cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Arini Azka Muthia
Contact Email
aazkamuthia@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
aazkamuthia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal
Published by Universitas Bengkulu
ISSN : 25411926     EISSN : 25287656     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
UBELAJ (University of Bengkulu Law Journal) aims to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Medical Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law. UBELAJ publish twice in a year, April and October.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER" : 6 Documents clear
NORMATIF REVIEW TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENJAGA KUALITAS AIR DAN MENCEGAH PENCEMARAN AIR Stevri Iskandar; Siska Iskandar
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.137-157

Abstract

TANGGUNG JAWAB ORANG TUA DALAM PERMASALAHAN PEKERJA ANAK DI SEKTOR INFORMAL DALAM KAJIAN SOSIOLOGIS YURIDIS Noeke Sri Wardhani; Susi Ramadhani; Lentiara Putri
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.119-136

Abstract

POLITIK HUKUM DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2012 (ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 28/PUU-XI/2013) Zamzam Pintaku
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.158-176

Abstract

AbstractThe background to the formation of a law is inseparable from the legal politics of a country. So it can be said that the law is one of the legal products in which the law is a political product of a country. Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives is one of the political products of the Indonesian government. The law was passed on October 29, 2012, promulgated on October 30, 2012, and entered into force on the date of promulgation. However, not long ago in effect, that is, only within 1 (one) year for 7 (seven) months, Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives was declared not to have binding legal force by the Constitutional Court through the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 28 / PUU- XI / 2013 dated May 28, 2014 because it was proven to conflict with the 1945 Constitution. This study aimed to analyze the decision referred to concerning the political politics of establishing Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives. Keyword: Political Law, Judicial Review, Decision of the Constitution Court. AbstrakLatar belakang pembentukan undang-undang tidak terlepas dari politik hukum suatu negara. Sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa undang-undang merupakan salah satu produk hukum dimana hukum tersebut merupakan produk politik suatu negara. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2012 tentang Perkoperasian merupakan salah satu produk politik pemerintah Indonesia. Undang-Undang tersebut telah disahkan pada tanggal 29 Oktober 2012, diundangkan pada tanggal 30 Oktober 2012, dan mulai berlaku pada tanggal diundangkan. Namun, belum lama berlaku, yakni hanya dalam kurun waktu sekitar 1 (satu) tahun 7 (tujuh) bulan, Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2012 tentang Perkoperasian dinyatakan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 28/PUU-XI/2013 tanggal 28 Mei 2014 karena terbukti bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis putusan dimaksud dikaitkan dengan politik hukum pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2012 tentang Perkoperasian. Kata Kunci: Politik Hukum, Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
PAJAK DAN RETRIBUSI DAERAH SEBAGAI PENOPANG OTONOMI DAERAH DILEMA TERHADAP KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI IKLIM USAHA Devi Taurisa
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.89-105

Abstract

Pelaksanaan otonomi daerah memberikan keleluasaan kepada Pemerintah Daerah untuk meningkatkan Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) melalui pajak daerah dan retribusi daerah. Namun, kreativitas Pemerintah Daerah yang berlebihan telah menimbulkan akses negatif bagi iklim usaha. Pelaku usaha mengeluhkan banyak pungutan liar yang tidak jelas landasan hukumnya.Berbagai peraturan daerah tentang pajak dan retribusi tumpang tindih dengan peraturan pusat, merupakan beban yang besar bagi dunia usaha.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dari ketentuan penetapan pajak dan retribusi daerah bagi pelaku usaha.Jenis penelitian yang akan dilakukan adalah yuridis normatif dengan metode penelitian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa perlu adanya intervensi pemerintah pusat untuk mengatur kembali kewenangan pemungutan pajak dan retribusi daerah melalui sinkronisasi kebijakan dengan pajak pusat.Kata kunci :pajak daerah; retribusi daerah; otonomi daerah; kepastian hukum; iklim usaha. AbstractThe implementation of regional autonomy provides flexibility to local governments to increase regional indigenous revenue (PAD) through regional taxes and regional retribution. However, the creativity of the excessive regional government has led to negative access to the business climate. Businesses complained of many illegal levies that are unclear to their legal bases. Various regional regulations on taxes and retribution overlap with the central regulations, is a huge burden for the business world. This research aims to provide legal certainty from the provisions of tax assignment and regional levy for business actors. The type of research that will be conducted is normative juridical with the literature research method. The results concluded that there needed to be a central government intervention to re-arrange the tax collection authority and regional retribution through policy synchronization with central taxes.Key words: local tax; regional levy; regional autonomy; legal certainty; business climate. 
PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA: PENERAPAN PRINSIP EQUALITY DALAM PUTUSAN OBERGEFELL, et.al. v. HODGES, USA SERTA ANALISIS MENGENAI PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS DI INDONESIA Holy K.M. Kalangit; Heru Susetyo
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.177-200

Abstract

AbstractThe ‘rights’ and ‘equality’ arguments have been widely used in the last couple of years by the same-sex marriage supporters in claiming the legalization of same-sex marriage. The principle of equality in same-sex marriage legalization claims is closely related with the concept of human rights on the ground that the principle of equality is considered as one of the most important principles in the said concept. The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health is the latest decision concerning the legalization of same-sex marriage that changes radically the legality of same-sex marriage in the United States and may affect other nations. This research analyzes the said Decision, specifically on the application of the principle of equality. This research also analyzes the same-sex marriage issue in Indonesia from the perspective of universality and cultural relativism of human rights. The conclusion of this research is that the principle of equality in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America was not correctly applied and therefore it cannot be used in the same-sex marriage claims. And in Indonesia, it can be concluded that from the perspective of universality and cultural relativism of human rights, same-sex marriage cannot be legalized.Keywords: human, rights, same-sex, marriage, equality, universality, cultural, relativism.
KEWENANGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA TERHADAP PUTUSAN PEMBERHENTIAN TIDAK DENGAN HORMAT Muten Nuna; Roy Marthen Moonti; Arifin Tumuhulawa; Dince Aisa Kodai
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.106-118

Abstract

Nowadays, Indonesia as a developing country has been developed in various sectors. Globalization is a process of organizational change from the function of capitalism which is marked by the emergence of the integration of markets and transnational companies and the lagging of supranational institutions. With this, it is possible for it to affect the work patterns of Indonesian society. For this reason, a further legal remedy will be needed if the party that feels disadvantage is not satisfied with the outcome of the dispute resolution that arises due to the development of globalization. The intended legal remedies are administrative efforts as referred to in Article 48 of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 9 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court (PTUN). The aim of this article is to find out the authority for dispute resolution of State Administrative Court (PTUN) toward dismissal with no reverence verdict and dispute resolution efforts for State Administrative Court (PTUN) toward dismissal with no reverence verdict. Juridical normative is applied as research method. This research concludes that dispute resolution on personnel is done through the State Administrative Court except it is caused by violations of the disciplinary rules of the State Civil Apparatus which will be resolved through administrative appeals to the Court of Civil Service.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): October Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): APRIL Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): OCTOBER Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): APRIL Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): OCTOBER Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): APRIL Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): OCTOBER Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): APRIL Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): OCTOBER Vol 6, No 1 (2021): APRIL Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER Vol 5, No 1 (2020): APRIL Vol 4, No 2 (2019): OCTOBER Vol 4, No 1 (2019): APRIL Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): APRIL Vol 3, No 2 (2018): OCTOBER Vol 3, No 1 (2018): APRIL Vol 2, No 2 (2017): OCTOBER Vol 2, No 1 (2017): APRIL Vol 1, No 1 (2016): OCTOBER More Issue