cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,922 Documents
 234   235   236   237   238 
KEABSAHAN PENERBITAN SURAT PENETAPAN KEMBALI TANPA SURAT PENETAPAN SEBELUMNYA Hatmoko, Aryo
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.610

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the validity of the SPKTNP without the SPTNP which has been regulated in the Customs Law which underlies the decision of the Supreme Court. The research is descriptive-analytical with a normative juridical approach. Collecting data by library or document study conducted by searching and studying and making an inventory of secondary legal documents or materials. As a result, the validity of the issuance of SPKTNP without SPTNP is regulated in Law Number 10 of 1995 Article 16 and its explanation which is closely related to Law Number 17 of 2006 Article 17 which is a re-stipulation. However, Article 16 paragraph (4) concerning the amount of the fine jo. Article 17 paragraph (4) which adds a fine from the construction of state administrative law is a positive fictitious decision considering that the function of government is active. Issuance of SPKTNP without SPTNP is a state administrative decision by Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Court Article 1 point 3 jis Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Court Article 1 point 9. The re-stipulation decision by the Supreme Court requires the issuance of the SPTNP before the issuance of the SPKTNP, then the Supreme Court did not defend the issuance of the SPKTNP without being preceded by the issuance of the SPTNP because it contradicted Article 17 jo. Article 16 of Law Number 17 of 2006 in conjunction with Article 7 of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation.
PEMBAGIAN WARISAN DAN PERAN NOTARIS DALAM MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT NIAS Loi, Sri Ayu sukmawati; Saly, Jeane Neltje
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.611

Abstract

Customary inheritance law in Indonesia is influenced by the existence of a family system such as in terms of the form of marriage and how to draw lineage to determine who has the right to be the heir and has the right to inherit. The indigenous people of Nias who adhere to an inheritance system based on a patrilineal descent system are generally known as honest marriages, namely marriages that are carried out by paying honestly (BÖwÖ) from the man to the woman. In the inheritance system in the Nias tribal community, the role of men is as the heirs of their parents, while women are not heirs. This study uses an empirical juridical approach. The problem in this research is how the division of inheritance and the role of the Notary in the customary law community of Nias. This research is important to carry out to find out the development of inheritance law and the role of the notary in the customary law community of Nias where there has been development in terms of inheritance of female heirs who have received a share of the inheritance of their parents even though the share is not larger than the male heirs and this is a family policy and agreement
ANALISIS HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PERBUATAN UJARAN KEBENCIAN Putri Jayanti Basri, Indah; Said Karim, Muhammad; Ilyas, Amir
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.614

Abstract

Penelitian ini bersifat normatif, dengan pendekatan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah primer dan sekunder, dimana Teknik pengumpulan datanya menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan wawancara. Bahan hukum yang telah dikumpulkan, dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Postingan ujaran kebencian yang dilakukan melalui media sosial oleh FH dan RS sempurna sebagai tindak pidana karena memenuhi unsur Pasal 28 ayat (2) Undang-Undang ITE, sekalipun telah dihapus. Terpenuhinya alasan-alasan pertanggungjawaban pidana berupa sifat melawan hukum, kesalahan, kemampuan bertanggung jawab dan tidak adanya alasan pemaaf, sehingga FH dan RS dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana penjara paling lama 6 (enam) tahun dan/atau denda paling banyak Rp. 1.000.000.000, - (satu milyar rupiah) sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidananya.
PANDANGAN HERMENEUTIKA TERHADAP KASUS MEREK DAGANG GOTO VS GoTo Martinelli, Imelda; Sugiarto, Ivan Richard; Hartono, Ernita Dewy
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.615

Abstract

Hermeneutics is a discipline or method of interpretation used to understand and interpret texts, especially complex texts such as literature, religious texts, or philosophy. Hermeneutics involves the process of studying texts comprehensively, analyzing the structure of the text, understanding the context, and searching for the meaning contained therein. A mark is a sign used to distinguish a product or service from similar products or services provided by other parties. A trademark is a mark that is registered with the Mark Registration Office and Geographical Indications, which grants an exclusive right to use the mark in business activities. This study examines the hermeneutical view of the GOTO vs GoTo trademark case contained in the Court Decision Number 71/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. The purpose of this study is to find out the protection regarding Trademarks in Indonesia and how the hermeneutical view of the case of the GOTO vs GoTo Trademarks. The research method used in this journal is normative juridical, which is an approach made by examining the principles, theories, concepts, principles, and legislation related to the research problem being studied. The results of this study are that PT TFT has a class and type that is different from Gojek Tokopedia, therefore in the trial the lawsuit against PT TFT was rejected. In this case, hermeneutics or interpretation is also used so that we can find out the existing meaning and the causes of the case.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN GB DAN PELAKU USAHA ATAS KERUGIAN KONSUMEN AKIBAT MENGKONSUMSI LAPCHIONG Putra Gunawan, Tri; Cornelia, Anita
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.616

Abstract

GB sebagai platform penyedia jasa layanan memiliki berbagai fitur yang dipergunakan untuk mempermudah hidup manusia. Salah satu fitur GB yang sering digunakan oleh konsumen dalam hal pemesanan makanan. Hal tersebut dikarenakan pemesanan makanan melalui GB memiliki berbagai keuntungan seperti menghemat waktu dan tenaga. Konsumen tidak perlu datang pada toko konvensional untuk mendapatkan makanan yang diinginkannya karena driver GB akan mengirimkan makanan sesuai dengan alamat yang diinginkan oleh konsumen. Lapchiong merupakan sosis keras berbahan dasar daging babi. Pelaku usaha lapchiong yang tidak mencantumkan keterangan tidak halal pada aplikasi GB mengakibatkan konsumen beragama Islam membeli dan mengkonsumsi lapchiong tersebut. Konsumen mengetahui bahwa lapchiong mengandung daging babi setelah konsumen tersebut mengkonsumsinya. Dalam Surat Al-Baqarah 173 terdapat larangan bagi Umat Islam untuk mengkonsumsi makanan yang mengandung daging babi. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis ingin mengetahui pihak yang bertanggung jawab akibat kerugian yang dialami oleh konsumen akibat mengkonsumsi makanan yang mengandung daging babi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah sah dan berlaku di Indonesia dan dikaitkan dengan kasus yang terjadi.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP PRODUK KADALUWARSA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA) Walangitang, Alicia Valda Veyfra
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.618

Abstract

In buying and selling activities, business actors as product providers try to avoid losses as much as possible. Not a few frauds are committed by business actors who sell expired products that are detrimental to consumers. Consumer protection is urgently needed given the weaker position of the consumer. Indonesia and Malaysia as ASEAN members regulate consumer protection. Indonesia established Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Malaysia holds Consumer Protection in the 1999 Consumer Protection Act (CPA). The problem formulation of this writing is to discuss the regulatory provisions regarding expired products and the perpetrators are responsible for losses due to expired products in Indonesia and Malaysia. In this paper the research method is normative legal research. The approach in this paper is the statutory approach and the comparative approach. The conclusion of this paper is that the provisions of Indonesian and Malaysian consumer protection laws both regulate business actors who are prohibited from trading expired products and require business actors to put information labels or explanations including the expiration date of a product. For the responsibility of business actors, Indonesia and Malaysia apply reverse verification in the Consumer Protection Law.
TINJAUAN HUKUM PENJATUHAN SANKSI ADAT TERHADAP PEMBURUAN DAGING PENYU SEBAGAI SATWA YANG DILINDUNGI (STUDI KASUS KECAMATAN PULAU BANYAK) Khatijah, Siti; Trisna, Nila
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.619

Abstract

Article 21 paragraph 2 of law number 5 of 1990 concerning living natural resources and their ecosystems. Violation of the provisions of article 21 paragraph 2 is regulated in article 40 of law number 5 of 1990. However, the reality that occurred in the Pulau Banyak sub-district was resolved through customary law that grew within the community and the community still violates the provisions of customary law that exist in society. The type of research method is empirical juridical using primary data through interview data, literature study of written materials such as books and documents. The results of this study say that in the Pulau Banyak District area there are still violations of customary law provisions that live in the community, so that people still violate customary law regarding turtle protection. Based on the case of turtle meat hunting, customary law cannot provide a definite resolution, so it is contrary to the law, therefore it must be resolved through positive law.
DAMPAK PERUBAHAN STATUS BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PT TIMAH TBK MENJADI ANAK PERUSAHAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PT INDONESIA ASAHAN ALUMINIUM (PERSERO) TERHADAP KEWENANGAN AUDIT BPK Rabbani, Ahmad Khalifah; Rinwigati, Patricia
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.620

Abstract

In line with the Government's efforts to increase efficiency in the performance of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) in each sector, one of the strategies used is to create BUMN Holding, Further, Government Regulation was stipulated concerning Amendments to Government Regulation Number 44 of 2005 concerning Procedures for Participation and Administration of State Capital in State-Owned Enterprises and Limited Liability Companies Number 72 of 2016. One of the implementation of BUMN Holding was carried out in the Mineral and Coal Mining sector resulting in a change in the status of PT Timah Tbk which was originally a state-owned enterprise (BUMN) based on Government Regulation concerning the Transfer of Forms of a State-owned Tin Mining Company to a Limited Liability Company (Persero) Number 3 of 1976 Changed to become a BUMN Subsidiary with the stipulation of Government Regulation Concerning the Addition of the Republic of Indonesia State Equity Participation into the Share Capital of PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium Company Number 47 of 2017 where PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium Tbk (Persero) is BUMN Holding. With the change in status from previously a State-Owned Enterprise (BUMN) to a Subsidiary of a State-Owned Enterprise (AP BUMN), it has an impact on the change in the financial status of PT Timah Tbk, which no longer has state shares/capital in it. Whereas based on the changing status of PT Timah Tbk to a BUMN Subsidiary of PT Indonesia Asahan Aluminium (Persero), there is legal dualism related to the authority of the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) to audit PT Timah Tbk
ANALYSIS OF DECISION OF CENTRAL JAKARTA COURT NUMBER 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Pst (FROM PMH TO ABUSE OF POWER) Fauziyah, Ratu Faridatul
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.621

Abstract

On March 2, 2023, the Central Jakarta District Court decided to accept the PRIMA party's lawsuit, declared the PRIMA party the party that was harmed, ordered the defendant to pay a fine of five hundred billion, punished the defendant in this case, the KPU not carrying out the remaining stages of the KPU, and so on. On the one hand, this decision is considered to be in the wrong room, and the JAKPUS District Court judges exceeded their authority, especially regarding the election postponement clause. However, on the other hand, this decision was aimed at justice for the PRIMA party due to the KPU's negligence. Based on this, the research seeks to analyze more deeply and comprehensively whether the JAKPUS District Court decision was in the wrong chamber and the judge exceeded his authority or whether this decision was indeed in his room. This research is normative research with a normative juridical approach. The legal material used in this study is secondary legal material, namely in the form of a JAKPUS District Court decision number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst, laws and regulations, doctrine, expert opinions, and so on related to the theme of this research. In addition, no research specifically examines this decision. The results of this study indicate that the unlawful act referred to in this case is a legal act committed by a government agency/institution, which is the authority of the Administrative Court as outlined in PERMA Number 2 of 2019. In addition, the judge's actions in handling this case fall into the category of abuse of power for exceeding their authority and not implementing the written rules, in this case, PERMA Number 2 of 2019
HAK PENCIPTA FILM TERHADAP KARYANYA YANG DIBAJAK SECARA ILEGAL PADA WEBSITE LK21 Marcellino, Jason; Martinelli, Imelda; Arrifa, Reisa
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.622

Abstract

Due to the rise in cases of film piracy in Indonesia, this has motivated the writer to conduct research on this case. By using a qualitative descriptive writing method, the data is obtained from observations and also from literature studies. The concludes from the author's research, someone who uploads a film without any permission from relevant party can be declared as film piracy, but unfortunately there are still many people who even support this. Because if you watch through illegal websites it is free, but they arn’t aware that this act is a violation of the ITE Law. The main factor is that the perpetrators of piracy get a lot of profit from the audience, and also get a good response from the public who prefer to use illegal websites rather than using illegal websites. with a legal film player application. Stopping film piracy carried out by the LK 21 website has been terminated by blocking the lk 21 website by the Ministry of Communication and Informatics, for viewers to be wiser by watching films through the official site or application so that piracy does not occur.

Page 236 of 393 | Total Record : 3922

 234   235   236   237   238 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue