cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mashari
Contact Email
mashari@untagsmg.ac.id
Phone
+6282136150409
Journal Mail Official
jurnalilmiahduniahukum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Faultas Hukum, UNTAG Semarang JL. Pemuda No. 70, Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum
Published by Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
ISSN : 25286137     EISSN : 27210391     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum (JIDH) diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Program Doktor Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang. JIDH merupakan e-jurnal sebagai media publikasi bagi akademisi, peneliti, dan praktisi dalam menerbitkan artikel ilmiah di bidang isue hukum kontemporer. Ruang Lingkup jurnal ini meliputi kajian hukum Pidana, Perdata, Tata Negara, Administrasi Negara, Hukum Internasional, Hak Asasi Manusia, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Lingkungan.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026" : 5 Documents clear
The Position of Victims in the Restorative Justice Mechanism under the New Criminal Code: Between Legal Protection and Substantive Justice Flora, Henny Saida; Simarmata, Berlian
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.7096

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the potential problems in the implementation of restorative justice concerning the position of victims within the criminal justice system in Indonesia, as well as to formulate an ideal reconstruction of the victim’s position in restorative justice under the New Criminal Code based on justice and Pancasila values. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, philosophical, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are obtained through library research, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, and are analyzed qualitatively using legal interpretation techniques. The findings reveal that the implementation of restorative justice still faces several challenges, including inadequate regulation concerning victims’ rights and protection, regulatory disharmony, the dominance of law enforcement authorities, and a legal culture that has not fully supported substantive justice. These conditions result in victims not being positioned as primary subjects but rather remaining in a vulnerable position within the criminal case resolution process. As a solution, this study proposes an ideal reconstruction of the victim’s position through strengthening legal substance that affirms victims’ rights, harmonizing regulations, limiting the discretion of law enforcement officials, and reinforcing a legal culture oriented toward victim recovery. This reconstruction is grounded in the values of Pancasila, particularly just and civilized humanity and social justice. Therefore, restorative justice is expected to function not only as a mechanism for resolving cases but also as an instrument for achieving substantive justice and comprehensive recovery of victims’ rights.
Protection of Commercial Cargo Ships in the Exercise of the Right of Passage Through International Straits Nugraha, Satriya; Putra, Rengga Kusuma; Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika; Nugroho, Aziz Widhi; Budiharseno, Rianmahardhika Sahid
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.7032

Abstract

As time goes by and the development of the ship industry, international straits also play an important role as vital routes for the movement of ships. UNCLOS 1982 regulates the use of international straits as international navigation routes, affirming the importance of the Strait in global trade. The Strait is a transportation route and a source of significant economic potential, supporting growth and investment in the surrounding area. However, there are often dynamics and conflicts with countries on the edge of the Strait, one of which is the case of the Yemeni militant Hothi, who attacked merchant ships heading to the Americas and Europe or vice versa. Therefore, it is important to know about the rights and obligations of strait states in the context of maritime law and maritime law. This study will examine the regulation of the protection of commercial cargo ships in the peaceful passage of international straits and the protection of commercial cargo ships that have been attacked by a country's military group in international waters, with a legal research method that will analyze and provide a prescriptive view. UNCLOS 1982 regulates the peaceful passage of commercial cargo ships in the international Strait with the principle of freedom of navigation. It guarantees the safety of navigation, but there are restrictions to maintain the peace of coastal states that must still be observed. Ship protection involves the responsibility of coastal states, which must ensure unimpeded peaceful passage and provide hazard notices. Additional regulations such as SOLAS 1974 set minimum safety standards. Military attacks on commercial cargo ships could cause diplomatic tensions and economic losses. International cooperation, strict law enforcement, and mutual security measures are needed to enhance protection. This joint effort, involving coastal states and international cooperation, is expected to create a safe and stable maritime environment.
Spatial Justice Within Ocean Grabbing Practices In Sea Fence Case: A Normative Review Of Coastal Area Utilization Maolani, Syariefah; Priyanta, Maret; Imamulhadi, Imamulhadi
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.6944

Abstract

Urgensi keadilan spasial dalam penelitian hukum terletak pada kemampuannya sebagai instrumen untuk menguji apakah norma hukum di Indonesia telah mencerminkan hak atas ruang yang berkeadilan atau justru melegitimasi eksklusi spasial, seperti adanya fenomena ocean grabbing. Penelitian ini berfokus pada kasus Pagar Laut di Tangerang sebagai manifestasi dari ocean grabbing tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis kerangka hukum struktural yang justru memungkinkan ketidakadilan spasial. Temuan mengungkapkan masalah inti yang teridentifikasi adalah konflik normatif fundamental antara rezim hukum privat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA) dan rezim hukum publik dalam Undang-Undang Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil (UU PWP3K). Konflik ini kemudian ditambah oleh peraturan pelaksana yang memberi celah privatisasi tanah pesisir. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa ocean grabbing yang diamati bukanlah kesalahan prosedural semata, melainkan kesalahan struktural dari sistem hukum. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini merekomendasikan adanya harmonisasi peraturan secara fundamental dengan memprioritaskan UU PWP3K sebagai hukum positif yang yurisdiksinya berlaku di wilayah pesisir, guna mewujudkan keadilan spasial dan menghentikan fenomena ocean grabbing di masa depan.
Disparities in Jurisdictional Locus Between the Enforcement of Maritime Immigration and Customs Laws Based on the Provisions of UNCLOS 1982 Through an Analysis of Lawrence M. Friedman's Legal System Theory Yusuf, Muhammad Choirul; Syahrin, M. Alvi; Arifin, Ridwan
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.6563

Abstract

Indonesia's geographical location at the intersection of two continents and oceans makes it a strategic consideration in assessing maritime development potential. To achieve maritime security resilience oriented toward the management and efficiency of maritime resources, the existence of law enforcement and legal substance in maritime zones is necessary to formulate legal certainty. The parent legal provisions governing maritime zone provisions and management rests on Law Number 17 of 1985, which ratified UNCLOS 1982, with its 320 articles and 9 annex. Among the various maritime zone provisions, there is the term "contiguous zone," which is a special jurisdiction extending 24 miles from the regulated sea baseline and serves as the basis for Immigration, Customs, Fiscal, and Sanitary Affairs to conduct supervision related to its legal provisions. However, the regulation of contiguous zones or maritime area specifications has not been accommodated in Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration as a form of active supervisory function, while Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning Customs has long accommodated provisions providing concrete supervision. This paper aims to analyze the harmonization of legislation, historical, and empirical aspects related to legal considerations regarding the formulation of articles regulating the locus of jurisdiction for maritime immigration supervision, thereby providing an ideal legal formulation within the framework of academic studies. The research method used in this paper is a normative-empirical one. The theory in this study applies Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory as an analytical tools. The results also indicate the legal impacts that lead to downstream problems related to immigration violations in maritime zones due to the lack of zoning regulations. Therefore, constructive legal and policy formulations are needed to serve as a fundamental foundation for projecting a comprehensive immigration oversight mechanism in Indonesia's maritime zones.
Digital Shadows: A Criminological Study of Cyber ​​Crime Law Enforcement in the Era of Technological Disruption Wulandari, Sri; Prabaningtyas, Farisha Dian
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.7093

Abstract

This study aims to examine cybercrime from a criminological perspective. The rapid development of information and communication technology has led to the growth of cybercrime, along with society's increasing dependence on digital technology. Cybercrime is a threat that cannot be ignored due to its widespread impact across various sectors of society, ranging from data theft and system sabotage, virus spread, electronic fraud, to politically motivated crimes and cyberterrorism. A criminological study of cybercrime is crucial in providing an understanding of the characteristics, motivations, and social impacts of these crimes. This study utilizes criminological theories to understand why individuals commit cybercrime and assesses the effectiveness of the role of law enforcement officials in Indonesia in combating it, based on the legal regulations of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE), which was later amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 in conjunction with Law Number 1 of 2024 and Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law).

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026 VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2025 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2025 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2024 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2024 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2023 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2023 VOLUME 7 NOMOR 1 OKTOBER 2022 VOLUME 6 NOMOR 2 APRIL 2022 VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1 OKTOBER 2021 VOLUME 5 NOMOR 2 APRIL 2021 VOLUME 5 NOMOR 1 OKTOBER 2020 VOLUME 4 NOMOR 2 APRIL 2020 VOLUME 4 NOMOR 1 OKTOBER 2019 VOLUME 3 NOMOR 2 APRIL 2019 VOLUME 3 NOMOR 1 OKTOBER 2018 VOLUME 1 NOMOR 1 OKTOBER 2016 More Issue