cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
KONSEP CYBERBULLYING DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA Hariyanto Hariyanto
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.219

Abstract

This research is a normative legal research that aims to analyze the modus operandi of cyberbullying and analyze cyberbullying in the perspective of criminal law in Indonesia and other countries. The method in this study is a normative research method. The results of the study analyzed that the modus operandi of cyberbullying is various forms of bullying or bullying that is carried out through the internet. The modus operandi can be categorized into exclusion; flaming; impersonation/fake profiles; trickery; fraping; dissing; and cyberstalking. In Indonesia, cyberbullying is still not specifically regulated or limited. So the handling still depends on Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Likewise in the Criminal Code the crime of cyberbullying is only limited to insults and defamation. An adequate discussion regarding cyberbullying is contained in Arkanas Regulation (AR Code) AR Code 5-71-217 (2015) in points (b), (c) and (d) as well as in the EU's Criminal Law in Conclusion of the Council 2009/C62 /05 of 27 November 2008 and the 2011/92/EU Directive on combating inappropriate treatment in cyberspace. This research is a normative legal research that aims to analyze the modus operandi of cyberbullying and analyze cyberbullying in the perspective of criminal law in Indonesia and other countries. The method in this study is a normative research method. The results of the study analyzed that the modus operandi of cyberbullying is various forms of bullying or bullying that is carried out through the internet. The modus operandi can be categorized into exclusion; flaming; impersonation/fake profiles; trickery; fraping; dissing; and cyberstalking. In Indonesia, cyberbullying is still not specifically regulated or limited. So the handling still depends on Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Likewise in the Criminal Code the crime of cyberbullying is only limited to insults and defamation. An adequate discussion regarding cyberbullying is contained in Arkanas Regulation (AR Code) AR Code 5-71-217 (2015) in points (b), (c) and (d) as well as in the EU's Criminal Law in Conclusion of the Council 2009/C62 /05 of 27 November 2008 and the 2011/92/EU Directive on combating inappropriate treatment in cyberspace.
PELAKSANAAN HAK KLIEN PEMASYARAKATAN UNTUK MEMPEROLEH BIMBINGAN DI BALAI PEMASYARAKATAN KLAS I PADANG Retno Rahman
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i1.220

Abstract

One of the goals of the Correctional System is to prepare Correctional Inmates (WBP) or hereinafter referred to as Correctional Clients so that they can integrate in a healthy manner and play a responsible role again in the family and the wider community. Class I Correctional Center Padang as a Technical Implementation Unit from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of West Sumatra as a law enforcer who carries out duties in the field of guiding Correctional Clients who must carry out correctional duties and functions based on applicable legal rules so that the fulfillment and protection of Human Rights can be realized. The fulfillment of the client's rights is regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections and the rules for its implementation.
METODE PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA CYBERBULLYING Jamaludin Jamaludin
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.221

Abstract

Cyberbullying is considered a serious bullying problem. The effects of cyberbullying can cause victims to feel depressed, depressed, and even commit suicide. Various methods of overcoming cyberbullying, starting from countermeasures through family, the surrounding environment to the legal system that will be used, must be enforced. This research is a normative legal research that aims to analyze methods of overcoming cyberbullying actions through penal and non-penal. The results of this study indicate that the methods of overcoming cyberbullying through penalizing efforts include: the Criminal Code, Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number I1 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, and the Indonesian National Police. . While the methods of overcoming cyberbullying through non-penal efforts include: Countermeasures from KOMINFO, the community, and countermeasures from the victims themselves.
KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ANTARA WARGA NEGARA ASING TERHADAP WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA Oriza Imanda Pratama Ismi Putri; Fatma Ulfatun Najicha
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.222

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal provisions in the regulations regarding the nominee agreement and the form of sanctions given to the notary making the nominee agreement deed that is contrary to the UUPA. This type of research is normative juridical and the approach method used is the statutory approach. The results of this study are that the nominee agreement between foreign citizen and Indonesian citizen does not meet the objective requirements for the validity of the agreement, because it does not contain a lawful cause. This is because this agreement was made to do things that are prohibited by law. Foreign nationals do not have ownership rights to land in Indonesia, but only have usufructuary rights to land. This has been regulated in Article 42 of the UUPA. In relation to the notary making the deed of the nominee agreement which is contrary to the UUPA, then administratively, the notary has violated article 16 paragraph (1) letter d of the UUJN, so that it can be subject to sanctions in the form of verbal warning, written warning, temporary dismissal, respectful dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal.
HAK AHLI WARIS PEKERJA MENINGGAL DUNIA DALAM HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN DI INDONESIA (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PHI PADA PN SURABAYA NOMOR 74/G/2014/PHI.SBY JO. PUTUSAN MA RI NO. 225 K/PDT.SUS PHI/2015) Neni Vesna Madjid; Afrinal Afrinal
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.223

Abstract

Meninggalnya pekerja maka berakhir pula hubungan kerja dengan sendiri atau dikenal dengan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja demi hukum. Konsekwensi dari meninggalnya pekerja, ada hak ahli waris yang diterima. Dalam tulisan ini penulis membahas hak waris pekerja yang meninggal dunia mulai dari ketentuan yang ada di pasal 1603 j KUPerda dan ketentuan Pasal 1601 y KUHPerdata. Lebih lanjut ketentuan Pasal 61 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan begitu juga dalam ketentuan UU No. 166 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Namun lahirnya UU No. 11 tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja, menghapus ketentuan Pasal 166 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan, dan memuat subtansi Pasal 166 UU No. 13 tahun 2003 , dalam ketentuan Pasal 57 Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (PP) Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja yang merupakan peraturan pelaksana UU Ciptaker. Penulis juga melakukan analisis terhadap penerapan hak ahliwaris yang meninggal dunia berdasarkan putusan PHI pada PN Surabaya Nomor 74/G/2014/PHI.Sby jo.Putusan MA RI No. 225 K/Pdt.Sus PHI/2015)
RESTRUKTURISASI KREDIT KENDARAAN BERMOTOR PERUSAHAAN PEMBIAYAAN AKIBAT SITUASI PANDEMIC COVID-19 Fadhli Marta Saputra; Iyah Faniyah
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.226

Abstract

With the increase and spread of the number of cases of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19), the impact of increasing the percentage of non-performing loans at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance, Tbk Padang Branch, from the data obtained from bad loans before the Covid-19 Pandemic there were around 500 (five hundred). Restructuring of Motor Vehicle Loans for Financing Companies Due to the Covid-19 Pendemic Situation at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance, Tbk Padang Branch is implemented in the form of rescheduled installment payments and there are consumers (creditors) who have been given restructuring with terms and conditions agreed by both parties, provided that the debtor or customer who submitted it is affected by Covid 19, the collateral or product being credited is still with the debtor, it is not transferred or over credited to another party, the financing value (principal debt) is below Rp10 billion. Preventive supervision of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in the West Sumatra Region OJK will send a letter of warning to Financing Companies that do not carry out restructuring programs during the current COVID-19 pandemic, and repressively to Financing Companies that do not implement Restructuring programs as per government policy. OJK will impose administrative sanctions in the form of fines to financing companies.
PROSPEK AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA RI TAHUN 1945 TERKAIT MASA JABATAN PRESIDEN PERSPEKTIF PADA PEMILU 2024 Darmini Roza
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.229

Abstract

The prospect of amendments carried out by a country shows that the country is following developments that the present will certainly not be the same in the future. Indonesia, which has undergone the replacement of the Constitution and the Amendment to the Law, has appointed Indonesia as a country to be better than in the past. Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia becomes the Fundamental Basis. Related to legal issues and discourses on the terms of office of the President and Vice President for three periods which have led to polemics for and against, however, if it is related to the opportunities that exist in the MPR as a State Institution, amend Article 7 of the Constitution regarding the terms of office of the President and Vice President and fulfill the provisions of Article 37 of the Law. The Constitution and the people's approval so that the past history in this country does not repeat itself, meaning that it is normatively legal for the 2024 Election.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR DALAM PENARIKAN SITA JAMINAN FIDUSIA TANPA MELALUI LELANG PENGADILAN Anggi Purnama Tradesa; Zainal Asikin; Eduardus Bayo Sili
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.230

Abstract

Debtors as legal subjects are entitled to legal protection, both preventive and repressive, written or unwritten. The legal protection provided is an implementation of the principle of recognition and dignity that is rooted in Pancasila and the Constitution. This study aims to analyze the protection and legal remedies of the debtor in withdrawing the confiscation of fiduciary guarantees without going through a court auction. This research is a normative legal research. The results of this study include: The debtor's legal effort in withdrawing a fiduciary guarantee without going through a court auction is to ask the creditor to show a Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate issued by the Fiduciary Registration Office. If the creditor cannot show a fiduciary guarantee certificate, then the debtor does not need to submit the collateral, because the creditor does not have the right to execute the collateral.
SOLUSI POTRET PROBLEMATIKA MATERI MUATAN REGULASI DALAM PENANGANAN COVID-19DI INDONESIA Ahmad Sabirin; Febrian Duta Adhiyaksa; Janna Shafira Widianti Apcar
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i3.232

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a tremendous impact, ranging from the economic crisis to public health, which is the government's focus in minimizing the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The type of research used in this research is juridical-normative. And the purpose of this research, namely; 1) describe the regulations issued by the Central and Regional Governments in dealing with the Covid-19 Pandemic, 2) and describe solutions to overcome regulatory problems issued by the Central and Regional Governments during the Covid-19 Pandemic. The government in issuing several regulations looks inconsistent, for example; the difference in the definition of PSBB as regulated in PP No. 21 of 2020 with that regulated in the Quarantine Law. Then, regarding the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 15 of 2021 which is considered to have neglected the regulations above. Problems with existing regulations, the government needs to break the chain of spread of the Covid-19 pandemic with the product of regulations based on the Tiered Law Theory by Hans Nawiasky. This theory then when associated with problems in Indonesia can make Article 34 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution and Law no. 6 concerning Health Quarantine is a reference for the government in formulating the rules under it, in matters relating to regulations during the Covid-19 pandemic so that it becomes a solution in overcoming the regulatory problems of handling the Covid-19 pandemic.
UPAYA HUKUM KEBERATAN ATAS PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) DALAM KASUS PENARIKAN UNIT KENDARAAN MELALUI PIHAK EKSTERNAL (DEBT COLLECTOR) (Studi Putusan Nomor 03/PTS/BPSK/2020/PN.Padang dan Putusan Nomor 07/PDT/BPSK/2020/PN.Padang) Bustanul Alamsyah
UNES Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v4i2.233

Abstract

Broadly speaking, BPSK decisions should be viewed as decisions that have permanent legal force. However, when compared to the principle (res judicata pro vitatate habetur) with Article 56 Paragraph (2) of the UUPK, it turns out that the parties can still file an objection to the District Court. The incident was caused by the weak position and authority given by UUPK to BPSK, especially regarding decisions that are final and binding. One of the factors that cause objections to the decision of the dispute settlement agency outside the court is in determining the type of dispute resolution that will be taken by the parties. The objection is that the settlement of the case should be resolved through BANI or the PN, but in this case the dispute resolution is resolved at BPSK. Based on the number of cases that have been resolved by the Padang City BPSK and the number of cases decided by the Padang City BPSK, it continues to the Padang Class IA District Court, starting from 2018 as many as 15 cases, in 2019 as many as 26 cases, then in 2020 as many as 61 cases. This shows an increase. Meanwhile, the number of cases decided by the Padang City BPSK continued to the Padang Class IA District Court, from 2018 there were 14 cases, in 2019 there were 3 cases, in 2020 there were 3 cases. This shows a decline. Based on the research and discussion, it can be seen that: First, the mechanism for objecting to the BPSK decision in the Class IA Padang District Court can be carried out if one of the litigants considers that the BPSK decision is unsuccessful so that they can file an objection to the Class IA Padang District Court with a note that after fulfilling the requirements the objection applicant may file an objection and the submission of the objection is still within the specified grace period, namely 14 (fourteen) days from the announcement of the BPSK decision and if the District Court accepts the objection, a decision will be given within 21 (twenty one) days at the latest. Second, the analysis of the judge's decision Number 03/PTS/BPSK/2020/PN.Padang and the judge's decision Number 07/PDT/BPSK/ 2020/ PN.Padang which was previously processed at BPSK Padang City, is an objection to the arbitration decision entered in The PN Padang Class IA cannot be said to be a new lawsuit or an appeal, the objection is a legal remedy taken specifically to object to the arbitration decision of the consumer dispute settlement body out of court.

Page 14 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue