cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rooselyna Ekawati
Contact Email
jrpipm@unesa.ac.id
Phone
0318297677
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Mathematics Department, Building C8 FMIPA Universitas Negeri Surabaya Jl. Ketintang Surabaya 60231
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM)
Published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25810480     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Education Mathematics Social Sciences
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) is a peer-refereed open-access journal which has been established for the dissemination of state-of-the-art knowledge in the field of mathematics education both theory and practice. This Journal is published periodically twice a year (April and September) by Universitas Negeri Surabaya with E-ISSN:2581-0480.
Arjuna Subject : Matematika - Matematika (Lain-Lain)
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025" : 6 Documents clear
Mathematical Numeracy Literacy Ability of High School Students in Solving Math Problems Ladyawati, Erlin; Maftuh, Moh. Syukron
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p141-150

Abstract

As the low mathematical connection problem shows, students are unable to make mathematical connections on their own. Thus the ability to make mathematical connections is very necessary for training students. This study aims to describe students' mathematical numeracy literacy skills using AKM questions with adapted PISA standards and the difficulties faced by students in solving the given questions. The subjects of this study were grade XI students of SMA Wachid Hasyim 2 Taman Sidoarjo who were selected in one class with a total of 28 students. The type of research used in this study is Mixed Methods Research. The techniques used in this study are test techniques to determine students' ability to solve math numeracy literacy problems, questionnaire techniques to find out students' difficulties, and interviews for in-depth examinations. From the results of the study, it was found that level 1 and 2 category questions were very good, students were able to provide explanations in the form of mathematics and use simple procedures to solve problems. In level 3 and 4 category questions are sufficient, students are still able even though they are not optimal in understanding concepts, representing, and designing solving strategies. On the level 5 question, the category is less. This is because students are less able to represent, reflect, and communicate questions properly and correctly. Level 6 category questions are lacking because students have not been able to apply and master technical mathematical operations, develop new strategies and approaches to deal with new situations, and communicate well. The biggest difficulty faced by students is in analyzing problems, representing, designing solving strategies, accuracy of calculations, and communicating them with argumentation.
PISA Problem-Solving of Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Adversity Quotient Perspective Lestari, Dea Ayu; Prayitno, Lydia Lia
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p128-140

Abstract

This descriptive qualitative study selected three high school students to describe students' mathematical literacy skills in solving PISA model problems based on adversity quotient (AQ). Three subjects from different AQs were involved in this study based on the results of completing the Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire and good oral communication skills based on the advice of mathematics teachers. Students' AQ was collected through ARP questionnaire instrument, mathematical literacy skills were collected through providing PISA questions and interview guidelines. Furthermore, the data were analyzed based on the stages of reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of completing the ARP questionnaire obtained three subjects with AQ climber, camper, and quitter supported by good communication skills. The results of this study and through triangulation of techniques showed that subjects with AQ climber and camper satisfied five indicators of mathematical literacy skills, including communication, mathematization, reasoning and argumentation, using mathematical tools, and designing solution strategies. Meanwhile, AQ quitter subjects were only able to satisfy four indicators of mathematical literacy indicators, which are mathematization, representation, reasoning and argumentation, use of mathematical tools, and design of solution strategies. The findings of this study are that quitter subjects are unable to satisfy communication indicators while climber and camper subjects are able to satisfy communication indicators. In addition, quitter subjects were also unable to use symbolic, technical, formal, language and operation forms in solving PISA problems, while climber and camper subjects were able to satisfy these indicators.
Development of a Learning Management System (LMS) Based on Canvas Instructure to Support Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Aulia Rahma Dewi; Alfi Syahrin Siregar; Rofiki, Imam
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p109-127

Abstract

A learning management system (LMS) is a solution for managing learning in the 21st-century education era. Canvas Instructure is an LMS that supports students’ critical thinking skills. This study aims to develop a canvas-based LMS structure on Linear Program material to support the critical thinking skills of grade 11 students. The research method was research and development using the ADDIE development model. The LMS was tested on 22 11th-grade high school students with Linear Program material. The results showed that LMS validation was 89.375% from LMS validation experts and 92.222% from material experts. The average of teachers’ and students’ response questionnaires were 94.36% and 89.37%, respectively. Student evaluation test results obtained a percentage of student completeness of 90.91% with an average of 85.82. Therefore, this LMS is considered valid, effective, and practical for use in supporting the critical thinking skills of grade 11 students in the Linear Program.
Gender Differences in Mathematical Proficiency: A Review of Mathematics Performance Syarifuddin, Muhammad
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p167-181

Abstract

Mathematical proficiency is developed in students to be able to solve problems faced in everyday life appropriately and efficiently. This study focuses on one of the things that influences students' abilities, namely gender. This study aims to describe the process of mathematical proficiency in solving problems based on gender. The instruments of this study were a mathematical ability test, a mathematical proficiency test, and an interview guideline. The mathematical ability test was distributed to 136 students who were members of the natural sciences interest in one of the high schools in Kendari City. Students who meet the specified criteria, namely having mathematical abilities equivalent to different genders, will be selected as research subjects. In this study, differences were found between male and female in solving problems, namely, male subjects can formulate and represent problems, can understand concepts, and apply procedures well so that they can solve problems, while female subjects can understand concepts, can formulate and represent problems, and do not choose procedures correctly so that they cannot solve problems correctly. In addition, they also have similarities, namely that both subjects represent problems with pictures, can explain the relationship between concepts and problems, and get ideas for solving problems based on everyday experiences. The productive disposition ability of male subjects supports in determining the strategies used in solving problems, while female subjects are less supportive in solving problems.
Development of Visual-Spatial Thinking Ability Test Instrument Based on Pattern Batik Ceplok-Ceplok Jatipelem Jombang Farabi, Muhammad Al; Masamah, Ulfa; Rofiki, Imam
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p151-166

Abstract

Visual-spatial thinking ability is an important ability for students in understanding and solving geometry problems. This study aims to develop a test instrument for students' visual-spatial thinking ability based on pattern batik Ceplok-Ceplok Jatipelem Jombang. This research is a development research (R&D) with the Tessmer model which consists of preliminary, self evaluation, expert reviews, one-to-one evaluation, small group evaluation, and field test evaluation stages. The subjects of this study were students of class IX MTs Negeri 3 Jombang. The data collection techniques used were questionnaires, interviews, and walkthroughs through test instruments and validation sheets. Analysis of the test results was carried out with the Rasch model approach assisted by Ministep software. The results obtained 4 items of descriptive questions that fulfill (1) Validity is satisfied based on the 0.5 < MNSQ < 1.5, -2.0 < ZSTD < +2.0, dan 0.4 < Pt Measure Corr < 0.85; (2) Reliability of respondents is categorized as sufficient, items are categorized as excellent, and the relationship between the two is categorized as good; (3) The level of difficulty of the test instrument varies at the easy, medium, and difficult levels. (4) The differentiating power of the questions is categorized as good and very good to use. So, it shows that the test instrument to measure the ability of visual-spatial thinking based on pattern batik Ceplok-Ceplok Jatipelem Jombang on geometric transformation material satisfies the criteria worthy to be used.
Case Study: Exploration of Numeracy Through a Metacognitive Knowledge Approach Santoso, Hajar Ahmad; Juniati, Dwi; Khabibah, Siti
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p182-196

Abstract

This study explores students' numeracy literacy skills through a metacognitive approach with the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) framework. Four female subjects were selected based on their highest scores on knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition. Data were collected through problem-solving tests and in-depth interviews, analyzed based on six indicators of numeracy literacy: understanding the context of the problem, data interpretation, problem solving, reflection and reasoning, mathematical communication, and decision making. The results showed that regulation of cognition supported effective reflection and evaluation, as seen in Subject 3, who solved the problem in a structured and confident manner. In contrast, Subject 4 took longer and often hesitated even though her steps were correct. Subjects 1 and 2, with a focus on knowledge of cognition, excelled in choosing strategies but required additional reflection to ensure accuracy. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating numeracy literacy and metacognitive strategies in learning to improve students' critical and reflective abilities.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM DESEMBER 2025 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JRPIPM SEPTEMBER 2025 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JRPIPM APRIL 2025 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): JRPIPM SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): JRPIPM ARPIL 2024 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): JRPIPM SEPTEMBER 2023 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): JRPIPM APRIL 2023 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): JRPIPM SEPTEMBER 2022 VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): JRPIPM APRIL 2022 VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): JRPIPM SEPTEMBER 2021 VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1 Vol 4, No 2 (2021): JRPIPM APRIL 2021 VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): JRPIPM APRIL 2021 VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2 Vol 4, No 1 (2020): JRPIPM September 2020 Volume 4 Nomor 1 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): JRPIPM September 2020 Volume 4 Nomor 1 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): JRPIPM April 2020 Volume 3 Nomor 2 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): JRPIPM April 2020 Volume 3 Nomor 2 Vol 3, No 2 (2020): JRPIPM April 2019 Volume 3 Nomor 2 Vol 3, No 1 (2019): JRPIPM September 2019 Volume 3 Nomor 1 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): JRPIPM September 2019 Volume 3 Nomor 1 Vol 2, No 2 (2019): JRPIPM April 2019 Volume 2 Nomor 2 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): JRPIPM April 2019 Volume 2 Nomor 2 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): JRPIPM September 2018 Volume 2 Nomor 1 Vol 2, No 1 (2018): JRPIPM September 2018 Volume 2 Nomor 1 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): JRPIPM April 2018 Volume 1 Nomor 2 Vol 1, No 2 (2018): JRPIPM April 2018 Volume 1 Nomor 2 Vol 1, No 1 (2017): JRPIPM September 2017 Volume 1 Nomor 1 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): JRPIPM September 2017 Volume 1 Nomor 1 More Issue