cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 744 Documents
 66   67   68   69   70 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)" : 744 Documents clear
Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum oleh PT. PLN (Persero) di Riak Danau Tapan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Fahlevi, Fahlevi; Warman, Kurnia; Nurdin, Zefrizal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1117

Abstract

Procurement for the construction of a 150 KV substation by PT. PLN (Persero) UIP Sumbagteng, which is in Nagari Riak Danau Tapan, Basa Ampek Balai Tapan District, Pesisir Selatan Regency. that the stipulation of land acquisition for the construction of the 150 KV substation took place in 2017 with a total area of ​​1.8 hectares with the holder of the communal land rights being a legitimate member of their clan but the attempt to relinquish their rights was a mistake because it was directed at a person who is not the owner of the rights over the land. The type of research in the preparation of this thesis is sociological juridical research. The results of this study are 1) Land Acquisition Process for the Construction of a 150 KV Substation in Nagari Siak Danau Tapan, Pesisir Selatan Regency, which consists of several stages, namely (a) The planning stage which contains the aims and objectives of the development plan, Compliance with the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) ), and National and Regional Development Plans, Land layout includes administrative areas such as name of village, kelurahan, sub-district, province, Required land area, General description of land status, Estimated time for land acquisition implementation, Estimated timeframe for construction implementation, Estimated land value, (b) the Preparation Stage which includes notification of Development Planning, Dissemination in the form of face-to-face meetings, Letters of notification, Initial data collection of development plan locations, Determination of Development Locations, and (c) Implementation Phase which includes Inventory and Identification, Determination of Appraisers. Deliberation on determining compensation, granting compensation. In carrying out land acquisition for the purposes of building a 150 KVA substation in Nagari Riak Danau Tapan by PT. PLN (Persero) in the process of land acquisition and payment of compensation has made a mistake, which is a personal error (error in persona) because the person conducting the negotiations and dealings is the person who is only cultivating the land and is not the real owner of the rights. 2) Legal Consequences Arising from the Land Acquisition Process for Public Interests that Does Not Use the Deed of Relinquishment of Rights, namely: legal defects due to the statement of Relinquishment of Rights made before a Notary is more accountable both formally and materially even though the law allows for other ways other than the existence notary deed regarding the release of rights. Thus the fulfilment of the Theory of Responsibility that the researcher uses in this thesis is not fulfilled, because apart from not being able to account for the authenticity of the statement of waiver of rights from the owner of the right, in the process of completing documents the statement made underhand is also vulnerable to falsification and this is a crime.
Identifikasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Pelaksanaan Lelang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan Natalia Lumare, Lawrina Cristi; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1118

Abstract

This paper research uses the Normative Juridical research method. Land is the safest object of collateral and has relatively high economic value. The land that is pledged as collateral is then tied up and registered with the local land office to be encumbered with mortgage rights. The consequence of having a mortgage right is that if the debtor breaks his promise, the bank has the authority to auction the collateral object. In order to provide legal protection for the debtor's interests in the auction of mortgage objects, the bank is obliged to carry out the execution in accordance with applicable regulations, one of which is that the auction of mortgage objects must be in accordance with the Mortgage Rights Law in accordance with the market price or in accordance with the limit value, so that does not harm the debtor.
Penyelesaian Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Fidusia Pada PT Reksa Finance di Kota Jakarta Asri Putri, Tiyas; Djajaputra, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1119

Abstract

This research aims to examine the resolution of defaults in credit agreements with fiduciary guarantees at PT REKSA FINANCE in the City of Jakarta. Collateral in a credit agreement can be in the form of material collateral and personal collateral. Factors causing default involve debtor errors in managing their business, health problems that require medical costs, irregularities in the use of credit facilities, and bad faith in paying debts. PT REKSA FINANCE in Jakarta City is facing difficulties in returning loans that are not paid by debtors. This research underlines the need for PT REKSA FINANCE to focus more on non-litigation resolution in order to maintain its reputation and minimize default problems. Apart from that
Identifikasi Risiko Terjadinya Wanprestasi Terhadap Perjanjian Kartu Kredit yang Diajukan Secara Online di Bank Mega Axfelia, Deviana; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1120

Abstract

This research was conducted to identify the risk of default in online credit card application agreements at Bank Mega. This research discusses the legal terms of an agreement, skill risks, the use of standard agreements, and the consequences of default. In addition, other risks such as personal financial conditions, lack of verification, high interest, irresponsible use, hidden fees, identity theft, and technical errors in online credit card applications are also explored. The results of this research underline the need for the socialization of laws governing online transactions so that people understand and comply with applicable regulations. Additionally, a solid understanding of the terms of the agreement and the risks involved in online transactions is essential to avoid future problems.
Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Balik Nama Didasarkan Kewarisan Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris Putera, Christoper; Lukito, Hilda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1121

Abstract

In order to provide definite guarantees according to law, land registration is carried out according to the provisions in Government Regulation no. 24/1997. The act of transferring a plot of land due to inheritance is recorded, a death certificate is completed, a statement of land rights if it has been registered, a deed of information on the party entitled to inheritance, registered at the Land Office (Kantah). The recording of the act of transferring a plot of land due to inheritance without a certificate of inheritance being included is problematic for the party entitled to other inheritance. The research used a statutory approach and a case approach, and the conclusion was obtained: To provide definite guarantees according to the law, the act of transfer must be registered in Kantah for the purpose of changing the name of the information of rights as stipulated in Article 19 of the UUPA. The act of transferring due to inheritance must be submitted by the party entitled to inheritance in addition to information on land plot rights, including death certificates, certificates of information as parties entitled to inheritance as stated in PP No. 24/1997 in conjunction with ATR Ministerial Regulation/Head of BPN No. 16/2021. The act of transferring a plot of land due to inheritance without the consent of the party entitled to inheritance even though Kantah issues a statement of rights, does not provide a definite guarantee according to the law for someone whose name is recorded in the statement of rights.
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Milik Atas Tanah Atas Penerbitan Sertifikat Ganda Fahrani, Ahzaza; Djaja, Benny; Sudirman, Maman
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1122

Abstract

Certificate of land ownership regulated in the Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) is an ownership proof of the land right where it becomes powerful evidence. The increasement of necessity of a land is not followed by the increasement of the availability of land that can be utilized by the society, which causes many disputes related to the ownership or land right. One of many problems that arises is double certificate on a land. Double certificate on a land causing risks on the owner of land right where such phenomena caused by the maladministration to criminal action. Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) as an institution established by the Government that holds the sole authority in national land should be responsible in the matters related to the land dispute, especially double certificate. Beside that, there is a necessity on the legal protection to be provided by the State for the owner of land right to protect the rights of the land owner. The research performed using juridical normative with legislation approach and conseptual approach. The results of the research will be presented in the form of an explanatory-analysis where the author explains the legal certainty for land ownership holders regarding the issuance of double certificates
Penitipan Sertipikat Tanah pada Kantor Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah di Kota Bukittinggi Wulan, Sari; Warman, Kurnia; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1125

Abstract

The agreement of sale and purchase made before notaries is commonly referred to as the Deed of Sale and Purchase, hereinafter referred to as PPJB (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli). PPJB is a temporary agreement made when the conditions for the sale and purchase process are not yet fulfilled. In the practice of notarial deeds, it is common to store land title certificates related to the deed, whether it is Right to Build (Hak Guna Bangunan) or Right of Ownership (Hak Milik). In reality, many parties have ill intentions, leading to cases of reporting notaries for alleged embezzlement of the deposited land certificates. This thesis addresses the following issues: 1) What are the reasons for storing land certificates in the making of Sale and Purchase Deeds in the city of Bukittinggi? 2) What are the responsibilities of notaries regarding the storage of land certificates at the Notary Office in Bukittinggi? 3) What legal protections are available for land certificate holders who have entrusted their certificates to the Notary Office? The research method used in this study is the empirical juridical method, which involves approaching the problem by examining the applicable legal norms and connecting them with the legal facts found in the field. The reasons for depositing certificates at the notary office, especially with Notary Elfita Achtar, are due to the incomplete legal process and the absence of clear and immediate elements in the sale and purchase agreement. The responsibilities of a notary regarding the deposited certificates can be categorized into three types: administrative responsibility, civil responsibility, and criminal responsibility. Legal protection for certificate owners can be sought through administrative means (filing a report with the Notary Supervisory Board), civil means (filing a civil lawsuit with the District Court), and criminal means (submitting a report to the Police Office).
Konsekuensi Yuridis Pengoperan dan Penyerahan Hak Atas Kepemilikan Rumah Secara dibawah Tangan Yang Masih dalam Jaminan Bank Indriani, Lidya; Azheri, Busyra; Fauzi, Wetria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1126

Abstract

Baseld on this casel, thel writelr foculseld on how thel lelgal forcel and lelgal conselqulelncels of thel ovelr creldit and transfelr of houlsel ownelrship in ulndelrhand deleld is gularanteleld by thel bank. Belsidels, this thelsis aim to know how is thel lelgal protelction for bank and third partiels as handovelr relcipielnts and transfelr of houlsel ownelrship in ulndelrhand deleld is gularanteleld by bank. This stuldy casel is baseld on normativel julridical melthod of an analytical delscriptivel relselarch ulsing selcondary data throulgh primary lelgal matelrials, selcondary lelgal matelrials and telrtiary lelgal matelrials of data collelction telchniqulels by doculmelnt stuldiels and analyzeld qulalitativelly. Thel lelgal forcel of ovelr creldit and transfelr of houlsel ownelrship is an aulthelntic deleld bult it is delgradeld as a ulndelrhand deleld and thel lelgal conselqulelncels arel bank only relcognizels thel old mortgagelel as thel ownelr and gularantor whilel thel ovelr creldit and transfelr of houlsel ownelrship only binds thel delbtor and third partiels. Lelgal protelction for thel bank whelrel thel delbtor is in delfaullt, bank has thel right to confiscatel thel celrtificatel of ownelrship and aulction it throulgh a pulblic aulction baseld on thel mortgagel celrtificatel and lelgal protelction for third partiels as handovelr relcipielnts. Transfelr of houlsel ownelrship is carrield oult wheln thel delbtor is in delfaullt and thel third party can filel a lawsulit to thel district coulrt baseld on copy elvidelncel of ovelr creldit and transfelr of houlsel ownelrship signeld by a Notary. Thel ovelr creldit and transfelr of houlsel ownelrship ulndelrhand deleld is gularanteleld by bank doels not bind bank itsellf. Bank as thel holdelr of thel mortgagel right has thel powelr to selll thel mortgagel objelct if thel delbtor is in delfaullt whilel thel third party as handovelr relcipielnts and transfelr of houlsel ownelrship havel to throulgh procelss thel local district coulrt for relimbulrselmelnt of costs or compelnsation if thel delbtor is in delfaullt. Bank has to sulrvely thel condition of thel mortgagel objelct which is still in thel creldit pelriod and thel delbtor mulst kelelp promisels in thel agrelelmelnt with crelditors and third partiels in good faith.
Lelang Barang Jaminan pada Perum Pegadaian Syariah Perspektif Fatwa Dsn Mui Nomor 25 Tahun 2002 (Studi Kasus di Sibuhuan Kecamatan Barumun Kabupaten Padang Lawas) Pohan, Irma Yanti; Zahra, Fatimah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1128

Abstract

The sharia pawnshop in Sibuhuan, Barumun District, Padang Lawas Regency is a non-bank institution that also helps people from the micro class by providing financial assistance by pawning goods as collateral, in order to get a sum of money worth the goods guaranteed by agreement between the customer and the pawnshop institution. However, if it is due and the customer has not paid off the collateral, the pawnshop contacts the customer to ask whether the customer still wants to extend the collateral or not, and if the collateral is still being extended. then the customer must pay a fine for extending the collateral. And if the customer does not redeem the collateral, the pawnshop may auction the collateral. This research uses empirical or field legal research by means of interviews, questionnaires or questionnaires and observations. Meanwhile, in collecting data, researchers used primary, secondary data and relevant journals. The result of this research is that the customer needs knowledge regarding collateral items auctioned by the Pegadaian institution in accordance with the auction procedures carried out. For this reason, pawnshop institutions must explain to customers that the process of buying and selling pawned goods or auctioned goods must have an element of willingness in buying and selling auctioned goods, because the buying and selling of auctioned goods is legal and good according to the regulations in the DSN-MUI Fatwa. And the proceeds from the sale are not enough to pay off the Rahn's debt, so the Rahn is not obliged to pay the shortfall.
Kewajiban Pemerintah dalam Pemenuhan Kuota Minimal 2% Pekerja Penyandang Disabilitas pada Lingkungan Pemerintah Zora, Zimtya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1129

Abstract

The government must ensure that the implementation of the human rights of every citizen is guaranteed without discrimination. There are three obligations that must be fulfilled by the state in this regard, to protect, to promote and to fulfill. Persons with disabilities have the same rights and opportunities to get work in any field without any differences. International law and national law have stipulated the rights of people with disabilities, so there is no more discrimination against them.

Page 68 of 75 | Total Record : 744

 66   67   68   69   70 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue