cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
kornelius benuf
Contact Email
korneliusbenuf@gmail.com
Phone
+6282325620669
Journal Mail Official
korneliusbenuf@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Simongan No. 123 Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Law, Development and Justice Review
Published by Universitas Diponegoro
ISSN : 26551942     EISSN : 26551942     DOI : DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.v3i1.7349
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
aw, Development & Justice Review (e ISSN:2655-1942) diterbitkan Badan Konsultasi Hukum (BKH UNDIP), Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro. Law, Development & Justice Review merupakan jurnal ilmiah sebagai wadah bagi dosen, konsultan hukum, dan Advokat dalam mengekspresikan hasil Pengabdian masyarakat (public service publications), hasil penelitian (research), hasil pembahasan kasus (case review), dan hasil pemeriksanaan dokumen (book review). Law, Development & Justice Review sebagai media dalam memenuhi salah satu kegiatan tri darma perguruan tinggi di Fakultas Hukum UNDIP. Selain itu, LDJR juga digunakan sebagai wahana mengembangkan dan atau kebaharuan ilmu hukum dalam menjawab dan menyelesaikan problem solving di bidang hukum mengekspresikan dalam bentuk tulisan ilmiah populer. BKH merupakan salah satu kegiatan yang memberikan pelayanan konsultasi di bidang hukum bagi masyarakat, mahasiswa dan akademisi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Maka dari itu, pertanggungjawaban pun disampaikan kepada Dekan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. Law, Development & Justice Review baru terindeks melalui Google Scholar saja dan belum masuk sebagai jurnal bereputasi. Tiada gading yang tak retak, mohon masukan, restu dan dukungan atas keberadaan Law, Development & Justice Review supaya tetap konsistensi agar dapat disejajarkan dengan jurnal ilmiah bereputasi di lingkungan UNDIP.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 155 Documents
 12   13   14   15   16 
Tinjauan Yuridis Penambahan Biaya Tambahan Pada Sistem Pembayaran Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) Mutiara Pramesti; Ery Agus Priyono
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.103-119

Abstract

The 21st century marks a massive transition toward the digital era that changes the transaction behavior of society from cash to non-cash. One of the crucial innovations in Indonesia's payment ecosystem is the implementation of the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). However, the implementation of QRIS has sparked controversy regarding regulatory disparities related to the imposition of additional administrative fees or surcharges on consumers, even though, according to regulations, the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) fee is the responsibility of the business operators. This research aims to analyze the regulatory disparities arising from the implementation of QRIS and its impact on financial transactions in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with a doctrinal approach that examines legislation and positive legal norms. The research results indicate a discrepancy between Bank Indonesia's regulation prohibiting additional charges to service users and the actual practice in the field where business operators set fixed rates to protect their profit margins. On the other hand, the use of QRIS significantly impacts the operational efficiency of banking, enhances financial inclusivity for MSMEs, and creates a cashless society ecosystem that supports transaction transparency
Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan Yang DiWaarmeking Notaris Tubagus Hikam Ahmad; Budi Santoso; Herni Widanarti
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.154-174

Abstract

When the warmeking is subimtted to a notary for registration, the parties concerned must sign it first, even thought the warmeking is made privately. many people misunderstand the process of warmeking to a notary. one of them is teh legal strength of the private deed which is certified by the notary. this study focuses on the legal strength of private deeds certified by a notary. primary dan secondary legal texts are used in this normative legal research. this study found that legal force will apply perfectly when two parties acknowledge the signature and contents of the deed. on the other hand, private letters given to third parties have the power of independent evidence. 
Penerapan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Mekanisme Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Amin, Naufal Sakti Ramadhani; Adhari, Ade
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.139-161

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia mengakibatkan kerugian negara yang besar, sementara mekanisme pemulihan aset berbasis conviction-based hanya mampu memulihkan sekitar 30–35% aset. Kondisi ini menimbulkan kebutuhan untuk mengadopsi Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB-AF) yang memungkinkan pemulihan aset tanpa putusan pidana. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana NCB-AF dapat diterapkan untuk memulihkan kerugian negara, dan kesesuaiannya dengan sistem peradilan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui analisis peraturan dan instrumen internasional. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa NCB-AF tidak bertentangan dengan asas legalitas maupun presumption of innocence karena bersifat tindakan terhadap objek kejahatan. Implementasi efektif memerlukan pengesahan RUU Pemulihan Aset serta harmonisasi dengan KUHAP 2026. Penerapan NCB-AF dinilai strategis untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pemulihan aset dan memperkuat pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia.
Kedudukan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) Sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia dan Problematika Hukumnya Abdhan Rahman Ainun Aly; Agustinus Diaz Alphanino Ananda
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.206-225

Abstract

The development of creative economy financing policies, in relation to the use of copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee, raises legal issues when applied to traditional cultural expressions (EBT). This condition has given rise to debate regarding the suitability of EBT with the principles of guarantee law, especially regarding ownership, economic valuation, and implementation of execution. This study aims to analyze the position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee based on the theory of guarantee law, as well as to examine its implementation and legal problems. The benefit is that it can strengthen the legal position of EBT as an object of fiduciary guarantee. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach analyzed descriptively-analystically. The results show that copyright on EBT does not meet the characteristics of an object of fiduciary guarantee because it does not fulfill the material element in the form of ownership rights (eigendom), has the character of res extra commercium, and has the potential to conflict with public order (openbare orde) in the implementation of execution. Furthermore, the implementation of renewable energy as a fiduciary guarantee object faces obstacles in terms of legal subjects, as it is a communal asset managed by the state, and in terms of objects, due to the lack of financial valuation standards from the Indonesian Society of Appraisers (MAPPI). Therefore, it is crucial for the House of Representatives (DPR) to establish specific, sui generis regulations to ensure legal certainty and protect the communal character of renewable energy, thereby providing protection for the community.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pengusahaan Energi Panas Bumi Atas Dampak Ekstraktif Bagi Keadilan Ekologis Masyarakat Dieng Nur Cholis Al Qodri; Levina Yustitianingtyas
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.9.2026.183-205

Abstract

Indonesia has a geothermal energy potential of 24 GW; however, two decades of development in the Dieng Geothermal Working Area (WKP) have been marred by H₂S gas leaks, aquifer contamination, and ecological conflicts, highlighting a legal gap between energy transition policies and the protection of community rights. This gap is reflected in the suboptimal regulations regarding legal protection, public participation, and state accountability for the extractive impacts of geothermal development. This study aims to analyze guarantees of legal protection and ecological justice for the people of Dieng, evaluate the effectiveness of the state accountability model, and formulate an ideal legal framework. The study employs a normative legal method with a legislative and conceptual approach, accompanied by descriptive-prescriptive analysis through content analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results indicate that legal protection guarantees remain ineffective because the centralization of permitting under Law No. 6 of 2023 limits public participation and weakens the preventive function of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The state accountability model is also ineffective as it continues to rely on proving fault following the erosion of the strict liability principle, thereby failing to provide optimal protection for affected communities. These research findings can serve as a basis for government policy to strengthen legal protection by reinstating the principle of strict liability, enhancing public participation based on Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), and integrating a human rights perspective to achieve ecological justice.

Page 16 of 16 | Total Record : 155

 12   13   14   15   16 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press) Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 8, No 3 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 8, No 2 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 8, No 1 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 7, No 3 (2024): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press) Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Law, Development & Justice Review More Issue