cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 41   42   43   44   45 
ANALYSIS OF DECISION OF CENTRAL JAKARTA COURT NUMBER 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Pst (FROM PMH TO ABUSE OF POWER) Ratu Faridatul Fauziyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.621

Abstract

On March 2, 2023, the Central Jakarta District Court decided to accept the PRIMA party's lawsuit, declared the PRIMA party the party that was harmed, ordered the defendant to pay a fine of five hundred billion, punished the defendant in this case, the KPU not carrying out the remaining stages of the KPU, and so on. On the one hand, this decision is considered to be in the wrong room, and the JAKPUS District Court judges exceeded their authority, especially regarding the election postponement clause. However, on the other hand, this decision was aimed at justice for the PRIMA party due to the KPU's negligence. Based on this, the research seeks to analyze more deeply and comprehensively whether the JAKPUS District Court decision was in the wrong chamber and the judge exceeded his authority or whether this decision was indeed in his room. This research is normative research with a normative juridical approach. The legal material used in this study is secondary legal material, namely in the form of a JAKPUS District Court decision number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst, laws and regulations, doctrine, expert opinions, and so on related to the theme of this research. In addition, no research specifically examines this decision. The results of this study indicate that the unlawful act referred to in this case is a legal act committed by a government agency/institution, which is the authority of the Administrative Court as outlined in PERMA Number 2 of 2019. In addition, the judge's actions in handling this case fall into the category of abuse of power for exceeding their authority and not implementing the written rules, in this case, PERMA Number 2 of 2019
HAK PENCIPTA FILM TERHADAP KARYANYA YANG DIBAJAK SECARA ILEGAL PADA WEBSITE LK21 Jason Marcellino; Imelda Martinelli; Reisa Arrifa
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.622

Abstract

Due to the rise in cases of film piracy in Indonesia, this has motivated the writer to conduct research on this case. By using a qualitative descriptive writing method, the data is obtained from observations and also from literature studies. The concludes from the author's research, someone who uploads a film without any permission from relevant party can be declared as film piracy, but unfortunately there are still many people who even support this. Because if you watch through illegal websites it is free, but they arn’t aware that this act is a violation of the ITE Law. The main factor is that the perpetrators of piracy get a lot of profit from the audience, and also get a good response from the public who prefer to use illegal websites rather than using illegal websites. with a legal film player application. Stopping film piracy carried out by the LK 21 website has been terminated by blocking the lk 21 website by the Ministry of Communication and Informatics, for viewers to be wiser by watching films through the official site or application so that piracy does not occur.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DEBT COLLECTOR SEBAGAI PIHAK ALIH DAYA ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DALAM PENAGIHAN PADA PENYELENGGARAAN LAYANAN PENDANAAN BERSAMA BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (LPBBTI) Della Nanda Iswanto; Adhitya Widya Kartika
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.623

Abstract

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan guna (1) mencari tahu hubungan hukum pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector sebagai pihak alih daya pada diadakannya Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (2) guna mencari tahu kepastian hukum sistem pertanggungjawaban pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector sebagai pihak alih daya pada diadakannya Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi berdasaran ius constitutum. Metodoe pada penelitian penulis ialah memakai metode penelitian hukum normatif serta berkarakteristik deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik kepustakaan digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data, yang selanjutnya diperiksa secara deskriptif dan kualitatif untuk menunjukkan hasil yang diantisipasi dan menarik kesimpulan tentang masalah tersebut. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan hukum antara pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector yang berperan sebagai pihak alih daya dalam penyelenggaraan LPBBTI terjadi dikarenakan sebuah perikatan yang terjadi antara pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector dalam menjalankan layanan pendanaan. Dalam mempertanggungjawabkan seluruh kegiatannya, pihak penyelenggara dengan debt collector diikat dengan hukum yang tertera di Peraturan OJK 10/2022 mengenai Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi.
PENANGANAN BAGI PEJABAT PEMERINTAH YANG TIDAK MELAKSANAKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Andre Lumban Batu; Tri Hayati
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.624

Abstract

The study aimed to discover an understanding of the handling of government officials who do not carry out the decisions of the State Administrative Court. In the mechanism for implementing decisions, the State Administrative Court has no implementing agency, and hence, the State Administrative Officers often disobey and do not implement the decisions of the State Administrative Court. Therefore, citizens' constitutional rights to justice decided by the State Administrative Court can be threatened. This study aimed to compare the state administrative justice systems in Indonesia and Thailand. This research uses doctrinal research with a statutory approach. The results of this study are that there is no institution for implementing the decisions of the State Administrative Court in Indonesia. Meanwhile, in Thailand, there is already an implementing agency, and functionally the executive body executes litigants. Therefore, regulation and implementation of State Administrative Officers who do not implement State Administrative Court Decisions is an urgency to increase the effectiveness of implementing State Administrative Court decisions in Indonesia.
IMPLIKASI YURIDIS UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 PASAL 88C AYAT 1 DAN 2 TENTANG UPAH MINIMUM KABUPATEN ATAU KOTA TERHADAP DUNIA BISNIS Dila Fatmala; Retno Catur Kusuma Dewi; Avindo a Charima Wardan
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.626

Abstract

Along with the national development program carried out by the government, a work copyright law was enacted which is expected to provide ease of doing business, inflow of investment, so as to create jobs and improve people's welfare. This study aims to examine the impact of Article 88C paragraphs 1 and 2 of the work copyright law number 11 of 2020 on district minimum wages in Indonesia. Because there were many controversies, demonstrations by workers and students emerged who understood that this article is more detrimental to workers because it lowers the district or city minimum wage. The research method used is descriptive and normative methods in the form of literature studies. In the perspective of Indonesian law, this article provides protection for workers and companies in order to create economic stability. However, there are still challenges and problems in determining efforts to determine the District/City Minimum Wage, such as if it only follows the Provincial Minimum Wage then the District/City Minimum Wage may be lower and vice versa. Therefore, discussions and in-depth studies are needed to consider the interests of all parties, including workers, employers, and the general public.
PELAKSANAAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM PERUSAHAAN TERBUKA SECARA ELEKTRONIK (E- RUPS) DENGAN SISTEM E-PROXY DI PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA (Persero), Tbk Harsa Khairu; Busyra Azheri; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.627

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the electronic General Meeting of Shareholders (e-RUPS) using the e-proxy method at PT Telkom and to find out how the Notary's authority is in holding the General Meeting of Shareholders electronically. The research method that researchers use is Empirical Juridical law (sociolegal research). The data that has been collected will then be analyzed using a qualitative approach, namely research procedures that produce descriptive data. The research results of PT Telkom as one of the users of the easy.KSEI applications have carried out e-RUPS since the Covid-19 pandemic hit Indonesia in 2020 until the last e-RUPS in 2022.
KERINGANAN HUKUMAN BAGI SAKSI YANG BEKERJASAMA (JUSTICE COLLABORATOR) DALAM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR. 798/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel.) Verdy Cahyana Putra; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.628

Abstract

In the case of premeditated murder committed by Former Head of Propam Polri Ferdy Sambo division which was carried out at Ferdy Sambo's official house on Jalan Duren Tiga, No. 46, South Jakarta on Friday (8/7/2022) at around 17.00 WIB against Brigadier Joshua Hutabarat. In the premeditated murder case, Bharada Richard Eliezer, who acted as a justice collaborator, made it easier for law enforcement officials to uncover the case, in which a justice collaborator was given a very light sentence compared to the sentence previously given by the Public Prosecutor, namely imprisonment for 12 years. however, when the verdict was passed against Bharada Richard Eliezer, the Panel of Judges at the South Jakarta District Court only gave a sentence in the form of imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months against Bharada Richard Eliezer, who was the perpetrator of the premeditated murder. The court judges gave Bharada Richard Eliezer a light sentence because he was a justice collaborator who uncovered the premeditated murder case of Brigadier Joshua Hutabarat, in SEMA No. 4 of 2011, namely a justice collaborator, was given a lighter sentence than the perpetrators of other crimes involved. on the crime of premeditated murder.
IMPLEMENTASI PEMBERATAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP ANGGOTA TNI YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA ASUSILA Alvaro David Gabriel Dumais; R. Rahaditya
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.629

Abstract

Criminal Sexual Violences or Sexual Violences, in fact, do not only occur in the midst of ordinary society, but also within active institutions of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). In this case it is clear that the TNI members involved have violated the soldier's oath and 8 (eight) TNI conscripts. In this case, every member who of course commits immoral crimes must be held responsible for their actions by receiving sanctions in the form of dismissal and appropriate punishment because they have damaged the good name of the TNI institution. The type of research method used in this writing is the normative legal research method. The method of normative legal research is carried out by studying documents and referring to studies of court decisions, principles, legal principles, legal theories, doctrines, and opinions of experts. The writing specification used is descriptive. It is used to explain various regulations and legal theories that can be correlated and examined in events or cases that occur in related problems by using secondary research data types and statutory approaches (statute approach). Therefore, it is hoped that the implementation of additional punishment in the form of dismissal can be given with the aim of providing a deterrent effect in order to maintain the image and reputation of the TNI.
PENYELESAIAN PERKARA WANPRESTASI DALAM ARISAN BERBASIS ONLINE Brandon David; Gunawan Djajaputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.630

Abstract

In essence, Indonesia is a state based on law as stated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 1 paragraph 3, so that every community activity is regulated by using law as a tool to carry out order, justice, security and development. One form of guarantee provided by law in its products is the legal relationship between legal subjects and other legal subjects in the economic field which cannot be separated from everyday human activities with the existence of arrangements regarding agreements. One that relates to agreements is online-based arisan which is based on written or oral agreements, thus providing protection to legal subjects to avoid unwanted things such as not having good faith in carrying out online arisan activities, especially those that can be a default form. Therefore the researcher uses a type of normative research method with a statutory approach. The results of this study are that the legal consequences arising from non-payment of online arisan funds can cause losses and are included in the category of default in the agreement so that they are required to compensate for losses and the conclusion in this study is that repayment can be carried out by means of litigation and non-litigation.
ACTUALIZATION OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA Rosalina Simanungkalit; Benny Djaja
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.631

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the actualization of legal philosophy in the criminal justice system and review critical theory in efforts to deal with crime in society. Legal philosophy has an important role in shaping the basics of legal thinking and directing the development of an effective criminal justice system. Meanwhile, critical theory provides a critical view of the existing legal system and highlights social, economic, and political aspects that influence crime prevention. This research uses a descriptive-analytical research method by reviewing the relevant literature and literature. The analysis is carried out by studying the concepts of legal philosophy in the context of criminal justice, as well as analyzing critical theoretical reviews of the legal system and efforts to deal with crime in society. The results of the research show that the actualization of legal philosophy in the criminal justice system is important for ensuring justice and protecting individual rights. Principles such as the presumption of innocence, legal certainty and proportionality of punishment form the basis for carrying out the functions of criminal justice. In addition, a critical theory review highlights the importance of understanding the social, economic, and political factors that are at the root of crime problems. Crime prevention efforts need to involve a holistic approach that goes beyond mere criminal proceedings, involving rehabilitation programs, community empowerment, and increasing legal awareness.

Page 43 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 41   42   43   44   45 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue