Conclusion of the Council 2009/C62 /05 of 27 November 2008 and the 2011/92/EU Directive on combating inappropriate treatment in cyberspace. This research is a normative legal research that aims to analyze the modus operandi of cyberbullying and analyze cyberbullying in the perspective of criminal law in Indonesia and other countries. The method in this study is a normative research method. The results of the study analyzed that the modus operandi of cyberbullying is various forms of bullying or bullying that is carried out through the internet. The modus operandi can be categorized into exclusion; flaming; impersonation/fake profiles; trickery; fraping; dissing; and cyberstalking. In Indonesia, cyberbullying is still not specifically regulated or limited. So the handling still depends on Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Likewise in the Criminal Code the crime of cyberbullying is only limited to insults and defamation. An adequate discussion regarding cyberbullying is contained in Arkanas Regulation (AR Code) AR Code 5-71-217 (2015) in points (b), (c) and (d) as well as in the EU's Criminal Law in Conclusion of the Council 2009/C62 /05 of 27 November 2008 and the 2011/92/EU Directive on combating inappropriate treatment in cyberspace.
METODE PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA CYBERBULLYING Jamaludin, Jamaludin
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.221

Abstract

Cyberbullying is considered a serious bullying problem. The effects of cyberbullying can cause victims to feel depressed, depressed, and even commit suicide. Various methods of overcoming cyberbullying, starting from countermeasures through family, the surrounding environment to the legal system that will be used, must be enforced. This research is a normative legal research that aims to analyze methods of overcoming cyberbullying actions through penal and non-penal. The results of this study indicate that the methods of overcoming cyberbullying through penalizing efforts include: the Criminal Code, Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number I1 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, and the Indonesian National Police. . While the methods of overcoming cyberbullying through non-penal efforts include: Countermeasures from KOMINFO, the community, and countermeasures from the victims themselves.
KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ANTARA WARGA NEGARA ASING TERHADAP WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA Ismi Putri, Oriza Imanda Pratama; Ulfatun Najicha, Fatma
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.222

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal provisions in the regulations regarding the nominee agreement and the form of sanctions given to the notary making the nominee agreement deed that is contrary to the UUPA. This type of research is normative juridical and the approach method used is the statutory approach. The results of this study are that the nominee agreement between foreign citizen and Indonesian citizen does not meet the objective requirements for the validity of the agreement, because it does not contain a lawful cause. This is because this agreement was made to do things that are prohibited by law. Foreign nationals do not have ownership rights to land in Indonesia, but only have usufructuary rights to land. This has been regulated in Article 42 of the UUPA. In relation to the notary making the deed of the nominee agreement which is contrary to the UUPA, then administratively, the notary has violated article 16 paragraph (1) letter d of the UUJN, so that it can be subject to sanctions in the form of verbal warning, written warning, temporary dismissal, respectful dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal.
HAK AHLI WARIS PEKERJA MENINGGAL DUNIA DALAM HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN DI INDONESIA (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PHI PADA PN SURABAYA NOMOR 74/G/2014/PHI.SBY JO. PUTUSAN MA RI NO. 225 K/PDT.SUS PHI/2015) Madjid, Neni Vesna; Afrinal, Afrinal
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.223

Abstract

Meninggalnya pekerja maka berakhir pula hubungan kerja dengan sendiri atau dikenal dengan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja demi hukum. Konsekwensi dari meninggalnya pekerja, ada hak ahli waris yang diterima. Dalam tulisan ini penulis membahas hak waris pekerja yang meninggal dunia mulai dari ketentuan yang ada di pasal 1603 j KUPerda dan ketentuan Pasal 1601 y KUHPerdata. Lebih lanjut ketentuan Pasal 61 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan begitu juga dalam ketentuan UU No. 166 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Namun lahirnya UU No. 11 tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, menghapus ketentuan Pasal 166 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan, dan memuat subtansi Pasal 166 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 , dalam ketentuan Pasal 57 Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (PP) Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja yang merupakan peraturan pelaksana UU Ciptaker. Penulis juga melakukan analisis terhadap penerapan hak ahliwaris yang meninggal dunia berdasarkan putusan PHI pada PN Surabaya Nomor 74/G/2014/PHI.Sby jo.Putusan MA RI No. 225 K/Pdt.Sus PHI/2015)
RESTRUKTURISASI KREDIT KENDARAAN BERMOTOR PERUSAHAAN PEMBIAYAAN AKIBAT SITUASI PANDEMIC COVID-19 Marta Saputra, Fadhli; Faniyah, Iyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.226

Abstract

With the increase and spread of the number of cases of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19), the impact of increasing the percentage of non-performing loans at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance, Tbk Padang Branch, from the data obtained from bad loans before the Covid-19 Pandemic there were around 500 (five hundred). Restructuring of Motor Vehicle Loans for Financing Companies Due to the Covid-19 Pendemic Situation at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance, Tbk Padang Branch is implemented in the form of rescheduled installment payments and there are consumers (creditors) who have been given restructuring with terms and conditions agreed by both parties, provided that the debtor or customer who submitted it is affected by Covid 19, the collateral or product being credited is still with the debtor, it is not transferred or over credited to another party, the financing value (principal debt) is below Rp10 billion. Preventive supervision of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in the West Sumatra Region OJK will send a letter of warning to Financing Companies that do not carry out restructuring programs during the current COVID-19 pandemic, and repressively to Financing Companies that do not implement Restructuring programs as per government policy. OJK will impose administrative sanctions in the form of fines to financing companies.
PROSPEK AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA RI TAHUN 1945 TERKAIT MASA JABATAN PRESIDEN PERSPEKTIF PADA PEMILU 2024 Roza, Darmini
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.229

Abstract

The prospect of amendments carried out by a country shows that the country is following developments that the present will certainly not be the same in the future. Indonesia, which has undergone the replacement of the Constitution and the Amendment to the Law, has appointed Indonesia as a country to be better than in the past. Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia becomes the Fundamental Basis. Related to legal issues and discourses on the terms of office of the President and Vice President for three periods which have led to polemics for and against, however, if it is related to the opportunities that exist in the MPR as a State Institution, amend Article 7 of the Constitution regarding the terms of office of the President and Vice President and fulfill the provisions of Article 37 of the Law. The Constitution and the people's approval so that the past history in this country does not repeat itself, meaning that it is normatively legal for the 2024 Election.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR DALAM PENARIKAN SITA JAMINAN FIDUSIA TANPA MELALUI LELANG PENGADILAN Tradesa, Anggi Purnama; Asikin, Zainal; Sili, Eduardus Bayo
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.230

Abstract

Debtors as legal subjects are entitled to legal protection, both preventive and repressive, written or unwritten. The legal protection provided is an implementation of the principle of recognition and dignity that is rooted in Pancasila and the Constitution. This study aims to analyze the protection and legal remedies of the debtor in withdrawing the confiscation of fiduciary guarantees without going through a court auction. This research is a normative legal research. The results of this study include: The debtor's legal effort in withdrawing a fiduciary guarantee without going through a court auction is to ask the creditor to show a Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate issued by the Fiduciary Registration Office. If the creditor cannot show a fiduciary guarantee certificate, then the debtor does not need to submit the collateral, because the creditor does not have the right to execute the collateral.
UPAYA HUKUM KEBERATAN ATAS PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) DALAM KASUS PENARIKAN UNIT KENDARAAN MELALUI PIHAK EKSTERNAL (DEBT COLLECTOR) (Studi Putusan Nomor 03/PTS/BPSK/2020/PN.Padang dan Putusan Nomor 07/PDT/BPSK/2020/PN.Padang) Alamsyah, Bustanul
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.233

Abstract

Broadly speaking, BPSK decisions should be viewed as decisions that have permanent legal force. However, when compared to the principle (res judicata pro vitatate habetur) with Article 56 Paragraph (2) of the UUPK, it turns out that the parties can still file an objection to the District Court. The incident was caused by the weak position and authority given by UUPK to BPSK, especially regarding decisions that are final and binding. One of the factors that cause objections to the decision of the dispute settlement agency outside the court is in determining the type of dispute resolution that will be taken by the parties. The objection is that the settlement of the case should be resolved through BANI or the PN, but in this case the dispute resolution is resolved at BPSK. Based on the number of cases that have been resolved by the Padang City BPSK and the number of cases decided by the Padang City BPSK, it continues to the Padang Class IA District Court, starting from 2018 as many as 15 cases, in 2019 as many as 26 cases, then in 2020 as many as 61 cases. This shows an increase. Meanwhile, the number of cases decided by the Padang City BPSK continued to the Padang Class IA District Court, from 2018 there were 14 cases, in 2019 there were 3 cases, in 2020 there were 3 cases. This shows a decline. Based on the research and discussion, it can be seen that: First, the mechanism for objecting to the BPSK decision in the Class IA Padang District Court can be carried out if one of the litigants considers that the BPSK decision is unsuccessful so that they can file an objection to the Class IA Padang District Court with a note that after fulfilling the requirements the objection applicant may file an objection and the submission of the objection is still within the specified grace period, namely 14 (fourteen) days from the announcement of the BPSK decision and if the District Court accepts the objection, a decision will be given within 21 (twenty one) days at the latest. Second, the analysis of the judge's decision Number 03/PTS/BPSK/2020/PN.Padang and the judge's decision Number 07/PDT/BPSK/ 2020/ PN.Padang which was previously processed at BPSK Padang City, is an objection to the arbitration decision entered in The PN Padang Class IA cannot be said to be a new lawsuit or an appeal, the objection is a legal remedy taken specifically to object to the arbitration decision of the consumer dispute settlement body out of court.
PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN DALAM BENTUK KREDIT FIKTIF PADA BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT (BPR) MITRA DANAGUNG (Studi Pada Satreskrim Polres Pesisir Selatan) Ansari, Ichsan
UNES Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.234

Abstract

Article 49 of Law no. 10 of 1998 concerning Banking has explicitly regulated criminal acts related to bank business. However, there are still many parties who commit criminal acts in the banking sector, one of which is fictitious credit. Like the fictitious credit that happened to the Rural Bank (BPR) Mitra Danagung, which was carried out by the Director of Bank Mitra Danagung himself, in the period from 2011 to 2012. The formulation of the problems studied in this thesis are: First, how is the investigation of banking crimes in the form of fictitious loans at BPR Mitra Danagung Bank? Second, what are the obstacles faced by the Satreskrim Investigator of the Pesisir Selatan Police in the investigation of banking crimes in the form of fictitious credit at Bank BPR MitraDanagung? This research is a legal research with a descriptive analytical specification. The main approach used is a normative juridical approach and is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as primary data, and primary data as supporting data collected through library research and field research. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded, first, that the investigation of banking crimes in the form of fictitious credit at PBR Mitra Danagung Bank was carried out based on the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalis. After receiving the report, the investigative team conducts an investigation and review of the report to prepare a plan for investigative activities, followed by examining witnesses and collecting evidence and expert testimony, then a case is held to determine the suspect, then arrests and detentions are made. After the filing is complete, the investigator submits the case file to the Public Prosecutor accompanied by witnesses and evidence. Second, the obstacles faced by the investigators of the Satreskrim Polres Pesisir Selatan in the investigation of banking crimes in the form of fictitious credit at Bank BPR Mitra Danagung are: the overlapping authority of investigating banking crimes as regulated by a law that gives authority to the Police, Prosecutors, and Investigators. OJK, limited human resources for investigators, level of education and low knowledge of investigators about advances in information technology, as well as supporting facilities and infrastructure in conducting investigations.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue