Articles
250 Documents
<![CDATA[EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG TIDAK DIDAFTARKAN DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA BAGI KREDITUR (Studi Pada BRI Cabang Takengon dan PT. Mandala finance Cabang Takengon) ]]>
<![CDATA[YANTI ARNILIS]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2133
<![CDATA[The juridical consequence for a creditor who does not register his fiduciary collateral deed is that it is not protected by the Law No. 42/1999 on Fiduciary Collateral. The research problems are how about the legal consequence for a creditor who does not register his fiduciary object, how about the execution of unregistered fiduciary object in Bank BRI Takengon Branch and PT. Mandala Finance, and how about the obstacles encountered and efforts made by Bank BRI Takengon Branch and PT. Mandala Finance in the execution of the unregistered fiduciary object. The legal consequence for a creditor who does not register his fiduciary object is that the fiduciary object does not have any material rights for either Bank or financing companies as the creditor, the creditor does not have preference rights, the creditor does not have the rights to execute the fiduciary object and cannot request for protection to the police. What impedes Bank BRI Takengon Branch from conducting the execution is the provisions regulating that the minimum amount of a fiduciary object is IDR 50,000,000 (fifty million Rupiahs), the execution process takes much time, the fiduciary object is destroyed, the facility receiver name is different, the values of the fiduciary object is declined, and the debtor has different address. The impediment which is not included into a legal category is that the society has little understanding of fiduciary collaterals. The obstacles encountered by PT. Mandala Finance in the execution is that PT. Mandala Finance cannot make an execution because he has not registered the fiduciary object to the Fiduciary Collateral Office. The efforts made by BRI Takengon Branch is making an agreement; the execution is conducted by using an agreement of ownership right transfer of the object with trusts, by filinga simple lawsuit and re-registering the fiduciary object. The efforts that can be made by PT. Mandala Finance in the execution of the unregistered fiduciary object is by issuing Power of Attorney to grant the withdrawal authority and make negotiations with the debtor.]]>
<![CDATA[A HUKUM AGRARIA SEBAGAI OBJEK YURIDIS PRIMA: HUKUM AGRARIA SEBAGAI OBJEK YURIDIS PRIMA ]]>
<![CDATA[Robinson Robinson]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2141
<![CDATA[Tanah selaku objek yang sangat dekat dengan kehidupan masyarakat dan kepentingan negara. Peraturan atas tanah telah berlaku sejak Tahun 1960 pada Undang-Undang Pokok Agaria. Munculnya argumen atas perlunya pembenahan atas peraturan atas agraria. Dalam penelitian mengunakan metode yuridis normatif dalam menganalisis permasalahan yang ada. Sehingga dilihat bahwa manfaat pendaftaran tanah sangatlah penting dan dilihat bagaimana kejelasan atas pendaftaran tanah dapat berpengaruh besar bagi kepentingan baik penguna ataupun terhadap negara. Baik dari peran notaris hingga PPAT sebagai pejabat umum juga mempunyai tugas yang sangat intim dalam mendata juga membantu mencapai tujuan yang ada. Beberapa argumen yang muncul kemudian menjadi dorongan atas sadarnya kebutuhan hukum agraria yang perlu dikembangkan agar dapat sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat.]]>
<![CDATA[Perikatan Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Akibat Perjanjian Bangun Bagi Berlapis (Perjanjian Bangun Bagi Yang Disubstitusikan): Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Akibat Perjanjian Bangun Bagi Berlapis (Perjanjian Bangun Bagi Yang Disubstitusikan) ]]>
<![CDATA[Rudy Hartono]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2151
<![CDATA[Perjanjian timbal balik (konsensuil) dapat berupa perjanjian bangun bagi dimana hak dari pihak kedua selaku pemilik modal juga merupakan bentuk kewajiban dari pihak pertama selaku pemilik tanah begitu juga sebaliknya. Subtitusi atas perjanjian bangun bagi ini sering dilakukan oleh pihak kedua ke pihak lainnya. Penelitian ini mengambarkan dan melakukan analisa atas permasalahan-permasalahan yang dilakukan dengan cara pendekatan yuridis empiris yang biasa dikenal dengan metode deskripsi. Pengalihan perjanjian bangun bagi harus dibuat atas persetujuan tiga pihak yaitu kreditor, debitor lama dan debitor baru, oleh karena pengalihan perjanjian bangun bagi mengakibatkan pengantian debitor lama dengan debitor baru, sehingga kreditor tidak dapat lagi meminta pembayaran atau pemenuhan prestasi kepada debitor lama. Resiko hukum yang timbul dalam perjanjian bangun bagi yang disebabkan oleh keadaan memaksa yang tetap, debitor tidak dapat diminta pertanggung jawaban atau dituntut ganti rugi. Tetapi, dalam hal keadaan memaksa yang bersifat sementara debitor tetap wajib memenuhi prestasinya apabila keadaan memaksa sementara telah berubah menjadi normal. Kedudukan hukum pihak ketiga dalam perjanjian bangun bagi berlapis adalah sebagai debitor baru yang menggantikan kedudukan hukum debitor lama serta merupakan pihak yang bertanggung jawab untuk melaksanakan isi perjanjian dengan sukarela dan dengan itikad baik.]]>
<![CDATA[UMKM ANALISIS TANTANGAN E-COMMERCE DALAM MENGIMPLEMENTASIKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA: ANALISIS TANTANGAN E-COMMERCE DALAM MENGIMPLEMENTASIKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Rodiatn Adawiyah Wiya]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2152
<![CDATA[Kompleksitas dalam mekanisme bisnis E-commerce telah menjadi suatu ancaman bagi ruang lingkup persaingan usaha. Hal ini disebabkan oleh Undang-Undang Persaingan Usaha yang sekarang tidak dapat sepenuhnya diterapkan di dalam industri berbasis digital. Mengingat Indonesia adalah negara dengan peringkat pertama sebagai negara dengan pertumbuhan E-commerce terbesar di dunia maka KPPU seharusnya menaruh perhatian lebih dalam mengawasi industri berbasis digital agar dapat mencegah sesuatu hal yang dinamakan persaingan usaha tidak sehat seperti monopoli digital, predatory pricing, lock-in, dan kolusi terselubung yang dapat membawa efek buruk bagi perekonomian Indonesia, khususnya kepada industri UMKM konvensional. ]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PERUBAHAN ALAMAT KANTOR YANG TIDAK DILAPORKAN KEPADA MAJELIS PENGAWAS DAERAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Faisal Ramadhan Harahap]]>;
<![CDATA[Budiman Ginting]]>;
<![CDATA[Suprayitno -]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2174
<![CDATA[A notary is obliged to report any changes of his registered office address to the Regional Supervisory (henceford refrered to as MPD). Pursuant to the regulations of the Minister of Law and Human Right Number 15/2020 on the procedures of inspections by supervisory council, MPD gives a notary a minimum of 1 (one) regular visit a year. This Research is encouragedby the experience service user who misses out a notary’s new office address to MPD. This Research problems are how to changes to a notary’s registered office address are regulated by the law, how legal sanctions are regulated by the law to a notary for not reporting changes to his registered office address, and what efforts are made by MPD to enforce the law against any notary who does not report changes of his registered office address. Emprirical Normative research method is employed as this research studies primary legal materials such as the Law Number 4/2014, the Regulations of Minister of Law and Human Right Number 19/2019, and the Minister of Law and Human Right Number 61/2016, as well as references and secondary materials supported with interviews with informans. The objective of this research are to investigate and to analyse the laws and to a notary for not reporting changes of his registered office address, and the efforts made by MPD to enforce the againsts any notary who does not report changes of his registered office address. The research concludes that the obligation of a notary to report changes to his registered office address is specified in Regulations of the Minister of Law and Human Right Number 19/2019 and the other notar;s obligations are stipulated in the Law on Notary Functions. The imposition of sanction such as a registered office address is obstructed by the long-winded bureaucracy causing difficulties to MPD in supervising notaries and enforcing the fulfilment of laws and regulations concerning notary’s obligations be synchronized, bureaucracy process to impose the sanction of written deterrant to notaries be steamlined, facilities and insfrastucture required by MPD to perform their duties be completed, and double functions of members of MPD be avoided that the supervision over notaris can be more optimal.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS PERJANJIAN ANTARA MITRA PENJUAL (MERCHANT) DENGAN PERUSAHAAN PENYEDIA JASA TRANSPORTASI BERBASIS ONLINE (STUDI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN ANTARA APOTIK TERRY FARMA DAN PT SOLUSI TRANSPORTASI INDONESIA (GRAB INDONESIA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Clara Apulina Ginting]]>;
<![CDATA[T. Keizerina Devi Azwar -]]>;
<![CDATA[Jelly Leviza -]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2175
<![CDATA[High rate of smartphone users makes Medan city has big potential for the development of online-base business especially in service application user, such as online transportation. Grab Indonesia is one of the service provider companies for online-base transportation application. Grab sees promising investment value projection in online-base application service as people in Indonesia are highly active users of social media and e- commerce. The problems in this research are whether the agreement between merchant and Grab Indonesia meet the legal construction as electronic contract refers to valid legislation, how is Grab's responsibilities on product quality and safety sold by merchant, and how is dispute settlement procedures between merchant and Grab Indonesia pursuant to agreement contract. This is a normative juridical research with analytical descriptive design that describes the research object through samples or collected data and makes general conclusion. The data are carried out from primary and secondary data, namely primary, secondary and tertiary law; obtained by library study and guided interview. The result demonstrates that agreement between merchant and Grab meet the legal construction as electronic contract refers to valid legislation. Grab's responsibilities on product quality and safety sold by merchant are fully given to the merchant as stated in the term and condition clauses and in Grab's code of conduct. Non-litigation through arbitrage is prioritized in dispute settlement procedures between merchant and Grab pursuant to agreement contract.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PERAN NOTARIS TERKAIT LEGALITAS PENDIRIAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA DI KECAMATAN SUNGGAL KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG (Studi BUM Desa Mencirim Mandiri di Desa Sei Mencirim dan BUM Desa Annur di Desa Purwodadi) ]]>
<![CDATA[Rita Deliana Manik]]>;
<![CDATA[Budiman Ginting]]>;
<![CDATA[T. Keizeirina Devi A -]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2176
<![CDATA[Village-Owned Enterprise (henceforth referred to as BUM Desa) as one of rural development programs is established grounded on Village Regulations (henceforth referred to as Perdes), yet its operating activities such as opening a bank account and registering a taxpayer identification number requires a notarial deed its establishment, and so does Mencirim Mandiri and Annur BUM Desa. This research analyzes the roles of a notary related to legality of establishment of Mencirim Mandiri BUM Desa in Sei Mencirim Village and Annur BUM Desa in Purwodadi Village. This research employs normative juridical method. It uses secondary data supported by primary data collected through library study and interview and analysed by qualitative analysis method. The legal grounds for establishment of BUM Desa are Law No. 6/2014 on Village, Law No. 11/2020 on Job Creation, and Government Regulation No. 11/2021 on BUM Desa. BUM Desa can be established grounded on Perdes and is registered electronically. The legal grounds for a notary are not stipulated in Law No. 11/2020 on Job Creation and Government Regulation No. 11/2021 on BUM Desa in term of establishment of BUM Desa, yet as a public official, a notary plays a role in drawing the deeds of establishment of units of BUM Desa. Mencirim Mandiri and Annur BUM Desa were initially established grounded on Village Regulations. The organizers of BUM Desa encounter obstacles to take legal actions with other parties as they require a notarial deed. A notary actually plays a role concerning the units of BUM Desa, in form of legal entities, in line with Government Regulation No. 11/2021 on BUM Desa. It is suggested that Government socialize the Law on Job Creation related to BUM Des and Government Regulation No. 11/2021 on BUM Desa to relevant parties, so that they, particularly the BUM Desa in Sunggal Subdistrict, will properly implement the prevailing laws and regulations and will not mistake the legal entities of BUM Desa from private legal entities.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO.11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN ANAK, TERHADAP SANKSI PIDANA ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI KASUS PADA WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI LUBUK PAKAM No. 10/PID/SUS-Anak/2017/PN-LBP ) ]]>
<![CDATA[ERNAWATI BR BARUS]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2191
<![CDATA[The child is a treasure God Almighty that is highly anticipated by a family, because aside from being a descendant of a family of children as well as the next generation of the nation and successor development, namely a generation that is prepared as a subject of implementing sustainable development and control the future of a country. As time goes by children not only as a victim in a crime but there have been many children involved as perpetrators of the crime, in this case was the crime of narcotics is one of the extraordinary crime or "extraordinary crime". Regulations governing the criminal justice system of children aims to protect the rights of the child. Based on the background, the author raised the Thesis entitled "Juridical Review the implementation of the law No. 11 Year 2012 On Child justice system, criminal sanctions against children as perpetrators of Crime Narcotics (case study on Pengadilam of State jurisdiction Lubukpakam No. 14/Pid. Child/Sus-2017/PN-LBP, no. 15/Pid. Sus-child/2017/PN-LBP and no. 32/Pid. Sus-child/2017/PN-LBPMetode research in this thesis is done with normative juridical research is to do an analysis of the problem through legal principles as well as referring to the legal norms contained in the legislation. The data used are sourced from primary and secondary legal materials through the library reseach using research data from a variety of sources such as legislation, reading books, and the internet are judged relevant to this thesis was elevated to discover sejauhmana the application of law number 11 Year 2012 against the perpetrators of the crime of narcotics on the State Court jurisdiction Lubukpakam.]]>
<![CDATA[PELAKSANAAN PEMOTRETAN DIRI SESEORANG TANPA IZIN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN KOMERSIAL (STUDI PUTUSAN MA NO. 262.K.PDT.SUS/HKI/2016) ]]>
<![CDATA[Agung Julian]]>;
<![CDATA[O.K. Saidin]]>;
<![CDATA[Jelly Leviza]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v5i1.2177
<![CDATA[Copyright is the exclusive right of a creator that arises automatically based on declarative principles after a creation is realized in a tangible form without reducing restrictions in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations. The results of the discussion the photographer or the person using the portrait whose subject is a human for commercial purposes must first obtain permission from the person being photographed to be able to use the portrait for commercial purposes, so that the photographer and the person using the portrait do not commit an unlawful act. Legal analysis of Supreme Court Decision No. 262.K.PDT.SUS/HKI/2016 which decided that Siloam Hospital had committed an unlawful act in terms of Law no. 29 of 2014 concerning Copyright is based on paragraph 1 of Article 12 where every photo taken by the photographer with a human object must obtain prior permission from the person being photographed.]]>
<![CDATA[Hukum Kesehatan PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KESEHATAN TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PERBUATAN MALAPRAKTEK MELALUI HARMONISASI REGULASI ANTI MALPRAKTEK ]]>
<![CDATA[Daniel Limbong]]>
<![CDATA[ Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v5i1.2342
<![CDATA[Profesi dokter dilaksanakan oleh manusia yang tentu saja tidak dapat lepas dengan tindakan kesalahan atau kelalaian. Tindakan tersebut dapat mengakibatkan kerugian kepada pasien yang mempercayakan pengobatan kesehatan kepada profesi dokter. Tindakan kesalahan atau kelalaian tersebut dapat dilakukan dengan sengaja maupun tidak sengaja. Adapun kesalahan atau kelalaian tersebut kemudian dapat disebut dengan malpraktek. Di Indonesia penyebutan kata malpraktik sangat dikenal oleh para tenaga kesehatan yang sebenarnya disebut dengan Medical Malpractice. Hukum Positif di Indonesia dengan tegas mengatur sanksi Pidana terhadap perbuatan Malpraktek. Permasalahan yang dibahas pada penelitian ini merupakan bagaimana hukum mengatur Pertanggungjawaban tindakan Malpraktek yang dilakukan oleh dokter melalui Harmonisasi Regulasi Anti Malpraktek berdasarkan Regulasi yang berlaku di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian merupakan yuridis normatif, dan yuridis normatif digunakan buat menganalisis konsep hukum dan peraturan yang berkaitan dengan yang diteliti. Malpraktek adalah tindakan yang dilakukan oleh medis sehingga melanggar standar prosedur medis. Kelalaian dapat disebut sebagai bentuk malpraktek, namun pada malpraktek hal tersebut tidak ditemukan unsur kelalaian. Akan tetapi jika kelalaian menyebabkan kerugian materi, mencelakakan, bahkan merenggut nyawa orang lain, maka dapat disebutkan sebagai kelalaian berat. Pertanggungjawaban seorang Tenaga Medis khususnya seorang Dokter akibat perbuatan malpraktek yang dilakukan dapat dilakukan melalui Pertanggungjawaban secara Etis, Profesi, Pertanggungjawaban Hukum yang dapat dilakukan berupa pertanggungjawaban melalui Hukum Perdata, Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Administrasi. Harmonisasi KUHP, Undang-undang Kesehatan, Undang-undang Praktik Kedokteran dan Undang-undang Rumah Sakit jika dikaitkan dengan Putusan Nomor 417/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Mdn, maka hal tersebut tidak terjadi sinkronisasi terhadap aturan dan putusan tersebut serta tidak dapat melindungi korban sebagai pasien.]]>
