cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota jayapura,
P a p u a
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat
Published by Balai Arkeologi Jayapura Papua
ISSN : 20859767     EISSN : 25809237     DOI : -
Core Subject : Art,
Arts
Journal of Papua is published twice a year in June and November by the Balai Arkeologi Papua. The Papua Journal contains the results of research, conceptual ideas, studies and the application of theory relating to archeology.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 410 Documents
 18   19   20   21   22 
ARTEFAK MANIK-MANIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF ARKEOLOGI (Beads Artifact on Archaeology Perspective) Nasruddin, No First Name
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 8, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6346.258 KB)

Abstract

Knowledge about objects beads ss cultural works, mainly because it is used for clothing and jewelry of the human body. Since when made and used, is a question that requires a search through research. Small objects is one of the many artifacts of human cultural objects can be studied through the field of archeology. Beads of all types, materials and co/ora, thought to have been present to accompany the man, from prehistoric times to the modem era. From archaeological research report states that the findings bead old age, among other things found in the cave sites such as Sulawesi, Mangkulirang East Kutai, Kalimantan and East Java and the surrounding environment Is in the karst region. This research aims to understand the early history of the presence of beads for human life is based on archaeological evidence that is already known. Through the identification of artifacts beads diversity, ranging from the type, shape up the material element, it can put forward a variety of beads found in Indonesia starting from stone material, glass, metal to organic materials. Beads that can be identified include stone beads, glass, and only a small amount of organic materials and metals. Beads, mainly dominated glass beads, particularly the type of monochrome and polychrome. In connection with the scientific effort, the methods and ways of working that are used to understand the data artifacts beads that am completely limited, by using the method; contextual analysis, analysis of typology, analogy, arid interpretation. AbstrakPengetahuan mengenai benda manik-manlk sebagai karya budaya, temtama karana digunakan untuk pakaian dan pertiiasan tubuh manusla. Sejak kapan dibuat dan dipakai, adalah suatu psrtanyaan yang meroerlukan penelusuran melalui penelitian. Benda kecil ini merupakan salah satu artefak dan sekian banyak benda budaya mantissa yang dapat dikaji melalui bidang artceoiogi. Manik-manlk dengan berbagaijenls, bahan dan wama, dlperkirakan telah hadir menemani manusia, sejak masa prasejarah hingga di jaman modern ini. Dari iaporan penelitian arkeologl menyebutkan bahwa temuan manik-manik yang berumur tua, antara lain ditemukan di situs-situs gua saperti Sulawesi, Mangkulirang, Kutal Timur, Kalimantan, dan di Jawa Timur dan sekitarnya yang berada di lingkungan kawasan karat. Penulisan Ini bertujuan untuk memahami sejanah awai kehadiran manik-manik bagi kehidupan manusia bendasarkan bukti-bukti arkeoiogi yang sudah diketahui. Melalui identifikasi keragaman artefak manik-manik, mulai dari sisl Jenis, bentuk hingga pada unsur bahan, maka dapat dikemukakan anaka ragam manik-manik yang ditemukan di Indonesia mulai dari bahan batu, kaca, logam hingga bahan organik. Manik-manik yang dapat di identifikasi meliputi manik-manik batu, kaca, dan hanya sedikit jumlahnya daribahan organik dan logam. Manik-manik itu, terutama dkJomlnasl manik-manik kaca, khususnya tips monokrom dan poiikrom. Sehubungan dengan upaya iimiah, maka metode dan cara keija yang digunakan untuk memahami data artefak manik-manik yang sifatnya serba terbatas itu, yaitu dengan menggunakan metode; anal Isis kontektual, analisis tipologi, analog!, dan penafeiran.
Sumbangan Antropologi dalam Penelitian Arkeologi Taniardi, Putri Novita
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 1, No 2 (2009): November 2009
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (118.061 KB)

Abstract

Archaeology is a science that has goals to reconstruct the culture of the past, to reconstruct the culture history and reconstruct the changing of culture. To reach the goals, archaeology needs other field of science to help in analyzing the archaeological subject and Anthropology is one of them. The contribution of Anthropology in Archaeological research is particularly on its advantage in ethnographic data. Ethnoarchaeology is one of the branches of archaeology which using ethnographic analogy as one of the methods. Nevertheless, Ethnography should not just be interpreted as a data but also as a method. By applying the ethnographic method in archaeological research, it is hoped that it could help Archaeology in solving the problem they’re faced.
SENI LUKIS DAN SENI GORES PADA MEGALITIK PASEMAH PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN Indriastusti, Kristantina
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 3, No 2 (2011): November 2011
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.584 KB)

Abstract

The art of painting has emerged thousands of years ago in prehistoric society as an expression of their religious to the ancestor spirits and the power of natural forces around, as well as the lives ofprehistoric humans settled in the highlands pasemah, as an expression of their lives better either by nature or strength of their ancestors expressed in the form of paintings that depicted in various forms and styles. The presence of prehistoric paintings in Pasemah have a specific meaning in life relegi affiliated-but very valuable their magical beauty.
TRADISI PENGUBURAN DALAM GUA DAN CERUK PADA MASYARAKAT WEB DI KAMPUNG YURUF DISTRIK WEB KABUPATEN KEEROM Fairyo, Klementin
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 4, No 2 (2012): November 2012
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4123.896 KB)

Abstract

Burial in caves and niches on the Web is a prehistoric tradition continues. The tradition has been entrenched so that people in the process of implementation of the burial sites in caves and niches, often perform ritual dances accompanied by traditional feast. Archaeological evidence of burial traditions in the caves and niches are the archaeological remains in the form of human skulls, container crates, and the provision of the grave in the form of a dinner plate, bowl to drink, where betel lime, necklaces, camshaft, arrows, dogs and skull cow skull. Burial site in the caves and niches in Kampung District Yuruf Web can be encountered on how the site is the burial cave caves Yadumblu, Jigiyaw niche, niche Gumumblu 2, and complex cave site Yanglebi comprising caves, alcoves and cliffs.
SITUS NEOLITIK MALLAWA MAROS, SULAWESI SELATAN (Suatu Hasil Analisis Keterkaitan antara Artefak dengan Sumber Daya Lingkungan) Neolithic Site at Mallawa Maros of South Sulawesi [A Result of Relevancy Analysis Between The Artefacts and The Environment Resources] Hasanuddin, nFN
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 9, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1985.996 KB)

Abstract

The Mallawa is an open site located in the eastern part of Maros, South Sulawesi. The topography of Mallawa site is wavy and took place in a hilly area. Dating of the site using C14 Analysis showed that the site is about 3550 ±130 BP and 2710 ±170 BP and 2281± 46 BP. The point of this site, besides of its plenty artifacts that signifying occupied-densely site of some hills, the site is also located nearby caves of Maros. From the perspective of periodization, Mallawa site relatively younger compared to occupancy period in Maros caves. It is likely to say that the occupancy of Mallawa cave is the further stage in development of past life that characterized by its material culture remains. Several pottery findings possesses various of interesting forms and ornaments. In this research has also found several interesting findings such as pottery fragments, beads and stone artifacts. The excavation brings out more findings then the surficial findings. Through XRD analysis, SEM and also, XRF of the pottery and soil sample shows that Mallawa pottery were made and produced by the Mallawa themselves and the people surrounding based on the fact that the pottery contains the same mineral with the soil that surrounding this site.  ABSTRAKMallawa adalah situs terbuka yang terletak di bagian timur Maros, Sulawesi Selatan. Topografi situs Mallawa bergelombang dan terletak di daerah perbukitan. Pertanggalan situs dengan menggunakan Analisis C14 menunjukkan bahwa situs ini berumur sekitar 3550 ± 130 BP dan 2710 ± 170 BP dan 2281 ± 46 BP. Bagian penting dari situs ini, selain dari temuan artefak yang menandakan tempat berpenduduk padat di beberapa bukit, situs ini juga terletak di dekat gua-gua Maros. Dari segi periodisasi, situs Mallawa relatif lebih muda dibandingkan dengan masa hunian di gua Maros. Kemungkinan besar dikatakan bahwa hunian situs Mallawa merupakan tahap lanjutan dalam pengembangan kehidupan lampau yang ditandai oleh budaya materialnya. Beberapa temuan gerabah memiliki berbagai bentuk dan ornamen yang menarik. Dalam penelitian ini juga ditemukan beberapa temuan menarik seperti fragmen gerabah, manik-manik dan artefak batu. Penggalian tersebut menghasilkan lebih banyak temuan. Melalui analisis XRD, SEM dan juga, XRF dari gerabah dan sampel tanah menunjukkan bahwa gerabah Mallawa dibuat dan diproduksi di Mallawa sendiri berdasarkan fakta bahwa gerabah mengandung mineral yang sama dengan tanah di sekitar lokasi ini.
KERAMIK CINA BAGI ORANG BIAK-NUMFOR DI TELUK CENDERAWASIH: PENGGUNAAN DAN MAKNANYA (The Chinese Ceramics of Biaknese Numfor in Gulf of Cenderawasih: It’s Use and Meaning) Fairyo, Klementin
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 7, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1988.44 KB)

Abstract

Chinese ceramics is a thing that comes from outside Papua. existence is possible because of the trading relationship either directly or indirectly, with ceramic producer countries. Ceramic exchange (barter) to produce Papua, especially the Bird of Paradise, Pala, Masohi, and aloes. Chinese ceramics for the Biak-Noemfoor in cenderawasih an important valuables. The past, the Biak-Noemfoor have a lot of Chinese ceramics is regarded as a hero (mambri). This paper will discuss the shape and type of ceramics used in the Biak cultural activities, as well as the use and meaning of Chinese ceramics for the Biak-Noemfoor. The method used is descriptive qualitative, with data collection through literature study, observation and interviews. Chinese ceramics found on archaeological sites in the area that is the site Biak Wariaba 5 and websites Snerbab b. Utilization of Chinese ceramics in the traditional ceremonies of Biak-Noemfoor the tradition continues.AbstrakKeramik Cina merupakan benda yang berasal dari luar Papua. Keberadaannya dimungkinkan karena adanya hubungan dagang dengan negara-negara produsen keramik, baik secara langsung maupun tidak. Keramik ditukar (barter) dengan hasil bumi Papua, khususnya burung cenderawasih, pala, masohi, dan gaharu. Keramik Cina bagi orang Biak-Numfor di Teluk cenderawasih merupakan barang berharga yang penting. Masa lalu, orang Biak-Numfor memiliki banyak keramik Cina dianggap sebagai pahlawan (Mambri). Tulisan ini akan membahas bentuk dan jenis keramik yang digunakan dalam aktivitas budaya orang Biak, serta penggunaan dan makna keramik Cina bagi orang Biak-Numfor. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif, dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan, observasi dan wawancara. Keramik Cina yang ditemukan di situs arkeologi di wilayah Biak yaitu situs Wariaba 5 dan situs Snerbab b. Pemanfaatan keramik Cina dalam upacara adat orang Biak-Numfor merupakan tradisi berlanjut
Back Cover Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi, Redaksi
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 7, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (581.913 KB)

Abstract

PERDAGANGAN MASA PRASEJARAH DI PAPUA (TINJAUAN BERDASARKAN TINGGALAN ARKEOLOGI) Djami, Erlin Novita Idje
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 2, No 1 (2010): Juni 2010
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (69.503 KB)

Abstract

Prehistoric trade in Papua characterized by the existence of material culture beyond the diffusion of cultural products such as pottery, stone axes, bronze axes, nekara bronxe and beads of Indo-Pacific found in several sites in the territory of Papua. The existence of those cultural objects is indicated as a result of longdistance trade activities and is supported by progress in the field of maritime. In addition to long-distance trade, there was also a local trade proved by the existence of shells of shellfish in inland areas and there was even one species of molluscs gastropods class family cypraea moneta that was used as currency (mege/ siwol/tinale) by rural communities, particularly Ekagi, Ngalum and Timorini ethnic in the central Papua. Related to trade, there was not only merchandise but also production and distribution of goods and trade processes which occurred with reference to the trade proces in traditional societies of Papua
ALAT TULANG DARI SITUS SANGIRAN (Bone Tools From Sangiran Site) Abdullah, Ilham
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 6, No 2 (2014): November 2014
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (745.141 KB)

Abstract

Some of bone tools from Sangiran Site have been published through reports, scientific articles, and thesis. However, they have not been analyzed deeply. This paper provides conclusion and information about all bone tools finding in Sangiran both those that are new and that have been published previously. There are 33 bone tools identified namely from cervus sp., cervushippelaphus, sus sp., bos sp., rhinoceros, elephantidae, andbovidae. The technics used are fracturing, cropping, splitting, pressing, and rubbing. Those processes create blade, point, and spatula. Bone tools appeared firstly in Sangiran around 900.000 years ago until 100.000 years ago. They were found in Ngebung, Cangkol, GrogolanWetanManyarejo, and Dayu.ABSTRAKBeberapa alat tulang dari Situs Sangiran telah dipublikasikan melalui laporan penelitian, artikel ilmiah, dan skripsi, tetapi belum dibahas mendalam. Tulisan ini merangkum dan menginformasikan semua temuan alat tulang dari Situs Sangiran yang telah terpublikasi sebelumnya beserta beberapa temuan baru. Alat tulang temuan dari Situs Sangiran berhasil diidentifikasi, terdapat 12 jenis komponen anatomis binatang yang digunakan sebagai alat, binatang yang tulangnya digunakan sebagai alat tulang adalah cervus sp., cervus hippelaphus, sus sp., bos sp., rhinoceros, elephantidae, dan bovidae. Teknik yang digunakan dalam membuat alat tulang adalah teknik pecah, teknik pangkas, teknik belah, teknik tekan, dan teknik gosok. Jenis alat tulang yang dihasilkan adalah pisau, lancipan, dan spatula. Alat tulang di Situs Sangiran muncul pertama kali pada sekitar 900.000 tahun yang lalu dan eksis hingga sekitar 100.000 tahun lalu. Ditemukan di sekitar Desa Ngebung, Cangkol, Grogolan Wetan Desa Manyarejo, dan di sekitar Desa Dayu.
Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Situs Megalitik Tutari Mas’ud, Zubair
Jurnal Penelitian Arkeologi Papua dan Papua Barat Vol 1, No 1 (2009): Juni 2009
Publisher : BALAI ARKEOLOGI PAPUA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2549.749 KB)

Abstract

Management in archaeology usually called as archaeological remains advantaging. One of the cultural heritage that could manage is Tutari Megalitical site. Hope, the government as the facilitator must be give understanding about how important this archaeological remains. The public should be involved in the planning of cultural heritage management for archaeological remains preservation.

Page 20 of 41 | Total Record : 410

 18   19   20   21   22 

Filter by Year

2009 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): November 2020 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): Juni 2020 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): November 2019 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): Juni 2019 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): November 2018 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018): Juni 2018 Vol 9, No 2 (2017): November 2017 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2017): November 2017 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 9, No 1 (2017): Juni 2017 Vol 8, No 2 (2016): November 2016 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2016): November 2016 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016): Juni 2016 Vol 8, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2015): November 2015 Vol 7, No 2 (2015): November 2015 Vol 7, No 1 (2015): Juni 2015 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2015): Juni 2015 Vol 6, No 2 (2014): November 2014 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2014): November 2014 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2014): Juni 2014 Vol 6, No 1 (2014): Juni 2014 Vol 5, No 2 (2013): November 2013 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2013): November 2013 Vol 5, No 1 (2013): Juni 2013 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2013): Juni 2013 Vol 4, No 2 (2012): November 2012 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2012): November 2012 Vol 4, No 1 (2012): Juni 2012 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2012): Juni 2012 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2011): November 2011 Vol 3, No 2 (2011): November 2011 Vol 3, No 2 (2011): November 2011 Vol 3, No 1 (2011): Juni 2011 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2011): Juni 2011 Vol 2, No 2 (2010): November 2010 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010): November 2010 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2010): Juni 2010 Vol 2, No 1 (2010): Juni 2010 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2009): November 2009 Vol 1, No 2 (2009): November 2009 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2009): Juni 2009 Vol 1, No 1 (2009): Juni 2009 More Issue