cover
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 580 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)" : 580 Documents clear
Analisis Efektivitas Penerapan Hukum Pidana Dalam Pengawasan Tindak Pidana di Indonesia Khairani, Khairani; Suhendar, Suhendar; Mohamad Ali Syaifudin; Ali Imron; Rahmida Erliyani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2246

Abstract

Human trafficking is a serious crime that involves the exploitation of individuals The threat of imprisonment is a dominant feature of the Indonesian Criminal Code. Although imprisonment is a common punishment in most countries, its effectiveness has been a topic of debate for centuries. Therefore, it is imperative to identify alternative forms of custodial punishment to mitigate the negative consequences of imprisonment. This research utilizes a descriptive qualitative approach to provide a comprehensive overview of the current issues based on existing evidence. The results of this research revealed several key insights. The fundamental purpose of criminal supervision in the Indonesian criminal justice system is to protect the public from criminal acts in accordance with the principles of criminal law. The Draft National Criminal Code explains that supervision punishment is an alternative to imprisonment. Supervision punishment is an alternative form of punishment with the provision that the punishment imposed will not be implemented if the conditions are met, with a maximum probation period of three years. It is evident that conditional punishment as an alternative to deprivation of liberty punishment in the existing Criminal Code is inadequate in protecting individuals and criminal offenders. Therefore, the National Criminal Code must evolve to include alternative formulations, such as supervision punishment (probation), which has been successfully developed and implemented in various countries around the world. The fundamental purpose of supervision punishment is to replace deprivation of liberty/imprisonment, an approach that has resulted in poor outcomes for both the convicted person and society at large. Therefore, supervision punishment should be included as the main type of punishment in the upcoming National Criminal Code, serving as an effective and humane alternative to deprivation of liberty.
Perjanjian Kawin Dalam Perkara Sengketa Waris (Analisis Terhadap Putusan Nomor 21/Pdt.G/2022/PN Plk) Novea Elysa Wardhani; Sudiarti, Elin; Claudia Yuni Pramitha
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2247

Abstract

Marriage is a form of permanent relationship, which is carried out by a man and a woman, recognized as legitimate by the community concerned based on the applicable marriage regulations. Before entering into a marriage, the prospective husband and prospective wife can make a marriage agreement, which regulates the assets obtained before marriage, as well as the assets obtained after marriage. The assets obtained after marriage are related to the inheritance rights given to the heirs in the marriage. Indeed, the marriage agreement made must not conflict with the applicable positive law. If the marriage agreement is made not in accordance with the provisions of positive law, then the marriage agreement has no legal force if in the future there is a dispute between the parties related to the marriage.
Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nurdiana Yuniar Kusumawardhani; Ariyanda Tri Firanti; Rafferty Cullen Mantaria
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2248

Abstract

Corruption can occur anywhere, not only in government bureaucracy or in the judicial environment known as judicial corruption, but also in companies, foundations, political parties, hospitals, and even in religious institutions. Non-Conviction Based (NCB) asset forfeiture or confiscation of assets resulting from criminal acts with a mechanism without punishment. This mechanism allows the confiscation of assets resulting from criminal acts in rem (against assets) not against the perpetrators of corruption. Land rights consist of primary rights and secondary rights, which are obtained through an agreement between the landowner and the prospective holder of secondary rights. Thus, the Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture mechanism is an effective way to make the crime unprofitable because the perpetrators will think again about the consequences that will arise later. The concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture has become a legal necessity in Indonesia because the Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture mechanism is an alternative to recover state assets lost due to criminal acts related to the country's economy by perpetrators of crimes to hide their assets. The implementation of a restorative justice concept also prioritizes the fulfillment of human rights in asset confiscation efforts, because the asset confiscation analyzed is a civil asset confiscation, so that the pursuit is not on the perpetrator but on the frozen assets.
Efektivitas Putusan Erga Omnes dalam Mengatasi Pelanggaran Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Arifin, Firdaus
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2258

Abstract

Pelanggaran hukum tata usaha negara merupakan isu krusial dalam sistem hukum Indonesia yang mempengaruhi keadilan dan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas putusan erga omnes dalam mengatasi pelanggaran tersebut dan memperkuat supremasi hukum di Indonesia. Menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi peran putusan erga omnes dalam menciptakan kepastian hukum dan memberikan efek jera terhadap pelanggaran oleh pejabat publik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun putusan erga omnes memiliki potensi besar dalam memperkuat sistem hukum dan melindungi hak-hak masyarakat, implementasinya seringkali terhambat oleh kurangnya pemahaman di kalangan aparat penegak hukum dan birokrasi yang lamban. Implikasi penelitian ini mengindikasikan perlunya peningkatan pemahaman hukum, penguatan regulasi, dan kolaborasi antara pemerintah dan masyarakat sipil untuk memastikan efektivitas putusan erga omnes dalam hukum tata usaha negara.
Kolaborasi Pentahelik Pengelolaan Desa Wisata di Kabupaten Batang Dwi Edi Wibowo; Agung Aditya; Aditya Migi Prematura; Mutimatun Ni'ami
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2264

Abstract

Tourist villages in Batang Regency, Central Java, have great potential for development through pentahelix collaboration. Although collaborative efforts have been made, challenges such as inter-party coordination and marketing strategies still need improvement. The purpose of this research is to analyze the form of pentahelix collaboration in the management of tourist villages in Batang Regency and to identify supporting and hindering factors that affect this collaboration. This study uses empirical legal methods to analyze pentahelix collaboration in the management of tourist villages in Batang Regency through in-depth interviews, direct observation, and qualitative analysis. The results show that pentahelix collaboration in the management of tourist villages in Batang Regency involves the integration of five main components: government as facilitator and regulator, local communities as the main drivers, academics contributing through research, the business sector providing capital and expertise, and media playing a role in promotion. The implementation of this collaboration is evident in various tourist village development programs. The main supporting factors include local government commitment, active community participation, academic contributions, business sector investment, and the media's role in promotion. However, there are several obstacles such as lack of coordination between elements, limited human resource capacity, limited access to funding, overlapping regulations, environmental sustainability challenges, and resistance to change.
Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Perceraian Akibat Kekerasan Psikis di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas I A Palangka Raya Mulida Hayati; Aristoteles, Aristoteles; Evi, Evi; Angelica Rya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2265

Abstract

Palangka Raya class IA state. Object of research on divorce lawsuits at the Palangka Raya Class IA District Court. The aim of the research is to find out whether psychological violence can be used as a reason for a divorce suit at the Class I A Palangka Raya District Court, and to find out the judge's consideration of the divorce decision due to psychological violence at the Class I A Palangka Raya District Court. The research uses qualitative methods with empirical field or juridical research. Psychological violence can be used as a reason for divorce in court because it is in accordance with the regulations contained in the Marriage Law, Domestic Violence Eradication Law and Compilation of Islamic Law, as well as looking at the benefits contained in the judge's decision. The reason the plaintiff filed the lawsuit was because of psychological violence which resulted in mental stress or feelings, but this was not used as the main reason for the judge to consider granting the plaintiff's lawsuit.
Peran Notaris dalam Proses Perubahan Status Perseroan Perorangan Menjadi Perseroan Persekutuan Modal Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Hayati Ukami, Susan; Muda, Iskandar; Ryan Bakry, Mohammad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2272

Abstract

Kebijakan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pelaku usaha mikro dan kecil dilakukan dengan memberikan kemudahan pendaftaran legalitas kepada usaha mikro dan kecil dalam bentuk badan hukum Perseroan Perorangan. Melalui pengaturan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, Pendirian Perseroan Perorangan dapat dilakukan dengan 1 (satu) orang dan didirikan tidak memerlukan akta notaris. Pelaku usaha mikro dan kecil dapat melakukan pendirian legalitas usahanya secara mandiri dan tidak memerlukan peran notaris, karena pendirian cukup dilakukan dengan surat pernyataan pendiri. Apabila usaha yang dilakukan sudah tidak memenuhi kriteria usaha mikro dan kecil, maka pelaku usaha wajib merubah status usahanya menjadi Perseroan Persekutuan Modal. Perubahan status Perseroan Perorangan menjadi Perseroan Persekutuan Modal dilakukan dengan menggunakan akta autentik dari notaris. Dalam proses perubahan status ini diperlukan peran notaris, oleh karena perubahan status ini merupakan konsep baru dalam penerapan ketentuan Perseroan Terbatas, maka notaris harus mampu menentukan pilihan hukum, agar tindakan yang dilakukan tidak berimpliaksi bagi pelaku usaha, sehingga peran notaris dalam proses perubahan status dari Perseroan Peorangan menjadi Perseroan Persekutuan Modal menjadi vital.
Perjanjian Waralaba yang Belum Terdaftar: Batal Demi Hukum atau Dapat Dibatalkan? Rahma Widiastuti, Ambria; Akhmad Budi Cahyono
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2307

Abstract

Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising (PP 42/2007), requires that the Franchisor must register the Franchise prospectus which is followed up with the registration of the Franchise Agreement by the Franchisee. Failure to register the Franchise Agreement results in the agreement being null and void because the Franchise Agreement is included in the form of a Formal Agreement. Void and void means returning the parties to their original state when the agreement had not yet been formed. However, if the Franchisee suffers a loss, he can sue the Franchisor for compensation on the basis of an Unlawful Act. The Franchisee will not experience such losses if the Franchisor registers its franchise prospectus. This study uses a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach.
Analisis Yuridis Pelaksanaan Persidangan Secara In Absentia Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terhadap Tersangka Yang Tidak Pernah Diperiksa Pada Tahap Penyidikan : (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nomor: 59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Mdn) Dea Vony Nifili Zega; Mahmud Mulyadi; Detania Sukarja; Wessy Trisna
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2308

Abstract

In handling cases of criminal acts of corruption, special rules are imposed that stipulate that without the presence of defendants who have been legally summoned at the court hearing, the trial can still proceed with trial in absentia as stipulated in Article 38 paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. However, this provision does not formulate and regulate the investigation of corruption cases in absentia. The purpose of this thesis is to analyze and know the importance of trial in absentia in cases of criminal acts of corruption, to analyze and know the implementation and opportunities and challenges of trials in absentia in cases of criminal acts of corruption against suspects who have never been examined at the investigation stage. The research method used in this thesis is normative research with primary data collection and secondary data using literature study techniques and field studies then the data obtained are analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The urgency of trial in absentia in corruption cases is to realize legal justice in terms of saving state wealth through the return of assets resulting from corruption crimes, providing benefits for many people who have been harmed by social and economic rights as a society. The implementation of trials in absentia in corruption cases as decided in the Corruption Court Decision Number: 59/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Mdn does not only occur in the court examination process but has begun since the investigation stage, where the Suspect is no longer known or has fled after being determined as a Suspect. The trial in absentia of corruption cases against suspects who have never been examined at the investigation stage provides opportunities for the recovery of state financial losses, speeds up the completion of legal proceedings and to provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption crimes. The challenges of implementing trials in absentia of corruption cases in terms of legal substance, legal structure, legal culture and fulfillment of human rights.
Daerah Otorita Ibu Kota Negara: Koherensi Status Daerah Pada Ibu Kota Negara Nusantara Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia Ihsan Harivy Addas
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2309

Abstract

The dynamics of the discourse on relocating the national capital have been rolling after the Dutch colonization of Indonesia. This idea is not without reason, considering that the Indonesian government regime from the beginning had a long blue print in managing the government of the Republic of Indonesia and one of them was moving the capital city so that the Indonesian people had the authority to manage their territory while leaving the legacy of Dutch colonialization. Furthermore, Article 5 of Law number 3 of 2022 describes the specificity and position of the archipelago's capital city as an authoritative region. This has become a complex debate in academic discourse, especially in the field of constitutional law, considering that this law is substantially incoherent with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia article 18. Therefore, this article will further explain in more detail about the coherence of the status of “region” in the National Capital of the archipelago (IKN Nusantara). This article's research is based on normative legal research methodology or can also be referred to as doctrinal research. Normative research itself is one of the methods to find and determine what the law should be (ought to be) by analyzing various provisions of laws and regulations by presenting theories in legal science literature. Therefore, departing from the discourse on the relocation of the capital city and its implementation in Law number 3 of 2022, it is necessary to conduct a more specific study of the special regional status that is inline with the legislation that preceded it such as Law number 23 of 2014 as well as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue