Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.576
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL KEPEMIMPINAN DAN PENGURUSAN SEKOLAH Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Ar-Risalah: Media Ke-Islaman, Pendidikan, dan Hukum Islam UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Journal of Social And Economics Research Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Lareh Law Review journal of social and economic research
Yoserwan Yoserwan, Yoserwan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI KASUS PADA PEMILIHAN ANGGOTA DPR, DPD DAN DPRD DI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN 2009) Ardyan , Ardyan; Rianda Seprasia; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
Journal of Social and Economics Research Vol 6 No 1 (2024): JSER, June 2024
Publisher : Ikatan Dosen Menulis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/jser.v6i1.501

Abstract

Ketentuan pidana dalam undang-undang Pemilihan Umum (Pemilu) terus bertambah karena ada perbuatan yang belum diatur sebagai tindak pidana pemilu sebelumnya. Pada undang-undang Pemilu 2004 dan 2009, diatur tentang hukum acara serta batas waktu penegakan hukum pidana pemilu. Ketua Bawaslu, Kapolri, dan Jaksa Agung telah membuat Nota Kesepakatan Bersama membentuk Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu (Sentra Gakkumdu) yang terdiri dari Kepolisian, Kejaksaan, dan Panwaslu. Sentra Gakkumdu ini dibentuk di tingkat pusat, provinsi, dan kabupaten/kota untuk mengefektifkan penanganan tindak pidana pemilu sesuai prinsip peradilan yang cepat, sederhana, biaya ringan, bebas, jujur, dan tidak memihak. Penelitian hukum yuridis sosiologis dilakukan untuk menganalisis sumber data dan melakukan wawancara guna mengungkap masalah yang terjadi, pola koordinasi antara Panwaslu dan Sentra Gakkumdu, serta penanganan laporan pelanggaran tindak pidana pemilu. Ternyata, banyak kasus yang diteruskan Panwaslu ke Sentra Gakkumdu dinyatakan bukan tindak pidana pemilu, tidak cukup bukti, atau waktu penyelesaian melebihi batas. Koordinasi antara Panwaslu dan Sentra Gakkumdu berjalan baik, tetapi penegakan hukum pemilu 2009 gagal karena laporan dari Panwaslu harus dikaji kembali oleh Sentra Gakkumdu sebelum diteruskan ke penyidik. Oleh karena itu, sebaiknya undang-undang pemilu menguatkan posisi Sentra Gakkumdu sebagai lembaga sentral penegakan hukum pidana pemilu, bukan lagi pada Panwaslu.
Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Sebagai Implementasi Restorative Justice pada Tahap Penuntutan (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Pasaman Barat) Sayutis, Sayutis; Danil, Elwi; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2133

Abstract

Crime or criminal act is a word that is familiar to the public. Crime is increasingly common in society and its presence is very disturbing to society, because the losses it causes are not only material losses, but also the loss of a person's soul or life. The provisions of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics (Narcotics Law) have also mentioned several terms that have the same essence as narcotics users themselves, including narcotics abusers, victims of abusers, former narcotics abusers and patients. There are examples of cases of implementing medical rehabilitation. and social issues regarding narcotics abuse in the jurisdiction of the West Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office. Where the West Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office stopped the prosecution or Restorative Justice of three narcotics case files with five suspects to undergo rehabilitation because the suspects were narcotics addicts, not dealers. The suspects are suspected of being users or addicts of class I narcotics, not methamphetamine, violating Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a of the Narcotics Law. The Problem Formulation is (1) How is the termination of prosecution of narcotics abuse cases as an implementation of restorative justice at the prosecution stage (Case Study at the West Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office) and (2) What are the obstacles in terminating the prosecution of narcotics abuse cases as an implementation of restorative justice at the prosecution stage (Case Study at the West Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office)?. The conclusions of this research are: (1) The implementation of restorative justice in cases of narcotics abuse has been implemented at the West Pasaman Prosecutor's Office for 4 (four) suspects. The West Pasaman Prosecutor's Office has implemented Prosecutor's Guidelines Number 18 of 2021 concerning the Resolution of Handling of Narcotics Cases through Rehabilitation with a Restorative Justice Approach as an implementation of the Prosecutor's Dominus Litis Principle. (2) In its implementation, of course the West Pasaman District Prosecutor's Office also experienced obstacles that affected the implementation of restorative justice in cases of criminal acts of narcotics abuse.
Application of Restorative Justice Principles in Judges' Considerations in Decisions to Release from All Legal Charges (Decision Case Study Number: 28/Pid.B/2022/PN.LBB) Permana, Yondra; Yoserwan, Yoserwan; Elvandari, Siska
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2197

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze the application of the principles of restorative justice to judges' considerations in decisions to release all legal claims (case study decision number:28/Pid.B/2022/PN.LBB). This research uses the method normative juridical, while the approach used in this research is a statutory approach , then the data is analyzed using qualitative descriptive research analysis methods. The results of this research are : 1) Application of restorative justice in Decision No.28/Pid.B/2022/PN.Lbb, where the judge handed down a decision to release all legal charges against Defendant Dedi on charges of theft. 2) In terms of implementing the principles of Restorative Justice This is an obstacle to the implementation of restorative justice, including in very serious violations, the difficulty in creating public trust in the implementation of restorative justice in serious cases. Apart from that, the reasons for recidivist actions by perpetrators after undergoing a restorative justice process raise questions from the public if they have to repeat the process several times against the same perpetrator.
Penerapan Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Pelapor Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Barat Nursafitri, Kharisma; Danil, Elwi; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2200

Abstract

Pengaturan tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi, terkait dengan istilah saksi pelapor, terdapat istilah Whistleblower. Secara umum Whistleblower adalah orang-orang yang mengungkapkan dugaan pelanggaran, kejahatan, mal-administrasi maupun korupsi dan kejahatan yang terjadi di tempatnya bekerja. Para whistleblower ini takut untuk melaporkan dugaan tindak pidana yang terjadi karena rentan akan intimidasi dan ancaman. Dalam rangka memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi pelapor tindak pidana korupsi Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK) serta Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Barat melakukan koordinasi.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH APARAT KEPOLISIAN RESOR KOTA PADANG TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN YANG MENYEBABKAN KEMATIAN DALAM TAWURAN PELAJAR Rafifa, Dhiyaul Okasha; Danil, Elwi; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
Ar-Risalah Media Keislaman Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam Vol 22 No 2 (2024): (October 2024)
Publisher : LPPM IAI IBRAHIMY GENTENG BANYUWANGI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69552/ar-risalah.v22i2.2725

Abstract

One form of delinquency that often occurs is student brawls, which are mass fights between groups of students. This phenomenon is increasingly concerning because it results in many injuries and fatalities. In the context of Indonesian law, the act of brawling is regulated in Article 170 and Article 358 of the Criminal Code, which provides criminal penalties for those involved in group violence. The research method used is empirical juridical by examining literature material first followed by interviews. Then, the data obtained is analyzed qualitatively with the nature of analytical descriptive research. The results of the discussion show that law enforcement against criminal acts of brawl by children has been enforced properly in accordance with the applicable criminal procedure law while still taking into account the rights and obligations of children. However, in its law enforcement, the Padang City Police Force experienced obstacles caused by several factors including statutory factors, law enforcement factors, facilities and infrastructure factors, community factors, and cultural factors. It is hoped that the government will make regulations that specifically regulate student brawls in Padang City and for the community, especially parents, to carry out maximum supervision of their children not to brawl. Keywords: Law Enforcement, Violent Crime, Brawl, Padang City Police Force.
Penafsiran Hukum Terhadap Pasal 156a Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Tentang Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama Mursalin, Adinda Faradilla; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
Nagari Law Review Vol 8 No 2 (2024): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.8.i.2.p.269-284.2024

Abstract

The criminal offense of religious defamation, regulated under Article 156a of the Indonesian Criminal Code, often triggers social and political issues due to varying interpretations, leading to debates and criminalization. This research discusses a notable case of religious defamation in Indonesia, specifically Verdict Number 1612/Pid.B/2018.Pn.Mdn involving the defendant, Meliana. In this verdict, the court found the defendant guilty of insulting Islam concerning the volume of the call to prayer (adhan) in her neighborhood. Her actions provoked public anger, leading to serious legal consequences. Therefore, this study aims to analyze and provide an in-depth interpretation to address ambiguities in the article's formulation concerning the boundaries of “hostility,” “misuse,” and “defamation.”The research focuses on three main questions: (1) What is the legal interpretation of the criminal offense of religious defamation under the Law on Religious Defamation? (2) How is the concept of religious defamation in Article 156a of the Criminal Code legally interpreted? and (3) How did the judge interpret the criminal offense of religious defamation in Medan District Court Verdict Number 1612/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Mdn? This study adopts a normative research method, focusing on the written rules, principles, and norms within a legal system and analyzing laws, regulations, jurisprudence, and legal doctrines to solve legal issues. The research findings indicate the need to review Article 156a of the Criminal Code to better align it with societal developments. The verdict discussed in this study demonstrates that the criminal sanctions imposed were inconsistent with the substantive law in Article 156a of the Criminal Code. The sanctions included administrative and criminal penalties, highlighting the dual-track system in Law Number 1/PNPS of 1965 and Article 156a of the Criminal Code. Therefore, a more specific legal interpretation is needed to ensure the fair application of Human Rights Principles.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI KASUS PADA PEMILIHAN ANGGOTA DPR, DPD DAN DPRD DI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN 2009) Ardyan, Ardyan; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
Jurnal Kepemimpinan dan Pengurusan Sekolah Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/jkps.v9i2.454

Abstract

The criminal provisions in each law regarding General Elections (Elections) always increase, this is because there are still acts which in previous elections were not regulated as election crimes. The 2004 and 2009 Election Laws regulate procedural law and time limits for enforcing election criminal law. The Chairman of the Indonesian Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), the Chief of the Indonesian Police and the Attorney General have made a Memorandum of Agreement to form an Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu) which contains elements from the Police, Prosecutor's Office and Election Supervisory Committee (Panwaslu) and is formed at the center, province and districts/cities which aims to effectively handle election crimes in accordance with the principles of justice, namely fast, simple and low cost as well as free, honest and impartial. The enforcement of election criminal law in the 2009 elections should have been more effective, but it turns out that based on Bawaslu's report the enforcement of election criminal law was very ineffective. This can be seen from the 2629 cases of election criminal violations, only 215 of which were decided in court. Referring to this problem, using a sociological juridical (empirical) legal research method, namely research carried out by analyzing data sources and then conducting interviews to reveal what problems occurred, what the coordination pattern actually was carried out by the Panwaslu with the Gakkumdu Center, how the Panwaslu and The Gakkumdu Center follows up on reports/findings of violations of election crimes, to determine whether many cases forwarded by the Panwaslu to the Gakkumdu Center are declared not to be election crimes, or there is not enough evidence, or the time for resolving election crimes will exceed the time limit, as well as looking for any factors which is an obstacle for both Panwaslu and the Gakkumdu Center in enforcing the law for election crime violations. From the research results, it turns out that coordination between the Panwaslu and the Gakkumdu Center went well, but enforcement of the criminal law for the election of members of the DPR, DPD and DPRD in 2009 failed, this was because reports submitted to the Panwaslu were reviewed and then submitted to the Gakkumdu Center to be reviewed again before being forwarded. to investigators. In the end, the Gakkumdu Center is no longer a forum for speeding up the resolution of handling election crimes, instead it acts as a filter for cases that will be passed on to the trial stage. Apart from that, there is a problem of differences in perception between who has the authority to declare suspected criminal acts, whether the Panwaslu or the Police, and then there is a shifting of duties between each other. for collecting evidence between Investigators and Panwaslu, and it cannot be denied that the quality of Panwaslu's human resources is very limited, most recently due to time restrictions for enforcing election criminal law as regulated in the law on elections. Therefore, it would be better if the law on elections strengthens the position of the Gakkumdu Center as the central institution for reporting and enforcing election criminal law, no longer the Panwaslu.
Implementing The Anti-Money Laundering Law: Optimizing Asset Recovery in Corruption Cases in Indonesia Yoserwan, Yoserwan; Dias, Fausto Soares
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.227-250

Abstract

Corruption is still a severe problem in Indonesia. In 2022, the Attorney General Office of the Republic of Indonesia alone succeeded in handling 405 of 597 corruption cases in 2022, with a state loss of 39.207 trillion out of a total of 42.747 trillion. When the state loss is combined with the state economic loss, which refers to the indirect financial impact on the state due to corruption, the number will be up to IDR142 trillion. However, the total asset recovery through fines and state loss compensation was only IDR 8.9 trillion. Thus, it only recovers about 12% of state losses due to corruption. One of the efforts to recover state losses is applying the law on money laundering because its main objective is to pursue the proceeds of a crime, including corruption. This paper discusses how the money laundering law will be more optimal in recovering state losses due to corruption and its application in several cases. The method used in this study is normative legal research, especially case studies relating to implementing a money laundering law on corruption cases. From the study, it can be concluded that the anti-money laundering law was not optimally applied in asset recovery in corruption cases. Only in corruption, which indicates an actual state loss, can the anti-money laundering law be applied. Moreover, there should also be an indication that the money laundering process follows corruption. Applying the Anti-Money Laundering Law, whether in the investigation, prosecution, or trial of criminal acts of corruption, has not been optimal, so it has not supported efforts to recover state losses.
Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika oleh Anak di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Padang Saputra, Widi; Yoserwan, Yoserwan; Suryani, Nilma
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v8i1.1874

Abstract

Law enforcement cannot be carried out repressively because the juvenile justice system must prioritize the principle of child protection. This is especially true given the increasing number of cases, as evidenced by the police, and the number of cases occurring among them. This research problem is formulated below: How are efforts to prevent drug abuse by children in the Padang Police jurisdiction? This research method uses empirical juridical data. According to the research results, the Padang Police have implemented various structured prevention efforts. Prevention efforts are carried out through the "Police Go to School" program, outreach in areas vulnerable to drug use, and cross-sectoral collaboration, such as with the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), schools, and community leaders. Meanwhile, repressive methods are used firmly, while prioritizing the principle of restorative justice, where diversion and guidance are not prioritized except in serious cases such as the involvement of dealers.
EKSISTENSI PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM SECARA MATERIIL (MATERIELE WEDERRECHTELIJKHEID) DALAM ARTI NEGATIF TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Nadilla, Indah; Danil, Elwi; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.319

Abstract

Korupsi merupakan kejahatan luar biasa (extra ordinary crime) yang memerlukan perhatian khusus di Indonesia. Korupsi tidak hanya merugikan kekayaan dan keuangan negara, namun korupsi juga menghilangkan legitimasi penegakan hukum dengan menghancurkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap hukum. Dalam upaya penegakan hukum terhadap pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi diperlukannya kepastian hukum agar Hakim dapat malahirkan putusan yang adil dan bermanfaat bagi masyarakat. Namun terjadi persoalan terkait penafsiran hukum terhadap Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (selanjutnya disebut UU PTPK) khususnya pada bagian penjelasan pasal mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum materiil (Materiele Wederrechtelijkheid). Persoalan ini lahir akibat judicial review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Nomor Putusan 003/PUU-VI/2006. Maka untuk Menjawab persoalan tersebut, perlu diketahui bagaimana pengaturan dan penafsiran serta eksistensi perbuatan melawan hukum materiil (materiele wederrechtelijkheid) dalam arti negatif terhadap tindak pidana korupsi. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa Perbuatan melawan hukum materiil dalam arti positif akibat lahirnya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dianggap bertentangan dengan Pasal 28 D Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945, sehingga hanya perbuatan melawan hukum materiil dalam fungsi negatif saja yang masih berlaku. Kemudian dalam pengejawantahan delik tersebut, hakim haruslah melakukan penafsiran hukum yang ideal guna terciptanya kepastian hukum terhadap Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU PTPK tersebut.
Co-Authors Ardyan , Ardyan Ardyan, Ardyan Arma, Diana Dias, Fausto Soares Elwi Danil Fortuna, Lovely Harada Taquas Elta, Yonar Hendra Lesmana Irzal Rias, A. Ismansyah Ismansyah Kantosa, Melia Mursalin, Adinda Faradilla Nadilla, Indah Nani Mulyati Nursafitri, Kharisma Permana, Yondra Rafifa, Dhiyaul Okasha Raspati, Lucky Rianda Seprasia Saputra, Widi Sari Wulan, Sari Sayutis, Sayutis Siska Elvandari SRY WAHYUNI, SRY Suryani, Nilma Syofiarti Tenofrimer, Tenofrimer Yudari, Laras Zhafira, Indy