Mulawarman Law Review
Mulawarman Law Review (MULREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University. MULREV published twice a year in June and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, State and Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Adat Law and Local Custom, Natural Resources and Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law. ISSN: 2527-3485 | e-ISSN: 2527-3477
Articles
143 Documents
<![CDATA[Legal Protection for Domestic Airlines Consumers Related with Ticket Purchasing ]]>
<![CDATA[Susanto, Thomas Heru]]>;
<![CDATA[Miru, Ahmadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sitorus, Winner]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i1.40
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap Penerapan Batas Atas dan Batas Bawah Pembelian Tiket Pesawat berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 14 Tahun 2016. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dalam bentuk penelitian lapangan (field research). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap Penerapan Batas Atas dan Batas Bawah Pembelian Tiket Pesawat pada dasarnya telah diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 78 Tahun 2017, bahwa maskapai yang melakukan pelanggaran terhadap ketetapan batas atas tarif maskapai penerbangan dapat dijatuhi sanksi. Namun dalam implementasinya, belum ada yang diberikan sanksi, meskipun telah ditemukan adanya pelanggaran terhadap aturan tentang batas atas tarif jasa penerbangan di Manokwari. Upaya hukum bagi konsumen dalam hal terdapat harga tiket pesawat yang tidak sesuai dengan Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 14 Tahun 2016 yakni dapat memberikan informasi atau laporan pengaduan dari masyarakat kepada dinas perindustrian dan perdagangan atau lembaga swadaya masyarakat yang bergerak dibidang perlindungan konsumen. Ganti kerugian yang berhak diterima apabila terbukti terdapat maskapai jasa penerbangan yang menetapkan tarif di luar ketentuan batas atas taris jasa penerbangan adalah ganti kerugian materil berupa selisih harga yang seharusnya dan kerugian imateril berupa bunga atas jumlah kerugian materil yang diderita konsumen.]]>
<![CDATA[Justice Constitutionality of Specialized Court in Coping with the Dispute on Direct Local Leader Election Result ]]>
<![CDATA[Marwi, Ebin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 3 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.43
<![CDATA[In accordance with the petition of Constitutional Court Number 97/PUU-XI/2013, Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolves disputes on direct Local Leader Election result, because provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2018 Republic of Indonesia against the constitution of 1945 Article 157 paragraph (1) Law Number 8 Year 2018 determines that the dispute settlement on direct Local Leader Election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct Local Leader Election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constituional authority to fulfill temporary vacuum of norm (rechtvakum). Therefore Legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct Local Leader Election result.]]>
<![CDATA[Restorative Justice Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ringan yang Telah diberi Sanksi Adat ]]>
<![CDATA[Hardiman, Yogi]]>;
<![CDATA[Kotijah, Siti]]>;
<![CDATA[Sina, La]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i1.48
<![CDATA[Proses penyelesaian pelanggaran hukum adat, dengan diberikan sanksi adat oleh lembaga adat, dibenarkan sebagai bentuk perwujudatan keberadaan dan pengakuan hukum adat yang masih ada dan tumbuh dalam masyarakat di Indonesi dan diakui proses itu oleh kepolisia sebagai penyelesaian sengketa diluar pengadilan. Penelitian ini,yuridis empiris, dengan pendekatan studi kasus Suku Dayak Wehea Desa Nehes Liah Bing oleh kepolisian Kutai Timur. Penyelesaian adat atas tindak pidana ringan yang telah diberikan sanksi adat oleh Suku dayak wehea berdasarkan hukum adat itu,menjadi dasar pihak kepolisian memberlakukan penerapan restoratif justice terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ringan yang telah diberikan sanksi adat di Satuan Reserse Kriminal Kepolisian Resor Kutai Timur. Penerapan restoratif justice terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ringan yang telah diberikan sanksi adat di Satuan Reserse Kriminal Kepolisian Resor Kutai Timur merupakan role model dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa diluar pengadilan. Upaya ini menjadi lebih mudah, murah, dan tidak berbelit-belit, dan memberi kepastian hukum kepada korban dan pelaku tindak pidana pelanggaran ringan.]]>
<![CDATA[Pierre Cardin Trademark Dispute ]]>
<![CDATA[Atikah, Nisrina]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i1.51
<![CDATA[Trademark is a mark of commodity or service origin indentification which related with its producers. Trademark function is not only to differ a commodity with another commodity, but it has function as priceless company asset, especially for well-known mark. A trademark which became famous will make that trademark becomes valuable assets or properties of the company, but in the other side, the fame will lure other producers to run unfair business to commit “piracy” or imitate it. One of it happens on trademark dispute on case decision No.1 557K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015. This research research is to know protection toward well-known mark and PIERRE CARDIN LOGO are reviewed by normative intstrument which is Law No. 15, 2001 and TRIPs Agreement along with juridical concequence of Supreme Court Decision No.1 557K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/205 toward well-known mark in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative research with law and conceptual approaches. This research uses primary law material and secondary law material, then the law materials are analyzed qualitatively and served prespectively. Research shows that: 1) Determination of court decision by the council of judges was according to valid law which is Law No. 15, 2011 regarding trademark but TRIPS Agreement aspect is not noticed entirely, justice and prosperity aspects which must consider economy and morale loss impacts by the user or owner of that well-known mark; 2) Juridical Consequence from decision No.557K/Pdt.Sus-hki/2015 is well-known marks which are enter to Indonesia must follow indonesia national law, even though sutantively it was registered in several countries and obtained fame globally.]]>
<![CDATA[Problematika Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Organisasi Masyarakat ]]>
<![CDATA[Ismail, Rezki Robiatul Aisyiah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i1.52
<![CDATA[Indonesia is a democratic constitutional state set forth in article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, as a legal state for running a state and protection of human rights under the law. One of them is in Article 28 E Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia which states that everyone has the right to freedom of association, assembly, and expression. The regulation concerning the Organization of the Community is in fact set out in Law No. 17 of 2013 on Community Organizations. Community organization is an organization founded and formed by the community voluntarily based on the similarity of aspirations, wills, needs, interests, activities and objectives to participate in development in order to achieve the objectives of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on Pancasila. Community organizations may be in the form of two, incorporated and non-legal entities. The Government issued a Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2017 on the amendment to Law No. 17 of 2013 on Social Organization and then with the Regulation of Lieu of the Law the government made a policy that the Government in this case gave authority to the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights Asasi Manusia dissolved social organization which contradict with principle of Pancasila one of them is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia discussion Government Regulation of society organization still has weakness substantially. Government regulation in lieu of laws of community organizations in order to reinforce the principle of contrarius actus is not appropriate because it has actually attached to government officials without the need to be affirmed in the legislation.]]>
<![CDATA[Normative Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Theofany, Gabriel]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 3 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.53
<![CDATA[It is undeniable that the flow of globalization plays a major role in every aspect of state life, including the field of law and the legal product itself. Indonesia as a WTO member is obliged to ratify various types of international agreements to be made into domestic law products in the form of the Law. One of the important issues that must be protected is Intellectual Property Rights which is compiled based on the TRIPs standard. In its development, the concepts and characteristics of IPR have caused losses to developing countries such as Indonesia which have many assets in the form of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions held by local communities. The IPR legal regime cannot accommodate the protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions as a whole. The direction of legal regulation that protects traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions today is to form a new legal product that is specifically outside the IPR regime. The Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions has long been composed by Indonesia since 2008 and included in the 2009-2014 National Legislation Program. But even until now there has been no approval made by the government. The normatification of this bill is very important to be done so that it can be given that traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions can be used as an aid for advancing the nation's economy. By using normative legal research methods and qualitative approaches, this study concludes that the IPR legal regime in Indonesia has not been able to provide maximum protection to traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. Therefore, it is very important to discuss and ratify the Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions to become products law to guarantee protection and provide economic benefits to the State and society.]]>
<![CDATA[Burden of Proof Reversal in Criminal Acts of Money Laundering ]]>
<![CDATA[Fauzi Zainal, Muhammad Khusnul]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Akub]]>;
<![CDATA[Andi Muhammad Sofyan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.60
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the burden of proof reversal system in handling cases of money laundering. This type of research is normative juridical legal research. The results of this study indicate that in the reversal system of the burden of proof of criminal acts of money laundering, each party has a burden of proof, the public prosecutor is burdened to prove that these assets are the property of the defendant and has a relationship with the original criminal act charged, while the defendant burdened to prove the origin of the assets claimed and if the defendant is unable to prove the origin of the assets, the assets can be strongly suspected to originate from criminal offenses. There are still obstacles in law enforcement both from the substance of the law (norms), legal structure (law enforcement agencies) and the culture of law (the culture of community law).]]>
<![CDATA[Corporate Prosecution in Criminal Acts of Corruption: Opportunity and Challenge ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Sofyan, Andi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.67
<![CDATA[The corporation as an entity or legal subject whose existence contributes greatly in promoting economic growth and national development. However in reality, it is often for corporations to commit various criminal acts (corporate crime) that have a detrimental impact on the state and people. This research is normative legal research. Legal research which places the law as a normative system. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 Year 2016 was to clarify the guidelines for the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting corporate defendants in corruption criminal acts. The application of sanctions against corporations as perpetrators of corruption is carried out as an effort to recover the losses of the State and the restoration of the state’s economy is an appropriate step considering the essence of criminal punishment in eradicating criminal acts of corruption aimed at recovering state losses or the state’s economy.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Instrumen Kontrak dalam Pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Wahyu, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[A. Moein, Harustiati]]>;
<![CDATA[Bola, Mustafa]]>;
<![CDATA[Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.68
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar dimungkinkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, yakni Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2007 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 dan Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. Kontrak yang dimaksudkan dalam konteks ini adalah kontrak publik oleh karena salah satu pihaknya adalah Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Tanggung jawab para pihak dalam kontrak untuk pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar lahir dari adanya hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak yang diatur dalam Perjanjian. Selain itu, tanggung jawab yang dimaksud juga tibul dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan kegiatan reklamasi tersebut. Untuk itu, maka para pihak memikul beban tanggung jawab, baik secara personal maupun secara institusional sehingga para pihak dapat dinakan sanksi administratif, sanksi perdata, maupun sanksi pidana.]]>
<![CDATA[Rente as Proof of Land Ownership ]]>
<![CDATA[Alimuddin, Nur Hidayani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.69
<![CDATA[Rente or proof of payment of land taxes is no longer able used as proof of landownership, however there still people who think rente as proof of land ownership. This research is juridical empirical that analyze the position and perception of society that think rente as proof of ownership of the land in Pangkajene Islands Regency. The result of the study are rente position after the enactment of the Basic Agrarian Law is no longer able to be used as proof of land ownership. On the other hand the National Land Board still receive rente as written evidence to register a land, and there are still people who think rente as proof of land ownership.]]>
