cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 97   98   99   100   101 
Analysis of Decisions Determining the Imposition of Black List SanctiONS (Study of Decision 80/G/2022/PTUN.MKS) Sindawa Sindawa
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1263

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the validity of Decision Number: 27/KPTS/Cb29.5/2022 through Decision Number 80/G/2022/PTUN.MKS regarding the imposition of blacklist sanctions in the procurement of goods and services . This research uses normative legal research methods. The use of normative research methods in this research effort is based on the suitability of theory with the research methods required by the author. The results obtained are presented descriptively. The object of the dispute issued by LKPP is proven to contain a juridical defect in the substantive aspect, therefore, because the State Administrative Decree issued by a State Administrative Body or Official must not contain a juridical defect from the element of statutory regulations either from the sub-aspects of authority, formal procedural , or substantial, if it contains a juridical flaw in one aspect, then the State Administrative Decree must be declared null and void, so that there is sufficient legal grounds for the Panel of Judges to grant the Plaintiff's claim.
Dinamika Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Adat Dikabupaten Fakfak Provinsi Papua Barat Grace Angelia Soenartho; Amad Sudiro
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1264

Abstract

This research delves into the dynamics of resolving land disputes over customary rights among indigenous communities in Fakfak Regency, West Papua Province. The study addresses the historical context of customary rights in Fakfak, examining the growth and development of land disputes within this framework. Theoretical exploration encompasses the principles and concepts of customary rights within indigenous societies, accompanied by an analysis of relevant legal foundations and regulations in Papua Barat. Employing a multidisciplinary approach, the research scrutinizes common causes of land disputes and evaluates the role of social and political conflicts in these disputes. The study investigates various dispute resolution methods, assessing their advantages and shortcomings. Special attention is given to the active participation of indigenous communities in the resolution process, exploring factors influencing their involvement. Cultural and social dynamics affecting land dispute resolution are analyzed, identifying challenges and external factors complicating the process. The research concludes with recommendations for improvement, offering insights into effective dispute resolution strategies. Case studies from Fakfak Regency provide concrete examples, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the subject. The findings have implications for policies and practices related to customary land dispute resolution.
Tinjauan Keabsahan Pelaksanaan Kontrak Elektronik di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Sistem Hukum Positif Indonesia Hizkia Ivan Nugroho; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1266

Abstract

With current technological developments, various new innovations have emerged in various aspects in various parts of the world. Then the aspect that is most affected by changes in the current technological era is the agreement or contract. Where changes to the agreement or contract lie in the medium where conventional contracts innovate into electronic contracts. Electronic contracts are often used in electronic transactions because they are more efficient. Positive law regarding electronic contracts is regulated in Civil Law and Law Number 19 of 2016 Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronics. These two regulations explain the legal requirements for implementing a contract and the validity of a contract. The legal requirements for a contract are explained in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely that there is an agreement from both parties, the agreement must discuss a certain matter, the parties must have the skills to make an agreement, the agreement must have a valid reason, and the agreement must discuss a matter. certain. If the agreement meets these four conditions then the agreement is considered valid. Then, referring to Article 5 and Article 6 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, an electronic contract is declared valid if the electronic information in it can be guaranteed and its existence can be proven. The differences in the legal requirements for the two are not too different, only the electronic media is the difference. However, in its implementation, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law needs to strictly regulate the validity of electronic contracts.
Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Ditinjau dari Doktrin Business Judgement Rule Nadya Frisca Delicia; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1267

Abstract

Legislation in Indonesia is coercive and all-embracing. The tax sector is no exception. Both individuals and corporate entities have an obligation to pay taxes. As a taxpayer, it cannot be denied that there are opportunities to commit tax crimes. This article aims to analyze tax evasion as a means of tax crimes committed by company directors when viewed from the business judgment rule doctrine. This research uses normative juridical legal research by collecting secondary data. The results of this research show that directors can be held personally responsible if they are proven to have committed tax evasion on behalf of the company and cannot be protected by the business judgment rule doctrine.
Relevansi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung RI No.1506 K/Pdt/2002 dalam Transaksi Bisnis Internasional Denny Tendra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1271

Abstract

In international business transactions carried out by Indonesian business actors, both on an UMKM and large scale, with foreign business actors, there are those who do not make anchor agreements regarding the sales and purchases they make, and only use purchase orders and the sender's email as their sales and purchase agreements. However, when a dispute arises and is tried in an Indonesian court regarding a purchase order, this has different meanings and interpretations by legal and economic experts, so a uniform interpretation of purchase orders is needed that has legal certainty. In this regard, there is legal certainty regarding the purchase order, namely the Supreme Court jurisprudence No.1506 K/Pdt/2022. This jurisprudence can be used by parties in protecting international sales and purchases that are tried in Indonesian courts.
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Polis Asuransi Jiwa Terkait dengan Aksesibilitas Rekam Medis Carissa Indah Sari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1272

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada pemegang polis asuransi jiwa dalam konteks aksesibilitas rekam medis. Aksesibilitas rekam medis menjadi isu sentral dalam klaim asuransi jiwa, di mana informasi kesehatan pemegang polis memegang peran krusial dalam penentuan klaim. Studi ini melibatkan analisis mendalam terhadap peraturan dan kebijakan hukum yang mengatur hubungan antara pemegang polis dan perusahaan asuransi jiwa. Penelitian juga mencakup tinjauan terhadap perkembangan teknologi dan keamanan informasi yang dapat mempengaruhi aksesibilitas rekam medis. Hasil analisis menyoroti perlunya kejelasan norma hukum terkait privasi dan keamanan data kesehatan, seiring dengan meningkatnya risiko kebocoran informasi. Selain itu, diperlukan kajian lebih lanjut terkait etika penggunaan data kesehatan dalam konteks asuransi jiwa. Temuan penelitian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi pada penyempurnaan kerangka hukum yang melindungi pemegang polis asuransi jiwa, khususnya terkait dengan aksesibilitas rekam medis. Peningkatan kejelasan aturan dapat memberikan kepercayaan kepada pemegang polis sambil tetap memperhatikan aspek keamanan dan privasi dalam pengelolaan informasi kesehatan.
Kompetensi Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Badan Dan/Atau Pejabat Pemerintahan (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad) Muhammad Alifian Geraldi Fauzi; Anna Erliyana
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1273

Abstract

The competence to adjudicate the PTUN was previously very narrow, only having the authority to adjudicate state administrative decisions (beschikking) in the concrete, individual, and final sense as regulated in the PTUN Law. However, since the enactment of the UUAP, there has been a reverse flow of legislative policy which has led to the expansion and confirmation of the PTUN's authority in adjudicating government administration disputes. Implementation of the expansion of authority regarding the authority to adjudicate claims against unlawful acts by government bodies and/or officials. The broad implication of the competency to adjudicate state administration trade after the enactment of the UUAP is the transfer of competence to adjudicate against unlawful acts by government bodies and/or officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad/OOD) from the District Court to competence to adjudicate the State Administrative Court and the tangential point regarding the authority to adjudicate between the two courts, namely the District Court and the State Administrative Court, the Supreme Court as the highest holder of judicial authority has regulated this by issuing a PERMA which is Lex Specialist to regulate this matter. Based on Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 2 of 2019 concerning Settlement Guidelines regulating Government Actions and the Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Acts by Government Agencies and/or Officials (Onrechmatige Overheidsdaad) they are supposed to adjudicate actions against legal violations by government agencies and/or officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad). ) is fully competent to adjudicate at the State Administrative Court. However, regarding small claims for compensation at the State Administrative Court, members of the public can still submit claims for compensation through the District Court.
Perlindungan Hak-Hak Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana pada Proses Pemeriksaan di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas II Lubuk Basung Desi Fitria; Otong Rosadi; Neni Vesna Madjid
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1274

Abstract

Pasal 43 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak mengatur Pemeriksaan sidang anak dilakukan dalam suasana kekeluargaan. Penerapan Perlindungan Hak-hak Anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana pada proses Pemeriksaan dalam persidangan Anak dilakukan dengan cara pendampingan oleh orangtua/wali/orangtua asuh. Terdakwa harus didampingi oleh penasehat hukum. Dalam hal penasehat hukum, apabila dari pihak terdakwa tidak bisa menyediakan penasehat hukum, maka pengadilan wajib menunjuk penasehat hukum dimana biayanya dibebankan kepada negara. Terdakwa harus didampingi oleh pembimbing kemasyarakatan yaitu dari BAPAS anak. Persidangan dilakukan dalam persidangan yang tertutup untuk umum. Pemeriksaan terhadap anak dilakukan secara kekeluargaan, dalam arti hakim dan jaksa yang memeriksa tidak memakai toga dan pakaian dinas, hadirnya orangtua/wali dan pembimbing kemasyarakatan, dan tetap memberikan hak kepada terdakwa anak untuk didampingi penasihat hukum/advokat. Kendala-Kendala yang dihadapi dalam penerapan perlindungan hak anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana pada pemeriksaan di Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Basung dan upaya penanggulangan terhadap kendala tersebut adalah pembimbing kemasyarakatan terbatasnya jumlah anggotanya menyebabkan kadang kala pembimbing kemasyarakatan tidak dapat hadir dalam persidangan di pengadilan. kadang kalanya orang tua tidak mau datang mendampingi anaknya dalam persidangan. Upaya mengatasi kendala yang ada antara lain Apabila Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan tersebut tidak hadir dipersidangan tanpa alasan yang jelas, selain Hakim memberikan teguran kepada Jaksa untuk diteruskan kepada atasan Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan, juga hakim wajib menunda sidang tersebut sampai Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan hadir dipersidangan membawa hasil penelitian kemasyarakatan tersebut.
Implikasi Dualisme Status Otorita Ibukota Nusantara dalam Perspektif Hukum Keuangan Negara Yuliawan Anastasius; Widyaningrum Widyaningrum
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1275

Abstract

The Nusantara Capital Authority as the organizer of the special capital region of the Nusantara has an institutional dualism, namely as a regional government administrator and as an institution at the ministry level. This institutional dualism has implications for governance, particularly from the perspective of state finance law, including handing over financial management powers, accountability mechanisms, central and regional finance relations, and taxation. This study aims to explain the impact of institutional dualism, especially from the legal aspect of state finances. Different from previous legal studies that conducted studies related to the authority, legal basis, and instruments for the feasibility of moving the capital city, this study focuses more on governance from the legal aspect of state finances. This study uses a legal research method with a statutory approach. The result of this study can be utilized as a consideration for improving governance from the aspect of state finances by the Nusantara Capital Authority.
Perlindungan Hukum Mengenai Investasi Digital dalam Bentuk Non-Fungible Token Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 Muhammad Raditya Vijayaputro
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1276

Abstract

Investasi adalah penanaman modal yang biasanya dilakukan dalam jangka panjang, untuk pengadaan pembelian saham-saham dan surat berharga lain untuk memperoleh keuntungan. Seiring dengan perkembangan zaman, terdapat berbagai jenis investasi yang dapat dilakukan, salah satunya yaitu investasi berbentuk digital. Dengan kemajuan teknologi, kita dapat melakukan investasi secara daring dan bahkan terdapat mata uang digital. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Investor yang ingin melakukan Investasi digital diperlukan karena uang digital sangat rentan untuk menjadi kejahatan virtual. Salah bentuk Investasi secara Digital adalah dengan membeli Non-Fungible Token. Transaksi yang dilakukan biasanya berbentuk dalam gambar digital dan disimpan datanya di dalam teknologi yang bernama Blockchain. Perlindungan Hukum diperlukan agar Investor dapat dengan tenang melakukan investasi maupun transaksi agar tidak terjadi kejahatan, berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal

Page 99 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 97   98   99   100   101 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue